Abstract
Purpose
We investigated the effect of metformin and lifestyle intervention on metabolic, inflammatory, and steroid biomarkers of breast cancer (BC) recurrence risk in two intervention trials among BC survivors with overweight or obesity.
Methods
Baseline and follow-up serum samples collected during the two trials were analyzed and data pooled. The USA trial (Reach for Health) included postmenopausal BC survivors (n = 333) randomly assigned to 6-month metformin vs placebo and lifestyle intervention (LSI) vs control (2 × 2 factorial design). The Italian trial (MetBreCS) included BC survivors (n = 40) randomized to 12-month metformin vs placebo. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), adipokines, cytokines, and steroids were measured.
Results
Metformin compared to placebo showed a favorable decrease in leptin (− 8.8 vs − 3.5 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and HOMA-IR (− 0.48 vs − 0.25; p = 0.03), and an increase in SHBG (2.80 vs 1.45 nmol/L; p < 0.01). Excluding women taking aromatase inhibitors, metformin (n = 84) compared to placebo (n = 99) decreased estradiol (− 4 vs 0 pmol/L; p < 0.01), estrone (− 8 vs 2 pmol/L; p < 0.01) and testosterone (− 0.1 vs 0 nmol/L-; p = 0.02). LSI favorably affected adiponectin (0.45 vs − 0.06 ug/mL; p < 0.01), leptin (− 10.5 vs − 4.4 ng/mL; p < 0.01), HOMA-IR (− 0.6 vs 0.2; p = 0.03), and SHBG (2.7 vs 1.1 nMol/L; p = 0.04) compared to controls. The strongest impact was observed combining metformin with LSI on adipokines, CRP, SHBG, and estrogens.
Conclusions
Supportive healthy lifestyle programs combined with metformin to achieve maximal risk reduction among BC cancer survivors are recommended, especially for those with obesity in menopause.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In Western countries, over-nutrition has become a vast challenge to deal with. Insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia occur as a consequence of nutrient overload and associated adipocyte hypertrophy and adipose tissue inflammation. Obesity and insulin resistance are important modifiable risk factors associated with breast cancer incidence, recurrence, and worse overall survival, despite the administration of appropriate local and systemic therapies [1,2,3].
Elevated breast cancer risk associated with increasing BMI among postmenopausal women is related to an increase in estrogens, which are generated by increased aromatase in adipose tissue [4]. After menopause, when the ovary activity slows down, estrogens are mainly generated by peripheral aromatization of androgens originating from the adrenals or ovaries [5]. Estrogens might affect breast carcinogenesis through their oxidative metabolites and by affecting cell proliferation through their interaction with the estrogen receptors (ER) in breast tissue [6].
Obesity also enhances cancer risk via systemic metabolic effects such as insulin resistance which is associated with tumor-promoting hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia [7]. Adipokine secretion, hyperinsulinemia, estrogen signaling, and inflammation play important roles in promoting breast cancer progression, activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [8]. Metformin is a biguanide used as a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes that inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and sensitizes insulin action in the peripheral tissues. Metformin reduces diabetes incidence in obese women with glucose intolerance with a good tolerability profile [9]. Metformin has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and reduce circulating insulin in nondiabetic breast cancer subjects [10]. The drug has been proposed to have anti-cancer activities by acting directly on tumor cell metabolism, in particular through the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation of tumor cell mitochondria, and by acting as a PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibitor. Metformin has been associated with better survival in patients with breast cancer treated for diabetes, compared to other diabetic drugs [11, 12] although a phase III trial showed a lack of efficacy of metformin in preventing breast cancer recurrence in non-diabetic women except for the subgroup of HER-2 positive disease [13].
Over two-thirds of breast cancer survivors are overweight or obese and do not meet physical activity guidelines. Changes in systemic hormonal, cytokine, adipokine, and insulin pathway biomarkers influenced by weight loss and physical activity may help define both the necessary weight loss and the influence of regain on the likelihood of cancer recurrence. This trend can be slowed down by dietary approaches, increasing physical activity as well as adopting drug strategies to prevent or reduce hyperinsulinemia early, before obesity advances.
