Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rates of price disclosure associated with the surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer one year after implementation of federal regulations

  • Original Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mastectomy, breast reconstruction (BR) and breast conserving therapy (BCT) are core components of the treatment paradigm for early-stage disease but are differentially associated with significant financial burdens. Given recent price transparency regulations, we sought to characterize rates of disclosure for breast cancer-related surgery, including mastectomy, BCT, and BR (oncoplastic reconstruction, implant, pedicled flap and free flap) and identify associated factors.

Methods

For this cross-sectional analysis, cost reports were obtained from the Turquoise Health price transparency platform for all U.S. hospitals meeting national accreditation standards for breast cancer care. The Healthcare Cost Report Information System was used to collect facility-specific data. Addresses were geocoded to identify hospital referral and census regions while data from CMS was also used to identify the geographic practice cost index. We leveraged a Poisson regression model and relevant Medicare billing codes to analyze factors associated with price disclosure and the availability of an OOP price estimator.

Results

Of 447 identified hospitals, 221 (49.4%) disclosed prices for mastectomy and 188 42.1%) disclosed prices for both mastectomy and some form of reconstruction including oncoplastic reduction (n = 184, 97.9%), implants (n = 187, 99.5%), pedicled flaps (n = 89, 47.3%), and free flaps (n = 81, 43.1%). Non-profit status and increased market competition were associated with price nondisclosure. 121 hospitals (27.1%) had an out-of-pocket price estimator that included at least one breast surgery.

Conclusions

Most eligible hospitals did not disclose prices for breast cancer surgery. Distinct hospital characteristics were associated with price disclosure. Breast cancer patients face persistent difficulty in accessing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giaquinto A, Sung H, Miller K et al (2022) Breast cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 72(6):524–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winters Z, Benson J, Pusic A (2010) A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient- reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg 252(6):929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey C, Selber J, Liu J, Lee C, Offodile AC 2nd (2021) Current practice and perceptions regarding cost communication in breast cancer reconstruction: survey results of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 28(1):376–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenup R, Rushing C, Fish L et al (2019) Financial costs and burden related to decisions for breast cancer surgery. J Oncol Pract 15(8):e666–e676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Offodile AC 2nd, Lee C (2018) Future directions for breast reconstruction on the 20th Anniversary of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA Surg 153(7):605–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wharam J, Zhang F, Wallace J et al (2019) Vulnerable and less vulnerable women in high-deductible health plans experienced delayed breast cancer care. Health Aff 38(3):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zafar S, Abernethy A (2013) Financial toxicity, part I: a new name for a growing problem. Oncology 27(2):80–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Offodile AC 2nd, Asaad M, Boukovalas S et al (2021) Financial toxicity following surgical treatment for breast cancer: a cross-sectional pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 28(5):2451–2462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coroneos C, Lin Y, Sidey-Gibbons C et al (2020) Correlation between financial toxicity, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in an insured population of breast cancer surgical patients: a single-institution retrospective study. J Am Coll Surg 232(3):253–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey C, Asaad M, Boukovalas S et al (2021) Understanding the relationship between breast reconstruction subtype and risk of financial toxicity: a single-institution pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(1):1e–11e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fayanju O, Greenup R, Zafar S, Hyslop T, Hwang E, Fish L (2023) Modifiable barriers and facilitators for breast cancer care: a thematic analysis of patient and provider perspectives. J Surg Res 284:269–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rochlin D, Rizk N, Matros E, Wagner T, Sheckter C (2022) Commercial price variation for breast reconstruction in the era of price transparency. JAMA Surg 158:152

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Price transparency data for researchers. Turquoise health. https://turquoise.health/researchers. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  14. Jiang J, Makary M, Bai G (2022) Commercial negotiated prices for CMS-specified shoppable radiology services in U.S. hospitals. Radiology 302(3):622–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez G (2022) Variation in reported hospital cash prices across the United States and how they compare to reported payer-specific negotiated rates. Econ Lett 211:110226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berlin N, Chopra Z, Bryant A et al (2022) Individualized out-of-pocket price estimators for “shoppable” surgical procedures: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of US hospitals. Ann Surg Open 3(2):e162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cost Reports (2022) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-reports/cost-reports. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  18. Fulton B (2017) Health care market concentration trends in the United States: evidence and policy responses. Health Aff 36(9):1530–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaynor M, Ho K, Town R (2015) The industrial organization of healthcare markets. J Econ Lit 53(2):235–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Capps C, Dranove D (2004) Hospital consolidation and negotiated PPO prices. Health Aff 23(2):175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2023) National physician fee schedule and relative value files. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-schedules/physician/pfs-relative-value-files. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  22. Best Hospitals Award Methodology. Women’s choice award. https://womenschoiceaward.com/hospitalmethodology/#:~:text=The%20Women's%20Choice%20Award%C2%AE,women%20make%20smart%20healthcare%20choices. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  23. Garg A (2020) Community-based cancer care quality and expertise in a COVID-19 era and beyond. Am J Clin Oncol 43(8):537–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. List of CPT/HCPCS Codes (2022) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt/hcpcs-codes. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  25. von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang JX, Makary MA, Bai G (2021) Where are the high-price hospitals? With the transparency rule in effect, colonoscopy prices suggest they’re all over the place. In: Health Affairs Blog: Health Affairs

