Skip to main content
Log in

Sense-Making Resource Efficiency Through “Sustainability” Reports

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the nature and antecedents of a unique “sustainability” reporting initiative developed within a large Australian family-run manufacturing company. In so doing, the paper responds to calls for empirical insight into how accounting can inform organisational objectives relating to sustainability. Despite known flaws in the data, the company’s weekly sustainability reports had become a critical support to on-going sense-making, driven by deliberate strategies focused on resource efficiency, and understanding the business. While the contributions of these initiatives to broader global sustainability concerns were limited, the case provides insight into a well-intentioned and passionate journey towards the unknown of sustainability. The case explains how management distinguished related activities from core economic objectives. What is important here is that the CEO availed space for management to explore the moral dimensions of corporate activity. There was opportunity to now enhance that space, by encouraging engagement with a broader range of stakeholders, and a broader range of sustainability impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The format and content of these reports as explained in this section were verified during the interview process where appropriate, by referring to hard copy examples.

Bibliography

  • Abrahamsson, G., Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2016). On the (re)construction of numbers and operational reality. A study of face-to-face interactions. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(2), 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., & Frost, G. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., & Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. (2007). Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albelda, E. (2011). The role of management accounting practices as facilitators of the environmental management. Evidence from EMAS organisations. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), 76–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking. Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership. Knowing, doing and being (pp. 3–19). SAGE Publications Inc, Harvard University USA.

  • Arjalies, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation. The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable & Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(2), 263–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J. (2007). Changing organizational attitudes and culture through sustainability accounting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 226–242). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J. (2014). Accounting for sustainable development performance. Oxford: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Brown, J., & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., & Fraser, M. (2014). Organizational change and sustainability accounting. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 141–153). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Introduction to sustainability accounting and accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., & James, P. (1998). The green bottom line. In M. Bennett, & P. James (Eds.), The green bottom line. Environmental accounting for management. Current practices and future trends (pp. 30–60). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

  • Business Review Weekly (BRW). (2013) Top 1,000 companies. Accessed on 16 May 2014. Available from: http://www.brw.com.au/lists/top-1000-companies/2013/;jsessionid=72D58D3F29585D525AAA71423961524E.

  • Catasus, B., Martensson, M., & Skoog, M. (2009). The communication of human accounts: Examining models of sensegiving. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contrafatto, M., & Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J. (2014). Legitimating the social accounting project: An ethic of accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 233–248). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. and Thomson, I. (1998). Waste accounting and cleaner technology: A complex evaluation. In Asian Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting. Osaka, Japan.

  • Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, B., Brummans, B. H. J. M., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. R. (2010). “The calculation of business, or the business of calculation? Accounting as organizing through everyday communication. Human Relations, 63(8), 1249–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2013). Value drivers of corporate eco-efficiency: Management accounting information for the efficient use of environmental resources. Management Accounting Research, 24, 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. (2012). “Fleshing Out” an engagement with a social accounting technology. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 508–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, J., McCulloch, K., & Webster, W. (2010). The Prince’s accounting for sustainability project: Creating 21st-century decision-making and reporting systems to respond to 21st-century challenges and opportunities. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 29–45). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M. (2016). Sensemaking, sensegiving and sensebreaking: The case of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. N., Krause, T. S., & Kennelly, J. J. (1995). Beyond eco-efficiency: Towards socially sustainable business. Sustainable Development, 3, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. P., Grubnic, S., Hertzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Walters, D., Bebbington, J., & Thompson, I. (1995). The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organisational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6(3), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G., Unerman, J., & Fries, J. (2010). Introduction to the accounting for sustainability case studies. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 1–28). London: Earthscan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski, D., Meredith, J., & Kirwan, K. (2015). A comprehensive review of full cost accounting methods and their applicability to the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105(Part A), 1123–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, K., & Stromsten, T. (2012). Going public: The role of accounting and shareholder value in making sense of an IPO. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, M. (2005). Meanings of the term ‘Sustainable Development’ in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29(4), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., Carrasco-Fenech, F., Caro-Gonzalez, F. J., Correa-Ruiz, C., & Paez-Sandubete, J. M. (2001). The role of environmental accounting in organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. (2009). Nonfinancial information and accounting: A reconsideration of benefits and challenges. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1993). Accounting expertise and the politics of the product: Economic citizenship and modes of corporate governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(2/3), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J. (1996). On sustainability; the environment and management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 7, 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in Wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzman, B. (2010). Organisational and accounting change within the context of the environmental agenda. Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change, 6(4), 404–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (2011). Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economy, 33(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., Zvezdov, D., Horisch, J., & Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2015). Management roles and sustainability information. Exploring corporate practice. Australian Accounting Review, 75(5), 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 541–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Lambell, J. (1997). Accounting for the environment: The role of strategic management accounting. Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants, 75(2), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Rinaldi, L. (2010). Sainsbury’s: Embedding sustainability within the supermarket supply chain. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 47–71). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2014). Mapping the terrain of sustainability and accounting for sustainability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 507–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I., & Georgakopoulos, G. (2010). Building from the bottom, inspired from the top: Accounting for sustainability and the environment agency. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability Practical insights (pp. 129–147). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, K., & Goddard, A. (2008). Strategic management accounting and sense-making in a multinational company. Management Accounting Research, 19(2), 80–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Cramer, J., Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 380–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voronov, M. (2008). Toward a practice perspective on strategic organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 15(2), 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Accessed: 18 March 2012. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/publications.htm.

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 581–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge comments provided on earlier iterations of this paper from delegates attending Monforma in Melbourne in February 2015, a Jill McKinnon seminar at Macquarie University in Sydney in 2015, a seminar at Royal Holloway, University of London, in 2015, and at the 14th Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference (A-CSEAR), in Sydney in December 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Egan.

Ethics declarations

The author has no financial relationship, and otherwise no known potential conflict of interest, with the case study organisation explored in this study. In this study, semi-structured interviews have been undertaken with adult human participants, all of whom provided informed consent to be interviewed. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The author has full control of all primary data which are available to the journal to review if requested.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egan, M. Sense-Making Resource Efficiency Through “Sustainability” Reports. J Bus Ethics 154, 797–812 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3445-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3445-2

Keywords

Navigation