Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marine protected areas are not representative of chondrichthyan species assemblages in the Southwest Atlantic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating the representativeness of species assemblages and species richness in a network of protected areas is key to reach a balanced and equitable network design. However, representativeness has not been assessed for sharks, rays and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), one of the most threatened vertebrate classes. Here, we evaluate the representativeness of chondrichthyan biodiversity in the current network of closed fishing areas (CFAs), and marine protected areas (MPAs), and on a proposed network of relevant conservation areas (RCAs) in the Southwest Atlantic, a large, globally significant region for chondrichthyan conservation. For each Southwest Atlantic bioregion, we estimated the geographic distribution of species richness, and related CFA, MPA and RCA coverage with species richness, using generalized linear and generalized additive models. Within each bioregion, large expanses of high species richness were, in general, not covered by CFAs, and one bioregion had no CFA coverage whatsoever. Three out of the six bioregions had null MPA coverage. Local areas of high species richness had negligible MPA coverage. RCA coverage of local high-richness areas was much higher than either MPA or CFA coverage. This represented a marked improvement; however, vast areas of high bioregional species richness had no coverage, and one bioregion lacked any RCA coverage. Current CFAs and MPAs do not provide adequate protection for the chondrichthyan biodiversity of the Southwest Atlantic, and must be improved to reach full representativeness. Global conservation agendas promoting big MPAs in remote seas should be integrated to regional networks to avoid unbalancing and halting future MPA networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Valeria Falabella for providing the relevant conservation areas shape files. We thank Angus Jackson, James Lee, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. This paper is part of the first author's doctoral dissertation. We have chosen to publish in a non-open access journal because, as researchers from a developing country, we cannot afford to derive a significant part of our limited research funds to pay for publication fees.

Funding

This research was supported by Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (EXA No 953/20), Argentina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Sabadin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Communicated by James Tony Lee.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabadin, D.E., Barbini, S.A., Figueroa, D.E. et al. Marine protected areas are not representative of chondrichthyan species assemblages in the Southwest Atlantic. Biodivers Conserv 31, 97–117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02323-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02323-3

Keywords

Navigation