Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of hemicellulose on the binding and activity of cellobiohydrolase I, Cel7A, from Trichoderma reesei to cellulose

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrothermal pre-treatments decrease lignocellulose recalcitrance against enzymatic hydrolysis by removing the majority of the hemicellulose, thus increasing cellulase accessibility. However, a small amount of the hemicellulose may remain and become adsorbed to the cellulose, leading to cellulase inhibition. Here, we produced hemicellulose bound cellulose, using glucuronoxylan and galactomannan, to simulate hydrothermally pre-treated hardwoods and softwoods, respectively, and evaluated how this can affect cellulose hydrolysis by Trichoderma reesei derived cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A). Based on X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), histochemistry, scanning electron microscopy and Simon’s staining, hemicellulose binding onto cellulose affected the physical properties of the biomass, which subsequently affected its hydrolysis rate. As a result of hemicellulose binding onto cellulose, the adsorption of Cel7A was significantly impacted (up to 45%), leading to lowered activities (a 40% reduction), especially for glucuronoxylan. The bound hemicellulose may be released from the cellulose during agitation and hydrolysis. We therefore evaluated the effect of free hemicellulose on Cel7A. Free xylan was more inhibitory to Cel7A than free mannan, demonstrating non-competitive inhibition, while mannan exhibited uncompetitive inhibition. The recalcitrant effect of both bound and free hemicellulose could be relieved by the addition of hemicellulolytic enzymes (i.e. XT6 and Man26A) during cellulose hydrolysis. During the degradation of cellulose in “realistic” woody biomasses by Cel7A, the addition of hemicellulases led to a significant improvement in cellulose hydrolysis. This study showed that hemicellulose remains a critical factor regarding biomass recalcitrance and that the addition of hemicellulolytic activities in commercial enzyme cocktails is required (especially the mannanolytic activities lacking from most commercial enzyme cocktails), in order to realise high sugar yields at low enzyme protein loadings for low-cost biofuel production.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bååth JA, Abad AM, Berglund J et al (2018) Mannanase hydrolysis of Spruce galactoglucomannan focusing on the influence of acetylation on enzymatic mannan degradation. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Bomble YJ et al (2010) Identification of amino acids responsible for processivity in a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module from a fungal cellulase. J Phys Chem B 114:1447–1453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes A, Pellegrini VOA, Curtolo F et al (2019) Carbohydrate binding modules enhance cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis by increasing access of cellulases to the substrate. Carbohydr Polym 211:57–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382:769–781

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra RP, Saddler JN (2012) Use of the simons’ staining technique to assess cellulose accessibility in pretreated substrates. Ind Biotechnol 8:230–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra R, Ewanick S, Hsieh C, Saddler JN (2008) The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 24:1178–1185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra RP, Ewanick SM, Chung PA et al (2009) Comparison of methods to assess the enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Lett 31:1217–1222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esteghlalian AR, Bilodeau M, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN (2001) Do enzymatic hydrolyzability and Simons’ stain reflect the changes in the accessibility of lignocellulosic substrates to cellulase enzymes? Biotechnol Prog 17:1049–1054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filonova L, Kallas ÅM, Greffe L et al (2007) Analysis of the surfaces of wood tissues and pulp fibers using carbohydrate-binding modules specific for crystalline cellulose and mannan. Biomacromol 8:91–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein MA, Takagi M, Hashida S et al (1993) Characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose-binding protein A. Society 175:5762–5768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay K, Hu J, Arantes V et al (2015) The use of carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) to monitor changes in fragmentation and cellulose fiber surface morphology during cellulase- and swollenin-induced deconstruction of lignocellulosic substrates. J Biol Chem 290:2938–2945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Catchmark JM (2013) Binding specificity and thermodynamics of cellulose-binding modules from Trichoderma reesei Cel7A and Cel6A. Biomacromol 14:1268–1277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hébert-Ouellet Y, Meddeb-mouelhi F, Khatri V, Cui L et al (2017) Tracking and predicting wood fibers processing with fluorescent carbohydrate binding modules. Green Chem 19:2603–2611

