Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Platelet Inhibition with Ticagrelor 60 mg Versus 90 mg Twice Daily in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Rationale and Design of the PLINY THE ELDER Trial

  • Trial Designs
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Elderly status is steadily increasing among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the cornerstone of treatment to prevent recurrent thrombotic complications in patients with ACS. However, DAPT in older patients is challenged by a concurrent heightened risk of ischemia and bleeding. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of a lower dose of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) among elderly patients during the early phase of ACS.

Study Design

PLINY THE ELDER (PLatelet INhibition with two different doses of potent P2y12 inhibitors in THE ELDERly population) (NCT04739384) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of a lower dose of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) compared with a standard dose (90 mg twice daily) among elderly patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 50 patients, aged 75 years or more, with indication to potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors will be randomized within 3 days from PCI for the index ACS. Patients with indication to oral anticoagulant therapy, treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, or active bleeding will be excluded. The primary endpoint is platelet reactivity determined by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) (VerifyNow, Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) after treatment with ticagrelor 60 or 90 mg twice daily for 14 days. Secondary endpoints will include other pharmacodynamic tests of ADP-induced aggregation (light transmittance aggregometry and multiple electrode aggregometry) and determination of pharmacokinetic profile (plasma levels of ticagrelor and its metabolite AR-C124910XX) by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Conclusions

The PLINY THE ELDER trial will determine whether a lower dose of ticagrelor confers non-inferior platelet inhibition compared with the standard dose in the early phase of ACS among elderly patients undergoing PCI, informing future clinical investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The Electronic data capture was designed by the investigators and Web-implemented in REDCap.

References

  1. Capodanno D, Alfonso F, Levine GN, Valgimigli M, Angiolillo DJ. ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines on dual antiplatelet therapy: JACC guideline comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2915–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Capranzano P, Angiolillo DJ. Antithrombotic management of elderly patients with coronary artery disease. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:723–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Husted S, James S, Becker RC, Horrow J, Katus H, Storey RF, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:680–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, Steg PG, Storey RF, Jensen EC, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1791–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franchi F, Rollini F, Been L, Maaliki N, Abou Jaoude P, Rivas A, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of ticagrelor in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021;11:pvab042.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D, Ten Berg J, Bhatt DL, Bonello L, et al. Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1521–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, Price MJ, Jeong Y-H, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2261–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Storey RF, Angiolillo DJ, Bonaca MP, Thomas MR, Judge HM, Rollini F, et al. Platelet inhibition with ticagrelor 60 mg versus 90 mg twice daily in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Franchi F, Rollini F, Aggarwal N, Hu J, Kureti M, Durairaj A, et al. Pharmacodynamic comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the OPTIMUS (Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus)-4 study. Circulation. 2016;134:780–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanssen M, Cottin Y, Khalife K, Hammer L, Goldstein P, Puymirat E, et al. French registry on acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction FAST-MI 2010. Heart. 2010;2012(98):699–705.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piccolo R, Magnani G, Ariotti S, Gargiulo G, Marino M, Santucci A, et al. Ischaemic and bleeding outcomes in elderly patients undergoing a prolonged versus shortened duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PRODIGY randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:78–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piccolo R, Oliva A, Avvedimento M, Franzone A, Windecker S, Valgimigli M, et al. Mortality after bleeding versus myocardial infarction in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EuroIntervention. 2021;17(7):550–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gimbel M, Qaderdan K, Willemsen L, Hermanides R, Bergmeijer T, de Vrey E, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1374–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szummer K, Montez-Rath ME, Alfredsson J, Erlinge D, Lindahl B, Hofmann R, et al. Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the SWEDEHEART Registry. Circulation. 2020;142:1700–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Savonitto S, Ferri LA, Piatti L, Grosseto D, Piovaccari G, Morici N, et al. Comparison of reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous revascularization. Circulation. 2018;137:2435–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Franchi F, Rollini F, Been L, Briceno M, Maaliki N, Wali M, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of a low maintenance dose ticagrelor regimen versus standard dose clopidogrel in diabetes mellitus patients without previous major cardiovascular events undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2020;142:1500–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orme RC, Parker WAE, Thomas MR, Judge HM, Baster K, Sumaya W, et al. Study of two dose regimens of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2018;138:1290–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Giustino G, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, Généreux P, et al. Characterization of the average daily ischemic and bleeding risk after primary PCI for STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1846–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Roberta Paolillo and Attilio Leone are supported by a research grant provided by the Cardiopath PhD program.

Funding

The University of Naples Federico II is the sponsor of the trial and there is no external funding for this trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design (RaPi, GE); study conduction and patients recruitment (RaPi, MA, MEC, RP, FS, PG, CM, AL, AM), methodology and sample size calculation (DB); writing (original draft preparation) (RaPi, MA); writing (review and editing) (RaPi, PG, VC, FDP, AF, CM); funding (GE; PI); supervision (RaPi, GG, ES, LDS, AF, PC). All authors read and approved this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Piccolo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The final study protocol and informed consent have been reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee and by the Italian Medicines Agency (EudraCT 2019–002391-13). This study is conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

Informed consent will be obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The final study protocol and informed consent have been reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee and by the Italian Medicines Agency (EudraCT 2019–002391-13).

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Piccolo reports personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. Dr. Gargiulo G reports personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. Dr. Di Serafino reports personal fees from Abbott Vascular and Hexacath, outside the submitted work. Dr. Esposito reports personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Edwards Lifesciences, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work and research grants to the institution from Alvimedica, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT 2019–002,391-13. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04739384

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piccolo, R., Avvedimento, M., Canonico, M.E. et al. Platelet Inhibition with Ticagrelor 60 mg Versus 90 mg Twice Daily in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Rationale and Design of the PLINY THE ELDER Trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 37, 1031–1038 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07302-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07302-y

Keywords

Navigation