Abstract
Developing a sustainable separation membrane is imperative due to the growing environmental pollution caused by petrochemical-based polymers. Cellulose-based materials, including bacterial cellulose (BC), have exhibited potential as separation materials. Here, a novel BC membrane (BCM) is in-situ fabricated via microbial fermentation and physical post-treatment. Owing to the randomly assembled BC nanofibers and abundant hydroxyls on their surface, the obtained BCMs possess three-dimensional network structure with strong hydrophilicity. The BCMs properties can be manipulated by adjusting fermentation and drying conditions, satisfying different purposes for practical use. Extending fermentation time from 3 to 10 days, bacteria secret more BC nanofibers and form a denser membrane structure. Freeze-dried BCMs have the most porous structure and exhibit the highest flux (up to 52 L m−2 h−1) and molecular weight cut-off (up to 1000 KDa) under 2 bar. Press-dried BCMs obtain the highest tensile strength (up to 241.16 MPa) and BSA retention (up to 94.44%). Heat-dried BCMs show good prospects in the pressure-driven membrane process considering flux and retention and demonstrate favorable stability and flux recovery ratios (85.51%~96.43%). Modification of BCMs by carboxymethyl cellulose further promotes membrane hydrophilicity but causes denser structures than original BCMs. The present study proposes a sustainable cellulose membrane manufacturing strategy and demonstrates BCMs can be favorable alternatives to petrochemical-based membranes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated during this study are included in this published article.
Reference
Asad A, Rastgar M, Sameoto D, Sadrzadeh M (2021) Gravity assisted super high flux microfiltration polyamide-imide membranes for oil/water emulsion separation. J Membr Sci 621:119019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.119019
Choudhury RR, Sahoo SK, Gohil JM (2020) Potential of bioinspired cellulose nanomaterials and nanocomposite membranes thereof for water treatment and fuel cell applications. Cellulose 27:6719–6746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03253-z
Dalwani M, Benes NE, Bargeman G, Stamatialis D, Wessling M (2010) A method for characterizing membranes during nanofiltration at extreme pH. J Membr Sci 363:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.025
Dayal MS, Catchmark JM (2016) Mechanical and structural property analysis of bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 144:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.055
de Lima Fontes M, Meneguin AB, Tercjak A, Gutierrez J, Cury BSF et al (2018) Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr Polym 179:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.061
de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva Barud H, Tercjak A, Gutierrez J et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059
Fan T, Miao J, Li Z, Cheng B (2019) Bio-inspired robust superhydrophobic-superoleophilic polyphenylene sulfide membrane for efficient oil/water separation under highly acidic or alkaline conditions. J Hazard Mater 373:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.008
Fang Q, Zhou X, Deng W, Zheng Z, Liu Z (2016) Freestanding bacterial cellulose-graphene oxide composite membranes with high mechanical strength for selective ion permeation. Sci Rep 6:33185. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33185
Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G (2013) Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym 92:1432–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071
Galdino CJS, Maia AD, Meira HM, Souza TC, Amorim JDP et al (2020) Use of a bacterial cellulose filter for the removal of oil from wastewater. Process Biochem 91:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.020
Gao Q, Shen X, Lu X (2011) Regenerated bacterial cellulose fibers prepared by the NMMO·H2O process. Carbohydr Polym 83:1253–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.09.029
Gigault J, Hadri HE, Nguyen B, Grassl B, Rowenczyk L et al (2021) Nanoplastics are neither microplastics nor engineered nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 16:501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00886-4
Guo Y, Zhang X, Hao W, Xie Y, Chen L et al (2018) Nano-bacterial cellulose/soy protein isolate complex gel as fat substitutes in ice cream model. Carbohydr Polym 198:620–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.078
Hatanaka D, Yamamoto K, Kadokawa J (2014) Preparation of chitin nanofiber-reinforced carboxymethyl cellulose films. Int J Biol Macromol 69:35–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.05.022
Hou Y, Duan C, Zhu G, Luo H, Xu JJJoMS, (2019) Functional bacterial cellulose membranes with 3D porous architectures: conventional drying, tunable wettability and water/oil separation. J Membr Sci 591:117312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117312
