Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do we need reshape rTNM staging system for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence of breast cancer? A population-based, propensity score matched cohort study

  • Research
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to explore the role of recurrent TNM (rTNM) staging in predicting prognosis for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and determine the optimal treatment strategy for IBTR.

Method

IBTR cases were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning the years 2000–2018. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to examine factors associated with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to match IBTR with primary early breast cancer (EBC) based on clinicopathological characteristics. Investigations into the impact of different therapies were also included.

Results

Of the 4375 IBTR cases included in the study, the 5-year OS was 87.1%, 71.6% and 58.7% in rTNM stages I, II and III, respectively. After PSM, while IBTR patients had worse survival to primary EBC patients, prognosis of IBTR for different rTNM stage always closely aligned with the corresponding stage of primary EBC. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation therapy was equivalent to mastectomy with respect to OS and BCSS. Chemotherapy was favorable for OS and BCSS in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative IBTR or IBTR occurring within a 60-month interval.

Conclusions

rTNM staging system has an outstanding prognostic value for survival outcome of patients with IBTR, and IBTR and primary EBC may have potentially analogous features in the context of TNM staging. BCS plus radiation therapy may be an alternative. IBTR cases who have experienced recurrence with short intervals and with ER-negative tumors might benefit from chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the SEER program (https://seer.cancer.gov/).

Abbreviations

BCS:

Breast-conserving surgery

BCSS:

Breast cancer-specific survival

CT:

Chemotherapy

ER:

Estrogen receptor

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor 2

IBTR:

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

IDC:

Invasive ductal carcinoma

ILC:

Invasive lobular carcinoma

NOS:

Not otherwise specified

OS:

Overall survival

PSM:

Propensity score matching

References

  1. Yi M et al (2011) Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg 253(3):572–579. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fc2a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chand AR, Ziauddin MF, Tang SC (2017) Can locoregionally recurrent breast cancer be cured? Clin Breast Cancer 17(5):326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wapnir IL et al (2006) Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol 24(13):2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.3273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gosset M et al (2016) Prognostic impact of time to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving surgery. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0159888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fodor J et al (2008) Prognosis of patients with local recurrence after mastectomy or conservative surgery for early-stage invasive breast cancer. Breast 17(3):302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.11.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson SJ et al (2009) Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(15):2466–2473. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.19.8424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sopik V et al (2016) The relationship between local recurrence and death in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155(1):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3666-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giuliano AE, Edge SB, Hortobagyi GN (2018) Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25(7):1783–1785. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NCCN (2023) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Breast Cancer (Version 4. 2023). NCCN [cited 23 Mar 2023]

  10. Kolben T et al (2015) Surgical management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Int J Surg 23(Pt A):141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y et al (2022) Is repeat breast conservation possible for small ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence? Cancer 128(22):3919–3928. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Y et al (2021) Prognosis of surgical treatment after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. J Surg Res 258:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aebi S et al (2014) Chemotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer (CALOR): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 15(2):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70589-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wapnir IL et al (2018) Efficacy of chemotherapy for ER-negative and ER-positive isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: final analysis of the CALOR trial. J Clin Oncol 36(11):1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.76.5719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu X et al (2023) Is repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy possible for surgical axillary staging among patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence? Cancer 129(10):1492–1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole SR, Hernán MA (2004) Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75(1):45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Austin PC (2010) Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 172(9):1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq224

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Benson JR et al (2003) The TNM staging system and breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 4(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(03)00961-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Panet-Raymond V et al (2011) Clinicopathologic factors of the recurrent tumor predict outcome in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Cancer 117(10):2035–2043. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dent R et al (2014) Factors associated with breast cancer mortality after local recurrence. Curr Oncol 21(3):e418–e425. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JH et al (2015) Independent prognostic factors for overall survival after salvage operation for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following breast-conserving surgery. J Breast Cancer 18(4):386–393. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2015.18.4.386

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Murata T et al (2023) A prediction model for distant metastasis after isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 199(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06901-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu HL et al (2021) Prior local or systemic treatment: a predictive model could guide clinical decision-making for locoregional recurrent breast cancer. Front Oncol 11:791995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.791995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baek SY et al (2022) Clinical course and predictors of subsequent recurrence and survival of patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Cancer Control 29:10732748221089412. https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748221089412

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Youlden DR et al (2012) The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol 36(3):237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2012.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cardoso F et al (2012) Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):vii11–vii19. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jobsen JJ et al (2022) The clinical relevance of various methods of classifying ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence as either true local recurrence or new primary. Breast Cancer Res Treat 195(3):249–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06680-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panet-Raymond V et al (2011) True recurrence versus new primary: an analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(2):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abner AL et al (1993) Prognosis following salvage mastectomy for recurrence in the breast after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 11(1):44–48. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.1.44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fisher B et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hannoun-Levi JM et al (2013) Accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy as second conservative treatment for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence: multicentric study of the GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group. Radiother Oncol 108(2):226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Su Y et al (2019) Increased mortality with repeat lumpectomy alone after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Oncologist 24(9):e818–e827. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baek SY et al (2021) Long-term survival outcomes of repeat lumpectomy for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 185(1):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05932-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arthur DW et al (2017) NRG Oncology-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 1014: 1-year toxicity report from a phase 2 study of repeat breast-preserving surgery and 3-dimensional conformal partial-breast reirradiation for in-breast recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98(5):1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Walstra C et al (2019) Repeat breast-conserving therapy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(8):1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Walstra C et al (2021) Repeat breast-conserving treatment of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a nationwide survey amongst breast surgeons and radiation oncologists in the Netherlands. Breast Cancer Res Treat 187(2):499–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06154-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee K et al (2021) The role of chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 11:653243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.653243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Eom YH et al (2023) Prognostic factors after isolated ipsilateral local and regional recurrence in HER2-negative luminal breast cancer: a multi-center retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 21(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02991-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Elliott MJ, Cescon DW (2022) Development of novel agents for the treatment of early estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Breast 62(Suppl 1):S34-s42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim BH et al (2020) Identifying long-term survival candidates among patients with isolated locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: implications of the use of systemic chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer 23(3):279–290. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher B et al (1991) Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy. Lancet 338(8763):327–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)90475-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SW conceived of the study. SWZ and HPY collected and analyzed the data. SWZ wrote the paper. HPY, YQX and SW was responsible for final editing and approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study is conducted using publicly available database and no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

As this study is based on a publicly available database without identifying patient information, informed consent was not needed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1,745 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Yang, H., Xu, Y. et al. Do we need reshape rTNM staging system for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence of breast cancer? A population-based, propensity score matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07340-8

Keywords

Navigation