Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying long-term survivors among metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing primary tumor surgery

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The prognostic role of primary tumor surgery in women with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis is contentious. A subset of patients who will benefit from aggressive local treatment is needed to be identified. Using a nationwide database, we developed and validated a predictive model to identify long-term survivors among patients who had undergone primary tumor surgery.

Methods

A total of 150,043 patients were enrolled in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry between January 1990 and December 2014. Of these, 2332 (1.6%) presented with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we developed and validated a model that predicts survival in patients who undergo primary tumor surgery, based on the clinicopathological features of the primary tumor.

Results

A total of 2232 metastatic breast cancer patients were reviewed. Of these, 1541 (69.0%) patients had undergone primary tumor surgery. The 3-year survival rate was 62.6% in this subgroup. Among these patients, advanced T-stage, high-grade tumor, lymphovascular invasion, negative estrogen receptor status, high Ki-67 expression, and abnormal CA 15-3 and alkaline phosphatase levels were associated with poor survival. A prediction model was developed based on these factors, which successfully identified patients with remarkable survival (score 0–3, 3-year survival rate 87.3%). The clinical significance of the model was also validated with an independent dataset.

Conclusions

We have developed a predictive model to identify long-term survivors among women who undergo primary tumor surgery. This model will provide guidance to patients and physicians when considering surgery as a treatment modality for metastatic breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2016) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. http://www.nccn.org website. Accessed 31 Aug 2016

  2. Blanchard DK, Shetty PB, Hilsenbeck SG, Elledge RM (2008) Association of surgery with improved survival in stage IV breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 247(5):732–738. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656d32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD, Beers C, Zander C, Margenthaler JA (2007) Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988–2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol 14(8):2187–2194. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9438-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olson JA Jr, Marcom PK (2008) Benefit or bias? The role of surgery to remove the primary tumor in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Surg 247(5):739–740. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181706140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez-Fidalgo JA, Pimentel P, Caballero A et al (2011) Removal of primary tumor improves survival in metastatic breast cancer. Does timing of surgery influence outcomes? Breast 20(6):548–554. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2011.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rashaan ZM, Bastiaannet E, Portielje JE et al (2012) Surgery in metastatic breast cancer: patients with a favorable profile seem to have the most benefit from surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(1):52–56. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas A, Khan SA, Chrischilles EA, Schroeder MC (2016) Initial surgery and survival in stage IV breast cancer in the United States, 1988–2011. JAMA Surg 151(5):424–431. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Warschkow R, Guller U, Tarantino I et al (2016) Improved survival after primary tumor surgery in metastatic breast cancer: a propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER trend analysis. Ann Surg 263(6):1188–1198. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L et al (2006) Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 13(6):776–782. doi:10.1245/aso.2006.03.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bafford AC, Burstein HJ, Barkley CR et al (2009) Breast surgery in stage IV breast cancer: impact of staging and patient selection on overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115(1):7–12. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0101-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neuman HB, Morrogh M, Gonen M, Van Zee KJ, Morrow M, King TA (2010) Stage IV breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy: does surgery of the primary tumor matter? Cancer 116(5):1226–1233. doi:10.1002/cncr.24873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Danna EA, Sinha P, Gilbert M, Clements VK, Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2004) Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease. Cancer Res 64(6):2205–2211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norton L, Massague J (2006) Is cancer a disease of self-seeding? Nat Med 12(8):875–878. doi:10.1038/nm0806-875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Tjan-Heijnen VC et al (2012) Systemic therapy with or without up front surgery of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with distant metastases at initial presentation. BMC Surg 12:5. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-12-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N et al (2015) Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16(13):1380–1388. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00135-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shien T, Nakamura K, Shibata T et al (2012) A randomized controlled trial comparing primary tumour resection plus systemic therapy with systemic therapy alone in metastatic breast cancer (PRIM-BC): Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1017. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(10):970–973. doi:10.1093/jjco/hys120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soran A, Ozmen V, Ozbas S et al (2013) Abstract S2–03: early follow up of a randomized trial evaluating resection of the primary breast tumor in women presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer; Turkish study (protocol MF07-01). Cancer Res 73(24 Supplement):S2–03. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-s2-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittendorf EA (2010) Early surgery or standard palliative therapy in treating patients with stage IV breast cancer (ECOG 2108). NCT01242800

  19. Soran A, Ozbas S, Karanlik H et al (2016) A randomized controlled trial evaluating resection of the primary breast tumor in women presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer: Turkish Study (Protocol MF07-01). J Clin Oncol 34:suppl; abstr 1005

  20. Moon HG, Han W, Noh DY (2009) Underweight and breast cancer recurrence and death: a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. J Clin Oncol 27(35):5899–5905. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.4436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moon HG, Han W, Noh DY (2010) Comparable survival between pN0 breast cancer patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy and extensive axillary dissection: a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1692–1699. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.9226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. You JM, Kim YG, Moon HG et al (2015) Survival improvement in Korean Breast Cancer patients due to increases in early-stage cancers and hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative subtypes: a Nationwide Registry-Based Study. J Breast Cancer 18(1):8–15. doi:10.4048/jbc.2015.18.1.8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Min SY, Kim Z, Hur MH, Yoon CS, Park EH, Jung KW (2016) The basic facts of Korean Breast Cancer in 2013: results of a Nationwide Survey and Breast Cancer Registry Database. J Breast Cancer 19(1):1–7. doi:10.4048/jbc.2016.19.1.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Criscitiello C, Giuliano M, Curigliano G et al (2015) Surgery of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer: to do or not to do? Eur J Surg Oncol 41(10):1288–1292. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pathy NB, Verkooijen HM, Taib NA, Hartman M, Yip CH (2011) Impact of breast surgery on survival in women presenting with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Surg 98(11):1566–1572. doi:10.1002/bjs.7650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petrelli F, Barni S (2012) Surgery of primary tumors in stage IV breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of published studies with meta-regression. Med Oncol 29(5):3282–3290. doi:10.1007/s12032-012-0310-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris E, Barry M, Kell MR (2013) Meta-analysis to determine if surgical resection of the primary tumour in the setting of stage IV breast cancer impacts on survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20(9):2828–2834. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-2998-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Andre F, Slimane K, Bachelot T et al (2004) Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: trends in survival during a 14-year period. J Clin Oncol 22(16):3302–3308. doi:10.1200/jco.2004.08.095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I et al (2015) The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 16(1):25–35. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71159-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Swain SM, Kim SB, Cortes J et al (2013) Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 14(6):461–471. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70130-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Patrick J, Khan SA (2015) Surgical management of de novo stage IV breast cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13(4):487–493 (quiz 493)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. King TA, Lyman JP, Gonen M et al (2016) Prognostic impact of 21-gene recurrence score in patients with stage IV breast cancer: TBCRC 013. J Clin Oncol 34(20):2359–2365. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.1960

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korean Breast Cancer Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Joo Chae.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 102 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, TK., Chae, B.J., Kim, S.J. et al. Identifying long-term survivors among metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing primary tumor surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165, 109–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4309-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4309-2

Keywords

Navigation