Skip to main content
Log in

Segmental analysis of congenital heart disease: putting the “puzzle” together with computed tomography

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advances in surgical and medical treatment for congenital heart disease have resulted in greater life expectancy. As a result, there has been an increase in the utilization of cross-sectional imaging for diagnosis and management of complex congenital heart disease. This manuscript describes a morphological and sequential segmental approach to deciphering the code of complex congenital heart defects in cross-sectional imaging, mostly computed tomography. This manuscript will review approaches to differentiate types of transposition, the anatomic relationships of cardiac structures, and the application of these relationships in the description of complex congenital heart disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perloff JK, Child JS (1998) Congenital heart disease in adults, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RH, Becker AE, Freedom RM et al (1984) Sequential segmental analysis of congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 5:281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott ME (1936) Atlas of congenital heart disease. American Heart Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards WD (2008) Classification and terminology of cardiovascular anomalies. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants children and adolescents, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 34–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Praagh R (1972) The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. In: Birth defects: original article series. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 4–23

  6. Van Praagh R, David I, Gordon D et al (1981) Ventricular diagnosis and designation. In: Godman MJ (ed) Pediatric cardiology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  7. De la Cruz MV, Nadal-Ginard B (1972) Rules for the diagnosis of visceral situs, truncoconal morphologies and ventricular inversions. Am Heart J 84:19–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De la Cruz MV, Espino-Vela J, Attie F et al (1967) An embryological theory for the ventricular inversions and their classification. Am Heart J 73:777–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De la Cruz MV, Berrazueta JR, Arteaga M et al (1976) Rules for diagnosis of arterioventricular discordances and spatial identification of ventricles. Br Heart J 8:341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson RH, Becker AE, Van Mierop LH (1977) What should we call the ‘crista’. Br Heart J 39:856–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Casey B (1998) Two rights make a wrong: human left-right malformations. Hum Mol Genet 7:1565–1571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Applegate DE, Goske MJ, Pierce G et al (1999) Situs revisited: imaging of the heterotaxy syndrome. Radiographics 19:837–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards WD (1989) Congenital heart disease. In: Schoen FJ (ed) Interventional and surgical cardiovascular pathology: clinical correlations and basic principles. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 281–367

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hagler DJ, O’Leary PW (2008) Cardiac malpositions and abnormalities of atrial and visceral situs. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants children and adolescents, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1149–1172

    Google Scholar 

  15. De la Cruz MV, Anselmi G, Cisneros F et al (1959) An embryologic explanation for the corrected transposition of the great vessels: additional description of the main anatomic features of this malformation and its varieties. Am Heart J 57:104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Praagh R (1984) Diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease: morphologic–anatomic method and terminology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 7:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson RH, Shirali G (2009) Sequential segmental analysis. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2(1):24–35

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tynan M, Becker A, Macartney F et al (1979) Nomenclature and classification of congenital heart disease. Br Heart J 41:544–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Bierhals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bierhals, A.J., Rossini, S., Woodard, P.K. et al. Segmental analysis of congenital heart disease: putting the “puzzle” together with computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1161–1172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0443-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0443-7

Keywords

Navigation