Abstract
Copper sulfide (either supported or unsupported) has received poor attention as promoter since this chalcogenide displayed modest hydrotreatment activity. In this sense, was evaluated the potential of sulfide CuMo catalyst in the FCC gasoline hydrotreatment. A MoS2 bulk and the industrial NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst were used as reference. According to the results obtained, the NiMo commercial catalyst had higher HDS, HDN, and HYD activity, but with a significant decrease in the octane number (RON). While the CuMo catalysts showed a lower response towards hydrotreatment, maintaining its octane value. According to the results obtained in the characterizations carried out (XRD, XPS, TPR, physisorption of N2, among others), we propose that copper species could be generating geometric and/or electronic changes in the CuMoS phases, increasing the number of active sites. Additionally, the incorporation of the Cu in the crystalline structure could be modifying its electronic structure, granting a metallic character to the active phase. The work demonstrates the potential of CuMo catalyst for HDT of FCC gasoline.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liu J, Zhao Sh, Chen X, Shen B (2016) Fuel 166:467–472
Nadeina KA, Klimov OV, Pereima VY, Koryakina GI, Danilova IG, Prosvirin IP, Gerasimov EY, Yegizariyan AM, Noskov AS (2016) Catal Today 271:4–15
Viswanadham N, Negi BS, Garg MO, Sundaram M, Sairam B, Agarwal AK (2007) Fuel 86:1290–1297
Brunet S, Mey D, Pérot G, Bouchy C, Diehl F (2005) Appl Catal A 278:143–172
Busca G (2014) Metal catalysts for hydrogenations and dehydrogenations. Heterogeneous catalytic materials. solid state chemistry, surface chemistry and catalytic behaviour, vol 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 297–343
Chen B, Dingerdissen U, Krauter JGE, Lansink Rotgerink HGJ, Möbus K, Ostgard DJ, Panster P, Riermeier TH, Seebald S, Tacke T, Trauthwein H (2005) Appl Catal A 280:17–46
Ishutenko D, Mozhaev A, Salnikov V, Nikulshin P (2016) React Kinet Mech Catal 119:615–627
Nikulshin PA, Tomina NN, Pimerzin AA, Stakheev AY, Mashkovsky IS, Kogan VM (2011) Appl Catal A 393:146–152
Zhao YF, Yang Y, Mims C, Peden C, Li J, Mei D (2011) J Catal 281:199–211
Harris S, Chianelli RR (1986) J Catal 98:17–31
Kibsgaard J, Tuxen A, Knudsen KG, Brorson M, Topsøe H, Lægsgaard EJ (2010) J Catal 272:195–203
Boukoberinea Y, Hamada B (2016) Arab J Chem 9:S522–S527
Liu H, Yin C, Li H, Liu B, Li X, Chai Y, Li Y, Liu C (2014) Fuel 129:138–146
Hernández-Maldonado AJ, Yang RT (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:992–993
Dai W, Zhou YP, Li SN, Li W, Su W, Sun Y, Zhou L (2006) Ind Eng Chem Res 45:7892–7896
Meille V, Schulz E, Lemaire M, Vrinat M (1997) J Catal 170:29–36
Trakarnpruk W, Seentrakoon B (2007) Ind Eng Chem Res 46:1874–1882
Hatanaka S, Yamada M, Sadakane O (1997) Ind Eng Chem Res 36:1519–1523
Cheng WC, Kim G, Peters AW, Zhao X, Rajagopalan K, Ziebarth MS, Pereira CJ (1998) Catal Rev Sci Eng 40:39–79
Leflaive P, Lemberton JL, Pérot G, Mirgain C, Carriat JY, Colin JM (2002) Appl Catal A 227:201–215
Munaretto A, Ruette F, Sánchez M, Rodtfguez-Arias E (2006) Ciencia 14:83–95
Chen W, Chen H, Zhu H, Gao Q, Luo J, Wang Y, Zhang S, Zhang K, Wang C, Xiong Y, Wu Y, Zheng X, Chu W, Song L, Wu Z (2014) Small 10:4637–4644
He J, Chen L, Wang F, Liu Y, Chen P, Au CT, Yin SF (2016) ChemSusChem 9:624–630
Scofield J, Hartree-Slater J (1976) J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 8:129–137
Feduschak T, Akimov A, Morozov M, Uymin M, Zaikovskii V, Prosvirin I, Vosmerikov A, Zhuravkov S, Vlasov V, Kogan V (2016) C R Chim 19:1315–1325
Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Perkin-Elmer Corporation Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie
Yin M, Wu CK, Lou Y, Burda C, Koberstein JT, Zhu Y, O’Brien S (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:9506–9511
Afanasiev P (2006) Appl Catal A 303:110–115
Rodríguez-Castellón E, Jiménez-López A, Eliche-Quesada D (2008) Fuel 87:1195–1206
López Cordero R, López Agudo A (2000) Appl Catal A 202:23–35
Scheffer B, Dekker NJJ, Mangnus PJ, Moulijn JA (1990) J Catal 121:31–46
Mangnus PJ, Riezebos A, Vanlangeveld AD, Moulijin JA (1995) J Catal 151:178–191
Topsøe NY, Tuxen A, Hinnemann B, Lauritsen JV, Knudsen KG, Besenbacher F, Topsøe H (2011) J Catal 279:337–351
Yao HC (1981) J Catal 2:440–444
Topsoe NY, Topsoe H (1993) J Catal 139:641–651
Sobczynski A, Zmierczak W (1991) React Kinet Catal Lett 44:511–516
Yoosuk B, Hyung Kim J, Song C, Ngamcharussrivichai C, Prasassarakich P (2008) Catal Today 130:14–23
Wang W, Zhang K, Li L, Wu K, Liu P, Yang Y (2014) Ind Eng Chem Res 53:19001–19009
Boudart M, Djega-Mariadassou G (1984) Kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions, vol 4. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 118–154
Acknowledgements
Authors thanks PDVSA for the FCC gasoline samples used in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Betancourt, P., Pinto-Castilla, S. Effect of Cu-Promotion on the Performance of Molybdenum Sulfide for Hydrotreating of FCC Gasoline. Catal Lett 149, 2425–2432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02851-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02851-2