Abstract
For low-volume tumours, high surgical hospital volume is associated with better survival. For high-volume tumours like breast cancer, this association is unclear. The aim of this study is to determine to what extent the yearly surgical hospital breast cancer volume is associated with overall survival. All patients, diagnosed with primary invasive non-metastatic breast cancer in the period 2001–2005, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were grouped by their annual volume of surgery for invasive breast cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were used including patient and tumour characteristics as covariates. Follow-up was completed until the 1st of February 2013. Primary endpoint was 10-year overall survival rate. In total, 58,982 patients with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer were diagnosed during the period 2001–2005. Hospitals were grouped by their (mean) annual surgical volume: <75 (n = 19), 75–99 (n = 30), 100–149 (n = 29), 150–199 (n = 9) and ≥200 (n = 14). The 10-year observed survival rates were 77, 81, 80, 82 and 82 %, respectively. After case-mix adjustment, patients in low-volume hospitals had a HR of 1.09 (<75 vs. ≥200; 95 % CI 1.03–1.15). Survival was significantly higher for lobular carcinoma and for diagnosis in the most recent year (2005). Being a male, having a higher age at diagnosis, a higher tumour grade, a larger tumour size, a higher number of positive lymph nodes, an earlier year of diagnosis and a lower SES resulted in a reduced survival and influenced death, all to a larger extent than surgical volume did. In the Netherlands, surgical hospital volume influences 10-year overall survival only marginally and far less than patient and tumour characteristics. No difference in survival was revealed for invasive non-metastatic breast cancer patients in hospitals with 75–99 operations per year compared with hospitals with over 200 operations per year.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wouters MW, Karim-Kos HE, le Cessie S et al (2009) Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1789–1798
Nienhuijs SW, Rutten HJ, Luiten EJ et al (2010) Reduction of in-hospital mortality following regionalisation of pancreatic surgery in the south-east of the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:652–656
Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW et al (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 98:485–494
Wouters MW, Gooiker GA, van Sandick JW et al (2012) The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 118:1754–1763
Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Post PN et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Are breast cancer patients better of with a high volume provider? Eur J SurgOncol. 2010; 36 Suppl 1: S27–35
Vrijens F, Stordeur S, Beirens K et al (2012) Effect of hospital volume on processes of care and 5-year survival after breast cancer: a population-based study on 25000 women. Breast 21:261–266
Sariego J (2010) The impact of facility volume/size on breast cancer treatment and outcome. Am Surg 76:1333–1337
www.eusoma.org/doc/EuromaBURequirements2010.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2014
http://www.oncoline.nl/nabonnota. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
http://werkgroepeniknl.nl/Landelijk/werkgroepen/nabon_openbaar/index.php?id=6580. Accessed 1 July 2014
Ho V, van der Hoeven K, de Raaf A et al (2013) Bijna elk ziekenhuis levert kankerzorg in (in Dutch). Medisch contact 01:34–37
www.cbs.nl. Accessed 1 Feb 2014
Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D et al (2003) Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 10:606–615
Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME et al (2006) Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg 49:251–258
Allgood PC, Bachmann MO (2006) Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer 94:36–42
Gilligan MA, Neuner J, Zhang X et al (2007) Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health 97:539–544
Chen CS, Liu TC, Lin HC, Lien YC (2008) Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:349–356
Tanke MA, Ikkersheim DE (2012) A new approach to the tradeoff between quality and accessibility of health care. Health Policy 105:282–287
Hébert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J et al (2005) Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer 104:1343–1348
Gutierrez JC, Hurley JD, Housri N et al (2008) Are many community hospitals undertreating breast cancer?: lessons from 24,834 patients. Ann Surg 248:154–162
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the registration teams of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Netherlands and Comprehensive Cancer Centre South for the collection of data for the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We thank Michael Schaapveld in his assistance with the statistics.
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The study was financed by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siesling, S., Tjan-Heijnen, V.C.G., de Roos, M. et al. Impact of hospital volume on breast cancer outcome: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147, 177–184 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3075-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3075-7