Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of level of hormone-receptor expression on treatment outcomes of “triple-positive” early-stage breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer that overexpresses the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and both estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors is recently recognized as a subtype (triple-positive) with distinctive behavior and response to treatment. In this study, we investigate the treatment outcomes and the beneficial effect of anti-HER2 treatment in relation to level of hormone-receptor (HR) expression.

Methods

Consecutive breast cancer patients with triple-positive disease, diagnosed, treated and followed at our institution between 2006 and 2016 were enrolled. Disease-free survival (DFS) was studied in relation to the level of HR-positivity.

Results

During the study period, a total of 312 were enrolled; median age (range) was 47 (20–83) years. Fifty (16.0%) of the enrolled patients received adjuvant chemotherapy without trastuzumab (cohort A). All remaining patients were treated with both chemotherapy and trastuzumab and were divided into two groups: Cohort B with both ER and PR scores ≥ 50% (n = 130, 41.7%) and Cohort C with ER and/or PR < 50% (n = 132, 42.3%). After a median follow-up of 47 months, 14 (28.0%), 30 (23.1%) and 20 (15.2%) patients in cohorts A, B, and C had an event in a form of local/system relapse or death while disease-free. The estimated 5-year DFS was 56.2%, 75.4%, and 80.8%, respectively, and at 7 year was 56.2%, 67.1%, and 78.0%, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

HER2-positive tumors are not homogeneous; stronger ER/PR co-expression may weaken the beneficial effect of anti-HER2 therapy. Such findings may have potential implication on modifying anti-HER2 treatment based on the strength of HR expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AC:

Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide

ASCO:

American Society of Clinical Oncology

BCS:

Breast-conserving surgery

BMI:

Body mass index

CAP:

College of American Pathologists

CPG:

Clinical practice guidelines

DCIS:

Ductal carcinoma in situ

DFS:

Disease-free survival

ER:

Estrogen receptor

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2

HR:

Hormone receptor

IHC:

Immune histochemical staining

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

MRM:

Modified radical mastectomy

PR:

Progesterone receptor

LCIS:

Lobular carcinoma in situ

LVI:

Lymphovascular invasion

OS:

Overall survival

TPBC:

Triple-positive breast cancer

References

  1. Prat A, Baselga J (2008) The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5:531–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Abramson VG et al (2016) Role of patient and disease factors in adjuvant systemic therapy decision making for early-stage, operable breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of cancer care Ontario guideline recommendations. J Clin Oncol 34:2303–2311. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutierrez C, Schiff R (2011) HER2: biology, detection, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1043/2010-0454-RAR.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortes J, Saura C, Bellet M, Munoz-Couselo E, Ramirez-Merino N, Calvo V, Perez J, Vidal M (2011) HER2 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer–blocking the right target. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8:307–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, Hasmuller S, Lebeau A, Kreienberg R, Camara O, Muller V, du Bois A, Kuhn T, Stickeler E, Harbeck N, Hoss C, Kahlert S, Beck T, Fett W, Mehta KM, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S (2011) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. J Clin Oncol 29:3351–3357. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.4930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giuliano M, Trivedi MV, Schiff R (2013) Bidirectional crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 signaling pathways in breast cancer: molecular basis and clinical implications. Breast Care (Basel) 8:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Laurentiis M, Arpino G, Massarelli E, Ruggiero A, Carlomagno C, Ciardiello F, Tortora G, D’Agostino D, Caputo F, Cancello G, Montagna E, Malorni L, Zinno L, Lauria R, Bianco AR, De Placido S (2005) A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:4741–4748. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iancu G, Vasile D, Iancu RC, Daviţoiu DV (2017) “Triple positive” breast cancer—a novel category? Rom J Morphol Embryol 58:21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vici P, Pizzuti L, Sperduti I, Frassoldati A, Natoli C, Gamucci T, Tomao S, Michelotti A, Moscetti L, Gori S, Baldini E, Giotta F, Cassano A, Santini D, Giannarelli D, Di Lauro L, Corsi DC, Marchetti P, Sini V, Sergi D, Barba M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Russillo M, Mentuccia L, D’Onofrio L, Iezzi L, Scinto AF, Da Ros L, Bertolini I, Basile ML, Rossi V, De Maria R, Montemurro F (2016) “Triple positive” early breast cancer: an observational multicenter retrospective analysis of outcome. Oncotarget 7:17932–17944. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. You SH, Chae BJ, Eom YH, Yoo TK, Kim YS, Kim JS, Park WC (2018) Clinical differences in triple-positive operable breast cancer subtypes in Korean patients: an analysis of Korean breast cancer registry data. J Breast Cancer 21:415–424. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Montemurro F, Di Cosimo S, Arpino G (2013) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol 24:2715–2724. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, Hayes DF, Lakhani SR, Chavez-MacGregor M, Perlmutter J, Perou CM, Regan MM, Rimm DL, Symmans WF, Torlakovic EE, Varella L, Viale G, Weisberg TF, McShane LM, Wolff AC (2020) Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update. J Clin Oncol 38:1346–1366. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y-C, Morrison G, Gillihan R, Guo J, Ward RM, Fu X, Botero MF, Healy NA, Hilsenbeck SG, Phillips GL, Chamness GC, Rimawi MF, Osborne CK, Schiff R (2011) Different mechanisms for resistance to trastuzumab versus lapatinib in HER2-positive breast cancers—role of estrogen receptor and HER2 reactivation. Breast Cancer Res 13:R121. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pizzuti L, Krasniqi E, Barchiesi G, Della Giulia M, Izzo F, Sanguineti G et al (2020) Distinct HR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical behavior of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and degree of benefit from novel anti-HER2 agents in the real world setting. Int J Cancer 146:1917–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schedin TB, Borges VF, Shagisultanova E (2018) Overcoming therapeutic resistance of triple positive breast cancer with CDK4/6 inhibition. Int J Breast Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7835095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiser MR, Montgomery LL, Tan LK, Susnik B, Leung DYH, Borgen PI, Cody HS (2001) Lymphovascular invasion enhances the prediction of non-sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 8:145–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0145-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamy A-S, Lam G-T, Laas E, Darrigues L, Balezeau T, Guerin J, Livartowski A, Sadacca B, Pierga J-Y, Vincent-Salomon A (2018) Lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly associated with poor prognosis in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 169:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnamurti U, Wetherilt CS, Yang J, Peng L, Li X (2017) Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are significantly associated with better overall survival and disease-free survival in triple-negative but not estrogen receptor–positive breast cancers. Hum Pathol 64:7–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Calster B, Vanden Bempt I, Drijkoningen M, Pochet N, Cheng J, Van Huffel S, Hendrickx W, Decock J, Huang H-J, Leunen K, Amant F, Berteloot P, Paridaens R, Wildiers H, Van Limbergen E, Weltens C, Timmerman D, Van Gorp T, Smeets A, Van den Bogaert W, Vergote I, Christiaens M-R, Neven P (2009) Axillary lymph node status of operable breast cancers by combined steroid receptor and HER-2 status: triple positive tumours are more likely lymph node positive. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9914-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alzahrani W, Althoubaity F, Alsobhi D, Mohamed Y, AlMutairi A, Sindi D, Alharbi R, Zaidi N (2019) Clinicopathological features and metastatic pattern of triple-positive breast cancer among female patients at a tertiary care hospital. Cureus 11:e6458. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6458

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gershon N, Berchenko Y, Hall PS, Goldstein DA (2019) Cost effectiveness and affordability of trastuzumab in sub-Saharan Africa for early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 17:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0174-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, Procter M, Goldhirsch A, de Azambuja E, Castro G Jr, Untch M, Smith I, Gianni L, Baselga J, Al-Sakaff N, Lauer S, McFadden E, Leyland-Jones B, Bell R, Dowsett M, Jackisch C (2017) 11 years’ follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet 389:1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32616-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier A-L, Loi S, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L et al (2019) 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 393:2599–2612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30650-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Joensuu H, Bono P, Kataja V, Alanko T, Kokko R, Asola R, Utriainen T, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Jyrkkiö S, Möykkynen K, Helle L, Ingalsuo S, Pajunen M, Huusko M, Salminen T, Auvinen P, Leinonen H, Leinonen M, Isola J, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L (2009) Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer trial. J Clin Oncol 27:5685–5692. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Purmonen TT, Pänkäläinen E, Turunen JHO, Asseburg C, Martikainen JA (2011) Short-course adjuvant trastuzumab therapy in early stage breast cancer in Finland: cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis based on the 5-year follow-up results of the FinHer trial. Acta Oncol (Madr) 50:344–352. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2011.553841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neyt M, Huybrechts M, Hulstaert F, Vrijens F, Ramaekers D (2008) Trastuzumab in early stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Belgium. Health Policy 87:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rimawi MF, Cecchini RS, Rastogi P, Geyer CE, Fehrenbacher L, Stella PJ, Dayao Z, Rabinovitch R, Dyar SH, Flynn PJ, Baez-Diaz L, Paik S, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Osborne CK, Wolmark N (2017) Abstract S3-06: a phase III trial evaluating pCR in patients with HR+, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP) +/− estrogen deprivation: NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52. Cancer Res. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS16-S3-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Llombart-Cussac A, Cortés J, Paré L, Galván P, Bermejo B, Martínez N, Vidal M, Pernas S, López R, Muñoz M, Nuciforo P, Morales S, Oliveira M, de la Peña L, Peláez A, Prat A (2017) HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): an open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30021-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, Bapsy PP, Vaid A, Wardley AM, Tjulandin S, Jahn M, Lehle M, Feyereislova A, Révil C, Jones A (2009) Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, Zardavas D, Benyunes M, Viale G, Suter T, Arahmani A, Rouchet N, Clark E, Knott A, Lang I, Levy C, Yardley DA, Bines J, Gelber RD, Piccart M, Baselga J, APHINITY Steering Committee, and Investigators (2017) Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 377(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zambelli A, Pappagallo G, Marchetti P (2020) Adding pertuzumab to adjuvant therapy for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer in APHINITY: a GRADE analysis. J Comp Eff Res 9(6):423–430. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Loibl S, Colleoni M, Regan MM, Piccart-Gebhart M, Senn HJ, Thürlimann B, André F, Baselga J, Bergh J, Bonnefoi H, Brucker SY, Cardoso F, Carey L, Ciruelos E, Cuzick J, Denkert C, Di Leo A, Ejlertsen B, Francis P, Galimberti V, Garber J, Gulluoglu B, Goodwin P, Harbeck N, Hayes DF, Huang CS, Huober J, Khaled H, Jassem J, Jiang Z, Karlsson P, Morrow M, Orecchia R, Osborne KC, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Pritchard K, Ro J, Rutgers EJT, Sedlmayer F, Semiglazov V, Shao Z, Smith I, Toi M, Tutt A, Viale G, Watanabe T, Whelan TJ, Xu B (2018) De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017. Ann Oncol 28(8):1700–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Denduluri N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Telli ML, Eisen A, Graff SL, Hassett MJ, Holloway JN, Hurria A, King TA, Lyman GH, Partridge AH, Somerfield MR, Trudeau ME, Wolff AC, Giordano S (2018) Selection of optimal adjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy for early breast cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol 36(23):2433–2443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Untch M, Wolmark N, Rastogi P, Schneeweiss A, Redondo A, Fischer HH, Jacot W, Conlin AK, Arce-Salinas C, Wapnir IL, Jackisch C, DiGiovanna MP, Fasching PA, Crown JP, Wülfing P, Shao Z, Rota Caremoli E, Wu H, Lam LH, Tesarowski D, Smitt M, Douthwaite H, Singel SM, Geyer CE Jr, KATHERINE Investigators (2019) Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380(7):617–628. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1814017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, Im YH, Lee ES, Yokota I, Kuroi K, Im SA, Park BW, Kim SB, Yanagita Y, Ohno S, Takao S, Aogi K, Iwata H, Jeong J, Kim A, Park KH, Sasano H, Ohashi Y, Toi M (2017) Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 376(22):2147–2159. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu J, Kong R, Tian S, Li H, Wu K, Kong L (2019) Can trastuzumab emtansine be replaced by additional chemotherapy plus targeted therapy for HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Chin J Cancer Res 31(6):878–891. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.06.04

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Alwan NAS, Mualla FH, Al Naqash M, Kathum S, Tawfiq FN, Nadhir S (2017) Clinical and pathological characteristics of triple positive breast cancer among Iraqi patients. Gulf J Oncol 1:51–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hikmat Abdel-Razeq.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee [King Hussein Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (IRB)] and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Because of the retrospective nature of the study and the lack of personal details of participants that compromise anonymity, consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Razeq, H., Edaily, S., Iweir, S. et al. Effect of level of hormone-receptor expression on treatment outcomes of “triple-positive” early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 185, 459–467 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05942-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05942-6

Keywords

Navigation