Abstract
The previous two decades of scholarship devoted to the role of social justice in climate change adaptation have established an important theoretical basis to evaluate the concept of just adaptation, or, in other words, how the implementation of climate adaptation policy affects socially vulnerable groups. This paper synthesizes insights from relevant literature on urban climate change governance, climate adaptation, urban planning, social justice theory, and policy implementation to develop three propositions concerning the conditions that must occur to implement just adaptation. First, just adaptation requires the inclusion of socially vulnerable populations as full participants with agency to shape the decisions that affect them. Second, just adaptation requires that adaptation framings explicitly recognize the causes of systemic injustice. Third, just adaptation requires a focus on incremental evaluations of implementation to avoid timeframes inconsistent with advancing justice. We then integrate the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) with the just adaptation literature to develop a framework to evaluate the implementation of climate adaptation. We present two novel modifications to the ACF aimed at fostering policy analysis of the previously presented three propositions for implementation of just adaptation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281
Adger WN (2016) Place, well-being, and fairness shape priorities for adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 38:A1–A3
Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):77–86
Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (2006) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge
Agyeman J (2013) Introducing just sustainabilities: policy, planning, and practice. Zed Books Ltd
Anguelovski I, Shi L, Chu E, Gallagher D, Goh K, Lamb Z et al (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: critical perspectives from the global North and South. J Plan Educ Res 36(3):333–348
Barkan J, Pulido L (2017) Justice: an epistolary essay. Ann Am Assoc Geograph 107(1):33–40
Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance, vol 4. Psychology Press
Bulkeley H, Carmin JA, Castan Bronto V, Edwards G, Fuller S (2013) Climate justice and global cities: mapping the emerging discourses. Glob Environ Chang 23:914–925
Bullard RD (2018) Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press
Chu E (2017) Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state-society relations: the politics of community knowledge and mobilization in Indore, India. Urban Stud:1–17
Davoudi S (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? Plan Theory Pract 13(2):299–307
Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H (2015) Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 35:523–533
Fainstein S (2015) Resilience and justice. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(1):157–167
Few R, Brown K, Tompkins E (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Pol 7(1):46–59
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267
Fraser N (2014) Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge
Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):66–75
Gray B (2003) Framing environmental disputes. In: Gray B Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: frames and cases. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 11–34
Harris LM, Chu EK, Ziervogel G (2018) Negotiated resilience. Resilience 6(3):96–214
Hjern B (1982) Implementation research. J Public Policy 2:301–308
Hjern B, Porter DO (1981) Implementation structures: a new unit of administrative analysis. Organisation Studies 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068100200301
Hoffman AJ (2015) How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto
Holland B (2017) Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and transformational change. Environ Politics 26(3):391–412
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23
Hughes S (2013) Justice in urban climate change adaptation: criteria and application to Delhi. Ecol Soc 18(4):48
Hupe P (2014) What happens on the ground: persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy Admin 29(2):164–182
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II (2014) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II
Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Ingold K (2017) The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA (eds) Theories of the policy process, 4th edn. Westview press, pp 135–171
Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Chang 47(4):325–352
Klinsky S et al (2016) Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Glob Environ Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.002
Kythreotis AP, Bristow GI (2016) The ‘resilience trap’: exploring the practical utility of resilience for climate change adaptation in UK city-regions. Reg Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
Lewicki RJ, Saunders DM, Barry B (2015) Negotiation, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Lindblom CL (1968) The policy-making process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Lipskey M (1980) Street level bureaucracy. The dilemmas of individuals in the public service. Russel Sage Foundation, New York
Mnookin RH, Peppet SR, Tulumello AS (2001) Beyond winning: negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Morrison TH, Adger WN, Brown K, Lemos MC, Huitema D, Phelps J, Evans L, Cohen P, Song AM, Turner R, Quinn T, Hughes TP (2019) The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Glob Environ Chang 57:1–8
Moser SC, Boykoff MS (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge
Nussbaum MC (2011) Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press
Paavola J (2008) Science and social justice in the governance of adaptation to climate change. Environ Politics 17(4):644–659
Paavola J, Adger WN (2006) Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 56(4):594–609
Patterson JJ, Thaler T, Hoffman M, Hughes S, Oels A, Chu E, Mert A, Huitema D, Burch S, Jordan A (2018) Political feasibility of 1.5C societal transformations: the role of social justice. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 31:1–9
Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge
Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Chang 133(1):113–127
Pressman J, Wildavsky A (1979) Implementation: how great expectations are dashed. University of California Press, Berkeley
Putnam LL, Wondollek JM (2003) Intractability: definitions, dimensions, and distinctions. In: Lewicki R (ed) Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: concepts and cases, pp 35–62
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press
Roberts JT (2009) The international dimension of climate justice and the need for international adaptation funding. Environ Justice 2(4):185–190
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29
Sabatier P (1986) Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy 6(1):21–48
Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith (2011) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. San Francisco and Oxford. Westview Press, Boulder
Sabatier P, Mazmanian D (1979) The implementation of public policy: a framework of analysis. Policy Stud J 8(4):538–560
Schlosberg D (2009) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press
Schlosberg D (2012) Climate justice and capabilities: a framework for adaptation policy. Ethics Int Aff 26(4):445–461
Schlosberg D, Collins LB, Niemeyer S (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics 26(3):413–437
Sen AK (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sewell GC (2005) Actors, coalitions and the framework convention on climate change. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Shafritz J, Borick C, Russell EW, Hyde AC (2016) Introducing public administration. Routledge
Shi L, Chu E, Anguelovski I, Aylett A, Debats J, Goh K et al (2016) Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang 6(2):131–137
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292
Tschakert P, Dietrich K (2010) Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecol Soc 15(2):11
Tschakert P, van Oort B, St. Clair AL, LaMadrid A (2013) Inequality and transformation analyses: a complementary lens for addressing vulnerability to climate change. Clim Dev 5(4):340–350
Young IM (2011) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malloy, J.T., Ashcraft, C.M. A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation. Climatic Change 160, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6