The purpose of this combined analysis was to examine the impact of metformin and lifestyle intervention on biomarkers implicated in recurrence in breast cancer survivors at high risk for recurrence because of unhealthy lifestyle, adiposity, or breast cancer subtype. Biomarkers related to insulin resistance and inflammatory pathways as well as a panel of eight steroid hormones were measured.
Methods
Study design
Within a tertiary prevention trial, we investigated the mechanisms underlying the activity of metformin on metabolic impairment with a focus on estrogen receptor-negative disease. Because the trial did not reach the desired sample size, we combined data with the Reach for Health trial (RFH) trial [14].
Brief description of the two trials
The RFH was approved by the Human Research Protections Program at UC San Diego (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01302379), and participants signed informed consent forms [14]. Briefly, postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with overweight or obesity (n = 333; BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to a 6-month treatment with metformin versus placebo and lifestyle intervention vs control in a 2 × 2 factorial fashion. Metformin vs Placebo arms included participants randomly assigned to receive metformin or placebo pills. Participants were further randomly assigned to a telephone-based weight loss intervention or control.
The Italian MetBreCS trial (EudraCT Protocol #: 2015-001001-14), a mono-institutional, randomized placebo-controlled phase II study for breast cancer survivors with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 (n = 40) at higher risk for recurrence (TNBC, non-luminal HER2+, and Luminal B HER2+) was approved by the local IRB at IEO, Milan, Italy, and participants signed informed consent.
Serum biomarkers of insulin resistance
Serum adiponectin, leptin, resistin, complement factor D, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (CCL2), Serpin (PAI-1), IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha (TNF-a) were measured using an automated immunoassay platform called ELLA (ProteinSimple, Bio-techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA) [15].
Serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and SHBG were determined by a chemiluminescent immunoassay designed for the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System (Immunodiagnostic Systems Limited, United Kingdom).
Serum concentrations of insulin were determined by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, performed on the automated instrument ARCHITECT i System (Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany). Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein were determined by an immunoturbidimetric assay using the automated instrument ALINITY c analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany). HOMA-IR [fasting insulinemia (mU/L) x glycemia (mmol/L)]/22.5 was applied as a surrogate index of insulin resistance.
Steroid biomarkers
Steroid hormones were measured in 709 patient samples (Hormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen Norway). Serum samples were analyzed for estradiol, estrone, cortisol, testosterone, androstenedione, progesterone, 11-deoxycortisol, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone, mapping large parts of the steroid hormone synthesis pathway.
Estradiol and estrone were analyzed using an ultrasensitive and thoroughly validated LC–MS/MS method [16]. All steps were fully automated. Because of the low sample volume, most samples had to be diluted (1 part of patient serum, 3 parts steroid-depleted human serum), thus increasing the functional LLOQ to 1.7 pmol/L and 0.9 pmol/L for estradiol and estrone, respectively. Results below LLOQ were assigned an arbitrary value of LLOQ/2, i.e. estradiol 0.85 pmol/L and estrone 0.45 pmol/L [17]. LLOQs were still well below the reference range for estradiol and estrone in postmenopausal women [16].
Testosterone, progesterone, cortisol, androstenedione, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, and 11-deoxycortisol were measured by a previously described multi-steroid LC–MS/MS assay [18]. The method is included in the NEQAS program and all measurement ranges cover the expected levels for postmenopausal women.
