Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Common Thread: The Impact of Mission on Ethical Business Culture. A Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the impact of mission on ethical business culture? This question was analyzed through a qualitative case study of a large nonprofit organization in the human services industry with a solid history of ethical business practices and consistent use of a values-based decision-making model. This research explored ethical decision making, ethical business culture, and congruence between enacted and espoused institutional values. Institutional values were identified, and the following pair of research questions was examined: To what extent were incongruent values found between espoused and enacted values? To what extent did incongruent values impact the ethical business culture? Incongruent enacted values were present in the culture, but negative impact was diminished by a larger number of congruent enacted values. Additional findings revealed that an intense commitment to the mission by all employees was the common thread that wound throughout the organization’s ethical business culture and essentially abrogated the undesirable effects of incongruent and negative values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardichvili, A., Mitchell, J., & Jondle, D. (2008). Characteristics of ethical business cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 445–451. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9782-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. (2004). Organizational factors encouraging ethical decision making: An exploration into the case of an exemplar. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 311–324. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-1527-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, P. (2009). Mission-based management: Leading your not-for-profit in the 21 st century. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D., Kacmar, K., & Wadsworth, L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004-2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Johnson, N., & Ohmer, D. (1998). Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 373–389. doi:10.1023/A:1005760606745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, M. (1996). Organizational culture as matrix of corporate ethics. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4, 329–351. doi:10.1108/eb028855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., Paul, K., Kundu, S. K., & Paudel, S. K. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 543–561. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0524-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O., & Skinner, S. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 103–109. doi:10.2307/3172930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (2004). Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 167–173. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033610.35181.ef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.

  • Gilmartin, R. (2003, November 10). Ethics and the corporate culture. Raytheon Lectureship in Business Ethics, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley College, Waltham, MA.

  • Harrington, S. (1997). A test of a person—Issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 362–375. doi:10.1023/A:1017900615637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayibor, S., & Wasieleski, D. (2009). Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 151–165. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9690-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W., Hopkins, S., & Mitchell, B. (2008). Ethical consistency in managerial decisions. Ethics and Behavior, 18(1), 26–43. doi:10.1080/10508420701519544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. O. (1996). Studying organizational symbolism: What, how, why?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Hiltebeitel, K. (1995). Organizational influence in a model of the moral decision process of accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 417–431. doi:10.1007/BF00872084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B., & Daly, J. (2002). Espoused values of organisations. Australian Journal of Management, 27(special issue), 89–104. doi: 10.1177/031289620202701S10.

  • Kabanoff, B., Waldersee, R., & Cohen, M. (1995). Espoused values and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1075–1104. doi:10.2307/256621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karacaer, S., Gohar, R., Aygün, M., & Sayin, C. (2009). Effects of personal values on auditor’s ethical decisions: A comparison of Pakistani and Turkish professional auditors. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 53–64. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0102-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P., & Elm, D. (2003). The effect of context on moral intensity of ethical issues: Revising Jones’s issue contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 139–154. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004594.61954.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitsch, D. (2006). Using dimensions of moral intensity to predict ethical decision making in accounting. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15(2), 135–149. doi:10.1080/06939280600609151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204. doi:10.1023/A:1006083612239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D., & Pauli, K. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation and intention. Business and Society, 41(1), 84–117. doi:10.1177/0007650302041001006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J., & Harvey, R. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 335–357. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9174-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1997). Contextualizing texts: Studying organizational texts. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 77–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M., & Butterfield, K. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo, J., & Vitell, S. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 65–74. doi:10.1023/A:1012648521593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (Ed.). (1979). Change and stability in American value systems, 1968-1971. In understanding human values: Individual and societal, (pp. 129–147). New York: Free Press.

  • Rothschild, J., & Milofsky, C. (2006). The centrality of values, passions, and ethics in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 137–143. doi:10.1002/nml.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2011). Effects of organizational ethical culture on the ethical decisions of tax practitioners in mainland China. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(5), 647–668. doi:10.1108/09513571111139139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siehl, C., & Martin, J. (1990). Organizational culture: A key to financial performance? In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 281–284). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (Or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256. doi:10.1023/A:1024194519384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Karande, C., Rao, P., & Vitell, S. (2001). How important are ethics and social responsibility? A multinational study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 133–152. doi:10.1108/03090560110363382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., & Kraft, K. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2006). Management development: Developing ethical corporate culture in three organisations. Journal of Management Development, 25(6), 588–600. doi:10.1108/02621710610670146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M. (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography and other case studies. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education. Itasca, Il: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R., & Callahan, A. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 405–436. doi:10.2307/256007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., & Pierce, B. (2010). The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 531–551. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0237-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attributes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447–476. doi:10.2307/3857431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanSandt, C., & Neck, C. (2003). Bridging ethics and self-leadership: Overcoming ethical discrepancies between employee and organizational standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 363–387. doi:10.1023/A:1023009728390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Ouwerkerk, C., & Peelen, E. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors on ethical decision making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1175–1187. doi:10.1007/BF00412816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Seger, J. (2002). Influence upon organizational ethical subclimates: A replication study of a single firm at two points in time. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 69–84. doi:10.1023/A:1021350122677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 25–41. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9831-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Winona State University, 175 W. Mark Street, Winona, MN, 55987, USA

    Jana L. Craft

Authors
  1. Jana L. Craft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana L. Craft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craft, J.L. Common Thread: The Impact of Mission on Ethical Business Culture. A Case Study. J Bus Ethics 149, 127–145 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3034-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3034-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation