Skip to main content
Log in

Youth Top Problems in an Acute Psychiatric Sample: Describing Consumer-Nominated Treatment Needs in an Adolescent Partial Hospital Setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the wide range of diagnostic presentations treated in partial hospital programs, finding efficient ways to identify and measure progress on the chief concerns of consumers in these settings is important. The current study uses a self-administered version of the Top Problems Assessment to describe treatment targets identified by youth and their caregivers presenting for care at an adolescent partial hospital setting. Caregiver-youth agreement on these chief concerns upon admission and predictors of agreement were explored. About one-third (34.65%) of caregiver-youth pairs did not match on any target problems. Although anxiety and depression were the most commonly cited top problems in this sample, caregivers and youth exhibited disagreement on these domains. Treatment teams in acute care settings such as a partial hospital program can benefit from careful assessment surrounding the initial goals of treatment as youth and their caregivers may not agree on the referral problems upon entering a program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiser LJ, Culhane DP, Hadley TR (1995) The current practice of child and adolescent partial hospitalization: results of a national survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34:1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199510000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotsopoulos S, Walker S, Beggs K, Jones B (1996) A clinical and academic outcome study of children attending a day treatment program. Can J Psychiatry 41:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379604100608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2018) National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS): 2018. Data on Mental Health Treatment Facilities. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NMHSS-2018.pdf. Accessed February 2022

  4. Thatte S, Makinen JA, Nguyen HN et al (2013) Partial hospitalization for youth with psychiatric disorders: treatment outcomes and 3-month follow-up. J Nerv Ment Dis 201:429–434. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31828e1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenz AS, Conte GD, Lancaster C et al (2014) Evaluation of a partial hospitalization program for adolescents. Couns Outcome Res Eval 5:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137813518063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenz AS, Del Conte G (2018) Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents in a partial hospitalization program. J Couns Dev 96:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson KE (2000) Outcomes of a partial-day treatment program for referred children. Child Youth Care Forum 29:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009453428705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelcovitz M, Bennett S, Desai P et al (2022) High rates of anxiety among adolescents in a partial hospitalization program. Child Youth Care Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-022-09680-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiu AW, Falk A, Pelcovitz M et al (2022) Considerations for implementing evidence-based practices for youth anxiety in an acute psychiatric care setting. Prof Psychol Res Pr 53:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leffler JM, Junghans-Rutelonis AN, McTate EA (2020) Feasibility, acceptability, and considerations for sustainability of implementing an integrated family-based partial hospitalization program for children and adolescents with mood disorders. Evid-Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health 5:383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2020.1759471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weisz JR, Frye A, Bearman SK et al (2011) Youth top problems: using idiographic, consumer-guided assessment to identify treatment needs and to track change during psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 79:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Milgram L, Tonarely NA, Ehrenreich-May J (2021) Youth top problems and early treatment response to the unified protocols for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01151-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzpatrick O, Carson A, Weisz JR (2020) Using mixed methods to identify the primary mental health problems and needs of children, adolescents, and their caregivers during the coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 52:1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01089-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawley KM, Weisz JR (2003) Child, parent, and therapist (dis)agreement on target problems in outpatient therapy: the therapist’s dilemma and its implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 71:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeh M, Weisz JR (2001) Why are we here at the clinic? parent-child (dis)agreement on referral problems at outpatient treatment entry. J Consult Clin Psychol 69:1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman LJ, Chu BC (2015) Target problem (mis) matching: Predictors and consequences of parent–youth agreement in a sample of anxious youth. J Anxiety Disord 31:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bannon WM Jr, McKay MM (2005) Are barriers to service and parental preference match for service related to urban child mental health service use? Fam Soc 86:30–34. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Los RA, Kazdin AE (2005) Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychol Bull 131:483–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL, Park AL et al (2017) Child steps in california: A cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing modular treatment with community implemented treatment for youth with anxiety, depression, conduct problems, or traumatic stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 85:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dour HJ, Chorpita BF, Lee S, Weisz JR (2013) Sudden gains as a long-term predictor of treatment improvement among children in community mental health organizations. Behav Res Ther 51:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guan K, Park AL, Chorpita BF (2019) Emergent life events during youth evidence-based treatment: impact on future provider adherence and clinical progress. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 48:S202–S214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1295382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D et al (1997) The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:545–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, The Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 282:1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Allgaier A-K, Pietsch K, Frühe B et al (2012) Screening for depression in adolescents: Validity of the patient health questionnaire in pediatric care. Depress Anxiety 29:906–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson LP, Rockhill C, Russo JE et al (2010) Evaluation of the PHQ-2 as a brief screen for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatr Evanst 125:e1097–e1103. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolko DJ, Kazdin AE (1993) Emotional/behavioral problems in clinic and nonclinic children: Correspondence among child, parent and teacher reports. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 34:991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01103.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berg-Nielsen TS, Vika A, Dahl AA (2003) When adolescents disagree with their mothers: CBCL-YSR discrepancies related to maternal depression and adolescent self-esteem. Child Care Health Dev 29:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2003.00332.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferdinand RF, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC (2004) Parent-adolescent disagreement regarding psychopathology in adolescents from the general population as a risk factor for adverse outcome. J Abnorm Psychol 113:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Becker-Haimes EM, Jensen-Doss A, Birmaher B et al (2018) Parent–youth informant disagreement: implications for youth anxiety treatment. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 23:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104516689586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sequeira SL, Silk JS, Woods WC et al (2020) Psychometric properties of the SCARED in a nationally representative U.S. sample of 5–12-year-olds. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 49:761–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1614001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Doorn M, Bodden DHM, Jansen M et al (2018) Linking mother-child discrepancies to behavioral observations of children’s anxiety. Child Youth Care Forum 47:481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9441-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peris TS, Sugar CA, Bergman RL et al (2012) Family factors predict treatment outcome for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 80:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027084

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Youth Anxiety Center team for their support and contribution. We would like to thank all the partial program staff for their support as well as the families that have agreed to participate in this work.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Youth Anxiety Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela W. Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Shannon Bennett, Ph.D. has received research support, speaking fees and travel support for speaking engagements from the Tourette Association of America. She has received royalties from Oxford University Press, and receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer for articles on Child Anxiety for UpToDate. She has received research support from NIMH and PCORI. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. All procedures involved in the study were in concordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments of comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board approval record number: 1501015832. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiu, A.W., Desai, P., Skriner, L. et al. Youth Top Problems in an Acute Psychiatric Sample: Describing Consumer-Nominated Treatment Needs in an Adolescent Partial Hospital Setting. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 55, 520–530 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01427-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01427-3

Keywords

Navigation