Abstract
What happens if you see a person pronouncing the word “go” after having gestured “stop”? Differently from iconic gestures, that must necessarily be accompanied by verbal language in order to be unambiguously understood, symbolic gestures are so conventionalized that they can be effortlessly understood in the absence of speech. Previous studies proposed that gesture and speech belong to a unique communication system. From an electrophysiological perspective the N400 modulation was considered the main variable indexing the interplay between two stimuli. However, while many studies tested this effect between iconic gestures and speech, little is known about the capability of an emblem to modulate the neural response to subsequently presented words. Using high-density EEG, the present study aimed at evaluating the presence of an N400 effect and its spatiotemporal dynamics, in terms of cortical activations, when emblems primed the observation of words. Participants were presented with symbolic gestures followed by a semantically congruent or incongruent verb. A N400 modulation was detected, showing larger negativity when gesture and words were incongruent. The source localization during N400 time window evidenced the activation of different portions of temporal cortex according to the gesture and word congruence. Our data provide further evidence of how the observation of an emblem influences verbal language perception, and of how this interplay is mainly instanced by different portions of the temporal cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andric M, Small SL (2012) Gesture’s neural language. Front Psychol 3:99. doi:10.3389/fpsyg201200099
Andric M, Solodkin A, Buccino G, Goldin-Meadow S, Rizzolatti G, Small SL (2013) Brain function overlaps when people observe emblems speech and grasping. Neuropsychologia 51:1619–1629. doi:10.1016/jneuropsychologia201303022
Arbib MA (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav Brain Sci 28:105–124 discussion 125–167
Arbib MA (2008) From grasp to language: embodied concepts and the challenge of abstraction. J Physiol Paris 102:4–20. doi:10.1016/jjphysparis200803001
Avanzini P, Fabbri-Destro M, Campi C, Pascarella A, Barchiesi G, Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G (2013) Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15878–15885. doi:10.1073/pnas1314420110
Baetens K, der Cruyssen LV, Achtziger A, Vandekerckhove M, Van Overwalle F (2011) N400 and LPP in spontaneous trait inferences. Brain Res 1418:83–92. doi:10.1016/jbrainres201108067
Barbieri F, Buonocore A, Dalla Volta R, Gentilucci M (2009) How symbolic gestures and words interact with each other. Brain Lang 110:1–11. doi:10.1016/jbandl200901002
Barrett SE, Rugg MD (1989) Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces. Neuropsychologia 27:913–922
Barrett SE, Rugg MD (1990) Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain Cogn 14:201–212
Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC (1985) Event-related potentials lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60:343–355
Berchio C, Rihs TA, Michel CM, Brunet D, Apicella F, Muratori F, Gallese V, Umiltà MA (2013) Parieto-frontal circuits during observation of hidden and visible motor acts in children a high-density EEG source imaging study. Brain Topogr 27:258–270. doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0314-x
Bernardis P, Gentilucci M (2006) Speech and gesture share the same communication system. Neuropsychologia 44:178–190. doi:10.1016/jneuropsychologia200505007
Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Cox RW, Rao SM, Prieto T (1997) Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 17:353–362
Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL (2009) Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb cortex (New York NY: 1991) 19:2767–2796. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055
Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Garrard P, Hodges JR (2000) Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia 38:1207–1215
Brandeis D, Lehmann D, Michel CM, Mingrone W (1995) Mapping event-related brain potential microstates to sentence endings. Brain Topogr 8:145–159
Britz J, Michel CM (2010) Errors can be related to pre-stimulus differences in ERP topography and their concomitant sources. NeuroImage 49:2774–2782. doi:10.1016/jneuroimage200910033
Britz J, Landis T, Michel CM (2009) Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cereb Cortex (New York NY: 1991) 19:55–65. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn056
Brouwer H, Hoeks JC (2013) A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Front Hum Neurosci 7:758. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758
Brown C, Hagoort P (1993) The processing nature of the n400: evidence from masked priming. J Cogn Neurosci 5:34–44. doi:10.1162/jocn19935134
Brunet D, Murray MM, Michel CM (2011) Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:813870. doi:10.1155/2011/813870
Burling R (1999) Motivation conventionalization and arbitrariness in the origin of language. In: King BJ (ed) The origins of language: what nonhuman primates can tell us. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp 307–350