Huang HC, Chen LC, Lin SB, Hsu CP, Chen HH (2010) In situ modification of bacterial cellulose network structure by adding interfering substances during fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:6084–6091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.031
Huang S, Chen Y, Wang X, Guo J, Li Y et al (2022) Preparation of antifouling ultrafiltration membranes from copolymers of polysulfone and zwitterionic poly(arylene ether sulfone)s. Chin J Chem Eng 11:100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2022.06.025
Kang Y, Obaid M, Jang J, Kim IS (2019) Sulfonated graphene oxide incorporated thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane to enhance permeation and antifouling properties. Desalination 470:114125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114125
Kim JF, Székely G, Valtcheva IB, Livingston AG (2014) Increasing the sustainability of membrane processes through cascade approach and solvent recovery—pharmaceutical purification case study. Green Chem 16:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc41402g
Kingkaew J, Kirdponpattara S, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Phisalaphong M (2014) Effect of molecular weight of chitosan on antimicrobial properties and tissue compatibility of chitosan-impregnated bacterial cellulose films. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 19:534–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-014-0081-x
Lacin NT (2014) Development of biodegradable antibacterial cellulose based hydrogel membranes for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 67:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.003
Li J-F, Xu Z-L, Yang H, Yu L-Y, Liu M (2009) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl Surf Sci 255:4725–4732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.139
Li S-L, Guan Y, Qin Y, Chen Y, Cheng D, Gong G, Hu Y (2023) An antifouling loose nanofiltration membrane prepared by cross-linking HPAN ultrafiltration membrane with zwitterionic polymer PEI-CA for efficient dye desalination. Desalination 549:116354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116354
Lin WC, Lien CC, Yeh HJ, Yu CM, Hsu SH (2013) Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym 94:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076
Lin D, Liu Z, Shen R, Chen S, Yang X (2020) Bacterial cellulose in food industry: current research and future prospects. Int J Biol Macromol 158:1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.230
Liu J, Chen P, Qin D, Jia S, Jia C et al (2020) Nanocomposites membranes from cellulose nanofibers, SiO2 and carboxymethyl cellulose with improved properties. Carbohydr Polym 233:115818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115818
Ma T, Zhao QQ, Ji KH, Zeng B, Li GQ (2014) Homogeneous and porous modified bacterial cellulose achieved by in situ modification with low amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose 21:2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0316-1
Mautner A, Lee KY, Lahtinen P, Hakalahti M, Tammelin T, Li K, Bismarck AJCC (2014) Nanopapers for organic solvent nanofiltration. Chem Commun 50:5778–5781. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc00467a
Mautner A, Lee K-Y, Tammelin T, Mathew AP, Nedoma AJ, Li K, Bismarck A (2015) Cellulose nanopapers as tight aqueous ultra-filtration membranes. React Funct Polym 86:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.014
Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
Muhamad MS, Salim MR, Lau W-J (2015) Preparation and characterization of PES/SiO2 composite ultrafiltration membrane for advanced water treatment. Korean J Chem Eng 32:2319–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0065-3
Paximada P, Koutinas AA, Scholten E, Mandala IG (2016) Effect of bacterial cellulose addition on physical properties of WPI emulsions comparison with common thickeners. Food Hydrocoll 54:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.10.014
Salari M, Sowti Khiabani M, Rezaei Mokarram R, Ghanbarzadeh B, Samadi Kafil H (2018) Development and evaluation of chitosan based active nanocomposite films containing bacterial cellulose nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll 84:414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.037
Shenvi S, Ismail AF, Isloor AM (2014) Enhanced permeation performance of cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of sulfonated Poly(1,4-phenylene ether ether sulfone) and Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride). Indust Eng Chem Res 53:13820–13827. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502310e
Stumpf TR, Yang X, Zhang J, Cao X (2018) In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 82:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121
Suratago T, Taokaew S, Kanjanamosit N, Kanjanaprapakul K, Burapatana V, Phisalaphong M (2015) Development of bacterial cellulose/alginate nanocomposite membrane for separation of ethanol–water mixtures. J Indust Eng Chem 32:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.09.004
