Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prostate cancer screening clinic in the Bahamas: a model for low- and middle-income countries

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Grand Bahama (pop. 51,000) is an island within the Bahamas archipelago. A local chapter of International Us TOO Prostate Cancer Support Group (UTGB) has led an annual community-based prostate cancer screening clinic in Grand Bahama each September since 2009. Features of this initiative, characteristics of attendees, and a description of found cancers were summarized to determine the clinic’s value and to guide improvements.

Method

We analyzed the established clinic from 2012 to 2015, wherein UTGB attracted corporate funding, volunteers managed clinics, and health professionals provided healthcare services. An explicit algorithm was used to sort clients by age, comorbidities, and findings from digital rectal examinations, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, to determine which clients would undergo secondary assessment and prostate biopsy.

Results

Overall, 1,844 males were registered (mean age 57.6 years), and only 149 men attended on more than one occasion for a total of 1,993 clinic visit. The urologist reviewed 315 men in secondary follow-up, for elevated PSA and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Of these, 45 men fulfilled criteria for trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy, and there were 40 found cases of prostate cancer, for a positive-predictive value of 89%. By D’Amico risk-stratification, these 40 cases were low (10%), intermediate (40%), and high risk (50%). The urologist counseled all 40 cases and facilitated access to standard care.

Conclusion

This study suggests that low-resource countries can advance cost-effective screening clinics, apply policy guidelines, and provide services within acceptable standards of care. It is the expectation, with a sustained effort and community participation over the ensuing years, that earlier disease presentation will occur and, consequently, a concomitant decrease in the disease-specific mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A et al (2010) Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(8):1893–1907. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Us TOO International (2017) http://www.ustoo.org/Us-Too- International. Accessed 4 Jan 2017

  3. Roberts RA et al. (2009) 2nd American Association of Cancer Research Cancer Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial /Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved Conference. Arizona: Prostate cancer burden in the Bahamas: real men die from prostate cancer. Abstract # 218

  4. Razzaghi H et al (2017) Leading causes of cancer mortality—Caribbean region, 2003–2013. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65:1395–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Odedina FT et al (2009) Prostate cancer disparities in Black men of African descent: a comparative literature review of prostate cancer burden among Black men in the United States, Caribbean, United Kingdom, and West Africa. Infect Agent Cancer 4(Suppl 10):S2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM et al (2012) Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 367:203–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1415–1424. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1606220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M (2013) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pasick R, Hiatt R, Paskett E (2004) Lessons Learned from Community-Based Cancer Screening Intervention Research. Cancer 101(Suppl 5):1146–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Government of the Bahamas Department of Statistics Population and Census. bahamas.gov.org. Accessed 4 Jan 2017

  11. Schonberg Index https://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/schonberg.php

  12. Reis LO, Simao AFL, Baracat J et al (2013) Digital rectal examination standardization for inexperienced hands: teaching medical students. Adv. Urol. 2013:797096. doi:10.1155/2013/797096

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad S, Manecksha RP, Cullen IM et al (2011) Estimation of clinically significant prostate volumes by digital rectal examination: a comparative prospective study. Can J Urol 18(6):6025–6030

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng WC, Ng FC, Chan KC et al (2004) Interobserver variation of prostatic volume estimation with digital rectal examination by urological staffs with different experiences. Intern Braz J Urology 30(6):466–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation Therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loeb S, Roehl KA, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ, Suarez BK, Nadler RB (2006) Baseline prostate-specific antigen compared with median prostate-specific antigen for age group as predictor of prostate cancer risk in men younger than 60 years old. Urology 67(2):316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Preston MA, Batista JL, Wilson KM et al (2016) Baseline prostate-specific antigen levels in midlife predict lethal prostate cancer. J. Clin Oncol 34(23):2705–2711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Barry MJ (2009) Screening for prostate cancer—the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 360:1351–1354. http://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/360/13/. doi:10.1056/NEJMe0901166

  19. Catalona WJ, D’Amico AV, Fitzgibbons WF, Kosoko-Lasaki O, Leslie SW, Lynch HT, Moul JW, Rendell MS, Walsh PC. (2012) What the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force missed in its prostate cancer screening recommendation. Ann Intern Med 157(2):137–138. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Stark JR, Busch C, SPCG-4 Investigators et al (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1708–1717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hugosson J, Carlsson S, Aus G, Bergdahl S, Khatami A, Lodding P et al (2010) Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol 11:725–732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moyer VA (2012) U.S. Preventive services task force. Screening for prostate cancer. U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157:120–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klotz L et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Health Information and Research Unit, Ministry of Health Nassau, Bahamas

  25. NCI Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html

  26. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (1985) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Toronto, pp 106–107

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merrimen JL, Jones G, Hussein SAB, Leung CS, Kapusta L, Srigley JR (2011) A model to predict prostate cancer after atypical findings at initial prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 185:1240–1245. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morash C, Tey R, Aqbassi C, Klotz L, McGowan T, Srigley J, Evans A (2015) Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: guideline recommendations. Can Urol Assoc J 9:171–178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Foley RW (2017) Editorial: prostate cancer risk stratification: to biopsy or not to biopsy? AME Med J. doi:10.21037/amj.2017.03.06

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts R (2014) From bench to bedside: the realities of reducing global prostate cancer disparity in black men. ecancer 8:458. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2014.458

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stephan C (2017) Special Issue: Diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers in prostate cancer. Intern J Mol Sci 18(8):1640. doi:10.3390/ijms18081640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Filella X, Foj L (2016) Prostate cancer detection and prognosis: from prostate specific antigen (PSA) to exosomal biomarkers. 17(11):1784. doi:10.3390/ijms17111784

  33. Nalejska E, Maczynska E, Lewandowska MA. (2014) Prognostic and predictive biomarkers: tools in personalized oncology. Mol Diagn Ther 18:273–284. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031398/pdf/40291_2013_Article_77.pdf

  34. Sullivan T, Sullivan R, Ginsburg OM (2015) Chap. 12, Screening for cancer: considerations for low- and middle-income countries. In: Gelband H, Sankaranarayanan R et al (eds) Cancer: disease control priorities, vol 3, 3rd. World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Roberts.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 Summary of male attendance, PSA values, and Biopsy results for 2012 to 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, R., Mitchell, C., Tancawan, A.L. et al. The prostate cancer screening clinic in the Bahamas: a model for low- and middle-income countries. Cancer Causes Control 28, 1187–1193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0972-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0972-1

Keywords

Navigation