Caldara R, Jermann F, Arango GL, Van der Linden M (2004) Is the N400 category-specific? A face and language processing study. NeuroReport 15:2589–2593
Campione GC, De Stefani E, Innocenti A, De Marco D, Gough PM, Buccino G, Gentilucci M (2014) Does comprehension of symbolic gestures and corresponding-in-meaning words make use of motor simulation? Behav Brain Res 259:297–301. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.025
Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 2:913–919. doi:10.1038/13217
Coccia M, Bartolini M, Luzzi S, Provinciali L, Ralph MAL (2004) Semantic memory is an amodal dynamic system: evidence from the interaction of naming and object use in semantic dementia. Cogn Neuropsychol 21:513–527. doi:10.1080/02643290342000113
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
De Stefani E, Innocenti A, Secchi C, Papa V, Gentilucci M (2013) Type of gesture, valence, and gaze modulate the influence of gestures on observer’s behaviors. Front Hum Neuroscience 7:542. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00542
Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21. doi:10.1016/jjneumeth200310009
Devlin JT, Russell RP, Davis MH, Price CJ, Wilson J, Moss HE, Tyler LK (2000) Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task. NeuroImage 11:589–600. doi:10.1006/nimg20000595
Duncan CC, Barry RJ, Connolly JF, Fischer C, Michie PT, Näätänen R, Van Petten C (2009) Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting recording and quantifying mismatch negativity P300 and N400. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1883–1908. doi:10.1016/jclinph200907045
Federmeier KD, Wlotko EW, De Ochoa-Dewald E, Kutas M (2007) Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Res 1146:75–84. doi:10.1016/jbrainres200606101
Ferri F, Busiello M, Campione GC, De Stefani E, Innocenti A, Romani GL, Costantini M, Gentilucci M (2014) The eye contact effect in request and emblematic hand gestures. Eur J Neurosci 39:841–851. doi:10.1111/ejn.12428
Friederici AD (2004) Event-related brain potential studies in language. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 4:466–470
Ganis G, Kutas M, Sereno MI (1996) The search for « common sense » : an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 8:89–106. doi:10.1162/jocn19968289
Gentilucci M, Corballis MC (2006) From manual gesture to speech: a gradual transition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:949–960. doi:10.1016/jneubiorev200602004
Gentilucci M, Bernardis P, Crisi G, Dalla Volta R (2006) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of Broca’s area affects verbal responses to gesture observation. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1059–1074. doi:10.1162/jocn20061871059
Geukes S, Huster RJ, Wollbrink A, Junghöfer M, Zwitserlood P, Dobel C (2013) A large N400 but no BOLD effect–comparing source activations of semantic priming in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. PLoS One 8:e84029. doi:10.1371/journalpone0084029
Gold BT, Balota DA, Jones SJ, Powell DK, Smith CD, Andersen AH (2006) Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. J Neurosci 26:6523–6532. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI0808-062006
Goldin-Meadow (1999) The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends Cogn Sci 3:419–429
Goldin-Meadow S (2003) Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Green A, Straube B, Weis S, Jansen A, Willmes K, Konrad K, Kircher T (2009) Neural integration of iconic and unrelated coverbal gestures: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 30:3309–3324. doi:10.1002/hbm20753
Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M (2011) Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology 48:1711–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273
Gunter TC, Bach P (2004) Communicating hands: eRPs elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures. Neurosci Lett 372:52–56. doi:10.1016/jneulet200409011
Guthrie D, Buchwald JS (1991) Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology 28:240–244
Hadar U, Wenkert-Olenik D, Krauss R, Soroker N (1998) Gesture and the processing of speech: neuropsychological evidence. Brain Lang 62:107–126. doi:10.1006/brln19971890
Hentschke H, Stüttgen MC (2011) Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets. Eur J Neurosci 34:1887–1894. doi:10.1111/j1460-9568201107902x
Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:393–402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113
Holle H, Gunter TC (2007) The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: eRP evidence. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1175–1192. doi:10.1162/jocn20071971175
Holle H, Gunter TC, Rüschemeyer S-A, Hennenlotter A, Iacoboni M (2008) Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures. NeuroImage 39:2010–2024. doi:10.1016/jneuroimage200710055
Holle H, Obleser J, Rueschemeyer S-A, Gunter TC (2010) Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. NeuroImage 49:875–884. doi:10.1016/jneuroimage200908058
Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM (2001) Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37:163–178
Kappenman ES, Luck SJ (2010) The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. Psychophysiology 47:888–904. doi:10.1111/j1469-8986201001009x
Kelly SD, Kravitz C, Hopkins M (2004) Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Brain Lang 89:253–260. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00335-3
Kendon A (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press
Khateb A, Pegna AJ, Landis T, Mouthon MS, Annoni J-M (2010) On the origin of the N400 effects: an ERP waveform and source localization analysis in three matching tasks. Brain Topogr 23:311–320. doi:10.1007/s10548-010-0149-7
Kim MS, Jang KM, Che H, Kim DW, Im CH (2012) Electrophysiological correlates of object-repetition effects: sLORETA imaging with 64-channel EEG and individual MRI. BMC Neurosci 13:124. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-124
Krauss RM, Hadar U (1999) The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In: Messing LS, Campbell R (eds) Gesture speech and sign. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–116
Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647. doi:10.1146/annurevpsych093008131123
Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1980) Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science (New York NY) 207:203–205
Lambon Ralph MA, Pobric G, Jefferies E (2009) Conceptual knowledge is underpinned by the temporal pole bilaterally: convergent evidence from rTMS. Cereb Cortex (New York NY: 1991) 19:832–838. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn131
Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D (2008) A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532
Lau E, Almeida D, Hines PC, Poeppel D (2009) A lexical basis for N400 context effects: evidence from MEG. Brain Lang 111:161–172. doi:10.1016/jbandl200908007
Laudanna A, Thornton AM, Brown G, Burani C, Marconi L (1995) Un corpus dell’italiano scritto contemporaneo dalla parte del ricevente. III giornate internazionali di analisi statistica dei dati testuali 1:103–109
Lehmann D (1987) Principles of spatial analysis. In: Gevins AS, Remond A (eds) Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology volume 1 Methods of analysis of brain electrical and magnetic signals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–354
Lehmann D, Skrandies W (1980) Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:609–621
Levelt WJM, Richardson G, La Heij W (1985) Pointing and voicing in deictic expressions. J Mem Lang 24:133–164
Lotze M, Heymans U, Birbaumer N, Veit R, Erb M, Flor H, Halsband U (2006) Differential cerebral activation during observation of expressive gestures and motor acts. Neuropsychologia 44:1787–1795
Lui F, Buccino G, Duzzi D, Benuzzi F, Crisi G, Baraldi P, Rizzolatti G (2008) Neural substrates for observing and imagining non-object-directed actions. Soc Neurosci 3:261–275. doi:10.1080/17470910701458551
Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164:177–190
McCarthy G, Nobre AC, Bentin S, Spencer DD (1995) Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I Intracranial distribution and neural generators. J Neurosci 15:1080–1089
McNeill D (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
McNeill D (2005) Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Michel CM, Seeck M, Landis T (1999) Spatiotemporal dynamics of human cognition. News Physiol Sci 14:206–214
Murray MM, Wylie GR, Higgins BA, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ (2002) The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping source analysis and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 22:5055–5073
Murray MM, Michel CM, Grave de Peralta R, Ortigue S, Brunet D, Gonzalez Andino S, Schnider A (2004) Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage 21:125–135
Murray MM, Brunet D, Michel CM (2008) Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topogr 20:249–264. doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5
Nakamura A, Maess B, Knösche TR, Gunter TC, Bach P, Friederici AD (2004) Cooperation of different neuronal systems during hand sign recognition. NeuroImage 23:25–34. doi:10.1016/jneuroimage200404034
Nobre AC, McCarthy G (1995) Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II Effects of word type and semantic priming. J Neurosci 15:1090–1098
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Ozyürek A, Willems RM, Kita S, Hagoort P (2007) On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: insights from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 19:605–616. doi:10.1162/jocn2007194605
Papeo L, Rumiati RI (2013) Lexical and gestural symbols in left-damaged patients. Cortex 49:1668–1678. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.003
Pobric G, Jefferies E, Ralph MAL (2007) Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20137–20141. doi:10.1073/pnas0707383104
Poggi I (2002) Symbolic gestures: the case of the Italian gestionary. Gesture 2:71–98
Proverbio AM, Mariani S, Zani A, Adorni R (2009) How are « Barack Obama » and « President Elect » differentially stored in the brain? An ERP investigation on the processing of proper and common noun pairs. PLoS One 4:e7126. doi:10.1371/journalpone0007126
Ren G-Q, Liu Y, Han Y-C (2009) Phonological activation in chinese reading: an event-related potential study using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Neuroscience 164:1623–1631. doi:10.1016/jneuroscience200909029
Rihs TA, Tomescu MI, Britz J, Rochas V, Custo A, Schneider M, Debbané M, Eliez S, Michel CM (2013) Altered auditory processing in frontal and left temporal cortex in 22q112 deletion syndrome: a group at high genetic risk for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 212:141–149. doi:10.1016/jpscychresns201209002
Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci 21:188–194
Rogers TT, Lambon Ralph MA, Garrard P, Bozeat S, McClelland JL, Hodges JR, Patterson K (2004) Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol Rev 111:205–235. doi:10.1037/0033-295X1111205
Rugg MD, Nagy ME (1987) Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: evidence from event-related potentials. Mem Cogn 15:473–481
Simos PG, Basile LF, Papanicolaou AC (1997) Source localization of the N400 response in a sentence-reading paradigm using evoked magnetic fields and magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 762:29–39
Skipper JI, Goldin-Meadow S, Nusbaum HC, Small SL (2009) Gestures orchestrate brain networks for language understanding. Curr Biol 19:661–667. doi:10.1016/jcub200902051
Straube B, Green A, Bromberger B, Kircher T (2011) The differentiation of iconic and metaphoric gestures: common and unique integration processes. Hum Brain Mapp 32:520–533. doi:10.1002/hbm21041
Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28:675–691. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129 discussion 691–735
Van Petten C, Luka BJ (2006) Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain Lang 97:279–293. doi:10.1016/jbandl200511003
Villarreal M, Fridman EA, Amengual A, Falasco G, Gerschcovich ER, Gerscovich ER, Leiguarda RC (2008) The neural substrate of gesture recognition Neuropsychologia 46:2371–2382. doi:10.1016/jneuropsychologia200803004
Visser M, Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA (2010) Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature. J Cogn Neurosci 22:1083–1094. doi:10.1162/jocn200921309
Warrington EK (1975) The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q J Exp Psychol 27:635–657. doi:10.1080/14640747508400525
Willems RM, Ozyürek A, Hagoort P (2007) When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. Cereb Cortex 17:2322–2333. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl141
Willems RM, Ozyürek A, Hagoort P (2009) Differential roles for left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in multimodal integration of action and language. NeuroImage 47:1992–2004. doi:10.1016/jneuroimage200905066
Wu YC, Coulson S (2005) Meaningful gestures: electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology 42:654–667. doi:10.1111/j1469-8986200500356x
Wu YC, Coulson S (2007a) How iconic gestures enhance communication: an ERP study. Brain Lang 101:234–245. doi:10.1016/jbandl200612003
Wu YC, Coulson S (2007b) Iconic gestures prime related concepts: an ERP study. Psychon Bull Rev 14:57–63
Xu J, Gannon PJ, Emmorey K, Smith JF, Braun AR (2009) Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20664–20669. doi:10.1073/pnas0909197106
Yang CL, Perfetti CA, Liu Y (2010) Sentence integration processes: an ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses. Brain Lang 112:85–100. doi:10.1016/jbandl200910005
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Riccardo Dalla Volta for the comments on the manuscript. The work was supported by MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca) Grant to M.G. P.A. and C.C. were supported by the ERC Project n. 250013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Online Resource 1: The zip-file contains all the 20 videos used as stimuli. Each single videoclip is named with the corresponding gesture name listed in Table 1.
Supplementary material 1 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 9 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 10 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 11 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 12 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 13 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 14 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 15 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 16 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 17 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 18 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 19 (AVI 7558 kb)
Supplementary material 20 (AVI 7558 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fabbri-Destro, M., Avanzini, P., De Stefani, E. et al. Interaction Between Words and Symbolic Gestures as Revealed By N400. Brain Topogr 28, 591–605 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0392-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0392-4