Skip to main content
Log in

Making Loan Decisions in Banks: Straight from the Gut?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a business owner approaches a bank for a loan for their business they might hope that a well-established bureaucratic procedure would ensure that their application was processed with stipulated rules and impersonal criteria. They might expect that two bank officials, evaluating the same proposal for a loan, would reach the same decision. However, research shows that both quantifiable data and “gut feelings” are used in the decision. In this research, analysis of interviews with senior managers, and both individual and focus group interviews with bank loan officers, reveals that there are no set criteria or stipulated rules. The interviews demonstrate how and why nonquantifiable data is used, and why different bank officials can reach different conclusions on the same loan proposal. While these bank loan officers do not appear to be discriminatory against female business owners, the lending criteria and process allows significant room for discrimination. It appears questionable whether bank lending is seen as an ethical and fair process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesini, A., Lotti, F., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2008). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy, Working Paper, NBER.

  • Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., and Zazzao, A. (2010a) Do male and female loan officers differ in small business lending? A review of the literature, MOFIR Working Paper no 47, November.

  • Bellucci, a, Borisov, A., & Zazzao, A. (2010b). Does gender matter in bank-firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2968–2984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1966). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. Methuen: University Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: the role of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 613–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E. (2003). Don’t trust your gut. Harvard Business Review, 5, 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttner, E. H., & Rosen, B. (1988). Bank loan officers’ perceptions of the characteristics of men, women, and successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttner, E. H., & Rosen, B. (1992). Rejection in the loan application process; male and female entrepreneurs’ perception and subsequent intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship and bank lending: the criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 31, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R., Goldberg, L., & White, L. (2004). Cookie cutter vs. character: the micro structure of small business lending by large and small banks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B. C., & Smith, D. L. (1996). Perceptions of business ethics: Students vs. business people. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 889–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: a comparison of men and women-owned small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2002). Characteristics and borrowing behaviour or small women-owned firms: evidence from the 1998 survey of small business finances. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Robb, A. (2009). A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data. Small Business Economics, 33, 397–411.

  • Courpasson, D., & Clegg, S. (2006). Dissolving the iron cages: Tocqueville, Michels, bureaucracy and the perpetuation of elite power. Organization, 13, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: the importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danos, P., Holt, D. L., & Imhoff, E. A. (1989). The use of accounting information in bank lending decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakins, D., & Hussain, G. (1994). Risk assessment and asymmetric information. Journal of Bank Marketing, 12(1), 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P., Joseph, J., & Prasad, R. (2006). Factors impacting on ethical behaviour in hospitals. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekanem, I., & Smallbone, D. (2007). Learning in small firms: The case of investment decision making behaviour. International Small Business Journal, 25(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equality and Human Rights Commission (2009) Employment and earnings in the finance sector: A gender analysis. Equality and Human Rights Commission.

  • Fabowale, L., Orser, B., & Riding, A. (1995). Gender, structural factors, and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, Summer, 41–65.

  • Fay, M., & Williams, L. (1993). Gender bias and the availability of business loans. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) (2012). Entrepreneurship Inquiry will tackle access to finance to small firms, FSB News Release, 8th February.

  • Fletcher, M. (1995). Decision making by Scottish bank managers. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 1(2), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. (2004). Finance for small and medium-sized enterprises: A report on the 2004 UK survey of SME finances. Warwick: Centre for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Warwick Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M., Carter, S., Tagg, S., & Mason, C. (2010). The latent demand for bank debt: characterizing “discouraged borrowers”. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 399–418.

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: the power of thinking without thinking. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimzade, N., & Rodionova, Y. (2013). Gender bias in access to finance, occupational choice and business performance. Economic Papers, Department of Economics, University of Reading

  • Hisrich, R. D., & Brush, C. (1984). The woman entrepreneur, management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R., & Brush, C. G. (1986). The woman entrepreneur. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & O’Brien, M. (1982) The woman entrepreneur as a reflection of the type of business. In K. H. Vesper (Ed.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 54–67). Boston, MA: Babson college.

  • Institute of Leadership and Management (2012). Women in banking. London: Institute of Leadership and Management. https://www.i-l-m.com/~/media/ILM%20Website/Downloads/Insight/Reports_from_ILM_website/Research_womeninbanking_march12%20pdf.ashx.

  • Jankowicz, A. D., & Hisrich, R. D. (1987). Intuition in small business lending decisions. Journal of Small Business Management, 25, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, Y., & storey, D. J. (2003). A theory of discouraged borrowers. Small Business Economics, 21, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryzanowski, L., & Bertin-Boussu, E. (1984). Equal access to credit: Lender’s attitudes toward an applicant’s sex and marital status. International Journal of Woman’s Studies, 4(3), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., & Shulimovitz, N. (2007). Intuition and emotion in bank loan officers’ credit decisions. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1, 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Rogers, A. (1997). The business angel’s investment decision: An exploratory analysis. In D. Deakins, P. Jennings, & C. Mason (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the 1990s (pp. 29–46). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterton, V. (2005). Learning to love debt, big fish. Bank of Scotland, Issue 5, Spring.

  • McNamara, G., & Bromiley, P. (1997). Decision making in an organizational setting: cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1063–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J., Lewis, P. V., & Reinsch, N. L. (1992). Bank ethics: An exploratory study of ethical behaviours and perceptions in small, local banks. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A Review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orser, B., Riding, A., & Manley, K. (2006). Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 30, 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, L. (1994). Raising bank finance: A comparative study of the experiences of male and female business owners. Venture Finance Working Paper, 11, November. Dept of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton.

  • Robb, A., & Wolken, J. (2005). Firm, owner and financing characteristics: differences between female and male owned businesses. Working paper presented at the University of North Carolina Boot Camp on Women and Minority Entrepreneurship Research, August.

  • Saparito, P., Elam, A., & Brush, C. (2012). Bank-firm relationships: do perceptions vary by gender? Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 37(4), 837–858.

  • Schminke, M. (1997). Gender differences in ethical frameworks and evaluation of others, choices in ethical dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikula, A., & Costa, A. D. (1994). Are women more ethical than men? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(11), 859–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still, L., & Guerin, C. D. (1991). Barriers facing self-employed women: The Australian experience. Women in Management Review and Abstracts, 6(6), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. (1994). New firm growth and bank financing. Small Business Economics, 6(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treanor, J. (2013). HSBC chief bemoans lack of women among banking elite, Guardian. Friday 8th November. Found at www.theguardian.com/business/2013/no/08/hsbc-stuart-gulliver-women-in-banking.

  • Treichel, M. Z., & Scott, J. A. (2006). Women-owned businesses and access to bank credit: Evidence from three surveys since 1987. Venture Capital, 8(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J., & Ortiz-Buonafina, M. (1990). Ethical beliefs. Differences of males and females. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 509–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1948). Bureaucracy. Chapter VIII (H. H. Gerth, Ed., C. Wright Mills, Trans.). From Max Weber: essays in Sociology, pp. 196–244 published as 1991 edition, London: Routledge.

  • Welch, J. (2001). In John A. Byrne (Ed.), Straight from the Gut. New York: Warner Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of three other researchers on this project—Sara Carter, Eleanor Shaw, and Wing Lam. The research team is grateful for the financial support for this project from the Economic and Social Research Council, UK. Award Reference No RES-000-23-0247.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, F. Making Loan Decisions in Banks: Straight from the Gut?. J Bus Ethics 137, 53–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2515-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2515-y

Keywords

Navigation