Tang N, Zhang S, Si Y, Yu J, Ding B (2019) An ultrathin bacterial cellulose membrane with a Voronoi-net structure for low pressure and high flux microfiltration. Nanoscale 11:17851–17859. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr06028f
Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23:2291–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y
Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Rajabi L, Zinadini S, Derakhshan AA (2012) Boehmite nanoparticles as a new nanofiller for preparation of antifouling mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 401–402:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.040
Vilarinho F, Sanches Silva A, Vaz MF, Farinha JP (2018) Nanocellulose in green food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:1526–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1270254
Waheed S, Ahmad A, Khan SM, Gul S-e, Jamil T, Islam A, Hussain T (2014) Synthesis, characterization, permeation and antibacterial properties of cellulose acetate/polyethylene glycol membranes modified with chitosan. Desalination 351:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.07.019
Wahid F, Zhao XJ, Duan YX, Zhao XQ, Jia SR, Zhong C (2021) Designing of bacterial cellulose-based superhydrophilic/underwater superoleophobic membrane for oil/water separation. Carbohydr Polym 257:117611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117611
Wang T, Wang Y-Q, Su Y-L, Jiang Z-Y (2006) Antifouling ultrafiltration membrane composed of polyethersulfone and sulfobetaine copolymer. J Membr Sci 280:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.038
Wang X, Ullah N, Sun X, Guo Y, Chen L, Li Z, Feng X (2017) Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose reinforced biocomposite films based on protein from buckwheat distiller’s dried grains. Int J Biol Macromol 96:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.106
Wang H, Yan B, Hussain Z, Wang W, Chang N (2022) Chemically graft aminated GO onto dehydro-fluorinated PVDF for preparation of homogenous DF-PVDF/GO-NH2 ultrafiltration membrane with high permeability and antifouling performance. Surf Interfaces 33:102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102255
Xiang W, Guo Z (2022) Nonflammable, robust and recyclable hydrophobic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks/sponge with high oil absorption capacity for efficient oil/water separation. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 650:129570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129570
Xu W, Sun X, Huang M, Pan X, Huang X, Zhuang H (2020) Novel covalent organic framework/PVDF ultrafiltration membranes with antifouling and lead removal performance. J Environ Manag 269:110758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110758
Yagoub H, Zhu L, Shibraen MHMA, Xu X, Babiker DMD, Xu J, Yang S (2019) Complex membrane of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals with cationic guar gum for oil/water separation. J Appl Polym Sci 136:47947. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47947
Yu L, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Liu J, Zhang H, Song C (2013) Preparation and characterization of HPEI-GO/PES ultrafiltration membrane with antifouling and antibacterial properties. J Membr Sci 447:452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.042
Yu Q, Jiang Z, Yu Y, Yang H, Sun X, Wang C, Ho SH (2021) Synchronous removal of emulsions and organic dye over palladium nanoparticles anchored cellulose-based membrane. J Environ Manag 288:112402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112402
Zhang X, Yang W, Wang Q, Huang F, Gao C, Xue L (2021) Tuning the nano-porosity and nano-morphology of nano-filtration (NF) membranes: Divalent metal nitrates modulated inter-facial polymerization. J Membr Sci 640:119780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119780
Zhu J, Zheng J, Zhang Q, Zhang S (2016) Antifouling ultrafiltration membrane fabricated from poly (arylene ether ketone) bearing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups. J Appl Polym Sci 133:n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42809
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support by Key R&D Plan of Shaanxi Province, China (Project No: 2022NY-006).
Funding
This work was supported by Key R&D Plan of Shaanxi Province, China [Project No: 2022NY-006].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.G. and Y.W. contributed equally to this work. Z.L.: Funding acquisition, conceptualization, writing—review & editing. Y.G., Y.W.: Investigation, experiments, data collection and analysis, visualization and writing—original draft. F.J., S.L.: Partial data collection, investigation. S.L., S.S., W.Y.: Formal analysis, writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All authors were informed and agreed to publish in Cellulose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Jia, F. et al. Microbial fabrication of cellulose nanofiber-based ultrafiltration membrane: a sustainable strategy for membrane manufacture. Cellulose 30, 5001–5017 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05201-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05201-z