Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to make strategic decisions and improve their firm’s performance, top management teams must have information on the competitive context in general, and the firm’s competitors in particular. During the decision-making process, top managers can have access to “privileged information”—i.e., information of a confidential and potentially strategic nature that could ultimately confer a decisional advantage over competing parties. However, obtaining and using privileged information in a business context is often illegal—and if not, is usually deemed unethical or “against the rules.” Using a quasi-experimental design, this study explores the reasons why an individual might engage in such unethical behavior. We assess the extent to which managers use privileged information with respect to perceived team cohesion and peers’ ethicality. More specifically, our results show that the use of privileged information is predicted by the decision-maker’s perceptions of their team cohesion and their peers’ ethicality. Moreover, we find that team performance, as a group-level nonself-reported factor (measured by the firm’s share price in our simulation), moderates the relationship between cohesion and the use of privileged information. The relationship between cohesion, ethical behavior, and team performance is also discussed. We draw on these findings to make some practical suggestions on how to incorporate practices that could better prevent the unethical use of privileged information in strategic decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdolmohammadi, M., & Sultan, J. (2002). Ethical reasoning and the use of insider information in stock trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2005). Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: Insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, C., Albrecht, C., Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2009). Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 887–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, D., Cronan, T. P., & Jones, T. W. (1998). Modeling IT ethics: A study in situational ethics. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 544–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2005). Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 889–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. (2010). The role of ethical leadership versus institutional constraints: A simulation study of financial misreporting by CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2003). Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1500 articles published in journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 138–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1974). Modifications in decision structure in adapting to the environment: Some implications for organizational learning. Decision Sciences, 5(4), 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensleva, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, J. A., & Clark, M. A. (2013). Team knowledge representation: A network perspective. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(2), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Back, K. W., & Schachter, S. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2010). Who’s with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1074–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 569–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (1982). Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. G., & Jennings, D. F. (1997). Ethics and performance: A simulation analysis of team decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Dephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 326–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunc, M. H., & Morecroft, J. D. (2010). Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1164–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg, J. A., Tikkanen, H., Nokelainen, T., & Suur-Inkeroinen, H. (2009). Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. (1992). Insider trading: Should it be prohibited? Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 859–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, D. K., & Schminke, M. (1991). Ethics in declining organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(3), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., & Huey-Lian, S. (1998). Where should the line be drawn on insider trading ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, H. G. (1966). Insider trading and the stock market. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. W., & Peterson, J. H. (1991). Insider trading revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Schulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R., D'Innocenzo, L., & Reilly, G. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesionperformance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W. (2008). Applying ethics to insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulbroek, L. A. (1992). An empirical analysis of illegal insider trading. Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1661–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2003). An asymmetry-based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1990). What is really unethical about insider trading? Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, R., & Gioia, D. A. (2012). From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specific use of knowledge as a resource. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 421–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, J., Ronson, S., & Pillutla, M. (2006). Groups as enablers of unethical behavior: The role of cohesion on group member actions. In A. E. Tenbrunsel (Ed.), Ethics in groups: Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 8, pp. 127–147). Emerald Group Publishing Limited

  • Ntayi, J. M., Byabashaija, W., Eyaa, S., Ngoma, M., & Muliira, A. (2010). Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officers. Journal of Public Procurement, 10(1), 68–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, P. A. (2001). Insider trading in financial markets: Legality, ethics, efficiency. International Journal of Social Economics, 28(10–12), 1046–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J. A., & Quinn, J. F. (2000). The integrity capacity construct and moral progress in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations–development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in strategic management journal: 1996–2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Palomino, P., Martínez-Cañas, R., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Ethical culture and employee outcomes: The mediating role of person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1996). A systems view of the firm in competence-based competition. In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 3). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnatterly, K. (2003). Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 587–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1938). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1993). Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T., Schermerhorn, J. R., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Victor, B. (1992). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 38–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H. (1989). The ethics of insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 841–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltermuth, S. S., Bennett, V. M., & Pierce, L. (2013). Doing as they would do: How the perceived ethical preferences of third-party beneficiaries impact ethical decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation and Gaming, 28(4), 360–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1998). Teaching business ethics with management and marketing games. Simulation and Gaming, 29(1), 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J., & Rogé, J. N. (1997). Computerized general management games as strategic management learning environments. Simulation and Gaming, 28(4), 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, HEC Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Kevin J. Johnson, Joé T. Martineau, Saouré Kouamé, Gokhan Turgut & Serge Poisson-de-Haro

  2. Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Saouré Kouamé

Authors
  1. Kevin J. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joé T. Martineau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saouré Kouamé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gokhan Turgut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Serge Poisson-de-Haro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin J. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Ethical Challenges in Strategic Management: The 19th IESE International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, K.J., Martineau, J.T., Kouamé, S. et al. On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance. J Bus Ethics 152, 917–929 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3822-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3822-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation