Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship Between Ethical Organisational Culture and Organisational Innovativeness: Comparison of Findings from Finland and Lithuania

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the interrelations between ethical organisational culture and organisational innovativeness in two different socio-cultural contexts, Finland and Lithuania. According to the Global Innovation Index 2013, Finland ranked 6th and Lithuania 40th in terms of the national capacity to produce innovations. Prior research by Riivari and Lämsä (J Business Ethics 124:1–17, 2014) and Riivari et al. (Eur J Innov Manag 15:310–331, 2012) argues the importance of the ethical dimension of organisational culture in fostering the organisational capacity to innovate. In this paper, a different context is taken to test hypothesised differences between the two multidimensional phenomena. The paper discusses the findings of 2 surveys in Finnish and Lithuanian public organisations (respectively, n FI = 477 and n LT = 757). Data analysis shows that ethical organisational culture affects organisational innovativeness, in particular process and behaviour innovativeness in both organisations. The findings suggest that some ethical virtues such as congruency of management, discussability and clarity can be explained by an institutional rather than socio-cultural context. However, the effect of transparency and sanctionability in the Finnish organisation and congruency of supervisors, supportability and feasibility in the Lithuanian organisation rests on peculiarities of a socio-cultural context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M. (2011). Organizational culture: Meaning, discourse, identity. In N. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate (2nd ed., pp. 11–28). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., Norton, W. I., Baucus, D. A., & Human, S. H. (2008). Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, D. C. (2013). Leadership and the three faces of integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 414–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In B.-J. Koops, J. van den Hoven, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & I. Oosterlaken (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications (pp. 19–35). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., Chomik, C., & Flatten, C. (2015). How organizational culture influences innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking: fostering entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 868–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel, T., & Brenner, T. (2011). Regional factors and innovativeness: an empirical analysis of four German industries. Annals of Regional Science, 47, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013). Organizational culture and innovation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 763–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F. (2004). Global business ethics: regulation, code, or self-restraint. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(4), 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. (1989). Improving interactional organisational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H.-J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The local dynamics of innovation. Geneva, Ithaca, and Fontainebleau.

  • Donoho, C., Heinze, T., & Kondo, C. (2012). Gender differences in personal selling ethics evaluations: Do they exist and what does their existence mean for teaching sales ethics? Journal of Marketing Education, 34(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., Stam, D., & de Gilder, D. (2013). Feeling included and valued: How perceived respect affects positive team identity and willingness to invest in the team. British Journal of Management, 24, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation, 11(2), 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013a). Employee empowerment, employee attitudes, and performance: Testing a causal model. Public Administration Management, 73(3), 490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013b). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Välikangas, L. (2007). In praise of resource constraints. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(3), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintner, G. G., West, J. D., & Zarski, J. J. (1989). Learned resourcefulness and situation-specific coping with stress. Journal of Psychology, 123(3), 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouillart, F., & Hallett, T. (2015). Co-creation in government. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 2015, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: A resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 547–566. doi:10.1002/bse.1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. B. (2011). Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helkama, K., & Seppälä, T. (2006). Arvojen muutos Suomessa 1980–2000 [Value change in Finland 1980–2000]. In R. Heiskala & E. Raekallio (Eds.), Uusi jako: Kuinka Suomesta tuli kilpailukykyinen yhteiskunta [The new division: How Finland became a competitive society] (pp. 131–155). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlepas, N. (2013). Quality of life and local governance. SEARCH Working paper WP5/21, available at http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.21.pdf, Accessed 6 August 2014.

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Hyvönen, K., & Mauno, S. (2013). Ethical organizational culture as a context for managers’ personal work goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, T. G. R. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanauskas, V. (2011). Lietuviškoji nomenklatūra biurokratinėje sistemoje: Tarp stagnacijos ir dinamikos (1968–1988) [Lithuanian nomenclature in bureaucratic system: Between stagnation and dynamics (1968–1988)]. Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos instituto leidykla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. R. (2014). The innovation imperative: An analysis of the ethics of the imperative to innovate in public sector service delivery. Public Management Review, 16(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., & Jaeger, A. M. (1990). Introduction: The need for indigenous management in developing countries. In A. M. Jaeger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Management in developing countries (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: the corporate ethics virtue model. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 29, 923–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2010). The ethics of organizations: a longitudinal study of the U.S. working population. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: a critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2011). Enhancing form performance and innovativeness through error management culture. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate (2nd ed., pp. 137–157). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, J. (2004). Managers’ moral perceptions: change in Finland during the 1990s. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2/3), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, J. (2010). Corporate responsibility perceptions in change: Finnish managers’ views on stakeholder issues from 1994 to 2004. Business Ethics: European Review, 19(1), 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuokštis, V. (2012). Trust and taxes: Estonian and Lithuanian fiscal performance during the crisis, APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2104562, Accessed 2 June 2014.

