Skip to main content
Log in

Trust, but Verify: MD&A Language and the Role of Trust in Corporate Culture

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust is both ethically important and essential for business but difficult to measure. This paper contributes toward clarifying the nature of trust in a way that is both conceptually helpful for ethical inquiries concerning business and pertinent to the measurement of trust as an element in organizations. Several papers hypothesize that increasing the role of trust in a corporation reduces the need for external monitoring and contracts. Assessing this important hypothesis requires a way to gauge whether a firm has a trusting corporate culture. We develop an objective measure of trust in a firm’s corporate culture by counting the number of times 21 trust-related words appear in an important kind of document: the Management Discussion and Analysis section of the annual report. We report two significant findings: that, contrary to what one might think, firms with a trusting culture frequently use audit and control-type words and that trust is positively linked with subsequent share price volatility. We propose explanations of these findings with the hope of facilitating the objective measurement of trust and enhancement of a trusting atmosphere in corporate culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a useful gateway into the trust literature, see the special editions of Organization Science (Jan–Feb, 2003) and Academy of Management Review (July, 1998). Both Kramer and Tyler (1995) and Saunders et al. (2010) provide edited collections on the topic of trust.

  2. Since we count only lower cased trust words (except following a sentence termination), the word “Ethics” is not italicized because it is not included in our tabulation.

  3. Of the ten Integrity words used in Guiso et al. (2015), eight are also contained on our Trust words list. The only two exceptions are “Do the right thing” and “ownership”.

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Handbook of advances in trust research. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breeman, G. (2012). Hermeneutic methods in trust research. In F. Lyon, G. Mollering, & M. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1995). Transactions costs in organizations with trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 5, 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. K, Jr, & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. C., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2007). Trust and control inter-relations: New perspectives on the trust-control nexus: towards integrated perspectives. Group and Organization Management, 32(4), 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, G., Gillespie, N., & Chao, G. T. (2010). Unravelling the complexities of trust. In M. N. K. Saunders, D. Skinner, N. Gillespie, G. Dietz, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Organizational trust: A cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M., Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2009). Commonality in codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). The values of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming).

  • Holder-Webb, L., & Cohen, J. (2012). The cut and paste society: Isomorphism in codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (2009). Rethinking trust. Harvard Business Review, 87(6), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.). (1995). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1998). Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2013). Trust: The unwritten contract in corporate governance. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Closer Look Series: Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance and Leadership No. CGRP-34.

  • Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 708–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on trust in an organizational context. Organization Science, 14(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patelli, L., & Pedrini, M. (2015). Is tone at the top associated with financial reporting aggressiveness? Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., & Vanneste, B. S. (2009). Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. N. K., Skinner, D., Dietz, G., Gillespie, N., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Organizational trust: A cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waber, B., Williams, M., Carroll, J. S., & Pentland, A. (2011). A voice is worth a thousand words: The implications of the micro-coding of social signals in speech for trust research. In F. Lyon, G. Molering, & M. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. New York: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuthas, K., Rogers, R., & Dillard, J. F. (2002). Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1–2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Loughran.

Additional information

We thank Denis Arnold, James Fuehrmeyer, Gary Monroe (editor), and Gary Weaver for helpful comments.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Definitions of the variables used in the paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Audi, R., Loughran, T. & McDonald, B. Trust, but Verify: MD&A Language and the Role of Trust in Corporate Culture. J Bus Ethics 139, 551–561 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2659-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2659-4

Keywords

Navigation