Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Event Stigma: Typology, Processes, and Stickiness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What do events such as scandals, industrial accidents, activist threats, and mass shootings have in common? They can all trigger an audience’s stigma judgment about the organization involved in the event. Despite the prevalence of these stigma-triggering events, management research has provided little conceptual work to characterize the dimensions and processes of organizational event stigma. This article takes the perspective of the evaluating audience to unpack the stigma judgment process, identify critical dimensions for categorizing types of event stigma, and explore the role of the stigmatizers’ aesthetic, emotional, and cognitive reactions as well as their practical considerations in producing what we call “sticky stigmas.” Our event stigma typology provides clarity regarding how stigmas differ based on the types of events and audiences’ reactions and why some event stigmas are stronger and more long-lasting than others. We highlight the role of emotions and aesthetics in stigma formation and the various ethical dilemmas that influence stigma stickiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this and other examples of ethical dilemmas faced by stakeholders of an organization.

References

  • Averill, J. A. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40(3), 676–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M. T., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., et al. (2016). Intentions and moral judgment across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4688–4693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Work, consumerism, and the new poor. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, C., Soucek, R., Kühnen, U., & Baumeister, R. F. (2020). Unable to resist the temptation to tell the truth or to lie for the organization? Identification makes the difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. E., & Chalkley, K. M. (2007). “Ex” marks a spot: The stickiness of dirty work and other removed stigmas. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz, S., Artiges, E., Van De Moortele, P. F., Poline, J. B., Rouquette, S., Consoli, S. M., et al. (2002). Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(6), 961–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N. (1986). Aesthetic components of management ethics. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braman, D. (2004). Doing time on the outside: Incarceration and family life in urban America. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, M., & Zhuang, J. (2016). Detrimental effects of community-based stigma. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(11), 1283–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, B., Alani, F., Li, A., & Wildeman, C. (2022). Sticky stigma: The impact of incarceration on perceptions of personality traits and deservingness. Social Forces, 100(4), 1910–1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organizations. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carberry, E. J., Engelen, P. J., & Essen, M. V. (2018). Which firms get punished for unethical behavior? Explaining variation in stock market reactions to corporate misconduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(2), 119–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D., & Ryan, A. M. (2020). Is policing becoming a tainted profession? Media, public perception, and implication. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(7), 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2019). Part I: PG&E gets burned for California wildfires. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2019/02/07/part-1-pge-gets-burned-for-california-wildfires/#510935a1a8fd.

  • Corkery, M. 2016. Wells Fargo offers regrets, but doesn's admit misconduct. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/business/dealbook/wells-fargo-apologizes-but-doesnt-admit-misconduct.html.