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilden L, Daniel G, Johansson G (2003) Use of a fluorescence labelled, carbohydrate-binding module from Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D for studying wood cell wall ultrastructure. Biotechnol Lett 25:553–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Saddler JN (2018) Why does GH10 xylanase have better performance than GH11 xylanase for the deconstruction of pretreated biomass? Biomass Bioenerg 110:13–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Arantes V, Saddler JN (2011) The enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates by the addition of accessory enzymes such as xylanase: is it an additive or synergistic effect? Biotechnol Biofuels 4:36

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Chandra R, Arantes V et al (2015) The addition of accessory enzymes enhances the hydrolytic performance of cellulase enzymes at high solid loadings. Bioresour Technol 186:149–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jalak J, Valjamae P (2014) Multi-mode binding of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei to cellulose. PLoS ONE 9:e108181

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi MZH, Karmakar A, Michaelis VK, Williams FJ (2019) Separation of cellulose/hemicellulose from lignin in white pine sawdust using boron trihalide reagents. Tetrahedron 75:1465–1470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri V, Meddeb-mouelhi F, Beauregard M (2018) New insights into the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic polymers by using fluorescent tagged carbohydrate-binding modules. Sustain Energy Fuels 2:479–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnke T, Brelid H, Westman G (2009) Adsorption of cationized barley husk xylan on kraft pulp fibres: influence of degree of cationization on adsorption characteristics. Cellulose 16:1109–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohnke T, Lund K, Brelid H, Westman G (2010) Kraft pulp hornification: a closer look at the preventive effect gained by glucuronoxylan adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 81:226–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Costaouec T, Pakarinen A, Varnai A et al (2013) The role of carbohydrate binding module (CBM) at high substrate consistency: comparison of Trichoderma reesei and Themoascus aurantiacus Cel7A (CBHI) and Cel5A (EGII). Bioresour Technol 143:196–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linder Å, Bergman R, Bodin A, Gatenholm P (2003) Mechanism of assembly of xylan onto cellulose surfaces. Langmuir 19:5072–5077

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long L, Tian D, Zhai R et al (2018) Thermostable xylanase-aided two-stage hydrolysis approach enhances sugar release of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 257:334–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda H, Ishida N (1967) Specificity of binding of hexopyranosyl polysaccharides with Fluorescent Brightener. J Biochem 62:276–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malgas S, van Dyk JS, Pletschke BI (2015) A review of the enzymatic hydrolysis of mannans and synergistic interactions between β-mannanase, β-mannosidase and α-galactosidase. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:1167–1175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malgas S, Susan Van Dyk J, Abboo S, Pletschke BI (2016) The inhibitory effects of various substrate pre-treatment by-products and wash liquors on mannanolytic enzymes. J Mol Catal B Enzym 123:132–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malgas S, Chandra R, Van Dyk JS et al (2017) Formulation of an optimized synergistic enzyme cocktail, HoloMix, for effective degradation of various pre-treated hardwoods. Bioresour Technol 245:52–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-abad A, Berglund J, Toriz G et al (2017) Regular motifs in xylan modulate molecular flexibility and interactions with cellulose surfaces. Plant Physiol 175:1579–1592

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra PP, Loqué D (2014) Histochemical staining of Arabidopsis thaliana secondary cell wall elements. J Vis Exp 87:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Momeni MH, Ubhayasekera W, Sandgren M et al (2015) Structural insights into the inhibition of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A by xylo-oligosaccharides. FEBS J 282:2167–2177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME et al (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini VOA, Lei N, Kyasaram M et al (2014) Reversibility of substrate adsorption for the cellulases Cel7A, Cel6A, and Cel7B from Hypocrea jecorina. Langmuir 30:12602–12609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahikainen JL, Evans JD, Mikander S et al (2013) Cellulase–lignin interactions-the role of carbohydrate-binding module and pH in non-productive binding. Enzyme Microb Technol 53:315–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi M, Shrivastava S (2017) Recent advances in second generation bioethanol production: an insight to pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:330–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Zúñiga UF, Cannella D, de Giordano RC et al (2015) Lignocellulose pretreatment technologies affect the level of enzymatic cellulose oxidation by LPMO. Green Chem 17:2896–2903