Statistical methods
Descriptive statistics are presented by trial arm including tumor characteristics of the participants and baseline median values and interquartile ranges of serum biomarkers, applying a 2-sided P-value to evaluate differences among arms (Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables). We also presented median values and interquartile ranges of baseline and absolute changes of serum biomarkers by treatment (metformin vs placebo) and lifestyle intervention (LSI) groups (yes vs no), collapsing the original trial arms. The effects of metformin and LSI on the serum biomarkers changes were evaluated through ANCOVA models adjusted for baseline values, study center, age, baseline BMI and aromatase inhibitor therapy (AI). Least square means from models including the four types of intervention (placebo, metformin, LSI, LSI + metformin) as a covariate are also presented to investigate a potential additive effect of LSI on that of metformin only (LSI + metformin). We carried out the same analyses for the subgroups of women not taking AIs and for postmenopausal women not taking AIs in regard to steroids (namely estrone, estradiol, and testosterone), and according to estrogen receptor status in regard to absolute changes of serum biomarkers (adiponectin, leptin, and SHBG). The normal distribution of residuals from full models was graphically checked. When the normality assumption was not met, extreme outliers were excluded from the models. All analyses were carried out using R statistical software, version 4.1.2. Spearman rank’s correlation coefficient between baseline inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers and BMI was performed.
Results
A flow diagram showing the treatment allocation of the two trials and main effect comparisons are shown in Fig. 1. Participants taking metformin were pooled together against those taking placebo pills, irrespective of lifestyle intervention. Participants randomized to lifestyle intervention were pooled together against participants not enrolled in the lifestyle intervention. A blood draw was performed at baseline and at treatment termination, namely 6 months in the RFH trial and 12 months in the MetBreCS trial. A total of 373 women were randomized, and 352 participants had follow-up serum samples available.
Participant characteristics
Baseline host and tumor characteristics of participants according to the allocation arm have been published [19]. Several breast cancer characteristics at diagnosis that are associated with increased risk of recurrence were more frequent in the Italian MetBreCS trial, such as grading, hormone receptor, and HER2 status were more common in the MetBreCS trial as this trial was designed for breast cancer survivors at high risk of recurrence. Mean BMI was greater in the RFH study population and a great proportion of US study women (57%) were taking aromatase inhibitors (Supplementary Table S1).
Baseline median and interquartile ranges of circulating biomarkers of insulin resistance by allocation arm are shown in Supplementary Table S2. We observed some differences in baseline biomarkers between the two trials, which may at least in part be attributable to the statistically significant differences in BMI between the two cohorts [19]. Overall, 54% of women in RFH were obese versus 35% of the MetBreCS cohort Insulin, HOMA index, complement factor D, and IL-10 were statistically significantly higher in the RFH trial. At variance with the RFH, the MetBreCS women were younger and had higher levels of PAI-I, plausibly attributable to the presence of premenopausal women (41%), known to have higher concentrations of PAI-I than postmenopausal women [20].
Baseline median and interquartile ranges of circulating steroids by allocation arm are shown in Supplementary Table S3. The RFH trial included women still taking endocrine adjuvant treatment, while the MetBreCS trial only included women who had completed their adjuvant treatment. In the table, we report the frequency of women taking aromatase inhibitor therapy as this drastically affects estrogen levels. Women were asked to maintain the same adjuvant treatment during the whole study duration. In postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors, very low to undetectable levels of estrogens are expected [16]. This explains the statistically significant difference in baseline estradiol and estrone levels between the two trials. Results below the lower limit of quantification (LOQ) were assigned an arbitrary value of LOQ/2 [17] i.e., estradiol 0.85 pmol/L and estrone 0.45 pmol/L. Thus, regarding these two steroids, we describe both overall results and results from the subgroup of women not taking aromatase inhibitors.
Biomarker changes upon metformin and lifestyle intervention
Changes in circulating biomarkers of insulin resistance and steroids not affected by aromatase inhibitors are presented in Table 1 as main effect groups. After adjustments for confounders, metformin treatment compared to placebo was significantly associated with a favorable decrease in circulating leptin (− 8.8 vs − 3.5 ng/mL; p < 0.01), insulin, and HOMA-index (− 0.48 vs − 0.25; p = 0.03), and an increase in adiponectin/leptin ratio and SHBG (2.80 vs 1.45 nmol/L; p < 0.01) levels. Lifestyle intervention (Table 2) showed a strongly favorable effect on both adipokines, as evidenced by a marked increase in adiponectin (0.45 vs − 0.05 ug/mL; p < 0.01), as well as a steep decrease in leptin levels (− 10.5 vs − 4.4 ng/mL; < 0.01). Insulin levels and HOMA-index (− 0.6 vs 0.2; p = 0.03) also decreased, and SHBG levels increased (2.7 vs 1.1 nmol/L; p = 0.04). No significant modulation in other markers of adiposity and inflammatory markers was observed, neither with metformin nor by LSI.
The changes in estrogen and testosterone are presented in Table 3. We decided to investigate the effect of metformin and lifestyle intervention only in the subgroup of women not taking aromatase inhibitors, due to the strong suppression observed at baseline. Metformin (n = 84) compared to placebo (n = 99) was associated with a decrease in estradiol (-4 vs 0 pmol/L; p < 0.01), estrone (− 8 vs 2 pmol/L; p < 0.01) and testosterone (− 0.1 vs 0 nmol/L-; p = 0.02), while no significant effects by lifestyle intervention were observed. The same results were confirmed after excluding the premenopausal women (Supplementary Table S3).
We explored the existence of an improved effect of metformin in combination with LSI, through the four main effect groups (Figs. 2, 3). The combination of metformin with lifestyle intervention lead to the strongest favorable impact on adipokines, SHBG, and CRP, maintaining the same consistent trend of all these biomarkers (Fig. 2). Metformin treatment was associated with favorable, significantly reduced levels of estradiol and estrone, compared to the placebo/control (Fig. 3). On average, this effect was enhanced in the combination intervention; LSI alone showed no effect. The analyses were adjusted for the baseline value of the biomarker, study center, age, and baseline BMI.
We also investigated any interaction of ER status at diagnosis (Supplementary Table S4) with biomarker changes. We found similar favorable metabolic effects of metformin and lifestyle intervention regardless of ER status at diagnosis.
In Supplementary Fig. 1 we describe Spearman correlations between adipokines, inflammatory cytokines, and BMI at baseline. Strong direct correlations between leptin and BMI (Spearman rank’s correlation coefficient: 0.638, p < 0.0001), and between CRP and IL-6 (0.58; p < 0.0001) were observed. Indirect correlations of the HOMA index with adiponectin/leptin ratio (− 0.54; p < 0.0001), as well as with SHBG (− 0.59; p < 0.0001), were observed. Moderate correlations between BMI and several inflammatory cytokines: CRP (0.40, p < 0.0001), IL-6 (0.384, p < 0.0001), and TNF-alpha (0.189, p < 0.0002).
Discussion
Our findings in overweight to obese breast cancer survivors provide evidence of a favorable effect of metformin and lifestyle intervention on biomarkers involved in the breast carcinogenesis pathways. Apart from the known decrease in insulin levels and insulin resistance, one of the most marked changes was observed for leptin, which decreased with both metformin or lifestyle intervention, with a further improved effect in the combined treatment arm. Goodwin and colleagues [21] reported similar relative changes with metformin compared to placebo in their MA.32 trial, despite lower baseline leptin levels, in line with the lower median BMI in their trial. The WISER Survivor trial in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors observed significant decrements in leptin in the weight loss arms [22]. Adiponectin favorably increased only in the lifestyle intervention group. Leptin is an adipocyte-derived hormone strongly correlated with total subcutaneous body fat [23] that exerts powerful effects both centrally and peripherally [24]. In the brain, leptin inhibits food intake, promotes energy expenditure, and regulates autonomic nerve control, thus playing a key role in body weight regulation [25]. The hepatic leptin receptor was identified as a target gene being upregulated by metformin [26], which may enhance leptin sensitivity in the liver. Leptin also plays an important role in proinflammatory immune responses [27, 28].
During the development of obesity, adipose tissue macrophage infiltration increases [29]. The macrophages and adipocytes are the major TNFα and IL-6 sources in individuals with obesity. Together these cells are also involved in a feedback loop that perpetuates macrophage recruitment and production of proinflammatory cytokines [25, 30]. Conversely, metformin treatment decreased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in adipose cells from abdominal subcutaneous fat obtained from healthy older women (> 60 years) [30]. Metformin has been described to improve chronic inflammation through its metabolic effects [21] but also by a direct anti-inflammatory impact locally [31]. The CRP decrease by metformin in our pooled analysis was not significant unless combined with LSI. Several studies indicate that metformin may influence IL-6 levels and ameliorate the state of chronic inflammation [32], but we, like others [33] were unable to confirm such an effect in our pooled analysis.
Overall, the impact of metformin was greater when combined with lifestyle intervention, as evidenced by a stronger change in adipokines, SHBG, and CRP serum levels in the combination arm. Moreover, these participants lost statistically more weight than those in the placebo group [14]. We acknowledge that the sample size estimates were based on main effects comparisons of metformin versus placebo and weight loss versus control. Thus, the sensitivity analysis exploring an improved effect of metformin in combination with lifestyle intervention is only suggestive and not conclusive. Indeed, these biomarkers are all strictly correlated with fat mass, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, pro-inflammatory state, and increased breast cancer risk [2,3,4,5, 7, 8, 34, 35]. Notably, neither metformin nor lifestyle intervention was able to reduce fasting plasma glucose levels in the RFH trial [14]. A large phase III adjuvant trial [13] concluded that metformin did not improve invasive disease-free survival.
Stronger metabolic changes might be required to obtain satisfactory long-term risk reductions. The strategy of combining metformin use with intermittent fasting/aerobic exercise or with other target drugs involved in the downstream pathway cascade toward tumorigenesis appears promising. Prolonged nightly fasting intervals of at least 13 h point to a reduction in breast cancer recurrence [36]. The combination of metformin with intermittent fasting, impaired tumor growth only when administered during fasting-induced hypoglycemia in a mice model [37]. A presurgical window of opportunity trial evaluating metformin and intermittent fasting on breast cancer growth is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05023967).
The adipose tissue also regulates the production of sex hormones [38] which are considered to mediate the association of adiposity with breast cancer risk by expressing aromatase enzymes, and by increasing the bioavailability of free estradiol and testosterone, through hyperinsulinemia, elevated IGF-1 bioavailability, and decreased hepatic secretion of SHBG. In postmenopausal women, the rate of transformation of androgens to estrogens is higher amongst obese women [4, 38] and aromatase expression in the breast tissue is directly correlated with BMI and white adipose tissue inflammation [39]. An important difference between the cohorts was the use of adjuvant hormone therapy. Contrary to the RFH, where 57% of participants were taking aromatase inhibitors, in the MetBreCS trial women had concluded any adjuvant endocrine therapy before entering the trial. Notwithstanding, most women taking aromatase inhibitors had serum estrogen concentrations below the LLOQ. Thus, the metformin effects on estradiol, estrone, and testosterone were restricted to women not taking aromatase inhibitors (n = 183). Metformin significantly reduced all three sex steroids, showing a favorable effect on these breast cancer risk biomarkers [40, 41]. Similar effects of metformin were previously reported [42]. We recently observed in our metabolomics study of these samples, that metformin seems to increase the activity of the enzyme CYP1A2 [19]. This enzyme catabolizes estradiol and women with genomic variants of the CYP1A2 gene with less enzymatic activity may be at increased risk [43].
Another piece of evidence from our pooled analysis was the result of similar favorable metabolic effects of metformin and lifestyle intervention, regardless of ER status at diagnosis. A recent pooled analysis confirms the associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality, without any strong evidence of associations by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype [44].
In summary, our pooled analyses show that metformin and lifestyle intervention advantageously affected adipokines, insulin resistance, inflammation, and sex steroid bioavailability, with the strongest impact in the combination arm. These findings hold the potential for a reduction in BC recurrence with a supportive healthy lifestyle alongside chemoprevention to achieve maximal risk reduction, especially for obese women after menopause.
Data availability
The data underlying this article may be shared upon reasonable request to the PI of the MetBrCs study (Dr Bernardo Bonanni), following approval by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board at IEO, Milan.
References
Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR et al (2022) American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 72:230–262. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21719
Lee K, Kruper L, Dieli-Conwright CM, Mortimer JE (2019) The impact of obesity on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 21:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0787-1
Li YR, Ro V, Tchou JC (2018) Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: from prevention to intervention. Curr Surg Rep 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-018-0204-y
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK et al (2003) Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg022
Bhardwaj P, Au CMC, Benito-Martin A et al (2019) Estrogens and breast cancer: mechanisms involved in obesity-related development, growth and progression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 189:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.03.002.
Yager JD, Davidson NE, Hopkins Bloomberg J (2006) Mechanisms of disease estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 354(3):270–282. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra050776
Iyengar NM, Gucalp A, Dannenberg AJ, Hudis CA (2016) Obesity and cancer mechanisms: tumor microenvironment and inflammation. J Clin Oncol 34:4270–4276. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4283
Pu X, Chen D (2021) Targeting adipokines in obesity-related tumors. Front Oncol 11:685923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.685923
Bray GA, Edelstein SL, Crandall JP et al (2012) Long-term safety, tolerability, and weight loss associated with metformin in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Diabetes Care 35:731–737. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1299
Goodwin PJ, Parulekar WR, Gelmon KA et al (2015) Effect of metformin vs placebo on and metabolic factors in NCIC CTG MA.32. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:djv006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv006
Tang GH, Satkunam M, Pond GR et al (2018) Association of metformin with breast cancer incidence and mortality in patients with type II diabetes: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27:627–635. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0936
Chen L, Chubak J, Boudreau DM et al (2017) Diabetes treatments and risks of adverse breast cancer outcomes among early-stage breast cancer patients: a SEER-medicare analysis. Cancer Res 77:6033–6041. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0687
Goodwin PJ, Chen BE, Gelmon KA et al (2022) Effect of metformin vs placebo on invasive disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer. JAMA 327:1963. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.6147
Patterson RE, Marinac CR, Sears DD et al (2018) The effects of metformin and weight loss on biomarkers associated with breast cancer outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 110:1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy040
Macis D, Aristarco V, Johansson H et al (2021) A novel automated immunoassay platform to evaluate the association of adiponectin and leptin levels with breast cancer risk. Cancers 13:3303. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133303
Bertelsen BE, Kellmann R, Viste K et al (2020) An ultrasensitive routine LC-MS/MS method for estradiol and estrone in the clinically relevant sub-picomolar range. J Endocr Soc 4:bvaa047. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa047
Antweiler RC, Taylor HE (2008) Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics. Environ Sci Technol 42:3732–3738. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071301c
Methlie P, Hustad S, Kellman R et al (2013) Multisteroid LC–MS/MS assay for glucocorticoids and androgens and its application in Addison’s disease. Endocr Connect 2:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-13-0023
Bellerba F, Chatziioannou AC, Jasbi P et al (2022) Metabolomic profiles of metformin in breast cancer survivors: a pooled analysis of plasmas from two randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Transl Med 20:629. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03809-6
Chung HC, Rha SY, Park JO et al (1998) Physiological and pathological changes of plasma urokinase-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor levels in healthy females and breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 49:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005997421733
Goodwin PJ, Dowling RJO, Ennis M et al (2021) Effect of metformin versus placebo on metabolic factors in the MA.32 randomized breast cancer trial. NPJ Breast Cancer 7:74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00275-z
Lin D, Sturgeon KM, Gordon BR et al (2023) WISER survivor trial: combined effect of exercise and weight loss interventions on adiponectin and leptin levels in breast cancer survivors with overweight or obesity. Nutrients 15:3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15153453
Langendonk JG, Pijl H, Toornvliet AC et al (1998) Circadian rhythm of plasma leptin levels in upper and lower body obese women: influence of body fat distribution and weight loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1706–1712. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.83.5.4717
Flak JN, Myers MG (2016) Minireview: CNS mechanisms of leptin action. Mol Endocrinol 30:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2015-1232
Obradovic M, Sudar-Milovanovic E, Soskic S et al (2021) Leptin and obesity: role and clinical implication. Front Endocrinol 12:585887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.585887
