Skip to main content
Log in

Machine Learning for Predicting Corporate Violations: How Do CEO Characteristics Matter?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on upper echelon theory, we employ machine learning to explore how CEO characteristics influence corporate violations using a large-scale dataset of listed firms in China for the period 2010–2020. Comparing ten machine learning methods, we find that eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) outperforms the other models in predicting corporate violations. An interpretable model combining XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) indicates that CEO characteristics play a central role in predicting corporate violations. Tenure has the strongest predictive power and is negatively associated with corporate violations, followed by marketing experience, education, duality (i.e., simultaneously holding the position of chairperson), and research and development experience. In contrast, shareholdings, age, and pay are positively related to corporate violations. We also analyze violation severity and violation type, confirming the role of tenure in predicting more severe and intentional violations. Overall, our findings contribute to preventing corporate violations, improving corporate governance, and maintaining order in the financial market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. More detailed information can be found at http://english.sse.com.cn/news/newsrelease/c/4986736.shtml

  2. We use the 2010–2020 period for our investigation of corporate violations because 2009 was an important year for the A-share market due to the introduction of a number of policies (e.g., strengthening market regulations, promoting new stock issuance, and reducing stamp duty), and companies may have taken some time to adapt to these policies.

  3. CEOs with business degrees tend to exhibit more business ethics and are less likely to commit violations (Troy et al., 2011). Thus, we separate the possession of an MBA from education in general to investigate the impact of CEO MBA on corporate violations.

  4. Using the logarithm to compress the original data into a smaller range has been widely employed to analyze CEO characteristics because the data are easier to process and the impact of noise and outliers on the results is reduced (e.g., Chidambaran and Prabhala, 2003; Gao and Li, 2015).

  5. CEO pay in our study does not include equity incentives because the equity incentive plan for Chinese listed companies starts late, while the proportion of equity incentives implemented by listed companies and the proportion of equity incentive shares granted by equity incentives are low.

  6. According to the database guide, CEO shareholdings do not include unexercised stock options.

References

  • Amiram, D., Bozanic, Z., Cox, J. D., Dupont, Q., Karpoff, J. M., & Sloan, R. (2018). Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: A multidisciplinary review of the literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), 732–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Jondle, D., Kowske, B., Cornachione, E., Li, J., & Thakadipuram, T. (2012). Ethical cultures in large business organizations in Brazil, Russia, India, and China. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babalola, M. T., Bal, M., Cho, C. H., Garcia–Lorenzo, L., Guedhami, O., Liang, H., ... & van Gils, S. (2022). Bringing excitement to empirical business ethics research: Thoughts on the future of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(3), 903–916.

  • Bao, Y., Ke, B., Li, B., Yu, Y. J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Detecting accounting fraud in publicly traded US firms using a machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(1), 199–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S. (1994). Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: A multivariate model of corporate illegality. Journal of Management, 20(4), 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, E., Kandel, E., & Veronesi, P. (2010). Stock–based compensation and CEO (dis) incentives. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1769–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertomeu, J., Cheynel, E., Liao, Y., & Milone, M. (2021b). Using machine learning to measure conservatism. Available at SSRN 3924961. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/76928

  • Bertomeu, J. (2020). Machine learning improves accounting: Discussion, implementation and research opportunities. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(3), 1135–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertomeu, J., Cheynel, E., Floyd, E., & Pan, W. (2021a). Using machine learning to detect misstatements. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 468–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, L. S., Krishnan, G. V., & Yu, W. (2017). Debt covenant violations, firm financial distress, and auditor actions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 186–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. C., Crowley, R. M., & Elliott, W. B. (2020). What are you saying? Using topic to detect financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(1), 237–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., Iqbal, F., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2021). Reputations in flux: How a firm defends its multiple reputations in response to different violations. Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1109–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, J., & Ozel, N. B. (2017). Earnings expectations and employee safety. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over–sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794.

  • Cheynel, E., & Zhou, F. S. (2023). Auditor tenure and misreporting: Evidence from a dynamic oligopoly game. Management Science, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4944

  • Cheynel, E., Cianciaruso, D., & Zhou, F. (2023). Fraud Power Laws. Available at SSRN 4292259. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4292259

  • Chidambaran, N. K., & Prabhala, N. R. (2003). Executive stock option repricing, internal governance mechanisms, and management turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D., Shin, H., & Kim, K. (2023). CEO’s childhood experience of natural disaster and CSR activities. Journal of Business Ethics, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05319-3

  • Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2016). Executive compensation and corporate fraud in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 669–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. H. (2022). Who did it matters: Executive equity compensation and financial reporting fraud. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73(2–3), 101453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., Dey, A., & Smith, A. (2015). Executives’ “off–the–job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikolli, S. S., Mayew, W. J., & Nanda, D. (2014). CEO tenure and the performance–turnover relation. Review of Accounting Studies, 19, 281–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, K., Lev, B., Peng, X., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2020). Machine learning improves accounting estimates: Evidence from insurance payments. Review of Accounting Studies, 25, 1098–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzyabura, D., El Kihal, S., Hauser, J. R., & Ibragimov, M. (2023). Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. Marketing Science, 42(6), 1125–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post–IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farag, H., & Mallin, C. (2018). The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. The European Journal of Finance, 24(16), 1528–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangloff, K. A., Connelly, B. L., & Shook, C. L. (2016). Of scapegoats and signals: Investor reactions to CEO succession in the aftermath of wrongdoing. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1614–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., & Li, K. (2015). A comparison of CEO pay-performance sensitivity in privately–held and public firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G., Huang, X., Wu, S., Tian, H., & Li, W. (2021). Punishment by securities regulators, corporate social responsibility and the cost of debt. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G., Xu, S., & Gong, X. (2018). On the value of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An empirical investigation of corporate bond issues in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 227–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A., Summers, J., & Mennecke, B. (2018). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, F., Du, H., & Yu, B. (2022). Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., & Miller, B. P. (2008). The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1487–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyden, M. L., Gu, J., Wechtler, H. M., & Ekanayake, U. I. (2023). The face of wrongdoing? An expectancy violations perspective on CEO facial characteristics and media coverage of misconducting firms. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(3), 101671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C., & Redfern, K. A. (2010). Consideration of the role of guanxi in the ethical judgments of Chinese managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, D. B., & Blair Staley, A. (2005). An analysis of recent accounting and auditing failures in the United States on US accounting and auditing in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, D. B., Golemon, P. L., Chen, Y., Wang, T. S., & Hung, W. S. (2009). Guanxi and business ethics in Confucian society today: An empirical case study in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, C., Ding, S., Li, Y., & Wu, Z. (2009). Fraud, enforcement action, and the role of corporate governance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y., & LENT, L. V., & Zeng, Y. (2014). Masculinity, testosterone, and financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1195–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Z., Liu, D., & Brass, D. J. (2020). Do online friends bring out the best in us? The effect of friend contributions on online review provision. Information Systems Research, 31(4), 1322–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2), 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch-Bayram, I. F., & Wernicke, G. (2018). Drilled to obey? Ex-military CEOs and financial misconduct. Strategic Management Journal, 39(11), 2943–2964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupa, J., & Minutti-Meza, M. (2022). Regression and machine learning methods to predict discrete outcomes in accounting research. Journal of Financial Reporting, 7(2), 131–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, A. J., & Liu, M. (2010). Accounting irregularities and executive turnover in founder-managed firms. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yu, L., Mei, X., & Feng, X. (2022). Do social media constrain or promote company violations? Accounting and Finance, 62(1), 31–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Li, Y. (2020). Female independent directors and financial irregularities in Chinese listed firms: From the perspective of audit committee chairpersons. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisic, L. L., Silveri, S. D., Song, Y., & Wang, K. (2015). Accounting fraud, auditing, and the role of government sanctions in China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1186–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 118–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Wang, R., & Fang, M. (2024). Mapping green innovation with machine learning: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López Vargas, K., Runge, J., & Zhang, R. (2022). Algorithmic assortative matching on a digital social medium. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1138–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In I. Guyon et al. (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 30, pp. 4765–4774). Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unifed-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions.pdf

  • Martin, G., Campbell, J. T., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2016). Family control, socioemotional wealth and earnings management in publicly traded firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012). The impact of religion on financial reporting irregularities. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 645–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019). Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(44), 22071–22080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musteen, M., Barker, V. L., III., & Baeten, V. L. (2006). CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 604–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietsch, M. (2018). Corporate illegal conduct and directors’ liability: An approach to personal accountability for violations of corporate legal compliance. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 18(1), 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Cheng, Z. (2016). When CEO career horizon problems matter for corporate social responsibility: The moderating roles of industry–level discretion and blockholder ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perols, J. L., Bowen, R. M., Zimmermann, C., & Samba, B. (2017). Finding needles in a haystack: Using data analytics to improve fraud prediction. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons, O. S. (2006). The effects of fraud and lawsuit revelation on US executive turnover and compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot, D., Berry, Z., Chang, E. H., & Kay, M. B. (2023). The diversity heuristic: How team demographic composition influences judgments of team creativity. Management Science, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4862

  • Provis, C. (2020). Business ethics, Confucianism and the different faces of ritual. Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pereira, J., Balcik, B., Rancourt, M. È., & Laporte, G. (2021). A cost-sharing mechanism for multi-country partnerships in disaster preparedness. Production and Operations Management, 30(12), 4541–4565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. L. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., & Nyaga, G. N. (2019). The effect of firm size, asset ownership, and market prices on regulatory violations. Journal of Operations Management, 65(7), 685–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, Y. R., He, V. F., Puranam, P., & von Krogh, G. (2021). Algorithm supported induction for building theory: How can we use prediction models to theorize? Organization Science, 32(3), 856–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štrumbelj, E., & Kononenko, I. (2014). Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions. Knowledge and Information Systems, 41, 647–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2009). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2016). Does founder CEO status affect firm risk taking? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, C., Smith, K. G., & Domino, M. A. (2011). CEO demographics and accounting fraud: Who is more likely to rationalize illegal acts? Strategic Organization, 9(4), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Scotter, J. R., & Roglio, K. D. D. (2020). CEO bright and dark personality: Effects on ethical misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 451–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. Y., Duan, M., & Liu, G. (2021a). Does the power gap between a chairman and CEO matter? Evidence from corporate debt financing in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 65, 101495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Su, Z. Q., Fung, H. G., Jin, H. M., & Xiao, Z. (2021b). Do CEOs with academic experience add value to firms? Evidence on bank loans from Chinese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E., Dunfee, T. W., & Li, N. (2004). Social exchange in China: The double–edged sword of guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J., Ouyang, Z., & Chen, H. A. (2018). CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropic giving in an emerging market: The case of China. Journal of Business Research, 87, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. Q., & Ling, Y. (2015). CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. (2023). Text–based measure of supply chain risk exposure. Management Science, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4927.

  • Wu, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, S. X. (2022). Credit rating prediction through supply chains: A machine learning approach. Production and Operations Management, 31(4), 1613–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., Johan, S. A., & Rui, O. M. (2016). Institutional investors, political connections, and the incidence of regulatory enforcement against corporate fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Xiong, F., & An, Z. (2023). Using machine learning to predict corporate fraud: Evidence based on the gone framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(1), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, J., & Du, G. (2012). Are political connections a blessing or a curse? Evidence from CEO turnover in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhu, M., & Liu, F. (2023). Find who is doing social good: Using machine learning to predict corporate social responsibility performance. Operations Management Research, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00427-3

  • Zhang, J. (2018). Public governance and corporate fraud: Evidence from the recent anti-corruption campaign in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Luo, L. (2023). Can consumer–posted photos serve as a leading indicator of restaurant survival? Evidence from Yelp. Management Science, 69(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Du, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2022). A theory-driven machine learning system for financial disinformation detection. Production and Operations Management, 31(8), 3160–3179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2006). Guanxi and organizational dynamics in China: A link between individual and organizational levels. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge insightful suggestions from the editors and the anonymous reviewers, which substantively improved this article. We also thank Mingjie Fang, Caixia Liu, Simon Shufeng Xiao, Gil Coombe, and Zongli Dai for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. We thank the members of Star-lights Research Team for research assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [Grant No. 21YJC630076].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 743 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, R., Liu, F., Li, Y. et al. Machine Learning for Predicting Corporate Violations: How Do CEO Characteristics Matter?. J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05685-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05685-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation