Abstract
In the framework of the planar and circular restricted three-body problem, we consider an asteroid that orbits the Sun in quasi-satellite motion with a planet. A quasi-satellite trajectory is a heliocentric orbit in co-orbital resonance with the planet, characterized by a nonzero eccentricity and a resonant angle that librates around zero. Likewise, in the rotating frame with the planet, it describes the same trajectory as the one of a retrograde satellite even though the planet acts as a perturbator. In the last few years, the discoveries of asteroids in this type of motion made the term “quasi-satellite” more and more present in the literature. However, some authors rather use the term “retrograde satellite” when referring to this kind of motion in the studies of the restricted problem in the rotating frame. In this paper, we intend to clarify the terminology to use, in order to bridge the gap between the perturbative co-orbital point of view and the more general approach in the rotating frame. Through a numerical exploration of the co-orbital phase space, we describe the quasi-satellite domain and highlight that it is not reachable by low eccentricities by averaging process. We will show that the quasi-satellite domain is effectively included in the domain of the retrograde satellites and neatly defined in terms of frequencies. Eventually, we highlight a remarkable high eccentric quasi-satellite orbit corresponding to a frozen ellipse in the heliocentric frame. We extend this result to the eccentric case (planet on an eccentric motion) and show that two families of frozen ellipses originate from this remarkable orbit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The two firsts are works of the Copenhagen group that extensively explored periodic orbit solutions in the planar restricted three-body problem with two equal masses. The two lasts are the first numerical explorations of all the solutions of the restricted three-body problem that recovered and completed the precedent works.
Let us still mention that the “quasi-satellite” terminology has already been used in the paper of Danielsson and Ip (1972) but this was to describe the resonant behaviour of the near-Earth Object 1685 Toro and therefore was completely disconnected to retrograde satellite motion.
As we have to take into account the degree of freedom \((\lambda ', {{\widetilde{\varLambda }}}')\), we have \({{\mathscr {M}}}\subset {{\mathbb {T}}}\times {{\mathbb {R}}}\times {{\mathbb {C}}}^2\times {{\mathbb {T}}}\times {{\mathbb {R}}}\).
See the Sect. 3.2.
See Sect. 4 for further details on the family f.
In practice, the matrix \({{\mathcal {M}}}(\theta _0,u_0)\) is provided by a numerical differentiation of the equations of motion at the fixed point \((\theta _0,u_0)\).
Floquet theory; for further details, see Meyer and Hall (1992).
See Fig. 5.
Abbreviations
- RF:
-
Rotating frame with the planet
- AP:
-
Averaged problem
- RAP:
-
Reduced averaged problem
- RS:
-
Retrograde satellite
- TP:
-
Tadpole
- HS:
-
Horseshoe
- QS:
-
Quasi-satellite
- sRS:
-
“Satellized” retrograde satellite
- QS\(_{b}~\) :
-
Binary quasi-satellite
- QS\(_{h}~\) :
-
Heliocentric quasi-satellite
- \(L_1\), \(L_2\), \(L_3\) :
-
Circular Eulerian aligned configurations
- \(L_4\), \(L_5\) :
-
Circular Lagranian equilateral configurations
- \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{4}^{l}}\), \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{5}^{l}}\) :
-
In the RF, long period families that originate from \(L_4\) and \(L_5\).
- \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{3}}\), \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{4}^{s}}\), \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{5}^{s}}\) :
-
In the RF, short period families that originate from \(L_3\), \(L_4\) and \(L_5\).
- Family f :
-
In the RF, one-parameter family of simple-periodic symmetrical retrograde satellite orbits that extends from an infinitesimal neighbourhood of the planet to the collision with the Sun. For \({\varepsilon }<0.0477\), it is stable but contains two particular orbits where the frequencies \(\nu \) and \(1-g\) are in 1 : 3 resonance. These two orbits decomposed the neighbourhood of the family f in three domains: sRS, QS\(_{b}~\)and QS\(_{h}~\).
- 1, \(\nu \), g :
-
Frequencies, respectively, associated with the fast variations (the mean longitudes \(\lambda \) and \(\lambda '\)), the semi-fast component of the dynamics (oscillation of the resonant angle \(\theta \)) and the secular evolution of a trajectory (precession of the periaster argument \(\omega \)).
- \({{{\mathcal {N}}}_{L_4}^{u}}\), \({{{\mathcal {N}}}_{L_5}^{u}}\) :
-
In the RAP, the AP and the RF, families of \(2\pi /\nu \)-periodic orbits parametrized by \(|u|\le 0\) and that originate from \(L_4\) and \(L_5\). Moreover, they correspond to \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{4}^{l}}\) and \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{5}^{l}}\) in the RF.
- \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_3}^{e_0}}\), \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_4}^{e_0}}\), \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_5}^{e_0}}\) :
-
In the RAP, families of fixed points parametrized by \(e_0\) and that originate from \(L_3\), \(L_4\) and \(L_5\). In the AP and the RF, these fixed points correspond to periodic orbits of frequency, respectively, g and \(1-g\). Moreover, they correspond to \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{3}}\), \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{4}^{s}}\) and \({{{\mathscr {L}}}_{5}^{s}}\) in the RF.
