Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of transabdominal fat volumes as a predictor of prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a well-established treatment option for eligible patients with severe aortic stenosis. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between abdominal fat tissue volumes, measured using computed tomography (CT), and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. The study included 258 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at a single center between September 2017 and November 2020. During the preoperative preparation, CT scans were used to perform a semi-quantitative measurement of abdominal fat components. Body mass index (BMI) for each participant was calculated. The relationship between fat parameters and overall survival was determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Participants had a mean age of 76.8 ± 7.8 years, of whom 32.9% were male. The median follow-up period was 12 months, during which 38 patients (14.7%) died. Both the survivor and non-survivor groups showed comparable risk factors. Regarding transabdominal fat volume parameters, deceased individuals exhibited significantly lower values. However, no significant differences were observed in BMI and transabdominal area measurements. Among transabdominal fat parameters, only subcutaneous fat volume [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 0.83, p = 0.045] and total fat volume (TFV) [aHR = 0.82, p = 0.007] were identified as significant predictors of reduced all-cause mortality. Furthermore, TFV demonstrated the highest discriminative performance with a threshold of ≤ 9.1 L (AUC = 0.751, p < 0.001, sensitivity 71.1%, specificity 70.9%). Preoperative CT-based abdominal fat volume parameters, particularly TFV, can serve as potential predictors of survival in patients undergoing TAVR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard C, Jullian L, Joshi M et al (2019) TAVI and the future of aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 34(12):1577–1590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ et al (2014) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 370(19):1790–1798. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1400590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Arch Intern Med 158(17):1855–1867. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.17.1855

  6. van der Boon RM, Chieffo A, Dumonteil N et al (2013) Effect of body mass index on short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 111(2):231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto M, Mouillet G, Oguri A et al (2013) Effect of body mass index on 30-and 365-days complication and survival rates of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from the French aortic national corevalve and edwards 2 [France 2] registry). Am J Cardiol 112(12):1932–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith RL II, Herbert MA, Dewey TM et al (2012) Does body mass index affect outcomes for aortic valve replacement surgery for aortic stenosis? Ann Thorac Surg 93(3):742–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurm HS, Brennan DM, Booth J et al (2002) Impact of body mass index on outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (the obesity paradox). Am J Cardiol 90(1):42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02384-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foldyna B, Troschel FM, Addison D et al (2018) Computed tomography-based fat and muscle characteristics are associated with mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(3):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.03.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(3):254–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC et al (2021) Valve academic research consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J 42(19):1825–1857. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee K, Shin Y, Huh J et al (2019) Recent issues on body composition imaging for sarcopenia evaluation. Korean J Radiol 20(2):205–217. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P et al (2012) Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the valve academic research consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(15):1438–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koifman E, Kiramijyan S, Negi SI et al (2016) Body mass index association with survival in severe aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abramowitz Y, Chakravarty T, Jilaihawi H et al (2016) Impact of body mass index on the outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88(1):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kische S, D’Ancona G, Agma HU et al (2016) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in obese patients: overcoming technical challenges and maintaining adequate hemodynamic performance using new generation prostheses. Int J Cardiol 220:909–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, Chevalier B et al (2011) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation new criteria to predict vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(8):851–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fonarow GC, Srikanthan P, Costanzo MR et al (2007) An obesity paradox in acute heart failure: analysis of body mass index and inhospital mortality for 108,927 patients in the acute decompensated heart failure national registry. Am Heart J 153(1):74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2006.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mok M, Allende R, Leipsic J et al (2016) Prognostic value of fat mass and skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 117(5):828–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCarty MF (2003) A paradox resolved: the postprandial model of insulin resistance explains why gynoid adiposity appears to be protective. Med Hypotheses 61(2):173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-9877(02)00238-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Knudtson MD, Klein BE, Klein R et al (2005) Associations with weight loss and subsequent mortality risk. Ann Epidemiol 15(7):483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yokoyama M, Watanabe T, Otaki Y et al (2018) Impact of objective malnutrition status on the clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease following endovascular therapy. Circ J 82(3):847–856. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Genc O., Yildirim A., Dilek O., Urgun O.D., Gulek B., Kurt I.H. and Guler A. carried out the study, participated in collecting data and drafted the manuscript. Genc O., Guler A., and Sen O. performed the statistical analysis and participated in its design. Guler A., Genc O., Yildirim A., Urgun O.D., Gulek B., and Kurt I.H. participated in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Guler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guler, A., Genc, O., Yildirim, A. et al. Assessment of transabdominal fat volumes as a predictor of prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03079-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03079-x

Keywords

Navigation