Abstract
This study assessed the effectiveness of the Safer, Smarter Kids kindergarten sexual abuse prevention curriculum in meeting its educational objectives of increasing children’s knowledge of safety risks and self-protection strategies. The study utilized a two-phase non-probability convenience sample of public school kindergarten students. The sample consisted of 1169 students in four school districts in Florida. Using an alpha level of .05, a paired-samples t test was calculated to compare the mean pretest scores to the mean posttest scores of the youth participants. The mean difference was significantly greater than zero (p-value ≤.001). The measurement instrument used to assess student gains functioned well in terms of reliability (α = .82). The effect size was large with a Cohen’s d effect size of 1.09. The results indicated that completion of the Safer, Smarter Kids curriculum was followed by a significant increase in students’ knowledge of key prevention concepts with a 77 % increase in scores post intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, G., Scott-Little, C., Amwake, L., & Wynn, L. (2007). A review of methods and instruments used in state and local school readiness evaluations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
Children’s Advocacy Center. (2014). Impact of children’s advocacy centers on child abuse and neglect. Retrieved from http://www.fncac.org/cac-impact-on-child-abuse.html.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Association.
Daro, D. (2010). Child abuse prevention: A job half done. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
Finkelhor, D. (2009). The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. The Future of Children, 19(2), 169–194.
Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. M. (2004). Explanations for the decline in child sexual abuse cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Finkelhor, D., Ormrond, R., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. (2012). Child and youth victimization know to police, school and medical authorities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (March 2016). Retrieved from http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/profiles/2002/.
Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In 2003 Midwest research to practice conference in adult, continuing and community education (pp. 82–88). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Kenny, M. C. (2009). Child sexual abuse prevention: Psychoeducational groups for preschoolers and their parents. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 34(1), 24–42.
Kopp, B., & Miltenberger, R. G. (2009). Evaluating the acceptability of four versions of a child sexual abuse prevention program. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 31, 192–202.
Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.
National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. (2000). STILL unacceptable trends in kindergarten entry and placement. Washington, DC: National Association of Early Childhood Specialists.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Child sexual abuse prevention: Erin’s law. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/erins-law-and-child-sexual-abuse-prevention-laws.aspx#2015Legislation.
National Education Goals Panel. (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). State-funded pre-kindergarten: What the evidence shows. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. (1991). Exploratory factor analysis. Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach (pp. 590–630). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scott-Little, C. (2001). Assessing kindergarten children: What school systems need to know. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Shadish, W. C., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Smothers, M. K., & Smothers, B. D. (2011). A sexual assault primary prevention model with diverse urban youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 20, 708–727.
Snyder, H. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Vctim, incident and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder. (2010). Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml#.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2015). Child maltreatment 2013. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2016). Child maltreatment 2014. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.
Wurtele, S. (2009). Prevention sexual abuse of children in the twenty-first century: Preparing for challenges and opportunities. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 1–18.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Lauren’s Kids Foundation awarded to Florida Council Against Sexual Violence. Florida Council Against Sexual Violence wishes to thank the many teachers and guidance counselors who dedicated considerable time and effort to conducting the student pretesting and posttesting. The enthusiasm demonstrated for the Safer, Smarter Kids curriculum and the evaluation project is an expression of the teachers’ ongoing commitment to providing students with the knowledge needed for their safety and well-being. This study could not have been carried out without their support.
Funding
Lauren’s Kids subcontracted with the Florida Council Against Sexual Violence (FCASV) to fund this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Author’s employer, FCASV, received a research grant from Lauren’s Kids. Author, Donna Miriam Brown, declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all individual participants included in the study.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Lauren’s Kids Sexual Abuse Prevention Curriculum Safer, Smarter Kids
Teacher/School Counselor: Pre & Post Testing
Thank you for participating in the Lauren’s Kids curriculum pilot project. The goal of this project to assess the learning gains of students who have completed the Lauren’s Kids Safer, Smarter Kids sexual abuse prevention curriculum. The curriculum is designed for kindergarten students. Your school was chosen for the pilot testing project because it currently utilizes the Monique Burr Foundation’s Speak Up Be Safe!™ child abuse curriculum for 1st through 5th grade students and/or your school superintendent elected the district to be a pilot county.
Each test should take approximately three (3) minutes per student to administer. Administer the tests to each student participating in the 6-week curriculum. You can print the form and manually enter the data or enter the data directly to the pdf, but remember to click “save as” for each student’s form in order to maintain a blank fillable form.
Pretest Directions:
1. School, County and Child Identifier
Enter the name of the school and county and child identifier (code). Assign each student a number—begin with number one (1) and then indicate the classroom with teacher’s initials. For example, there are 5 students in John Doe’s kindergarten class. You would assign the following identifiers: 1-JD; 2-JD; 3-JD; 4-JD and 5 JD.
2. Child Demographics
Enter the student’s date of birth and then circle (if using paper version) the child’s gender and race. Include the date the pretest was given and the initials of the person administering the test.
3. Question Guidelines
Follow the directions given on the test for each question. Some basic guidelines for administering pre and posttests:
-
Start each interview with the same introduction. For example,
“Hi ——— [child’ name]. I’m going to ask you a few questions to help me understand more about kids and safety. Okay? There is no right or wrong answer. It’s okay to tell me if you’re not sure. I’d just like to know what you think. Ready?”
-
Administer the test in the same or similar environment for each child. Ideally the environment should be a comfortable space that minimizes distractions.
-
Ask each question in a simple and objective manner. Don’t encourage “correct” responses or give verbal or physical cues to guide the child’s answers, such as saying “are you sure?” when the student gives an undesirable response.
-
Select “unsure” or “could not answer” if student’s response is off topic.
-
Key to success—administer the test to each student with consistency and objectivity.
Posttest Directions:
Remember to do the following for each student post-tested.
1. Enter the same identifier for each student in order to link their pre and post-test responses.
2. Only posttest students who have attended all six (6) of the curriculum lessons.
3. Administer the posttest within 30 days of the final lesson (Lesson 6) of the curriculum
Question Guidelines
Follow the directions given on the test for each question. The guidelines for administering the posttest are the same:
-
Start each interview with the same introduction. For example,
“Hi ——— [child’ name]. I’m going to ask you a few questions to help me understand more about kids and safety. Okay? There is no right or wrong answer. It’s okay to tell me if you’re not sure. I’d just like to know what you think. Ready?”
-
Administer the test in the same or similar environment for each child. Ideally the environment should be a comfortable space that minimizes distractions.
-
Ask each question in a simple and objective manner. Don’t encourage “correct” responses or give verbal or physical cues to guide the child’s answers, such as saying “are you sure?” when the student gives an undesirable response.
-
Select “unsure” or “could not answer” if student’s response is off topic.
-
Key to success—administer the test to each student with consistency and objectivity.
Submitting the pre and posttest data:
Please mail hard copies of the pre and posttests to the Florida Council Against Sexual Violence, 1820 E. Park Ave., Suite 100, Tallahassee, FL 32301—ATTN: Donna Brown. For your convenience, Florida Council Against Sexual Violence will provide you with self-addressed manila envelopes. Pre and posttests must be mailed to the Florida Council Against Sexual Violence no later than May 21, 2012.
Appendix 2: Pretest and Posttest Questions
1. Read the following scenario: Jenny was at a friend’s house watching cartoons. At dinner time the friend’s dad told Jenny how nice she was and that he had some pennies for her to put in her piggy bank, but first she had to promise not to tell anyone. Not even her parents.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, D.M. Evaluation of Safer, Smarter Kids: Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Curriculum for Kindergartners. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 34, 213–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0458-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0458-0