  • Lämsä, A.-M., & Pučėtaitė, R. (2006). Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä, A.-M. & Viljanen, S. (2014). Finland: Positive union engagement with CSR. In L. Preuss, M. Gold and Rees, C. (eds.), Corporate social responsibility and trade unions: Perspectives across Europe. Routledge

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). Discretion. In B. Baddie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 677–679). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, T., Litzky, B. E., & Holderness, D. K, Jr. (2015). When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malti, T., & Latzko, B. (2012). Moral emotions. In V. Ramachadran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 644–649). Maryland Heights: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E., & Martins, N. (2002). An organizational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. (1998). Navigating cross-cultural ethics: What global managers do right to keep from going wrong. Woburn, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C, I. I. I., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oinas, P. (2005). Finland: A success story? European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1227–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, C., & Breda-Vázquez, I. (2012). Creativity and social innovation: what can urban policies learn from sectoral experiences? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2005). Fostering creativity and productivity through emotional literacy: The organizational context. Development and Learning in Organizations, 19(4), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilinkaitė-Sotirovič, V., & Žibas, K. (2011). Etninės ir socialinės grupės Lietuvoje: visuomenės nuostatos ir jų kaita [Ethnic and social groups in Lithuania: Societal attitudes and their changes]. Etninės studijos, 1–2, 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & McDermott, C. M. (2011). The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(7), 712–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pučėtaitė, R., & Lämsä, A.-M. (2008). Developing organizational trust through advancement of employees’ work ethics in a post-socialist context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pučėtaitė, R., Lämsä, A.-M., & Novelskaitė, A. (2010). Organizations which have the strongest potential for high-level organizational trust in a low-trust societal context. Transformations in Business and Economics, 9(2), 318–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehn, A., & Taalas, S. (2004). “Znakomstva i svyazi” (Acquaintances and connections)—Blat, the Soviet Union, and mundane entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riivari, E. (2015). Mixing methods in organizational ethics and organizational innovativeness research: Three approaches to mixed methods analysis. In R. Pučėtaitė, A. Novelskaitė, & R. Pušinaitė (Eds.), Organizacijų etika, novatoriškumas ir darniosios inovacijos [Organisational ethics, innovativeness and sustainable innovations] (pp. 193–207). Vilnius: Academic publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riivari, E., & Lämsä, A. M. (2014). Does it pay to be ethical? Examining the relationship between organisations’ ethical culture and innovativeness. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riivari, E., Lämsä, A.-M., Kujala, J., & Heiskanen, E. (2012). The ethical culture of organisations and organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(3), 310–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. V. (2006). Current ethical issues in Polish HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankowska, A. (2013). Relationships between organizational trust, knowledge transfer, knowledge creation, and firm’s innovativeness. Learning Organization, 20(1), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seilius, A. (1999). Kolektyvinis valdymas: teorija ir praktika [Collective management: theory and practice]. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, 12, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25, 1021–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajeddini, K., Trueman, M., & Larsen, G. (2006). Examining the effect of market orientation on innovativeness. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5–6), 529–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2013). Corruption perception index 2013. Berlin. Available at http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/#myAnchor2, Accessed 2 June 2 2014.

  • Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungvari-Zrinyi, I. (2001). Moralinės kultūros tendencijos postkomunistinėse visuomenėse [Moral culture in post-communist countries]. In N. Vasiljevienė (Ed.), Dalykinė etika [Business ethics] (pp. 229–247). Kaunas: Vilnius University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, J. C. N., Valle, R. S., & Jiménez, D. J. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljevienė, N. (2000). Verslo etika ir elgesio kodeksai [Business ethics and codes of conduct]. Kaunas: VU KHF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2003). ValuesManagementSystemZfW: A new standard for values driven management. In J. Wieland (Ed.), Standards and audits for ethics management systems: The European perspective (pp. 3–23). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Dong, X.-Y., Shen, K. N., Khalifa, M., & Hao, J.-X. (2013). Strategies, technologies, and organizational learning for developing organizational innovativeness in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2507–2514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žiliukaitė, R., Ramonaitė, A., Nevinskaitė, L., Beresnevičiūtė, V., & Vinogradnaitė, I. (2006). Neatrasta galia: Lietuvos pilietinės visuomenės žemėlapis [Undiscovered power: Map of the Civil Society in Lithuania]. Vilnius: Versus Aureus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research in Lithuania was funded by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant measure (project No. VP1-3.1-ŠMM-07-K-03-042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Raminta Pučėtaitė & Aurelija Novelskaitė

  2. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Anna-Maija Lämsä & Elina Riivari

Authors
  1. Raminta Pučėtaitė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aurelija Novelskaitė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna-Maija Lämsä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elina Riivari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raminta Pučėtaitė.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pučėtaitė, R., Novelskaitė, A., Lämsä, AM. et al. The Relationship Between Ethical Organisational Culture and Organisational Innovativeness: Comparison of Findings from Finland and Lithuania. J Bus Ethics 139, 685–700 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3051-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation