Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast in the United States: incidence, demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Squamous cell carcinoma of breast accounts for less than 0.1% of all breast cancers. The purpose of this study is to describe the epidemiology and survival of this rare malignancy.

Methods

Data were extracted from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry to identify women diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of breast between 1998 and 2013. SEER*Stat 8.3.1 was used to calculate age-adjusted incidence, age-wise distribution, and annual percentage change in incidence. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine predictors of survival.

Results

A total of 445 cases of squamous cell carcinoma of breast were diagnosed during the study period. The median age of diagnosis was 67 years. The overall age-adjusted incidence between 1998 and 2013 was 0.62 per 1,000,000 per year, and the incidence has been on a decline. Approximately half of the tumors were poorly differentiated. Stage II was the most common stage at presentation. Majority of the cases were negative for expression of estrogen and progesterone receptor. One-third of the cases underwent breast conservation surgery while more than half of the cases underwent mastectomy (unilateral or bilateral). Approximately one-third of cases received radiation treatment. The 1-year and 5-year cause-specific survival was 81.6 and 63.5%, respectively. Excluding patient with metastasis or unknown stage at presentation, in multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, older age at diagnosis and higher tumor stage (T3 or T4) or nodal stage at presentation were significant predictors of poor survival.

Conclusions

Our study describes the unique characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma of breast and demonstrates that it is an aggressive tumor with a poor survival. Older age and higher tumor or nodal stages at presentation were independent predictors of poor survival for loco-regional stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Troell A (1908) Zwei Falle von Palttenepithelcarcinom. Nord Med Ark 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Toikkanen S (1981) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 48:1629–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen PP, Ernsberger D (1987) Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma. A variant of metaplastic mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 11:351–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wargotz ES, Norris HJ (1990) Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. IV. Squamous cell carcinoma of ductal origin. Cancer 65:272–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson JT, Graham DJ, Khiyami A et al (1996) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: a clinical approach. Ann Surg Oncol 3:367–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan YM, Yeo A, Chia KH et al (2002) Breast abscess as the initial presentation of squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:91–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wrightson WR, Edwards MJ, McMasters KM (1999) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast presenting as a breast abscess. Am Surg 65:1153–1155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zomerlei TA, Samarghandi A, Terando AM (2016) Primary squamous cell carcinoma arising from a breast implant capsule. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e586

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Behranwala KA, Nasiri N, Abdullah N et al (2003) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: clinico-pathologic implications and outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:386–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Macia M, Ces JA, Becerra E et al (1989) Pure squamous carcinoma of the breast. Report of a case diagnosed by aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 33:201–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen PR (2001) Chapter 17: Squamous cell carcinoma. In: Brogi E (ed) Rosen’s breast pathology, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher ER, Palekar AS, Gregorio RM et al (1983) Mucoepidermoid and squamous cell carcinomas of breast with reference to squamous metaplasia and giant cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 7:15–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grenier J, Soria JC, Mathieu MC et al (2007) Differential immunohistochemical and biological profile of squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Anticancer Res 27:547–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Badve S, Dabbs DJ, Schnitt SJ et al (2011) Basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers: a critical review with an emphasis on the implications for pathologists and oncologists. Mod Pathol 24:157–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessy BT, Krishnamurthy S, Giordano S et al (2005) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. J Clin Oncol 23:7827–7835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grabowski J, Saltzstein SL, Sadler G et al (2009) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: a review of 177 cases. Am Surg 75:914–917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Menes T, Schachter J, Morgenstern S et al (2003) Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the breast. Am J Clin Oncol 26:571–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moisidis E, Ahmed S, Carmalt H et al (2002) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. ANZ J Surg 72:65–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cardoso F, Leal C, Meira A et al (2000) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Breast 9:315–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program www.seer.cancer.gov. SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2015 Sub (1973–2013) <Katrina/Rita population adjustment> —Linked to county attributes—Total US, 1969–2014 counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, surveillance systems branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission

  21. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*StatDatabase: Incidence—SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2015 Sub (2000–2013) <Katrina/Rita population adjustment> —Linked to county attributes—Total US, 1969–2014 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission

  22. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute SEER*Stat software (seer.cancer.gov/seerstat) version 8.3.2

  23. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M (2016) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aparicio I, Martinez A, Hernandez G et al (2008) Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 137:222–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg J, Chia YL, Plevritis S (2005) The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the US SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S et al (2010) Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol 28:1684–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yanagawa M, Ikemot K, Kawauchi S et al (2012) Luminal A and luminal B (HER2 negative) subtypes of breast cancer consist of a mixture of tumors with different genotype. BMC Res Notes 5(1):376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW et al (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T et al (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 27:4082–4088

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bellavance EC, Kesmodel SB (2016) Decision-making in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: factors influencing women’s choices for mastectomy and breast conserving surgery. Front Oncol 6:74

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA et al (2001) Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. JAMA 285:885–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brandt J, Garne JP, Tengrup I et al (2015) Age at diagnosis in relation to survival following breast cancer: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 13(1):33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Adamo M, Dickie L, Ruhl J (2015) SEER program coding and staging manual 2015. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, p 20850-9765

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siddhartha Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, S., Yadav, D. & Zakalik, D. Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast in the United States: incidence, demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164, 201–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4251-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4251-3

Keywords

Navigation