Abstract
It has long been known that under the right circumstances, inertial particles (such as sand, dust, pollen, or water droplets) settling through the atmospheric boundary layer can experience a net enhancement in their average settling velocity due to their inertia. Since this enhancement arises due to their interactions with the surrounding turbulence it must be modelled at coarse scales. Models for the enhanced settling velocity (or deposition) of the dispersed phase that find practical use in mesoscale weather models are often ad hoc or are built on phenomenological closure assumptions, meaning that the general deposition rate of particles is a key uncertainty in these models. Instead of taking a phenomenological approach, exact phase-space methods can be used to model the physical mechanisms responsible for the enhanced settling, and these individual mechanisms can be estimated or modelled to build a more general parameterization of the enhanced settling of inertial particles. In this work, we use direct numerical simulations (DNS) and phase-space methods as tools to evaluate the efficacy of phenomenological modeling approaches for the enhanced settling velocity of inertial particles for particles with varying friction Stokes numbers and settling velocity parameters. We use the DNS data to estimate profiles of a drift–diffusion based parameterization of the fluid velocity sampled by the particles, which is key for determining the settling velocity behaviour of particles with low to moderate Stokes number. We find that by increasing the settling velocity parameter at moderate friction Stokes number, the magnitude of preferential sweeping is modified, and this behaviour is explained by the drift component of the aforementioned parameterization. These profiles indicate that that when eddy-diffusivity-like closures are used to represent turbulent transport, empirical corrections used in phenomenological models may be potentially compensating for their incompleteness. Finally, we discuss opportunities for reinterpreting phenomenological approaches for use in coarse-scale weather models in terms of the exact phase-space approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliseda A, Cartellier A, Hainaux F, Lasheras JC (2002) Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 468:77–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002001593
Berk T, Coletti F (2020) Transport of inertial particles in high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 903:A18. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.597
Berk T, Coletti F (2021) Dynamics of small heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence: a Lagrangian experimental study. J Fluid Mech 917:A47. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.280
Boudreau BP, Hill PS (2020) Rouse revisited: the bottom boundary condition for suspended sediment profiles. Mar Geol 419(106):066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.106066
Bragg A, Swailes DC, Skartlien R (2012) Drift-free kinetic equations for turbulent dispersion. Phys Rev E 86(5):056306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.056306
Bragg A, Swailes DC, Skartlien R (2012) Particle transport in a turbulent boundary layer: non-local closures for particle dispersion tensors accounting for particle-wall interactions. Phys Fluids 24(10):103304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757657
Bragg AD, Richter DH, Wang G (2021) Mechanisms governing the settling velocities and spatial distributions of inertial particles in wall-bounded turbulence. Phys Rev Fluids 6(6):064302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.064302
Bragg AD, Richter DH, Wang G (2021) Settling strongly modifies particle concentrations in wall-bounded turbulent flows even when the settling parameter is asymptotically small. Phys Rev Fluids 6(12):124301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.124301
Brandt L, Coletti F (2022) Particle-laden turbulence: progress and perspectives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 54(1):159–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-021103
Csanady GT (1963) Turbulent diffusion of heavy particles in the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 20(3):201–208. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0201:TDOHPI>2.0.CO;2
Emerson EW, Hodshire AL, DeBolt HM, Bilsback KR, Pierce JR, McMeeking GR, Farmer DK (2020) Revisiting particle dry deposition and its role in radiative effect estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(42):26076–26082. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2014761117
Farmer DK, Boedicker EK, DeBolt HM (2021) Dry deposition of atmospheric aerosols: approaches, observations, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Phys Chem 72(1):375–397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-034936
Fischer HB (1973) Longitudinal dispersion and turbulent mixing in open-channel flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 5(1):59–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.05.010173.000423
Freire LS, Chamecki M, Gillies JA (2016) Flux-profile relationship for dust concentration in the stratified atmospheric surface layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol 160(2):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0140-2
Gao W, Samtaney R, Richter DH (2023) Direct numerical simulation of particle-laden flow in an open channel at. J Fluid Mech 957:A3. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.26
Giardina M, Buffa P (2018) A new approach for modeling dry deposition velocity of particles. Atmos Environ 180:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.038
Giardina M, Donateo A, Buffa P, Contini D, Cervone A, Lombardo C, Rocchi F (2019) Atmospheric dry deposition processes of particles on urban and suburban surfaces: modelling and validation works. Atmos Environ 214(116):857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116857
Giorgi F (1986) A particle dry-deposition parameterization scheme for use in tracer transport models. J Geophys Res 91(D9):9794. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD09p09794
Good G, Ireland P, Bewley G, Bodenschatz E, Collins L, Warhaft Z (2014) Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 759:R3. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.602
Holtslag AAM, Moeng CH (1991) Eddy diffusivity and countergradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 48(14):1690–1698. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1690:EDACTI>2.0.CO;2
Hoppel WA (2002) Surface source function for sea-salt aerosol and aerosol dry deposition to the ocean surface. J Geophys Res 107(D19):4382. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002014
Hoppel WA (2005) Particle deposition on water: surface source versus upwind source. J Geophys Res 110(D10):D10206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005148
Ireland PJ, Bragg AD, Collins LR (2016) The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Simulations with gravitational effects. J Fluid Mech 796:659–711. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.227
Jenkins GS, McCauley K, Thompson T, Diokhane A (2022) WRF-CHEM simulations of unhealthy PM10 concentrations during Four Dust Events in Senegal. J Geophys Res Atmos 127:e2022JD037068
Kantha LH, Clayson CA (2000) Small scale processes in geophysical fluid flows. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Kind R (1992) One-dimensional aeolian suspension above beds of loose particles-A new concentration-profile equation. Atmos Environ A Gen Top 26(5):927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90250-O
Kok JF, Parteli EJR, Michaels TI, Karam DB (2012) The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Reports Prog Phys 75(10):106901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901
Kok JF, Ridley DA, Zhou Q, Miller RL, Zhao C, Heald CL, Ward DS, Albani S, Haustein K (2017) Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance. Nat Geosci 10(4):274–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2912
Kukkonen J, Olsson T, Schultz DM, Baklanov A, Klein T, Miranda AI, Monteiro A, Hirtl M, Tarvainen V, Boy M, Peuch VH, Poupkou A, Kioutsioukis I, Finardi S, Sofiev M, Sokhi R, Lehtinen KEJ, Karatzas K, San José R, Astitha M, Kallos G, Schaap M, Reimer E, Jakobs H, Eben K (2012) A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe. Atmos Chem Phys 12(1):1–87. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1-2012
Kunkel GJ, Marusic I (2006) Study of the near-wall-turbulent region of the high-Reynolds-number boundary layer using an atmospheric flow. J Fluid Mech 548(1):375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005007780
Li C, Lim K, Berk T, Abraham A, Heisel M, Guala M, Coletti F, Hong J (2021) Settling and clustering of snow particles in atmospheric turbulence. J Fluid Mech 912:A49. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1153
Marchioli C, Soldati A, Kuerten J, Arcen B, Tanière A, Goldensoph G, Squires K, Cargnelutti M, Portela L (2008) Statistics of particle dispersion in direct numerical simulations of wall-bounded turbulence: Results of an international collaborative benchmark test. Int J Multiph Flow 34(9):879–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.01.009
Marusic I, Uddin AKM, Perry AE (1997) Similarity law for the streamwise turbulence intensity in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids 9(12):3718–3726. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869509
Maxey MR (1987) The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J Fluid Mech 174:441–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087000193
Miller RL, Cakmur RV, Perlwitz J, Geogdzhayev IV, Ginoux P, Koch D, Kohfeld KE, Prigent C, Ruedy R, Schmidt GA, Tegen I (2006) Mineral dust aerosols in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences ModelE atmospheric general circulation model. J Geophys Res 111(D6):D06208. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005796
Nemes A, Dasari T, Hong J, Guala M, Coletti F (2017) Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle-turbulence dynamics. J Fluid Mech 814:592–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.13
Nissanka ID, Park HJ, Freire LS, Chamecki M, Reid JS, Richter DH (2018) Parameterized vertical concentration profiles for aerosols in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(17):9688–9702. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028820
Oesterlé B, Zaichik LI (2004) On Lagrangian time scales and particle dispersion modeling in equilibrium turbulent shear flows. Phys Fluids 16(9):3374–3384. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1773844
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Prandtl L (1952) Essentials of fluid dynamics: with applications to hydraulics aeronautics, meteorology, and other subjects. Hafner Publishing Company, New York
Pullin DI, Saffman PG (1998) VORTEX DYNAMICS IN TURBULENCE. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):31–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.31
Querol X, Tobías A, Pérez N, Karanasiou A, Amato F, Stafoggia M, Pérez García-Pando C, Ginoux P, Forastiere F, Gumy S, Mudu P, Alastuey A (2019) Monitoring the impact of desert dust outbreaks for air quality for health studies. Environ Int 130(104):867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.061
Reeks MW (1991) On a kinetic equation for the transport of particles in turbulent flows. Phys Fluids A 3(3):446–456. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858101
Reeks MW (1992) On the continuum equations for dispersed particles in nonuniform flows. Phys Fluids A 4(6):1290–1303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858247
Reeks MW (2021) The Development and Application of a Kinetic Theory for Modeling Dispersed Particle Flows. J Fluids Eng 143(8):080803. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051289
Richter D, Chamecki M (2018) Inertial effects on the vertical transport of suspended particles in a turbulent boundary layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol 167(2):235–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0325-3
Rosa B, Parishani H, Ayala O, Wang LP (2016) Settling velocity of small inertial particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence from high-resolution DNS. Int J Multiph Flow 83:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.04.005
Rouse H (1937) Modern conceptions of the mechanics of fluid turbulence. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 102(1):463–505
Ryder CL, Marenco F, Brooke JK, Estelles V, Cotton R, Formenti P, McQuaid JB, Price HC, Liu D, Ausset P, Rosenberg PD, Taylor JW, Choularton T, Bower K, Coe H, Gallagher M, Crosier J, Lloyd G, Highwood EJ, Murray BJ (2018) Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic. Atmos Chem Phys 18(23):17225–17257. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018
Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Shao Y (2008) Dust transport and deposition. Physics and modelling of wind erosion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 247–301
Sikovsky DP (2019) Particle Reynolds stress model for wall turbulence with inertial particle clustering. J Phys Confer Ser 1382(1):012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1382/1/012099
Skartlien R (2007) Kinetic modeling of particles in stratified flow—evaluation of dispersion tensors in inhomogeneous turbulence. Int J Multiph Flow 33(9):1006–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2007.04.001
Slinn S, Slinn W (1980) Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters. Atmos Environ 1967 14(9):1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(80)90032-3
Slinn W (1967) Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies. Atmos Environ 16(7):1785–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90271-2
Smits AJ, McKeon BJ, Marusic I (2011) High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43(1):353–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160753
Tom J, Bragg AD (2019) Multiscale preferential sweeping of particles settling in turbulence. J Fluid Mech 871:244–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.337
Vickers D, Mahrt L, Andreas EL (2015) Formulation of the sea surface friction velocity in terms of the mean wind and bulk stability. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 54(3):691–703. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0099.1
Wang G, Fong KO, Coletti F, Capecelatro J, Richter DH (2019) Inertial particle velocity and distribution in vertical turbulent channel flow: a numerical and experimental comparison. Int J Multiph Flow 120(103):105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103105
Wang LP, Maxey MR (1993) Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 256:27–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093002708
Wang LP, Stock DE (1993) Dispersion of heavy particles by turbulent motion. J Atmos Sci 50(13):1897–1913. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1897:DOHPBT>2.0.CO;2
Wyngaard JC, Brost RA (1984) Top-down and bottom-up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41(1):102–112. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<0102:TDABUD>2.0.CO;2
Zhang L (2001) A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos Environ 35(3):549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5
Zhang Y, Bragg AD, Wang G (2023) Asymptotic closure model for inertial particle transport in turbulent boundary layers. Physical Review Fluids 8(1):014301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.014301
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Grant No. W911NF2220222 from the U.S. Army Research Office. The authors would also like to thank the Center for Research Computing at the University of Notre Dame, as well Tim Berk, and the two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions led to substantial improvements to the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Grace, A.P., Richter, D.H. & Bragg, A.D. A Reinterpretation of Phenomenological Modeling Approaches for Lagrangian Particles Settling in a Turbulent Boundary Layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 190, 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00858-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00858-w