Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal Selection and Principles of Production Tubing in Deep-Water Gas Fields

  • INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES OF OIL AND GAS
  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

During the exploitation of deep-water gas fields, the complex deep-water environment conditions result in extremely harsh requirements for the tubing selection. In this paper, the authors studied the selection of tubing in a deep-water gas field. Based on the specific practices in the deep-water gas reservoir A, they suggested the algorithm of the size selection and material selection of tubing. Assuming the flow pressure at the wellhead is 7.5 MPa, the optimized size of the tubing is selected from the most commonly used tubing sizes 5-1/2”, 7”, and 9-5/8”. The selection of the tubing size is determined by the comprehensive analysis of the tubing sensitivity, liquid-carrying capacity, and fluid erosion rate. Based on the analysis results, as well as the safety and economy issues, the 7” tubing size is regarded as the most suitable. The selection of the tubing material is determined by the analysis of the gas composition in the reservoir, the formation water characteristics, and the acid gas corrosion. The safety of the selected tubing material and the final strength of the optimized tubing are verified by the WellCat software. The results show that the strength of the 13Cr L80 tubing is satisfactory to meet the requirements for operations in the initial gas reservoir stage, the production stage, the well shut-in stage, the well killing stage, and for tubing leak situations under the conditions of different water-gas ratios. In this paper, the selection principles of the tubing size and material are summarized. The conclusions may be vitally important for improving the production safety and efficiency of the tubing, which is important in promoting the development of production technologies in the deep-water oil and gas reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Zhang, N. Lu, Y. Guo, Q. Wang, M. Cai, and E. Lou, “Modeling and analysis of sustained annular pressure and gas accumulation caused by tubing integrity failure in the production process of deep natural gas wells,” J. Energy Resour. Technol., 144(6), 063005 -063015 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Yang, D. Yan, R. Tian, B. Zhou, et al., “Bit stick-out calculation for the deep-water conductor jetting technique,” Pet. Explor. Dev., 40(3), 394-397 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Yang, W. Meng, M. Yao, et al., “Calculation method of riser top tension in deep water drilling,” Pet. Explor. Dev., 42(1), 119-122 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Yang, S. Liu, H. Wang, X. Zhou, Y. Song, R. Xie, Z. Zhang, Q. Yin, and F. Xu, “A novel method for fracture pressure prediction in shallow formation during deep-water drilling,” J. Energy Resour. Technol., 144(3), 033005-033018 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Yin, J. Yang, M. Tyagi, et al., “Machine learning for deep-water drilling: gas-kick-alarm classification using pilot-scale rig data with combined surface-riser-downhole monitoring,” SPE J., 26(4), 1773-1799 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Q. Yin, J. Yang, Y. Yuping, et al., “Origin of H2S and corrosion analysis of tubing in offshore oilfield flooding,” Surf. Technol., 46(09), 171-178 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Q. Yin, J. Yang, X. Hou, M. Tyagi, X. Zhou, B. Cao, T. Sun, L. Li, and D. Xu, “Drilling performance improvement in offshore batch wells based on rig state classification using machine learning,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 192, 107306 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Yang, “Strength and security calculation on riser with the effect of wind, wave, and current,” Chin. Offshore Oil Gas, 18(03), 198-200 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Yin, J. Yang, M. Tyagi, X. Zhou, X. Hou, and B. Cao, “Field data analysis and risk assessment of gas kick during industrial deep-water drilling process based on supervised learning algorithm,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 146, 312-328 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Gong, X. Yang, J. Li, G. Wang, and H. Lin, “Tubing comprehensive optimization method for offshore oil and gas well,” Chin. Pet. Mach., 44(12), 54-58 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Q. Yin, J. Yang, S. Shanshan, et al., “Corrosion failure analysis of conductor in Eastern Oilfield in the South China Sea,” Surf. Technol., 47(11), 134-141 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. X. Qiu, J. Dai, C. He, and Y. Bai, “Numerical simulation to factors influencing the gas-carrying-liquid ability in liquid-loading wells,” Well Log. Technol., 44(01), 92-97 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Hu, “CO2 corrosion mechanism on gas well tubing and anticorrosion measures,” Well Test. Prod. Technol., 18(002), 67-70 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Q. Wang, W. Wu, Q. Li, D. Zhang, Y. Yu, B. Cao, and Z. Liu, “Under-deposit corrosion of tubing served for injection and production wells of CO2 flooding,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 127, 105540 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Amezhnov, I. G. Rodionova, A. E. Antoshenkov, N. A. Stukalova, and Yu. S. Gladchenkova, “Influence of chemical composition and microstructure parameters of tubing steels on their corrosion resistance,” Metallurgist, 5, 1-11 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Yang, X. Luo, C. Hong, A. Yadav, M. Rogowska, and R Ambat, “Characterization, formation, and development of scales on L80 steel tube resulting from seawater injection treatment,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 193, 107433 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Kennedy, J. B. Wiskel, D. G. Ivey, and H. Henein, “L80 pipe steel microstructure assessment using ultrasonic testing,” Mater. Sci. Technol., 35(16), 1656370 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Andrews, T. F. Illson, and S. J. Matthews, “Erosion–corrosion studies on 13 Cr steel in gas well environments by liquid jet impingement,” Wear, 233, 568-574 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Q. Yin, J. Yang, H. Xiu, S. Liu, Z. Li, C. Tan, T. Li, S. Zhao, T. Sun, W. Li, and S. Shi, “Material qualification of a 13Cr-L80 casing for sour conditions,” Mater. Test., 61(9), 111362 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Fund number: 2021DJ2506 Project of China National Petroleum Corporation “Key Engineering Technology of Deep-water and Ultra-deep-water Drilling in Oversea Projects”.

Fund number: 2021-168 Project of China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Company Ltd. “Research on Drilling Difficulties and Drilling Engineering Design of Overseas Key Exploration Wells”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Long.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 6, pp. 106–110, November-December, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, D., Li, W., Long, Y. et al. Optimal Selection and Principles of Production Tubing in Deep-Water Gas Fields. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 57, 1013–1021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01338-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01338-y

Navigation