Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of port site scar on perception of patients with breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As the number of survivors continues to increase with improvements in breast cancer treatment, greater emphasis has been placed on the aesthetic outcome following breast surgery. Effort is made to minimize scarring on the breast, yet patients who require a port for treatment inevitably have a scar on the upper chest from the port itself. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer are conscious of their port scars, and if given a choice would prefer placement of the port in the arm rather than the chest.

Methods

Female breast cancer patients treated at our Breast Center who had a port placed from 2009 to 2015 were asked to complete a 20-question, anonymous survey via SurveyMonkey® reporting demographics and treatment information, and a validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ).

Results

Of 139 identified, 105 had email information available for contact, and 67 (64%) patients responded. Of the 67, 37 (55%) had undergone arm placement and 30 (45%), chest. Sixty (92%) patients report noticing their scars; 44 (69%) believed that their scar was noticeable to others; and 22 of the 44 (50%) made an effort to hide their scar. Thirty-seven patients were offered options for port site placement, and 24 (65%) chose placement in the arm (p = 0.057).

Conclusion

Most patients are conscious of their port scars and if offered the choice choose placement in the arm rather than the chest. Upper extremity port placement should be further explored as an alternative approach for patients with breast cancer to improve port scar consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Busch JD, Herrmann J, Heller F, Derlin T, Koops A, Adam G, Habermann CR (2012) Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days. Vasc Interv Radiol 199:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mori Y, Nagayama S, Kawamura J, Hasegawa S, Tanaka E, Okabe H, Takeuchi M, Sonobe M, Matsumoto S, Kanai M, Muto M, Chiba T, Sakai Y (2016) A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institution. Int J Clin Oncol 21(3):474–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiono M, Takahashi S, Kakudo Y, Takahashi M, Shimodaira H, Kato S, Ishioka C (2014) Upper arm central venous port implantation: a 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maggie DiNome.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voci, A., Lee, D., Ho, E. et al. Impact of port site scar on perception of patients with breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170, 569–572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4790-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4790-2

Keywords

Navigation