- \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{QS}^{e_0}}\) :
-
In the RAP, family of fixed points parametrized by \(e_0\). In the AP and the RF, these fixed points correspond to periodic orbits of frequency, respectively, g and \(1-g\). Moreover, this family corresponds to a part of the family f that belongs to the QS\(_{h}~\)domain.
- \({G_{L_3}}\), \({G_{L_4}}\), \({G_{L_5}}\), \({G_{QS}}\) :
-
In the RAP, fixed points that belong to \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_3}^{e_0}}\), \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_4}^{e_0}}\), \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{L_5}^{e_0}}\) and \({{{\mathcal {G}}}_{QS}^{e_0}}\) and characterized by \(g=0\). In the AP, sets of fixed points (also denoted as “circles of fixed points”) parametrized by \(\omega (t=0)\). In the RF, sets of \(2\pi \)-periodic orbits parametrized by \(\big (\lambda '-\omega \big )_{t=0}\).
- \({G_{L_3,1}^{e'}}\), \({G_{L_3,2}^{e'}}\), \({G_{L_4,1}^{e'}}\), \({G_{L_4,2}^{e'}}\), \({G_{L_5,1}^{e'}}\), \({G_{L_5,2}^{e'}}\), \({G_{QS,1}^{e'}}\), \({G_{QS,2}^{e'}}\) :
-
In the AP with \(e'\ge 0\), families of fixed points that originate from the circles of fixed points \({G_{L_3}}\), \({G_{L_4}}\), \({G_{L_5}}\), \({G_{QS}}\) when \(e'=0\).
References
Beaugé, C., Roig, F.: A semianalytical model for the motion of the Trojan asteroids: proper elements and families. Icarus 153, 391–415 (2001)
Benest, D.: Effects of the mass ratio on the existence of retrograde satellites in the circular plane restricted problem. Astron. Astrophys. 32, 39–46 (1974)
Benest, D.: Effects of the mass ratio on the existence of retrograde satellites in the circular plane restricted problem. II. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 353–363 (1975)
Benest, D.: Effects of the mass ratio on the existence of retrograde satellites in the circular plane restricted problem. III. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 231–236 (1976)
Bien, R.: Long-period effects in the motion of Trojan asteroids and of fictitious objects at the 1/1 resonance. Astron. Astrophys. 68, 295–301 (1978)
Brasser, R., Innanen, K., Connors, M., Veillet, C., Wiegert, P.A., Mikkola, S., Chodas, P.: Transient co-orbital asteroids. Icarus 171, 102–109 (2004)
Broucke, R.A.: Periodic orbits in the restricted three-body problem with earth-moon masses. JPL Technical report, 32–1168 (1968)
Broucke, R.A.: On relative periodic solutions of the planar general three-body problem. Celest. Mech. 12, 439–462 (1975)
Connors, M., Chodas, P., Mikkola, S., Wiegert, P.A., Veillet, C., Innanen, K.: Discovery of an asteroid and quasi-satellite in an Earth-like horseshoe orbit. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 1435–1441 (2002)
Connors, M., Veillet, C., Brasser, R., Wiegert, P.A., Chodas, P., Mikkola, S., Innanen, K.: Discovery of Earth’s quasi-satellite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 39, 1251–1255 (2004)
Couetdic, J., Laskar, J., Correia, A.C.M., Mayor, M., Udry, S.: Dynamical stability analysis of the HD 202206 system and constraints to the planetary orbits. Astron. Astrophys. 519, A10 (2010)
Danielsson, L., Ip, W.-H.: Capture resonance of the asteroid 1685 Toro by the Earth. Science 176, 906–907 (1972)
de la Fuente Marcos, C., de la Fuente Marcos, R.: (309239) 2007 RW\(_{10}\): a large temporary quasi-satellite of Neptune. Astron. Astrophys. 545, L9 (2012)
de la Fuente Marcos, C., de la Fuente Marcos, R.: Asteroid 2014 \(\text{ OL }_{339}\): yet another Earth quasi-satellite. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2985–2994 (2014)
Deprit, A., Henrard, J., Palmore, J., Price, J.F.: The Trojan manifold in the system Earth–Moon. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 137, 311–335 (1967)
Edelman, C.: Construction of periodic orbits and capture problems. Astron. Astrophys. 145, 454–460 (1985)
Gallardo, T.: Atlas of the mean motion resonances in the Solar System. Icarus 184, 29–38 (2006)
Giuppone, C.A., Beaugé, C., Michtchenko, T.A., Ferraz-Mello, S.: Dynamics of two planets in co-orbital motion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, 390–398 (2010)
Hadjidemetriou, J.D., Psychoyos, D., Voyatzis, G.: The 1/1 resonance in extrasolar planetary systems. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 104, 23–38 (2009)
Hadjidemetriou, J.D., Voyatzis, G.: The 1/1 resonance in extrasolar systems. Migration from planetary to satellite orbits. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111, 179–199 (2011)
Henon, M.: Exploration numérique du problème restreint. I. Masses égales; orbites périodiques. Annales d’Astrophysique 28, 499 (1965a)
Henon, M.: Exploration numérique du problème restreint. II. Masses égales, stabilité des orbites périodiques. Annales d’Astrophysique 28, 992 (1965b)
Henon, M.: Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, V. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 223–238 (1969)