  27. Nierengarten MB (2021) Greater price transparency needed for thyroid cancer treatment among US cancer centres. Lancet Oncol 22(7):914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berkowitz ST, Siktberg J, Hamdan SA, Triana AJ, Patel SN (2021) Health care price transparency in ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol 139(11):1210–1216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chino F, Johnson J, Moss H (2021) Compliance with price transparency rules at US National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers. JAMA Oncol 7(12):1903–1904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2020) Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA). https://www.cms.gov/cciio/programs-and-initiatives/other-insurance-protections/whcra_factsheet. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  31. Banegas M, Guy GJ, de Moor J et al (2016) For working-age cancer survivors, medical debt and bankruptcy create financial hardships. Health Aff 35(1):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meneses K, Azuero A, Hassey L, McNees P, Isu M (2012) Does economic burden influence quality of life in breast cancer survivors? Gyn Onc 124(3):437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Obeng-Gyasi S, Timsina L, Bhattacharyya O, Fisher C, Haggstrom D (2021) Bankruptcy among insured surgical patients with breast cancer: who is at risk? Cancer 127(12):2083–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haque Q, Ahmadzada M, Janumpally S et al (2022) Adherence to a Federal Hospital price transparency rule and associated financial and marketplace factors. JAMA 327(21):2143–2145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital price transparency resources. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/hospital-price-transparency. Accessed 14 Oct 2023

  36. Jiang JX, Krishnan R, Bai G (2023) Price transparency in hospitals—current research and future directions. JAMA Netw Open 6(1):e2249588–e2249588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Department of Health and Human Services (2019) Medicare and Medicaid Programs: CY 2020 hospital outpatient PPS policy changes and payment rates and ambulatory surgical center payment system policy changes and payment rates. Price transparency requirements for hospitals to make standard charges public

  38. Jiang J, Makary MA, Bai G (2021) Comparison of US hospital cash prices and commercial negotiated prices for 70 services. JAMA Netw Open 4(12):e2140526–e2140526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Desai S, Hatfield L, Hicks A, Chernew M, Mehrotra A (2016) Association between availability of a price transparency tool and outpatient spending. JAMA 315(17):1874–1881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mehrotra A, Brannen T, Sinaiko A (2014) Use patterns of a state health care price transparency web site: what do patients shop for? Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958014561496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sinaiko A, Rosenthal M (2016) Examining a health care price transparency tool: who uses it, and how they shop for care. Health Aff 35(4):662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jagsi R, Ward K, Abrahamse P et al (2018) Unmet need for clinician engagement regarding financial toxicity after diagnosis of breast cancer. Cancer 124(18):3668–3676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ho V, Offodile AC 2nd (2018) Making “Cents” for the patient: improving health care through consumerism. Baker Institute for Health Policy

  44. Mariotto AB, Enewold L, Zhao J, Zeruto CA, Yabroff KR (2020) Medical care costs associated with cancer survivorship in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 29(7):1304–1312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2021) Medicare program: hospital outpatient prospective payment and ambulatory surgical center payment systems and quality reporting programs; price transparency of hospital standard charges; radiation oncology model; request for information on rural emergency hospitals

  46. Shah SA, Song Z (2021) Navigating hospital price transparency-a cautionary tale. J Gen Intern Med 37(5):1306–1309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kliff S, Katz J (2021) Hospitals and insurers didn’t want you to see these prices. Here’s why. New York Times

  48. Gilligan T, Coyle N, Frankel RM et al (2017) Patient-clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline. J Clin Oncol 35(31):3618–3632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yousuf Zafar S (2015) Financial toxicity of cancer care: it’s time to intervene. J Natl Cancer Inst 108(5):370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Offodile AC 2nd, Gallagher K, Angove R, Tucker-Seeley R, Balch A, Shankaran V (2022) Financial navigation in cancer care delivery: state of the evidence, opportunities for research, and future directions. J Clin Oncol 40(21):2291–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Anaeze Offodile II, MD, MPH for his guidance and support.

Funding

No funding was used for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Cerullo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 36 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, S.A., Zhang, Y., Correa, A.M. et al. Rates of price disclosure associated with the surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer one year after implementation of federal regulations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 203, 397–406 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07160-2

Keywords

Navigation