Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety of systemic hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Symptoms of treatment-induced menopause negatively affect quality of life and adherence to endocrine therapy of breast cancer (BC) survivors. Nevertheless, the use of systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to mitigate these symptoms may be associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence in these patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety of systemic HRT on risk of disease recurrence in BC survivors.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed up to April 20, 2021 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the risk of disease recurrence with the use of HRT in BC survivors. A random-effect model was applied to calculate the risk of recurrence, reported as pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A subgroup analysis was performed to estimate the risk of recurrence according to hormone receptor status.

Results

Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n = 4050 patients). Overall, 2022 patients were randomized to receive HRT (estrogen/progestogen combination or tibolone) and 2023 to the control group with placebo or no HRT. HRT significantly increased the risk of BC recurrence compared to placebo (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12–1.91, p = 0.006). At the subgroup analysis, the risk of BC recurrence with the use of HRT was significantly increased in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.15–2.82, p = 0.010) but not in those with hormone receptor-negative tumors (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.80–1.77, p = 0.390).

Conclusion

Use of HRT was associated with a detrimental prognostic effect in BC survivors, particularly in those with hormone receptor-positive disease. Alternative interventions to mitigate menopause-related symptoms should be proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2021) Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71:7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I et al (2020) Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines†. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation, Anderson RA, Amant F, et al (2020) ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation†. Hum Reprod Open 2020:hoaa052. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa052

  4. Franzoi MA, Agostinetto E, Perachino M et al (2021) Evidence-based approaches for the management of side-effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30666-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pistilli B, Paci A, Ferreira AR et al (2020) Serum detection of nonadherence to adjuvant tamoxifen and breast cancer recurrence risk. J Clin Oncol 38:2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Grandi G, Caroli M, Cortesi L et al (2020) Postmenopausal hormone therapy in BRCA gene mutation carriers: to whom and which? Expert Opin Drug Saf 19:1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2020.1791818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gompel A, Kandouz M, Sirotnachkova M et al (1997) The effect of tibolone on proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in normal breast cells. Gynecol Endocrinol 11:77–79. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513599709152586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valdivia I, Campodónico I, Tapia A et al (2004) Effects of tibolone and continuous combined hormone therapy on mammographic breast density and breast histochemical markers in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 81:617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Aragaki AK, et al (2020) Association of Menopausal Hormone Therapy With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality During Long-term Follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials. 12

  10. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer - version 6.2020 - September 8 2020. Available at www.nccn.org/patients.

  11. Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Cohen DS, Hortobagyi GN et al (2002) Estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women with a history of breast carcinoma: Results of a 5-year, prospective study. Cancer 95:1817–1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmberg L, Iversen O-E, Rudenstam CM et al (2008) Increased risk of recurrence after hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 100:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenemans P, Bundred NJ, Foidart J-M et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 10:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70341-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fahlén M, Fornander T, Johansson H et al (2013) Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: 10 year follow up of the Stockholm randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 49:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marsden J, Whitehead M, A’Hern R et al (2000) Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible? Fertil Steril 73:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00510-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pagani O, Francis PA, Fleming GF et al (2020) Absolute improvements in freedom from distant recurrence to tailor adjuvant endocrine therapies for premenopausal women: results from TEXT and SOFT. J Clin Oncol 38:1293–1303. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Pistilli B et al (2019) Differential impact of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy on quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a prospective patient-reported outcomes analysis. Ann Oncol 30:1784–1795. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chirgwin JH, Giobbie-Hurder A, Coates AS et al (2016) Treatment adherence and its impact on disease-free survival in the breast international group 1–98 trial of tamoxifen and letrozole, alone and in sequence. J Clin Oncol 34:2452–2459. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.8619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2019) Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet Lond Engl 394:1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31709-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Barele M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Louwers YV et al (2021) Estrogens and progestogens in triple negative breast cancer: do they harm? Cancers 13:2506. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present work was supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (“Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro”, AIRC; MFAG 2020 ID 24698) and the Italian Ministry of Health (5 x 1000 funds 2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Lambertini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

F.P. declares honoraria and non-financial support from MSD, Eli Lilly, and Novartis outside the submitted work; L.D.M. declares honoraria and non-financial support from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Genomic Health, Takeda, Ipsen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Celgene, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, and Amgen outside the submitted work; M.L. declares personal fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Exact Sciences and Sandoz outside the submitted work; M.T. declares travel, accommodations, and expenses supported by Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Takeda, and activity as a medical writer supported by Novartis and Amgen. All other authors report no disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poggio, F., Del Mastro, L., Bruzzone, M. et al. Safety of systemic hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 191, 269–275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06436-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06436-9

Keywords

Navigation