Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Informativeness of Monitoring Features on the Conditions of Generating an Integral Criterion to Determine Their Priority

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

An approach to correcting the integral criterion of the minimum sum of the priorities of monitoring features obtained by partial (max-max) and (max-min) criteria is proposed. The possibility of using informative monitoring features while preparing the corresponding correcting coefficients is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. G. Gultchak, “On informability of aggregate of attributes,” Avtomat. i Telemekh., No. 6, 161–163 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. G. Zagoruiko, Recognition Methods and Their Application [in Russian], Sov. Radio, Moscow (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Kovalevskii, Optimal Decision Methods in Pattern Recognition [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. L. Gorelik and V. A. Skripkin, Recognition Method [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. S. Zhitetsky and L. S. Fainzilberg, “On an informational approach to assessing the usefulness of features in statistical pattern recognition,” Izv. AN SSSR, Tekhn. Kibernetika, No. 4, 120–126 (1983).

  6. A. A. Gorelik and S. S. Epshtein, “Information additivity conditions in object and phenomena recognition problems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 6, 843–848 (1983). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068576.

  7. V. I. Vasil’ev, Recognition Systems [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. Grenander, Regular Structures, Lectures in Pattern Theory, Vol. III, Springer-Verlag New York (1981).

  9. I. V. Sergienko, A. M. Gupal, and S. V. Pashko, “Complexity of classification problems,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 4, 519–533 (1996). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02366774.

  10. O. Iliashov and V. Komarov, “An approach to development of a mathematical model for determination of monitoring objects using informativeness of their monitoring indicators,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 56, No. 5, 766–769 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00297-8.

  11. O. Iliashov and V. Komarov, “Improvement of the signature-system method by applying priority features in the composition of the monitored object signatures to ensure maximum probability of correct recognition,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 56, No. 4, 577–585 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00274-1.

  12. L. S. Fainzilberg, Mathematical Methods for Utility Assessment of Diagnostic Features [in Russian], Osvita Ukrainy, Kyiv (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Iliashov, V. Komarov, and V. Oleksiiuk, “Formalization of the procedure of allocation of technical devices among monitoring objects based on the theory of fuzzy sets,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 57, No. 3, 417–421 (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00365-7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Komarov.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetyka ta Systemnyi Analiz, No. 4, July–August, 2021, pp. 131–135.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komarov, V., Oleksiiuk, V. & Iliashov, O. Influence of Informativeness of Monitoring Features on the Conditions of Generating an Integral Criterion to Determine Their Priority. Cybern Syst Anal 57, 617–620 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00386-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-021-00386-2

Keywords

Navigation