Abstract
Inconsistencies in grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity have been reported. However, it remains to be studied in an Asian population. We investigated consistency of grading AS severity at various left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) categories, and postulated alternative cut-offs for more consistent grading of AS severity. Consecutive Asian patients (n = 350) with index echocardiographic diagnosis of severe AS were divided them into three groups based on LVOTd: ‘small’ (< 20 mm), ‘average’ (20–22 mm) and ‘large’ (> 22 mm). In each group, the consistency of flow-dependent (transaortic mean pressure gradient (MG)) and flow-independent parameters (AVA) were used for classification of AS severity. Of 350 patients, 51.7% had small LVOTd, while 30.8% and 17.5% had average and large LVOTd respectively. Consistent grading by LVOTd based on AVA and MG, was seen in 33.7% of patients with small, 47.6% with average, 57.7% with large LVOTd. When an AVA cut-off of 0.9 cm2 was used, consistent grading improved to 38.0% in small, 56.5% in average and 70.0% in large LVOTd. At an AVA cut-off of 0.8 cm2, there was further incremental improvement in the small LVOTd group to 54.1% (p < 0.05). In conclusion, current severe AS guidelines are most inconsistent with those in the small LVOTd group. With majority of the study’s Asian population having small LVOTd, this raises concerns that current AS guidelines may overestimate the severity of AS in the Asian cohort. Improved consistency in echocardiographic grading may be attained with a lower AVA cut-off in this Asian cohort.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–48
Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al (2007) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:230–268
Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1–23
Tay EL, Lew PS, Poh KK et al (2013) Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore. Singapore Med J 54:36–39
Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, Eleid M, Maalouf J, Suri R et al (2013) Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart 99:921–931
Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (2006) The echo manual, Chapter 12, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 189–225.
Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:254–275
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2010) Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Heart 96:1431–1433
Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L et al (2009) Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:445–451
Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr et al (1988) Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 11:1227–1234
Bohbot Y, Kowalski C, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Marechaux S, Tribouilloy C (2017) Impact of mean transaortic pressure gradient on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 6:1–12
Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2008) Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 29:1043–1048
Carabello BA (2002) Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 346:677–682
Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C et al (2010) Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart 96:1463–1468
Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P et al (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115:2856–2864
Ngiam JN, Kuntjoro I, Tan BYQ et al (2017) Predicting changes in flow category in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on medical therapy. Echocardiography 34(11):1568–1574
Ngiam JN, Tan BYQ, Sia CH et al (2017) Comparing characteristics and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in low-flow vs normal-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in an Asian population. Echocardiography 34(5):638–648
Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE et al (2006) Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113:420–426
Malouf J, Le Tourneau T, Pellikka P et al (2012) Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1421–1427
Chew N, Hon JKF, Yip WLJ et al (2017) Mid-term study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Asian population with severe aortic stenosis: two-year valve academic research consortium-2 outcomes. Singapore Med J 58(9):543–550
Tay EL, Ngiam JN, Kong WK, Poh KK (2018) Management of severe aortic stenosis: the Singapore and Asian perspective. Singapore Med J 59(9):452–454
Funding
None reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted in accordance to the revised Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review committee.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chew, N.W.S., Ngiam, J.N., Tan, B.YQ. et al. Echocardiographic discrepancies in severity grading of aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cut-off values in an Asian population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 615–621 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01755-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01755-x