Henon, M., Guyot, M.: Stability of periodic orbits in the restricted problem. In: Giacaglia, G.E.O. (ed.) Periodic Orbits, Stability and Resonances, Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland, 349–374 (1970)
Jackson, J.: Retrograde satellite orbits. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 74, 62–82 (1913)
Kinoshita, H., Nakai, H.: Quasi-satellites of Jupiter. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 98, 181–189 (2007)
Kogan, A.I.: Quasisatellite orbits and their applications. In: Jehn, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 41st Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, 90–307 (1990)
Kortenkamp, S.J.: An efficient, low-velocity, resonant mechanism for capture of satellites by a protoplanet. Icarus 175, 409–418 (2005)
Kortenkamp, S.J.: Trapping and dynamical evolution of interplanetary dust particles in Earth’s quasi-satellite resonance. Icarus 226, 1550–1558 (2013)
Lidov, M.L., Vashkov’yak, M.A.: Theory of perturbations and analysis of the evolution of quasi-satellite orbits in the restricted three-body problem. Kosmicheskie Issledovaniia 31, 75–99 (1993)
Lidov, M.L., Vashkov’yak, M.A.: On quasi-satellite orbits for experiments on refinement of the gravitation constant. Astron. Lett. 20, 188–198 (1994a)
Lidov, M.L., Vashkov’yak, M.A.: On quasi-satellite orbits in a restricted elliptic three-body problem. Astron. Lett. 20, 676–690 (1994b)
Meyer, K.R., Hall, G.R.: Introduction to Hamiltonian dynamical systems and the N-body problem, vol. 90 of AMS. Springer, New York (1992)
Mikkola, S., Innanen, K.: Orbital stability of planetary quasi-satellites. In: Dvorak, R. & Henrard, J. (eds.) The Dynamical Behaviour of our Planetary System. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 345–355 (1997)
Mikkola, S., Brasser, R., Wiegert, P.A., Innanen, K.: Asteroid 2002 VE68, a quasi-satellite of Venus. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, L63–L65 (2004)
Mikkola, S., Innanen, K., Wiegert, P.A., Connors, M., Brasser, R.: Stability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 15–24 (2006)
Moeller, J.P.: Zwei Bahnklassen im probleme restreint. Publikationer og mindre Meddeler fra Kobenhavns Observatorium 99, 1–II (1935)
Morais, M.H.M.: Hamiltonian formulation of the secular theory for Trojan-type motion. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 677–689 (2001)
Namouni, F.: Secular interactions of coorbiting objects. Icarus 137, 293–314 (1999)
Namouni, F., Christou, A., Murray, C.: New coorbital dynamics in the solar system. Phys. Rev. Let. 83, 2506–2509 (1999)
Nesvorný, D., Thomas, F., Ferraz-Mello, S., Morbidelli, A.: A perturbative treatment of the co-orbital motion. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 82, 323–361 (2002)
Robutel, P., Gabern, F.: The resonant structure of Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids-I. Long-term stability and diffusion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 1463–1482 (2006)
Robutel, P., Pousse, A.: On the co-orbital motion of two planets in quasi-circular orbits. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 117, 17–40 (2013)
Robutel, P., Niederman, L., Pousse, A.: Rigorous treatment of the averaging process for co-orbital motions in the planetary problem. Comp. Appl. Math. 35, 675–699 (2016)
Sidorenko, V.V., Neishtadt, A.I., Artemyev, A.V., Zelenyi, L.M.: Quasi-satellite orbits in the general context of dynamics in the 1:1 mean motion resonance: perturbative treatment. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 120, 131–162 (2014)
Strömgren, E.: Connaisance actuelle des orbites dans le problème des trois corps. Bull. Astron. 9, 87–130 (1933)
Wajer, P.: 2002 \(\text{ AA }_{29}\): Earth’s recurrent quasi-satellite? Icarus 200, 147–153 (2009)
Wajer, P.: Dynamical evolution of Earth’s quasi-satellites: 2004 \(\text{ GU }_{9}\) and 2006 \(\text{ FV }_{35}\). Icarus 209, 488–493 (2010)
Wajer, P., Królikowska, M.: Behavior of Jupiter non-Trojan co-orbitals. Acta Astron. 62, 113–131 (2012)
Wiegert, P., Innanen, K., Mikkola, S.: The stability of quasi satellites in the outer Solar System. Astron. J. 119, 1978–1984 (2000)
Acknowledgements
This work has been developed during the Ph.D thesis of Alexandre Pousse at the “Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques”, IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A. Pousse: supported by the H2020-ERC project 677793 StableChaoticPlanetM.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pousse, A., Robutel, P. & Vienne, A. On the co-orbital motion in the planar restricted three-body problem: the quasi-satellite motion revisited. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 128, 383–407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-016-9749-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-016-9749-1