  • Crandall, C. S. (2000). Ideology and lay theories of stigma: The justification of stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 126–150). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., Hudson, B. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2014). Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., Taylor, S. S., & Hudson, B. A. (2020). Institutional aesthetics: Embodied ways of encountering, evaluating, and enacting institutions. Organization Studies, 41(3), 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 504–553). Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Grosset/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, V. M. (2011). Mass media and massive failures: Determining organizational efforts to defend field legitimacy following crises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devers, C. E., Dewett, T., Mishina, Y., & Belsito, C. A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science, 20(1), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devers, C. E., & Mishina, Y. (2019). Comments on stigma versus legitimacy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. C., Kiewitz, C., Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Kim, Y., & Chun, J. U. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: An elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (2015). The anthropology of intentions: Language in a world of others (Vol. D). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. (2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, P. (2006). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 701–724). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. E, Jr., & Li, Y. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language agency and structure in institutional theory since alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1662–1697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01022.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2004). The emotional dog gets mistaken for a possum. Review of General Psychology, 8, 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2019). Integrating care ethics and design thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, C. E., & Tracey, P. (2017). How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: The case of Cook’s travel agency in Victorian Britain. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2175–2207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, C. E., & Tracey, P. (2019). Introducing a spectrum of moral evaluation: Integrating organizational stigmatization and moral legitimacy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1456–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., Martinko, M. J., & Borkowski, N. (2017). Justifying deviant behavior: The role of attributions and moral emotins. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(4), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our sense of right and wrong. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Jin, R.K.-X., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind and Language, 22(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, W., & Patterson, K. (2014). Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: The positive implications of stigma for MMA organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1453–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, W. S., Patterson, K., & Hudson, B. A. (2019). Let’s not “taint” stigma research with legitimacy, please. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervieux, C., & Voltan, A. (2018). Framing social problems in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, S. R., & Carlos, W. C. (2019). From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent U.S. biodiesel market. Strategic Management Journal, 40, 865–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20(1), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, L. C. (2017). Feigned versus felt: Feigning behaviors and the dynamics of institutional logics. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Vaish, A., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2014). The emergence of human prosociality: Aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attributions in social interactions. General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional luralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (1998). The stigmatization of HIV and AIDS: Rubbing salt in the wound. In V. J. Deriega & A. P. Barbee (Eds.), HIV and social interaction (pp. 12–29). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2017). A semiotic theory of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1982). Introduction. In S. Lukes (Ed.), The rules of sociological method (pp. 1–27). The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., Vogus, T. J., & Lawrence, T. B. (2013). Sensemaking and emotion in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(3), 222–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 165–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P. (1980). Causal attributions for success and failure: A multivariate investigation of dimensionality, formation, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 704–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 487–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P. A., et al. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D. M., & Asher, T. (2000). Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 31–61). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., & Rogan, M. (2019). Capability reputation, character reputation, and exchange partners’ reactions to adverse events. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruchuri, S., & Misangyi, V. F. (2015). Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, B. A., & Martin, J. K. (2015). The stigma complex. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, F. M., Ferier, M. S., & Hoekstra, M. S. (2020). On the stickiness of territorial stigma: Diverging experiences in Amsterdam’s most notorious neighbourhood. Antipode, 52(2), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G., Lashley, K., Rindova, V. P., & Han, J.-H. (2019). Which of these things are not like the other? Comparing the rational, emotional, and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity, and stigma. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 444–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozner, J. E. (2008). Stigma and settling up: An integrated approach to the consequences of organizational misconduct for organizational elites. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulet, T. (2015). “What good is wall street?” Institutional contradiction and the diffusion of the stigma over the finance industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh, L. J., & Zilber, T. B. (2019). Bringing “Together”: Emotions and power in organizational responses to institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1413–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W., & Wansink, B. (2012). Toxic, Toyotas, and terrorism: The behavioral economics of fear and stigma. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 678–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodulka, T. (2017). Yogyakarta street careers—Feelings of belonging and dealing with sticky stigma. Antropologia, 4(2), 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Callahan, A. L. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 405–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S. (2014). The impoverished aesthetic of modern management: Beauty and ethics in organizations. Aesthetics and Business Ethics, Issues in Business Ethics, 41, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1211–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toubiana, M., & Zietsma, C. (2017). The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 922–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1999). Toward a general sociological theory of emotions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2006). Sociological theories of human emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, J. P. (2012). Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1027–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voronov, M., & Vince, R. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voronov, M., & Weber, K. (2016). The heart of institutions: Emotional competence and institutional actorhood. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 456–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, B. G., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). The antecedents of moral imagination in the workplace: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. (2011). Three questions about the legitimacy of groups and the mobilization of resources. Advances in Group Processes, 28, 255–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C. B. (2011). The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., Toubiana, M., Voronov, M., & Roberts, A. (2019). Emotions in organization theory (Cambridge Elements). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, L., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017). What sparks ethical decision making? The interplay between moral intuition and moral reasoning: Lessons from the Scholastic Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, F. (2015). Spread of unethical behavior in organizations: a dynamic social network perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kim Clark and Yuan Li contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clark, K., Li, Y. Organizational Event Stigma: Typology, Processes, and Stickiness. J Bus Ethics 186, 511–530 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05173-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05173-3

Keywords

Navigation