Tang X, Li J, Xiang W et al (2016) Metformin increases hepatic leptin receptor and decreases steatosis in mice. J Endocrinol 230:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0142
La Cava A (2017) Leptin in inflammation and autoimmunity. Cytokine 98:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.10.011
Pérez-Pérez A, Sánchez-Jiménez F, Vilariño-García T, Sánchez-Margalet V (2020) Role of leptin in inflammation and vice versa. Int J Mol Sci 21:5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165887
de Candia P, Prattichizzo F, Garavelli S et al (2021) The pleiotropic roles of leptin in metabolism, immunity, and cancer. J Exp Med 218:e20191593. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20191593
Le Pelletier L, Mantecon M, Gorwood J et al (2021) Metformin alleviates stress-induced cellular senescence of aging human adipose stromal cells and the ensuing adipocyte dysfunction. Elife 10:e62635. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62635
Bharath LP, Nikolajczyk BS (2021) The intersection of metformin and inflammation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 320:C873–C879. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00604.2020
Xu X, Du C, Zheng Q et al (2014) Effect of metformin on serum interleukin-6 levels in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health 14:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-93
Brown JC, Zhang S, Ligibel JA et al (2020) Effect of exercise or metformin on biomarkers of inflammation in breast and colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. Cancer Prev Res 13:1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0188
Berrino F, Villarini A, Traina A et al (2014) Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3076-6
Janssen JAMJL (2021) Hyperinsulinemia and its pivotal role in aging, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Int J Mol Sci 22:7797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157797
Marinac CR, Nelson SH, Breen CI et al (2016) Prolonged nightly fasting and breast cancer prognosis. JAMA Oncol 2:1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0164
Elgendy M, Cirò M, Hosseini A et al (2019) Combination of hypoglycemia and metformin impairs tumor metabolic plasticity and growth by modulating the PP2A-GSK3β-MCL-1 Axis. Cancer Cell 35:798–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2019.03.007
Bulun SE, Chen D, Moy I et al (2012) Aromatase, breast cancer and obesity: a complex interaction. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2011.10.003
Brown KA, Iyengar NM, Zhou XK et al (2017) Menopause is a determinant of breast aromatase expression and its associations with BMI, inflammation, and systemic markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:1692–1701. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3606
Key TJ, Appleby P, Barnes I et al (2002) Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:606. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.8.606
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK et al (2011) Circulating sex hormones and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of 13 studies. Br J Cancer 105:709–722
Campagnoli C, Berrino F, Venturelli E et al (2013) Metformin decreases circulating androgen and estrogen levels in nondiabetic women with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 13:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2013.08.012
Ayari I, Fedeli U, Saguem S et al (2013) Role of CYP1A2 polymorphisms in breast cancer risk in women. Mol Med Rep 7:280–286. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1164
Morra A, Jung AY, Behrens S et al (2021) Breast cancer risk factors and survival by tumor subtype: pooled analyses from the breast cancer association consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 30:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0924
Acknowledgements
The authors are deeply grateful to the study participants and their families for their contribution to the research project. The authors thank Chiara Accornero, research nurse at the European Institute of Oncology Milan, Italy, for accurate management of patient care during the trial conduction. Within the TRANSCAN ERA-Net call on Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN-JTC 2013) we would like to acknowledge the Institut National du Cancer, France (INCa N°2015-034), partners and important contributors to this biomarker project. This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5x 1000 funds. Federica Bellerba is a PhD student at the European School of Molecular Medicine (SEMM), Milan, Italy.
Funding
The MetBreCs trial was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (RRC-2014-2354553) through the TRANSCAN ERA-Net call on Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN-JTC 2013) while the Reach for Health study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (U54 CA155435). The biomarker analyses were conducted within the European Commission (EC) Seventh Framework Program (FP7) ERA-NET on Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN-JTC 2013) by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health (RRC-2014-2354553) and the Research Council Norway (Grant no. 246400)/Norwegian Cancer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no potential financial and non-financial competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, H., Bellerba, F., Macis, D. et al. Effect of metformin and lifestyle intervention on adipokines and hormones in breast cancer survivors: a pooled analysis from two randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 205, 49–59 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07241-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07241-2