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L (2014) Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech 5:337–353

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Segal L, Creely J, Martin A, Conrad C (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selig MJ, Knoshaug EP, Adney WS et al (2008) Synergistic enhancement of cellobiohydrolase performance on pretreated corn stover by addition of xylanase and esterase activities. Bioresour Technol 99:4997–5005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selig MJ, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Decker SR (2009) The impact of cell wall acetylation on corn stover hydrolysis by cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Cellulose 16:711–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sluiter JB, Ruiz RO, Scarlata CJ et al (2010) Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods. J Agric Food Chem 58:9043–9053

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Srisodsuk M, Lehtig J, Linder M et al (1997) Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I with an endoglucanase cellulose-binding domain: action on bacterial microcrystalline cellulose. J Biotechnol 57:49–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Alam A, Tu Y et al (2017) Steam-exploded biomass saccharification is predominantly affected by lignocellulose porosity and largely enhanced by Tween-80 in Miscanthus. Bioresour Technol 239:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H et al (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12:563–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Várnai A, Huikko L, Pere J et al (2011) Synergistic action of xylanase and mannanase improves the total hydrolysis of softwood. Bioresour Technol 102:9096–9104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von Freiesleben P, Spodsberg N, Stenbæk A et al (2018) Boosting of enzymatic softwood saccharification by fungal GH5 and GH26 endomannanases. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Li K, Yang M et al (2016a) Hydrolyzability of mannan after adsorption on cellulose. Cellulose 24:35–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Li K, Yang M, Zhang J (2016b) Hydrolyzability of xylan after adsorption on cellulose: exploration of xylan limitation on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 148:362–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney SEC, Brigham JE, Darke AH et al (1998) Structural aspects of the interaction of mannan-based polysaccharides with bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Res 307:299–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ (1980) Specificity in the interaction of direct dyes with polysaccharides. Carbohydr Polym 85:271–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xin D, Yang M, Chen X, Zhang J (2017) Recovering activities of inactivated cellulases by the use of mannanase in spruce hydrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:5265–5272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh T, Chang M, Chang W (2014) Comparison of dilute acid and sulfite pretreatments on Acacia confusa for biofuel application and the influence of its extractives. J Agric Food Chem 62:10768–10775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Lyczakowski JJ, Pereira C et al (2018) The patterned structure of galactoglucomannan suggests it may bind to cellulose in seed mucilage. Plant Physiol 178:1011–1026

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai R, Hu J, Saddler JN (2016) What are the major components in steam pretreated lignocellulosic biomass that inhibit the efficacy of cellulase enzyme mixtures? ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:3429–3436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai R, Hu J, Saddler JN (2018) The inhibition of hemicellulosic sugars on cellulose hydrolysis are highly dependant on the cellulase productive binding, processivity, and substrate surface charges. Bioresour Technol 258:79–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Donaldson AA, Ma X (2012) Advancements and future directions in enzyme technology for biomass conversion. Biotechnol Adv 30:913–919

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (NRF Grant No. 96004) and Rhodes University (Sandisa Imbewu) is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and therefore the NRF and CSIR do not accept any liability in regard thereto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Enzyme Science Programme (ESP), Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, 6140, South Africa

    S. Malgas & B. I. Pletschke

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Lorraine, Nancy and Metz, 54100, Lorraine, France

    V. M. Kwanya Minghe

Authors
  1. S. Malgas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. M. Kwanya Minghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. I. Pletschke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. I. Pletschke.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malgas, S., Kwanya Minghe, V.M. & Pletschke, B.I. The effect of hemicellulose on the binding and activity of cellobiohydrolase I, Cel7A, from Trichoderma reesei to cellulose. Cellulose 27, 781–797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02848-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02848-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation