Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

State of the Art Comprehensive Review of Individual Statins, Their Differences, Pharmacology, and Clinical Implications

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statins are currently the primary treatment for hyperlipidemia, particularly for the treatment of high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as many studies have proven benefit in a variety of populations. The benefits of statin treatment for high cholesterol have been proven in many trials. Forefront among different adverse events is statin-induced myopathy, which still eludes complete understanding, and may range anywhere from muscle soreness or fatigue to potentially extremely rare occurrence of rhabdomyolysis.

As most adverse events are rare and not life-threatening, in high-risk patients, a high-dose statin should be started initially as data suggests that clinicians rarely up titrate statin therapy after initial prescription leading to under-treatment of many patients requiring high-dose statin therapy. As we will discuss in this paper, musculoskeletal side effects are the main concern and reason for discontinuing statin therapy. The occurrence and true association of other adverse events in patients on statin such as new onset of diabetes, hepatic toxicity, or cognitive impairment are rare, controversial, and not proven. In placebo-controlled studies, abnormal liver function occurs to a similar degree in statin- and placebo-treated patients. This led to FDA removal of the requirement to monitor liver function tests in patients on statin therapy.

The combination of statins with other compounds such as ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors has shown some additional benefits in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The goal of this manuscript is to conduct a comprehensive review about most commonly used statins and compare data on their history, structures, benefits, adverse effects, and clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimmler S. Cardiovascular disease review series. Embo Mol Med. 2011;3:697.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 137(12).

  3. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2889–934.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel B. Pharmacology of statins: a brief overview. Nurse Prescribing. 2014;12(9):451–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakravartri R, Sahai V. Compactin—a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:618–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stancu C, Sima A. Statins: mechanism of action and effects. J Cell Mol Med. 2001;5(4):378–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Endo A. The origin of the statins. Atherosclerosis (Supplements) (Component). 2004;5:125–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Istvan ES, Deisenhofer J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Am Heart J. 2002;144(6 suppl):S27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence CM, Rodwell VW, Stauffacher CV. Crystal structure of Pseudomonas mevalonii HMG-CoA reductase at 3.0 angstrom resolution. Science. 1995;268(1758).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 137(12).

  11. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:89–118.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tawakol A, Fayad ZA, Mogg R, Alon A, Klimas MT, Dansky H, et al. Intensification of statin therapy results in a rapid reduction in atherosclerotic inflammation: results of a multicenter fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(10):909–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lovastatin Study Groups I Through IV. Lovastatin 5-year safety and efficacy study. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1079–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Bollen ELEM, Buckley BM, Cobbe SM, et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1623–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams SP, Tsang M, Wright JM. Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD008226.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Hunninghake D. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(5):582–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams SP, Sekhon SS, Wright JM. Lipid-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:11.

