Abstract
Biodiversity keeps declining in the European Union despite the large conservation effort done over the last decades. The Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 aims to address this situation by expanding the network of protected areas (PAs) and enhancing their effectiveness. However, many PAs still lack management plans, which in the case of the Natura 2000 network need to harmonise nature conservation and human uses objectives. We demonstrate how to use a spatial optimisation tool to design a multi-zoning scheme and to spatially direct management actions across the PA that address the Natura 2000 network needs. We integrate distributions of species, habitats and human activities (features) to prioritise the allocation of three management zones within a PA, using the Montseny Natural Park (NE Spain) for demonstration purposes. We also evaluate potential trade-offs between nature conservation and human uses by increasing representation targets for human uses while maintaining biodiversity targets constant. We found little representation trade-offs as targets were achieved (92%) for most of features regardless the representation target for human uses tested. However, we found spatial trade-offs as management zones became more fragmented for large targets on human uses, making the potential implementation of these solutions less feasible and/or effective. This methodology could be useful at addressing the multiple objectives pursued when designing management plans in PAs like Natura 2000 sites. Key aspects that deserve special attention are (i) the need for careful evaluation of the relationships between objectives to identify potential trade-offs and co-benefits and (ii) the designation of management zones were these relationships can be addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available to anyone interested upon request to authors.
Code availability
No code used.
References
Adams WM, Hutton J (2007) People parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Soc 5:147–183
Adams VM, Pressey RL, Álvarez-Romero JG (2016) Using optimal land-use scenarios to assess trade-offs between conservation development and social values. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158350
Apostolopoulou E, Drakou EG, Pediaditi K (2012) Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: evidence from a cross-level analysis. J Environ Manage 113:308–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.006
Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritization. In: Wilson K, Possingham H, Molainen A (eds) Quantitative methods and computational tools. Spatial conservation prioritisation. Oxford University Press, pp 185–195
Beunen R, de Vries JR (2011) The governance of Natura 2000 sites: the importance of initial choices in the organisation of planning processes. J Environ Plann Manage 54:1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.549034
Blondel J, Aronson J, Bodiou JY, Boeuf G (2010) The Mediterranean region: biological diversity in space and time. Oxford University Press
Carranza S, Amat F (2005) Taxonomy biogeography and evolution of Euproctus (Amphibia: Salamandridae) with the resurrection of the genus Calotriton and the description of a new endemic species from the Iberian Peninsula. Zool J Linn Soc 145:555–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00197.x
Carreras J, Ferré A (2014) Cartografia dels hàbitats a Catalunya versió 2: Manual d’interpretació. Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat, Generalitat de Catalunya
Cartografia dels hàbitats a Catalunya versió 2 (2008) http://territori.gencat.cat/ca/01_departament/12_cartografia_i_toponimia/bases_cartografiques/medi_ambient_i_sostenibilitat/bases_miramon/territori/29_habitats_1_5000_perfulls/ (last visited 2019)
Carwardine J, Wilson KA, Watts M, Etter A, Klein CJ, Possingham HP (2008) Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting. PLoS ONE 3:2586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002586
Carwardine J, Klein CJ, Wilson KA, Pressey RL, Possingham HP (2009) Hitting the target and missing the point: target-based conservation planning in context. Conserv Lett 2:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00042.x
Cook CN, Hockings M, Carter RW (2010) Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Front Ecol Environ 8:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1890/090020
Dimitrakopoulos PG, Jones N, Iosifides T, Florokapi I, Lasda O, Paliouras F, Evangelinos KI (2010) Local attitudes on protected areas: evidence from three Natura 2000 wetland sites in Greece. J Environ Manage 91:1847–1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.010
EC (2020a) The state of nature in the European Union. Report on the status and trends in 2013 - 2018 of species and habitat types protected by the Birds and Habitats Directives. Brussels, 15.10.2020 COM (2020) 635 final.
EC (2020b) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. Brussels, 20.5.2020b COM (2020b) 380 final
Esri Inc (2020) ArcGIS for Desktop (Version 10.4.1)
European Environment Agency (2020) Management effectiveness in the EU’s Natura 2000 network of protected areas. Prepared for the EEA by The Institute for European Environment Policy (IEEP), UNEP-WCMC and Trinomics
Framis H, Holroyd GL, Mañosa Rife S (2011) Home range and habitat use of little owl (Athene noctua) in an agricultural landscape in coastal Catalonia Spain. Anim Biodivers Conserv 34:369–378
Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol Conserv 161:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018
Grantham HS, Agostini VN, Wilson J, Mangubhai S, Hidayat N, Muljadi A et al (2013) A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat Indonesia. Mar Policy 38:184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.035
Guinart D, Solórzano S, Perpinyà NV (2014) Pla de conservació del Parc Natural del Montseny: Reserva de la Biosfera. Diputació de Barcelona
Hansen AJ, DeFries R (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol Appl 17:974–988. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1098
Hermoso V, Cattarino L, Linke S, Kennard MJ (2018) Catchment zoning to enhance co-benefits and minimise trade-offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation. Aquat Conserv 28:1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891
Hermoso V, Morán-Ordóñez A, Lanzas M, Brotons L (2020) Designing a network of green infrastructure for the EU. LandscUrban Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103732
Hull V, Xu W, Liu W, Zhou S, Viña A, Zhang J et al (2011) Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management. Biol Conserv 144:3028–3037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.007
IUCN (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2 http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 18 July 2019
Jones KR, Maina JM, Kark S, McClanahan TR, Klein CJ, Beger M (2018) Incorporating feasibility and collaboration into large-scale planning for regional recovery of coral reef fisheries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 604:211–222. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12743
Kati V, Hovardas T, Dieterich M, Ibisch PL, Mihok B, Selva N (2015) The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conserv Biol 29:260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12366
Katsanevakis S, Coll M, Fraschetti S, Giakoumi S, Goldsborough D, Mačić V, Mackelworth PC, Rilov G, Stelzenmüller V, Albano PG, Bates AE, Bevilacqua S, Gissi E, Hermoso V, Mazaris AD, Pita C, Rossi V, Teff-Seker Y, Yates K (2020) Twelve recommendations for advancing marine conservation in European and contiguous seas. Front Mar Sci 7:897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.565968
Klein CJ, Chan A, Kircher L, Cundiff AJ, Gardner N, Hrovat Y, Scholz A, Kendall BE, Airame S (2008) Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conserv Biol 22:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00896.x
Klein CJ, Steinback C, Watts M, Scholz AJ, Possingham HP (2010) Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Front Ecol Environ 8:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1890/090047
LaGro J (1991) Assessing patch shape in landscape mosaics. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 57:285–293
Lanzas M, Hermoso V, de-Miguel S, Bota G, Brotons L (2019) Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 651:541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.164
Lanzas M, Hermoso V, Moran-Ordoñez A, Regos A, Bota G, Brotons L (2021) The value of unprotected land for future conservation under dynamic conditions. Biol Conserv 261:109232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109232
Levin N, Watson JEM, Joseph LN, Grantham HS, Hadar L, Apel N, Perevolotsky A et al (2013) A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes. Biol Conserv 158:371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.032
Levin N, Mazor T, Brokovich E, Jablon PE, Kark S (2015) Sensitivity analysis of conservation targets in systematic conservation planning. Ecol Appl 25:1997–2010. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1464.1
Linke S, Kennard MJ, Hermoso V, Olden JD, Stein J, Pusey BJ (2012) Merging connectivity rules and large-scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems. J Appl Ecol 49:1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02177.x
Magris RA, Pressey RL, Mills M, Vila-Nova DA, Floeter S (2017) Integrated conservation planning for coral reefs: designing conservation zones for multiple conservation objectives in spatial prioritisation. Glob Ecol Conserv 11:53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.05.002
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251
Markantonatou V, Giakoumi S, Koukourouvli N, Maina I, Gonzalez-Mirelis G, Sini M (2021) Marine spatial plans focusing on biodiversity conservation: the case of the Aegean Sea. Aquat Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3610
McGarigal K (2015) FRAGSTATS help. University of Massachusetts: Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf
McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://wwwumass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats
McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B et al (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144:966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038
Metcalfe K, Vaz S, Engelhard GH, Villanueva MC, Smith RJ, Mackinson S (2015) Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritization software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools. J Appl Ecol 52:665–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12404
Morán-Ordóñez A, Whitehead AL, Luck GW, Cook GD, Maggini R, Fitzsimons JA, Wintle BA (2017) Analysis of trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon farming and agricultural development in northern Australia reveals the benefits of strategic planning. Conserv Lett 10:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12255
Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol 21:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003
Ohnesorge B, Plieninger T, Hostert P (2013) Management effectiveness and land cover change in dynamic cultural landscapes—Assessing a central European biosphere reserve. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05888-180423
Pe’er G, Bonn A, Bruelheide H, Dieker P, Eisenhauer N, Feindt PH, Hagedorn G, Hansjürgens B, Herzon I, Lomba A, Marquard E, Moreira F, Nitsch H, Oppermann R, Perino A, Röder N, Schleyer C, Schindler S, Wolf C, Zinngrebe Y, Lakner S (2020) Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People Nat 2:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region. South Africa Biol Conserv 112:99–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00424-X
Schmitz MF, Matos DGG, De Aranzabal I, Ruiz-Labourdette D, Pineda FD (2012) Effects of a protected area on land-use dynamics and socioeconomic development of local populations. Biol Conserv 149:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.043
Sundseth K, Creed P (2008) Natura 2000: protecting Europe's biodiversity. European Commission, Luxembourg
Tsiafouli MA, Apostolopoulou E, Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Drakou EG, Pantis JD (2013) Human activities in Natura 2000 sites: a highly diversified conservation network. Environ Manage 51:1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0036-6
Urquiza-Haas T, Tobón W, Kolb M, Lira-Noriega A, Contreras V, Alarcón J, Koleff P (2019) Assessing best practice for selecting surrogates and target-setting methods in a megadiverse country. Anim Biodivers Conserv 42:187–202. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2019.42.0187
Watts M, Steinback C, Klein EC (2008) User guide: applying Marxan with zones. North Central Coast of California Marine. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21224
Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C et al (2009) Marxan with Zones: software for optimal conservation based land-and sea-use zoning. Environ Model Softw 24:1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.005
Xu W, Li X, Pimm SL, Hull V, Zhang J, Zhang L et al (2016) The effectiveness of the zoning of China’s protected areas. Biol Conserv 204:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.028
Acknowledgements
H.A was supported by the programme Becas Másteres de Excelencia de la Fundació Catalunya La Pedrera at University of Lleida (MSc European Forestry Erasmus Mundus). A.M.O and V.H were supported by the Spanish Government through the Juan de la Cierva and Ramón y Cajal fellowship programs (IJCI-2016-30349 and RYC-2013-13979 respectively) and the INMODES project (Grant Number: CGL2017-89999-C2-2-R).
Funding
No funding sources to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA, AMO and VH conceived the idea, DV and DG provided data and on the ground expertise of the site for the analyses carried out by HA. AMO and VH supervised the analyses, HA led the writing and all authors contributed substantially to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
No ethical issues.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abarca, H., Morán-Ordoñez, A., Villero, D. et al. Spatial prioritisation of management zones in protected areas for the integration of multiple objectives. Biodivers Conserv 31, 1197–1215 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02383-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02383-z