Skip to main content
Log in

A Semi-analytical Model for Short-Range Near-Ground Continuous Dispersion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a semi-analytical model for the dispersion of passive scalars from continuous ground sources up to distances of a few hundred metres. We attempt to cope with problems typical of analytical models, such as the correct representation of the near-ground concentration and lateral dispersion, while avoiding the use of any empirical parameters. A previous analysis of Prairie Grass Project (PGP) data has shown that the near-ground, cross-wind integrated concentration decreases as some power of the distance from the source that is, itself, distance dependent. As the conventional power-law model is incapable of reproducing this behaviour, we propose a model in which the vertical diffusivity depends on both the height as a power law, and on the distance from the source. For this equation, we construct an infinite-series formal solution, with the first term used as an approximation. A set of equations based on this approximation and on Monin–Obukhov similarity theory is proposed for the the vertical diffusivity, from which the cross-wind integrated concentration is derived analytically. We further construct a simple empirical model for the distance-dependent vertical diffusivity. For the plume lateral width, a Langevin stochastic model depending on the plume height is proposed, whose formal analytical solution is used to derive a set of equations for the cloud width, which are easily solved numerically, with the results validated against PGP data. We apply four statistical measures to evaluate the performance of the model, including the computation of the 95% confidence intervals, for which we find very good agreement. Implementation of this model is extremely simple and computationally efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sometimes called orthogonal least squares, Euclidean regression or least-squares fitting—perpendicular offset, etc.

  2. After J.S. Irwin passed away in 2017, the contents of the site were transferred to www.harmo.org/jsirwin.

References

  • Alves I, Degrazia G, Buske D, Vilhena M, Moraes O, Acevedo O (2012) Derivation of an eddy diffusivity coefficient depending on source distance for a shear dominated planetary boundary layer. Physica A 391(24):6577–6586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya S (1999) Air pollution meteorology and dispersion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad M (1958) Project Prairie Grass. A field program in diffusion. Geophysical Research Paper, No. 59, vols I and II, AFCRC-TR-58-235. Airforce Cambridge Research Center, Bedford, USA

  • Britter R, Hanna S, Briggs G, Robins A (2003) Short-range vertical dispersion from a ground level source in a turbulent boundary layer. Atmos Environ 37(27):3885–3894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse AD, Zimmerman JR et al (1973) User’s guide for the climatological dispersion model. In: User’s guide for the climatological dispersion model, EPA

  • Carrascal M, Puigcerver M, Puig P (1993) Sensitivity of Gaussian plume model to dispersion specifications. Theor Appl Climatol 48(2–3):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD, Brode RW (2005) Aermod: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part i: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol 44(5):682–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis P (1983) Markov chain simulations of vertical dispersion from elevated sources into the neutral planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 26(4):355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff J, Willis G (1975) A parameterization of diffusion into the mixed layer. J Appl Meteorol 14(8):1451–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degrazia G, Anfossi D, De Campos Velho HF, Ferrero E (1998) A Lagrangian decorrelation time scale in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 86(3):525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degrazia GA, Moreira DM, Vilhena MT (2001) Derivation of an eddy diffusivity depending on source distance for vertically inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer. J Appl Meteorol 40(7):1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckman RM (1994) Re-examination of empirically derived formulas for horizontal diffusion from surface sources. Atmos Environ 28(2):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford F (1961) Use of routine meteorological observation for estimate atmospheric diffusion. Nucl Saf 24:67

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder D (1972) Relations among stability parameters in the surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 3(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart AG, Moreira DM, Carvalho JC, Tirabassi T (2004) Derivation of eddy diffusivities from an unsteady turbulence spectrum. Atmos Environ 38(36):6121–6124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. In: Boundary-Layer Meteorology 25th Anniversary Volume, 1970–1995. Springer, pp 215–246

  • Horst T, Doran J, Nickola P (1979) Evaluation of empirical atmospheric diffusion data. Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs, Richland, WA (USA), Technical report

  • Huang C (1979) A theory of dispersion in turbulent shear flow. Atmos Environ 13(4):453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J (1979) A theoretical variation of the wind profile power-law exponent as a function of surface roughness and stability. Atmos Environ 13(1):191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian-Ortiz J, Pogliani L, Besalu E (2010) Two-variable linear regression: modeling with orthogonal least-squares analysis. J Chem Educ 87(9):994–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kader B, Yaglom A (1990) Mean fields and fluctuation moments in unstably stratified turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 212:637–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Sharan M (2010) An analytical model for dispersion of pollutants from a continuous source in the atmospheric boundary layer. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci R Soc 466:383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng L, Zhang T, Kleinman L, Zhu W (2007) Ordinary least square regression, orthogonal regression, geometric mean regression and their applications in aerosol science. J Phys Conf Ser IOP Publishing vol 78, p 012084

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley AJ (1982) A random walk simulation of two-dimensional turbulent diffusion in the neutral surface layer. Atmos Environ (1967) 16(12):2799–2808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C, Wilson J (1993) Disagreements between gradient-diffusion and Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models, even for sources near the ground. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 64(3):291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira DM, Vilhena MT, Tirabassi T, Costa C, Bodmann B (2006) Simulation of pollutant dispersion in the atmosphere by the Laplace transform: the ADMM approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 177(1):411–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira DM, Moraes AC, Goulart AG, de Almeida Albuquerque TT (2014) A contribution to solve the atmospheric diffusion equation with eddy diffusivity depending on source distance. Atmos Environ 83:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwstadt F (1980) Application of mixed-layer similarity to the observed dispersion from a ground-level source. J Appl Meteorol 19(2):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwstadt F, Van Ulden A (1978) A numerical study on the vertical dispersion of passive contaminants from a continuous source in the atmospheric surface layer. Atmos Environ (1967) 12(11):2119–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YS, Baik JJ (2008) Analytical solution of the advection–diffusion equation for a ground-level finite area source. Atmos Environ 42(40):9063–9069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquill F (1974) Atmospheric diffusion: the dispersion of wind borne material from industrial and other sources. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquill F, Smith F (1983) Atmospheric diffusion. Ellis Horwood Limited, Halsted Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope S (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risken H (1996) The Fokker–Planck equation: methods of solution and applications, vol 18. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawford B (2001) Project prairie grass—a classic atmospheric dispersion experiment revisited. In: 14th Australian fluid mechanics conference

  • Sawford B, Yeung P (2001) Lagrangian statistics in uniform shear flow: direct numerical simulation and Lagrangian stochastic models. Phys Fluids 13(9):2627–2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan M, Yadav AK, Modani M (2002) Simulation of short-range diffusion experiment in low-wind convective conditions. Atmos Environ 36(11):1901–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder MG, Venkatram A, Heist DK, Perry SG, Petersen WB, Isakov V (2013) Rline: a line source dispersion model for near-surface releases. Atmos Environ 77:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein YJ (1983) Two dimensional Euclidean regression. In: Conference on computer mapping, Herzelia, Israel

  • Sutton O (1953) Micrometeorology. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton W (1943) On the equation of diffusion in a turbulent medium. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 182(988):48–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor J, Gur Y (1969) Analytical expressions for the vertical and lateral dispersion coefficients in atmospheric diffusion. Atmos Environ (1967) 3(6):688–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ulden A (1978) Simple estimates for vertical diffusion from sources near the ground. Atmos Environ (1967) 12(11):2125–2129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatram A, Du S (1997) An analysis of the asymptotic behavior of cross-wind-integrated ground-level concentrations using Lagrangian stochastic simulation. Atmos Environ 31(10):1467–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatram A, Snyder MG, Heist DK, Perry SG, Petersen WB, Isakov V (2013) Re-formulation of plume spread for near-surface dispersion. Atmos Environ 77:846–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein EW (2002) Least squares fitting. Wolfram Research Inc, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (1982) An approximate analytical solution to the diffusion equation for short-range dispersion from a continuous ground-level source. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 23(1):85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Thurtell G, Kidd G (1981) Numerical simulation of particle trajectories in inhomogeneous turbulence, iii: comparison of predictions with experimental data for the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 21(4):443–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD (2015) Dispersion from an area source in the unstable surface layer: an approximate analytical solution. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141(693):3285–3296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard JC (2010) Turbulence in the atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh G, Huang C (1975) Three-dimensional air pollutant modeling in the lower atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 9:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh GT (1975) Green’s functions of a diffusion equation. Geophys Res Lett 2(7):293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilitinkevich SS (2002) Third-order transport due to internal waves and non-local turbulence in the stably stratified surface layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 128(581):913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. A. Lacser for his careful reading of the manuscript and the valuable comments. We would also like to thank Dr. J. Wilson for providing us experimental data, which was very helpful in the course of developing the model, and for his fruitful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehud Gavze.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 244 KB)

Appendices

Appendices

Content of the Electronic Supplementary Material

The Electronic Supplementary Material file contains detailed derivations of some of the results presented in the paper. Sect. S1 contains the derivation of the approximate solution to the advection-diffusion equation with power-law profiles of the horizontal velocity and the turbulent vertical diffusion coefficient in which the vertical diffusivity depends on the distance from the source. Section S2 examines the range of validity of this approximation. Section S3 specifies the boundary layer parametrization we use. Section S4 presents the confidence intervals for the statistical measures used to evaluate the performance of the different models computing the CWI concentration, Sects. 7 and 8, and the cloud lateral width Sect. 11. Section S5 contains a detailed derivation of the equation for the cloud lateral width used in Sect. 10.

PGP Meteorological Data

Following are the meteorological data prevailed in PGP runs considered above (Table 6).

Table 6 Meteorological parameters in the PGP dataset

\(u_*\) and L for the stable conditions were taken from Wilson (1982) and for the unstable conditions from Wilson et al. (1981) except for runs 10, 27, 31, 47, 48, 51, 52 taken from Horst et al. (1979). The PGP meteorological data are 10-min and 20-min averages according to Barad (1958). For the sake of comparison we present power law and stability parameters derived for three characteristic stability conditions. Assume the wind speed at 10 m, \(U_{10}\) and the roughness length \(z_0\) are given, L is derived from Golder (1972) and Irwin (1979). \(u_*\), a and m are derived from:

$$\begin{aligned} u_*=&\,\kappa U\Big /\Big [\ln {\big (\frac{z}{z_0}\big )}-\varPsi _m\big (\frac{z}{L}\big )\Big ] \end{aligned}$$
(50a)
$$\begin{aligned} m=&\, u_* \varPhi _m/\kappa U \end{aligned}$$
(50b)
$$\begin{aligned} ~a=&\,U/z^m \end{aligned}$$
(50c)

with \(\varPhi _m\) given in Eq. 8 and \(\varPsi _m\) in Eq. 9. Table 7 shows the derived parameters with \(z_0=0.03\, \mathrm{m}\).

Table 7 MOST, power law and stability parameters for three classes; \(z_0=0.03\, \mathrm{m}\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavze, E., Fattal, E. A Semi-analytical Model for Short-Range Near-Ground Continuous Dispersion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 169, 297–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0363-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0363-5

Keywords

Navigation