  19. Jones P, Davidson M, Stein E, Bays HE, McKenney J, Miller E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:152–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang C-Y, Liu P-Y, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statin therapy: molecular mechanisms and clinical results. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14(1):37–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavalipati N, Shah J, Ramakrishan A, Vasnawala H. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Advances in pediatrics. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(5):554–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridker PM. The JUPITER trial: results, controversies, and implications for prevention. Circulation Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:279–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katz DH, Intwala SS, Stone NJ. Addressing statin adverse effects in the clinic: the 5 Ms. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(6):533–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Denus S, Spinler SA, Miller K, Peterson AM. Statins and liver toxicity: a meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24:584–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trompet S, van Vliet P, de Craen AJM, et al. Pravastatin and cognitive function in the elderly. Results of the PROSPER study. J Neurol. 2010;257:85–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Bégaud B. Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients the PRIMO study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005;19:403–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmed W, Khan N, Glueck CJ, Pandey S, Wang P, Goldenberg N, et al. Low serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels (<32 ng/mL) are associated with reversible myositis-myalgia in statin-treated patients. Transl Res. 2009;153(1):11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ovesjö M-L, Skilving I, Bergman P, Rane A, Ekström L, Björkhem-Bergman L. Low vitamin D levels and genetic polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor are associated with increased risk of statin-induced myopathy. Basic ClinPharmacol Toxicol. 2015;118(3):214–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riche KD, Arnall J, Rieser K, East HE, Riche DM. Impact of vitamin D status on statin-induced myopathy. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2016;6:56–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang J, Nguyen Q, Mutka J, Le Q. Rechallenging statin therapy in veterans with statin-induced myopathy post vitamin D replenishment. J Pharm Pract. 2016;30(5):521–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Golomb BA, Evans MA. Statin adverse effects: a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(6):373–418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bitzur R, Cohen H, Kamari Y, Harats D. Intolerance to statins: mechanisms and management. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 2):S325–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinal-Fernandez I, Casal-Dominguez M, Mammen AL. Statins: pros and cons. Med Clin (Barc). 2018;150(10):398–402.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmadi Y, Ghorbanihaghjo A, Naghi-Zadeh M, Yagin N. Oxidative stress as a possible mechanism of statin-induced myopathy. Inflammopharmacology. 2018;26.3:667–74 Web.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bagley WH, Yang H, Shah KH. Rhabdomyolysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2007;2:210–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Staffa JA, Chang J, Green L. Cerivastatin and reports of fatal rhabdomyolysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(7):539–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson PD, Clarkson P, Karas RH. Statin-associated myopathy. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1681–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohassel P, Mammen AL. Anti-HMGCR Myopathy. J Neuromuscular Dis. 2018;5(1):11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dubuc G, Chamberland A, Wassef H, et al. Statins upregulate PCSK9, the gene encoding the proprotein convertase neural apoptosis-regulated convertase-1 implicated in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1454–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Awan Z, Seidah NG, MacFadyen JG, et al. Rosuvastatin, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 concentrations, and LDL cholesterol response: the JUPITER trial. Clin Chem. 2012;58:183–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyu P-Y, Li R, Wang T-J, et al. Effects of plasma lipids and statins on cognitive function. Chin Med J. 2018;131(4):471.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. MRC/BHF heart protection study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9326):7–22.

  43. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Karlawish J, Hennessy S, Teal V, Bilker WB. Statin therapy and risk of acute memory impairment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1399–405.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang C-N, Li H-H, Lin C-L. Neuroprotective effects of statins against amyloid β-induced neurotoxicity. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13(2):198–206.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chan D, Binks S, Nicholas JM, Frost C, Cardoso MJ, Ourselin S, et al. Effect of high-dose simvastatin on cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and health-related quality-of-life measures in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: secondary analyses from the MS-STAT randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):591–600.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Xiaoxue L, Min Y, Shuya L, Zheng L. The association between apathy and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(7).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schultz BG, Patten DK, Berlau DJ. The role of statins in both cognitive impairment and protection against dementia: a tale of two mechanisms. Transl Neurodegener. 2018;7(1).

  48. Orth M, Bellosta S. Cholesterol: its regulation and role in central nervous system disorders. Cholesterol. 2012;2012:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Golomb BA, Evans MA. Statin adverse effects. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(6):373–418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Agarwala A, Kulkarni S, Maddox T. The association of statin therapy with incident diabetes: evidence, mechanisms, and recommendations. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20:50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Anyanwagu U, Mamza J, Donnelly R, Idris I. Effects of background statin therapy on glycemic response and cardiovascular events following initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a large UK cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Scattolini V, Luni C, Zambon A, et al. Simvastatin rapidly and reversibly inhibits insulin secretion in intact single-islet cultures. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7(4):679–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Betteridge DJ, Carmera R. The diabetogenic action of statins - mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(2):99–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yaluri N, Modi S, Rodríguez ML, et al. Simvastatin impairs insulin secretion by multiple mechanisms in MIN6 cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(11).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Henriksbo B, Schertzer J. Is immunity a mechanism contributing to statin-induced diabetes? Adipocyte. 2015;4(4):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brault M, Ray J, Gomez Y-H, Mantzoros CS, Daskalopoulou SS. Statin treatment and new-onset diabetes: a review of proposed mechanisms. Metabolism. 2014;63(6):735–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brault M, Ray J, Gomez Y-H, Mantzoros CS, Daskalopoulou SS. Statin treatment and new-onset diabetes: a review of proposed mechanisms. Metabolism. 2014;63(6):735–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Karahalil B, Hare E, Koç G, Uslu I, Şentürk K, Özkan Y. Hepatotoxicity associated with statins. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2017;68(4):254–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Farrag S, Hamzawy M, El-Yamany M, Saad M, Nassar N. Atorvastatin in nano-particulate formulation abates muscle and liver affliction when coalesced with coenzyme Q10 and/or vitamin E in hyperlipidemic rats. Life Sci. 2018;203:129–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mach F, Ray KK, Wiklund O, Corsini A, Catapano AL, Bruckert E, et al. Adverse effects of statin therapy: perception vs. the evidence – focus on glucose homeostasis, cognitive, renal and hepatic function, haemorrhagic stroke and cataract. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(27):2526–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Naci H, Brugts J, Ades T. Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246 955 participants from 135 randomized, controlled trials. Circ Cardiovacs Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(4):390–9.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Clarke AT, Johnson PCD, Hall GC, Ford I, Mills PR. High dose atorvastatin associated with increased risk of significant hepatotoxicity in comparison to simvastatin in UK GPRD cohort. PLoS One. 2016;11(3).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Awad K, Serban M-C, Penson P. Effects of morning vs evening statin administration on lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(4):972–985.e9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lee J, Morris J, Wald N. Grapefruit juice and statins. Am J Med. 2016;129(1):26–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Awad K, Banach M. The optimal time of day for statin administration: a review of current evidence. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2018;29(4):340–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Quinn KL, Macdonald EM, Mamdani MM, Diong C, Juurlink DN. Lipophilic statins and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage following ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Drug Saf. 2017;40(10):887–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gaist D, Goldstein LB, Soriano LC, Rodríguez LAG. Statins and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2017;48(12):3245–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Naci H, Brugts J, Ades T. Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246955 participants from 135 randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(4):390–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Karlson BW, Palmer MK, Nicholls SJ, Lundman P, Barter PJ. Doses of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin that induce equal reductions in LDL-C and non-HDL-C: results from the VOYAGER meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(7):744–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Welty FK, Lewis SJ, Friday KE, Cain VA, Anzalone DA. A comparison of statin therapies in hypercholesterolemia in women: a subgroup analysis of the STELLAR study. J Women's Health. 2016;25(1):50–6.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12 064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomized trial. The Lancet. 2010; 376(9753): 1658–1669.

  72. Tayal U, Carroll R. Should anyone still be taking simvastatin 80 mg? BMJ Case Rep. 2013;bcr2013200415.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tayal U, Carroll R. Should anyone still be taking simvastatin 80 mg? BMJ Case Rep. 2013;bcr2013200415.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wong N. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889–934.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Adams SP, Tsang M, Wright JM. Lipid lowering efficacy of atorvastatin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD008226.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Karlson BW, Palmer MK, Nicholls SJ, Lundman P, Barter PJ. To what extent do high-intensity statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in each of the four statin benefit groups identified by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines? A VOYAGER meta-analysis Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):450–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lee H, Choi J, Cho J, Kim T, Lee H, Jung B. Regulation of endogenic metabolites by rosuvastatin in hyperlipidemia patients: an integration of metabolomics and lipidomics. Chem Phys Lipids. 2018;214:69–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Giral P, Neumann A, Weill A, Coste J. Cardiovascular effect of discontinuing statins for primary prevention at the age of 75 years: a nationwide population-based cohort study in France. Eur Heart J. 2019;Epub ahead of print.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA

    Veronica Azemawah, Mohammad Reza Movahed, Patrick Centuori, Ryan Penaflor, Pascal L. Riel, Steven Situ, Mehrdad Shadmehr & Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh

  2. Pima College, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Veronica Azemawah, Patrick Centuori, Ryan Penaflor, Pascal L. Riel, Steven Situ & Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh

  3. CareMore, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Mohammad Reza Movahed

Authors
  1. Veronica Azemawah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Reza Movahed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Centuori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ryan Penaflor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pascal L. Riel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Steven Situ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mehrdad Shadmehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azemawah, V., Movahed, M.R., Centuori, P. et al. State of the Art Comprehensive Review of Individual Statins, Their Differences, Pharmacology, and Clinical Implications. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 33, 625–639 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-019-06904-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-019-06904-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation