Abstract
Understanding the effects of agricultural practices on farmland biodiversity requires a landscape perspective, as local-scale processes can be influenced by the structure of the surrounding landscape. We assess whether amount of natural vegetation in the landscape interacts with two local-scale variables, in-crop vegetation cover and farming approach (organic vs. integrated), to influence vineyard arthropods within the Cape Floristic Region. Responses were assessed for overall arthropods and three sub-categories based on arthropod species affinity to vineyards, natural vegetation (fynbos), or both systems. There were no significant interactions between local and landscape variables that affected the species richness of arthropods. However, there was a main effect of increased in-crop herbaceous vegetation that increased the species richness of overall arthropods and ubiquitous arthropods. Furthermore, interactions between the amount of natural vegetation and local-scale processes influenced composition of arthropod assemblages. Assemblages among integrated vineyards were similar in composition irrespective of landscape context, whereas they were dissimilar among organic vineyards in landscapes with different levels of natural vegetation. Our results suggest a relatively lower homogenising effect of organic farming than non-organic farming on landscape-scale biodiversity and that maintaining non-crop vegetation in vineyards benefits arthropod diversity. These findings emphasise the importance of considering the interplay between local management and the surrounding landscape in promoting biodiversity in a farming and conservation mosaic. This is especially important where landscapes vary greatly in complexity, as in many agricultural regions worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Baldissera R, Ganade G, Benedet Fontoura S (2004) Web spider community response along an edge between pasture and Araucaria forest. Biol Conserv 118:403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.017
Bartoń K (2022) Multi-model inference. R package version 1.46.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389
Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B 273:1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3530
Biswal A, Jeyaram A, Mukherjee S, Kumar U (2013) Ecological significance of core, buffer and transition boundaries in biosphere reserve: a remote sensing study in Similipal, Odisha, India. Comput Ecol Softw 3:126–137. https://doi.org/10.0000/issn-2220-721x-compuecol-2013-v3-0014
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Buchholz J, Querner P, Paredes D, Bauer T, Strauss P, Guernion M, Scimia J, Cluzeau D, Burel F, Kratschmer S et al (2017) Soil biota in vineyards are more influenced by plants and soil quality than by tillage intensity or the surrounding landscape. Science 7:17445. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17601-w
Chaplin-Kramer R, O’Rourke ME, Blitzer EJ, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14:922–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01642.x
Cox RL, Underwood EC (2011) The importance of conserving biodiversity outside of protected areas in Mediterranean ecosystems. PLoS ONE 6:e14508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014508
Cunningham SA, Schellhorn NA, Marcora A, Batley M (2013) Movement and phenology of bees in a subtropical Australian agricultural landscape. Austral Ecol 38:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02432.x
De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1
Dray S, Dufour AB (2007) The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v022.i04
Gaigher R, Samways MJ (2014) Landscape mosaic attributes for maintaining ground-living spider diversity in a biodiversity hotspot. Insect Conserv Divers 7:470–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12070
Galloway AD, Seymour CL, Gaigher R, Pryke JS (2021) Organic farming promotes arthropod predators, but this depends on neighbouring patches of natural vegetation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 310:107295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107295
Gámez-Virués S, Perović DJ, Gossner MM, Börschig C, Blüthgen N, de Jong H, Simons NK, Klein A-M, Krauss J, Maier G et al (2015) Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat Commun 6:8568. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9568
Garibaldi LA, Carvalheiro LG, Vaissière BE, Gemmill-Herren B, Hipólito J, Freitas BM, Ngo HT, Azzu N, Sáez A, Åström J et al (2016) Mutually beneficial pollinator diversity and crop yield outcomes in small and large farms. Science 351:388–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7287
Geldenhuys M, Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2021) Diverse herbaceous cover crops promote vineyard arthropod diversity across different management regimes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 307:107222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107222
Gelman A, Su Y (2021) arm: data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. R package version 1.12–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm
Gerlach J, Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2013) Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv 17:831–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9565-9
Hui FKC (2016) Boral – Bayesian ordination and regression analysis of multivariate abundance data in R. Methods Ecol Evol 7:744–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12514
Hui FKC (2020) Boral: Bayesian ordination and regression analysis. R package version 1.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=boral
Jonsson M, Straub CS, Didham RK, Buckley HL, Case BS, Hale RJ, Gratton C, Wratten SD (2015) Experimental evidence that the effectiveness of conservation biological control depends on landscape complexity. J Appl Ecol 52:1274–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12489
Kehinde T, Samways MJ (2012) Endemic pollinator response to organic vs. conventional farming and landscape context in the Cape Floristic Region biodiversity hotspot. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.020
Kehinde T, von Wehrden H, Samways MJ, Klein AM, Brittain CA (2018) Organic farming promotes bee abundance in vineyards in Italy but not in South Africa. J Insect Conserv 22:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0038-4
Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N, Smit J, Brak B, Groeneveld R (2004) Ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes in different agricultural landscapes in the Netherlands. Conserv Biol 18:775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x
Kratschmer S, Pachinger B, Schwantzer M, Paredes D, Guzmán G, Goméz JA, Entrenas JA, Guernion M, Burel F, Nicolai A et al (2019) Response of wild bee diversity, abundance, and functional traits to vineyard inter-row management intensity and landscape diversity across Europe. Ecol Evol 9:4103–4115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5039
Lichtenberg EM, Kennedy CM, Kremen C, Batary P, Berendse F, Bommarco R, Bosque-Perez NA, Carvalheiro LG, Snyder WE, Williams NM et al (2017) A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes. Glob Chang Biol 23:4946–4957. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13714
Linder HP (2005) Evolution of diversity: the Cape flora. Trends Plant Sci 10:536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.006
Manning JC, Goldblatt P (2012) Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: The core Cape flora. Strelitzia 29. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa
Martínez-Núñez C, Manzaneda AJ, Isla J, Tarifa R, Calvo G, Molina JL, Salido T, Ruiz C, Gutiérrez JE, Rey PJ (2020) Low-intensity management benefits solitary bees in olive groves. J Appl Ecol 57:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13511
Muneret L, Thiéry D, Joubard B, Rusch A (2018) Deployment of organic farming at a landscape scale maintains low pest infestation and high crop productivity levels in vineyards. J Appl Ecol 55:1516–1525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13034
Naimi B, Hamm N, Groen TA, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG (2014) Where is positional unscertainty a problem for species distribution modelling. Ecography 37:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens HH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010099.x
Paiola A, Assandri G, Brambilla M, Zottini M, Pedrini P, Nascimbene J (2020) Exploring the potential of vineyards for biodiversity conservation and delivery of biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services: a global-scale systematic review. Sci Total Environ 706:135839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135839
R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rouget M, Richardson DM, Cowling RM, Lloyd JW, Lombard AT (2003) Current patterns of habitat transformation and future threats to biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112:63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00395-6
Rusch A, Delbac L, Muneret L, Thiéry D (2015) Organic farming and host density affect parasitism rates of tortricid moths in vineyards. Agric Ecosyst Environ 214:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.019
Rusch A, Binet D, Delbac L, Thiéry D (2016) Local and landscape effects of agricultural intensification on Carabid community structure and weed seed predation in a perennial cropping system. Landsc Ecol 31:2163–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0390-x
Rusch A, Delbac L, Thiéry D (2017) Grape moth density in Bordeaux vineyards depends on local habitat management despite effects of landscape heterogeneity on their biological control. J Appl Ecol 54:1794–1803. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12858
Schmidt MH, Roschewitz I, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. J Appl Ecol 42:281–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01014.x
Schmidt MH, Thies C, Nentwig W, Tscharntke T (2007) Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 35:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01774.x
Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2001) Succession of bee communities on fallows. Ecography 24:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240110.x
Swart RC, Pryke JS, Roets F (2017) Optimising the sampling of foliage arthropods from scrubland vegetation for biodiversity studies. Afr Entomol 25:164–174. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.025.0164
Symondson WOC, Sunderland KD, Greenstone MH (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu Rev Entomol 47:561–594. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145240
Theron KJ, Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2020) Abandoned fields and high plant diversity support high spider diversity within an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 29:3757–3782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02048-9
Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2013) Spatial scale of benefits from adjacent woody vegetation on natural enemies within vineyards. Biol Control 64:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.09.019
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012a) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068
Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF et al (2012b) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes: eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, Ahnström J, Turnbull LA, Bengtsson J (2014) Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 51:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12219
Wang Y, Naumann U, Eddelbeuttel D, Wilshire J, Warton DI (2019) mvabund: statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. R package version 4.0.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mvabund
Weibull AC, Östman Ö, Granqvist Å (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers Conserv 12:1335–1355. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023617117780
Winqvist C, Bengtsson J, Aavik T, Berendse F, Clement LW, Eggers S, Fischer C, Flohre A, Geiger F, Liira J et al (2011) Mixed effects of organic farming and landscape complexity on farmland biodiversity and biological control potential across Europe. J Appl Ecol 48:570–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01950.x
Winter S, Bauer T, Strauss P, Kratschmer S, Paredes D, Popescu D, Landa B, Guzmán G, Gómez JA, Guernion, et al (2018) Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:2484–2495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.1312
Acknowledgements
Funding was from the Mapula Trust and The Lewis Foundation as part of the GreenMatter Fellowship. We extend our thanks to the landowners, farm managers, and viticulturalists who made their vineyards available to us. Many thanks to laboratory assistants, A. Pieterse, M. Eckert, S. Witbooi, and L. van der Merwe for the sorting of field collected samples. Many thanks to F. C. Basson for providing support with land cover analyses. Arthropod sampling was approved by CapeNature, permit number AAA007-00144-0056.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MG, RG, JSP and MJS: conceptualisation, methodology. MG: data curation. MG, RG, JP: data analyses. MG: writing- original draft preparation. MG, RG, JSP and MJS: writing- reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial or non-financial interests that could have influenced the work reported in this manuscript.
Additional information
Communicated by Akihiro Nakamura.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Geldenhuys, M., Gaigher, R., Pryke, J.S. et al. Interplay between amount of natural vegetation and effective vineyard management practices benefits local arthropod diversity. Biodivers Conserv 31, 3039–3053 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02473-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02473-y