Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite widespread discussion of the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on consumer perceptions, little research has examined how consumers cope with CSR-based crisis response messages as a bolstering strategy. To fill this gap, we propose a framework integrating situational crisis communication theory with the persuasion knowledge model, applying the model to an experiment with a 2 (topic knowledge − crisis type: accidental vs. intentional) × 2 (persuasion knowledge− CSR motives: intrinsic vs. extrinsic) × 2 (agent knowledge− CSR history: long vs. short) between-subjects factorial design. In Study 1, we found interaction effects between CSR motives and crisis type on word-of-mouth intention and purchase intention. In addition, inferences about CSR motives interacted with perceptions about CSR history on purchase intention. In Study 2, we replicated study 1 and found that crisis responsibility mediated the main effect of crisis type on behavioral intentions, but neither the main effect of CSR motives and CSR history nor the interactions effects among those variables were mediated by crisis responsibility. Our results indicate that consumer inferences from a company’s CSR-based crisis communications play a significant role in increasing consumer behavioral intentions in two situations: when a crisis is accidental and when a CSR history is short. Ethical and theoretical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimate endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis. Communication Monographs, 61, 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpan, L. M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2005). Stealing thunder: An analysis of the effects of proactive disclosure of crisis information. Public Relations Review, 31(3), 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (1993). Crisis in organizations: Managing and communicating in the heat of chaos. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D. C. (1988). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. L. (2014). President Barack Obama’s image repair on HealthCare.gov. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. L. (2015). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory and research (2nd ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1992). One the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortree, D. S. (2014). The state of CSR communication research: A summary and future direction. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., & Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, T. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. J. (1998). A strategic approach to managing crises. Public Relations Review, 24(4), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumer’s use of persuasion knowledge: the effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, A., & Jorden, A. (1993). Prepare for business-related crises. Public Relations Journal, 49, 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (1999). Ongoing crisis management: Planning, managing and responding. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007a). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007b). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33, 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2012). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2015). The value of communication during a crisis: Insights from strategic communication research. Business Horizon, 58, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attribution in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 84(4), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2007). The negative communication dynamic: Exploring the impact of stakeholder affects on behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2013). CSR as crisis risk: Expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 144–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Kline, S., & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity and purchase intention: Viability of a dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, D. S., & Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2006). Defining the characteristics of a lingering crisis: Lessons from the National Zoo. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people’s and researcher’s beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C., Merril, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grappi, S., & Romani, S. (2015). Company post-crisis communication strategies and the psychological mechanism underlying consumer reactions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groza, M., Pronschinske, M., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. R. (2006). Corporate philanthropy and corporate community relations: Measuring relationship-building results. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. T. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearit, K. M. (1996). The use of counter-attack in apologetic public relations crises: The case of General Motors vs. Dateline NBC. Public Relations Review, 22(3), 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearit, K. M. (2001). Corporate apologia: When an organization speaks in defense of itself. In R. L. Heath & G. M. Vasquez (Eds.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 595–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. D. (1995). Treachery by any other name: A case study of the Toshiba public relations crisis. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. Y., & Yang, S.-U. (2009). Effects of reputation, relational satisfaction, and customer-company identification on positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(4), 381–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ice, R. (1991). Corporate publics and rhetorical strategies: The case of Union Carbide’s Bhopal crisis. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet, J. (2011). The pros and cons of Amazon Mechanical Turk for scientific surveys. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guilty-planet/httpblogsscientificamericancomguilty-planet20110707the-pros-cons-of-amazon-mechanical-turk-for-scientific-surveys/.

  • Janssen, C., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 58(2), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., & Liu, B. F. (2010). The blog-mediated crisis communication model: Recommendations for responding to influential external blogs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 429–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B. K. (1996). Components of consumer reaction to company-related mishaps: A structural equation model approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2013). What’s worse in times of product-harm crisis? Negative corporate ability or negative CSR reputation? Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 838–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, H., & Cameron, G. T. (2009). Making nice may not matter: The interplay of crisis type, response type and crisis issue on perceived organizational responsibility. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 86–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2012). The complex attribution process of CSR motives. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, Daniel. (2015). Emerging issues in crisis management. Business Horizon, 58, 137–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. K. (2005). Hong Kong consumers’ evaluation in an airline crash: A path model analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(4), 363–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y.-S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. F., Jin, Y., & Austin, L. L. (2013). The tendency to tell: Understanding publics’ communicative responses to crisis information form and source. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, L., & Cameron, G. T. (2004). A relational approach examining the interplay of prior reputation and immediate response to a crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(3), 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, J. B., & Pratt, C. B. (1986). Communicating corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 12(2), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, D., & Morgan, J. (2011). CSR as reputation insurance: Premium non nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifon, N. J., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2016). Corporate socially responsible initiatives and their effects on consumption of green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network society: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skard, S., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2014). Is publicity always better than advertising? The role of brand reputation in communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nielsen Company. (2014). Doing well by doing good: Increasingly, consumers care about corporate social responsibility, but does concern convert to consumption? Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/apac/docs/reports/2014/Nielsen-Global-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Report-June-2014.pdf

  • Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, R. (1999). The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior towards superiors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. U., & Kang, M. J. (2009). Measuring blog engagement: Testing a four-dimensional scale. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 323–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Incheon National University Research Grant in 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Advertising, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA

    Chang-Dae Ham

  2. Department of Mass Communication, Incheon National University, Incheon, Korea

    Jeesun Kim

Authors
  1. Chang-Dae Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeesun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeesun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ham, CD., Kim, J. The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model. J Bus Ethics 158, 353–372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3706-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3706-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation