Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing bone banking activities at University of Malaya medical centre

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main advantage of establishing in-house bone banks is its ability to readily provide allograft bones for local surgeries. Bone procurement activities of our university bone bank during the 10 years of operation were reviewed. Socio-demographic data of donors, types of bone procured, cases of rejected bones and types of allograft bones transplanted are presented. From 179 potential donors, 73 % were accepted with 213 procured bones. Femoral head was the common bone transplanted (45 %), as it was also the most common procured (82 %). Bones were rejected mainly due to non-technical reasons (83 %) rather than positive results of microbiological (13 %) and serological (4 %) tests. Comprehensive data could not be obtained for further analysis due to difficulties in retrieving information. Therefore, quality assurance system was improved to establish more systematic documentations, as the basis of good banking practice with process control hence allowing traceability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas G, Bali SL, Abbas N, Dalton DJ (2007) Demand and supply of bone allograft and the role of orthopaedic surgeons. Acta Orthop Belg 73:507–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • APASTB (2007) Standards for Tissue Banks, Asia Pacific Association of Surgical Tissue Banks. In: Nather A, Yusof N, Hilmy N (eds) Radiation in tissue banking. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 385–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PG, Villar RN (1992) The bacteriology of bone allografts. J Bone Joint Surg 74(3):398–399

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2007) Radiation sterilization of tissue allografts: requirements for validation and routine control—a code of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivory JP, Thomas IH (1993) Audit of a bone bank. J Bone Joint Surg 75:355–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James LA, Ibrahim T, Esler CN (2004) Microbiological culture results for the femoral head—Are they important to the donor? J Bone Joint Surg 86:797–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappe T, Cakir B, Mattes T, Reichel H, Floren M (2010) Infections after bone allograft surgery: a prospective study by a hospital bone bank using frozen femoral heads from living donors. Cell Tissue Bank 11(3):253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie KE, Zhou Z, Robbins P, Bulsara M, Zheng MH (2011) Histopathology of femoral head donations: a retrospective review of 6161 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 93(16):1500–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meermans G, Roos J, Hofkens L, Cheyns P (2007) Bone banking in community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 73:754–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nather A, David V (2007) Femoral head banking: NUH tissue bank experience. Orthopedics 30(4):308–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nather A, Low JM, Sim YL (2010) Ethical, religious, legal and cultural issue for tissue banking. In: Nather A, Yusof N, Hilmy N (eds) Allograft procurement, processing and transplantation. A comprehensive guide for tissue banks. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 107–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Noble WC, Clayton YM (1963) Fungi in the air of hospital wards. J Gen Microbiol 32:397–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan JP (1993) Bone banking—from Tamworth-base hospital to Royal Newcastle hospital. Aust N Z J Surg 63(2):124–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer SH, Gibbons CLMH, Athanasou NA (1999) The pathology of bone allograft. J Bone Joint Surg 81(2):333–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saegeman V, Verhaegen J, Simon JP (2011) Screening femoral heads from living donors: a prospective study comparing swab-agar versus bone fragment-broth culture. Acta Orthop Belg 77:381–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salai M, Pritsch M, Amit Y, Israeli A, Chechick A (1999) Twenty-five years of clinical experience with bone banking in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 1(1):20–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh D (2012) Gamma irradiated bone allografts processed from femoral heads. Front Sci 2(5):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville S, Johnson N, Bryce S, Journeaux S, Morgan D (2000) Contamination of banked femoral head allografts: incidence, bacteriology and donor follow up. Aust N Z J Surg 70:480–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara S, van Ginkel AD, Jiya TU, van Royen BJ, van Diest PJ, Wuisman JM (1999) Histopathology of retrieved allografts of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 81(2):336–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomford WW (2000) Bone allografts: past, present and future. Cell Tissue Bank 1(2):105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vajaradul Y (2000) Bangkok biomaterial center: 15 years experience in tissue banking. Cell Tissue Bank 1:229–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varettas K (2013) Micro-organisms isolated from cadaveric samples of allograft musculoskeletal tissue. Cell Tissue Bank 14:621–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof N, Hilmy N (2010) Principle concepts of radiation sterilisation for tissue allografts. In: Nather A, Yusof N, Himy N (eds) Allograft Procurement, processing and transplantation. A comprehensive guide for tissue banks. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 371–383

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr Ihsan, Ms Sukanya, Ms Azera and Mrs Sahrinanah for their assistance and technical support. We also thank University of Malaya and UMMC for supporting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhaili Mohd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohd, S., Samsuddin, S.M., Ramalingam, S. et al. Assessing bone banking activities at University of Malaya medical centre. Cell Tissue Bank 16, 523–530 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-015-9499-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-015-9499-4

Keywords

Navigation