Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

State of seahorse fisheries in India, nearly two decades after they were banned

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implementing a ban on fishing specific taxa is difficult enough without the added complexity of the taxa being primarily obtained as incidental catch. Most measures for restricting capture and trade to sustainable levels are directed towards targeted species, while overlooking the needs of incidentally caught species. Our study investigates the exploitation and conservation of seahorses (Hippocampus spp.) in India, which have been primarily obtained in bycatch globally, in the context of a ban on their catch and trade. We found that seahorse extraction continues, with annual catches of around 13 million seahorses, based on estimates from the locations we surveyed along the coast of mainland India. Most of these animals were perceivably obtained by non-selective fishing gear operating along the sea bottom, close to the shore, at lower latitudes and shallower depths, particularly in biogenic habitats. We found that the state with the highest catch and trade of seahorses was also the state where the largest number of fishers provided unprompted comments about the national ban. Our work indicates the serious limitations of extraction and trade bans on species that are taken incidental to other extractive activities, a message that should also apply to terrestrial and freshwater species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abensperg-Traun M (2009) CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa. Biol Conserv 142(5):948–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Proc. 2nd inter. symposium on information theory, Budapest, pp 267–281

  • Anonymous (2003) Statistics of marine products exports, 2001. MPEDA, Kochi

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylesworth L, Phoonsawat R, Vincent ACJ (2017) Effects of indiscriminate fisheries on a group of small data-poor species in Thailand. ICES J Mar Sci 75(2):642–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey C (1997) Lessons from Indonesia’s 1980 trawler ban. Mar Policy 21(3):225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CS, Clapham PJ (2004) Modelling the past and future of whales and whaling. Trends Ecol Evol 19:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates DM, Månaechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck M (2001) Marine resource management, conflict and regulation in the fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker M, McRobb R, Watson F, Droge E, Kanyembo B, Murdoch J, Kakumbi C (2013) Evaluating wire-snare poaching trends and the impacts of by-catch on elephants and large carnivores. Biol Conserv 158:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth H, Pooley S, Clements T, Putra MIH, Lestari WP, Lewis S et al (2020) Assessing the impact of regulations on the use and trade of wildlife: An operational framework, with a case study on manta rays. Glob Ecol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughorbel SB (2017) Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0177678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177678

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Branch TA, Lobo AS, Purcell SW (2013) Opportunistic exploitation: an overlooked pathway to extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 28:409–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabin R, Mitchell R (2000) To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: when and how are the questions. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:246–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/20168454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canty A, Ripley B (2019) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-23

  • Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: 23rd international conference on machine learning. ACM Press, Pittsburgh, pp 161–168

  • Challender DWS (2011) Asian pangolins: increasing affluence driving hunting pressure. Traffic Bull 23:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Challender DWS, Harrop SR, MacMillan DC (2015) Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka M, Bjorndal KA, Balazs G, Bolten AB, Ehrhart LM, Limpus CJ, Suganuma H, Troëng S, Yamaguchi M (2008) Encouraging outlook for recovery of a once-severely-exploited marine megaherbivore and restoration of its ecological function. J Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner J (2009) Poverty and the use of destructive fishing gear near east African marine protected areas. Environ Conserv 36:321–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S, Harley SJ, Hoyle SD, Rice JS (2012) Population trends in Pacific oceanic sharks and the utility of regulations on shark finning. Conserv Biol 27(1):197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RM (2003) The magnitude and impact of by-catch mortality by fishing gear. In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G (eds) Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO, Rome, pp 219–233

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler J (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RWD, Cripps SJ, Nickson A, Porter G (2009) Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Mar Policy 33(4):661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat 5(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhi F, Mahmoudi-Hamidabad A (2012) Rethinking convenience sampling: defining quality criteria. Theory Pract Lang Stud. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley L (2010) “Totoaba macdonaldi”. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SJ, Vincent ACJ (2004) Life history and ecology of 679 seahorses: implications for conservation and management. J Fish Biol 65:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00429.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster SJ, Kuo T-C, Wan AKY, Vincent ACJ (2019) Global seahorse trade defies export bans under CITES action and national legislation. Mar Policy 103:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco-Trecu V, Drago M, Grandi M, Soutullo A, Crespo E, Inchausti P (2019) Abundance and population trends of the South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis) in Uruguay. Aquat Mamm 45:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.45.1.2019.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopi GV, Pandav B, Choudhury B (2006) Incidental capture and mortality of olive Ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) in commercial trawl fisheries in coastal waters of Orissa, India. Chelonian Conserv Biol 5:276–280. https://doi.org/10.2744/1071-8443(2006)5[276:ICAMOO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Ferro RST, Karp WA, MacMullen G (2007) Fishing practice, gear, design, and the ecosystem approach—three case studies demonstrating the effect of management strategy on gear selectivity and discards. ICES J Mar Sci 64(692):744–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta T, Manuel M, Manoharakrishnan M, Namboothri N, Shanker K (2019) Conservation and livelihood implications of trawler bycatch: towards improved management. J Governance 18:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill BJ, Wassenberg TJ (2000) The probable fate of discards from prawn trawlers fishing near coral reefs. A study in the northern Great Barrier Reef. Aust Fish Res 48(3):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar AB, Deepthi GR (2006) Trawling and by-catch: Implications on marine ecosystem. Curr Sci 90(8):922–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Kursa MB (2018) Package ‘Boruta’. Version 6.0.0

  • Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR (2010) Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw 36(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson JM, Foster SJ, Vincent ACJ (2017) Low bycatch rates add up to big numbers for a genus of small fishes. Fisheries 42:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2017.1259944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh KA (2005) The ecology and conservation biology of the endangered African wild dog (Lycaon pictus), in the Lower Zambezi, Zambia. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Australia

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 737:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey PA, Romanach SS, Tambling CJ, Chartier K, Groom R (2011) Ecological and financial impacts of illegal bushmeat trade in Zimbabwe. Oryx 45(1):96–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton A, Thangaraj M (2013) Distribution Pattern of Seahorse species (Genus: Hippocampus) in Tamilnadu and Kerala Coasts of India. Notulae Sci Biol. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb.5.1.8298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo A, Balmford A, Arthur R, Manica A (2010) Commercializing bycatch can push a fishery beyond economic extinction. Conserv Lett 3:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HK (2010) Historical reconstruction of human-induced changes in U.S. estuaries. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 48:265–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HK, Coll M, Magera AM, Ward-Paige C, Airoldi L (2011) Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 26:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan D, Han J (2011) Cetacean by-catch in the Korean Peninsula—by chance or by design? Hum Ecol 39:757–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9429-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magera AM, Flemming JEM, Kaschner K, Christensen LB, Lotze HK (2013) Recovery trends in marine mammal populations. PLoS ONE 8:e77908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mangi SC, Roberts CM (2007) Factors influencing fish catch levels on Kenya’s coral reefs. Fish Manage Ecol 14:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00549.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichamy R, Lipton AP, Ganapathy A, Ramalingam JR (1993) Large scale exploitation of sea horse (Hippocampus kuda) along the Palk Bay coast of Tamil Nadu. Mar Fish Inf Serv Tech Ext Ser 119:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews BW (1975) Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Protein Struct 405(2):442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Hicks CC, Darling ES (2008) Malthusian overfishing and efforts to overcome it on Kenyan coral reefs. Ecol Appl 18(6):1516–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughey RA, Hiddink JG, Jennings S, Pitcher CR, Kaiser MJ, Suuronen P, Rijnsdorp AD et al (2020) Choosing best practices for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota. Fish Fish 21:319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan MR, Hyeroba D, Asiimwe C, Reynolds V, Wallis J (2012) Chimpanzees in mantraps: lethal crop protection and conservation in Uganda. Oryx 46(4):598–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt of India (2001) Gazette Notification, S 0665 (E), 12 (2001)

  • Mohamed KS, Sathianandan TV, Zacharia PU, Asokan PK, Krishnakumar PK, Abdurahiman KP et al (2010) Depleted and collapsed marine fish stocks along Southwest Coast of India—a simple criterion to assess the status. In: Coastal fishery resources of India; conservation and sustainable utilisation. Society of Fisheries Technologists, Cochin, pp 67–76

  • Moore J, Žydelis R (2008) Quantifying seabird bycatch: where do we go from here? Anim Conserv 11:257–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle B (2003) Regulation, Conservation and Incentives. In: Oldfield S (ed) The trade in wildlife regulation for conservation. Fauna and Flora International, Resource Africa and TRAFFIC International, London, pp 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugan A, Dhanya S, Rajagopal S, Balasubramanian T (2008) Seahorses and pipefishes of the Tamil Nadu coast. Curr Sci 95:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugan A, Dhanya S, Sarcar AB, Naganathan V, Rajagopal S, Balasubramanian T (2011) Fishery biology, demography of three spotted seahorse, Hippocampus trimaculatus inhabiting gulf of Mannar region, southeast coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 40:411–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield S (2003) The trade in wildlife regulation for conservation. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver S, Braccini M, Newman S, Harvey E (2015) Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays. Mar Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain DJ et al (2006) Impact of protection on nest take and nesting success of parrots in Africa, Asia and Australasia. Anim Conserv 9(3):322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T, Ashton PS (1992) Not by timber alone: economics and ecology for sustaining tropical forests. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qual Soc Work 1(3):261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry AL, Vaidyanathan T, Giles B, Moreau M-A, Picco CM, Vincent ACJ (2020) The catch and trade of seahorses in India pre-ban. Fish Centre Res Rep 28(3):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietersen D, Jansen R, Connelly E (2019) Smutsia temminckii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019- 3.RLTS.T12765A123585768.en

  • Pondella D, Allen L (2008) The decline and recovery of four predatory fishes from the Southern California Bight. Mar Biol 154:307–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivalan P, Delmas V, Angulo E, Bull LS, Hall RJ, Courchamp F, Rosser AM, Leader- Williams N (2007) Can bans stimulate wildlife trade? Nature 447(7144):529–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roe D, Mulliken T, Milledge S, Mremi J, Mosha S, Griegran M (2002) Making a killing or making a living? Wildlife trade, trade controls and rural livelihoods. In: Biodiversity and livelihoods. IIED, London, pp. 1–109.

  • Salin KR, Yohannan TM, Nair CM (2005) Fisheries and trade of seahorses, Hippocampus spp., in southern India. Fish Manage Ecol 12:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorice M, Oh C, Gartner T (2013) Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation. Ecol Appl 23(5):1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1878.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stobutzki IC, Miller MJ, Heales DS, Brewer DT (2002) Sustainability of elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in a tropical prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery. Fish Bull 100:800–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner SS, Pervushina N (2013) Reduced to skin and bones revisited: an updated analysis of tiger seizures from 12 tiger range countries (2000–2012). TRAFFIC Malaysia

  • ’t Sas-Rolfes M (2000) Assessing CITES: four case studies. In: Endangered species, threatened convention. EarthScan, London, pp 69–87

  • Thompson FN, Abraham ER, Berkenbusch K (2013) Common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch in New Zealand commercial trawl fisheries. PLoS ONE 8:e64438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tolotti MT, Filmalter JD, Bach P, Travassos P, Serret B, Dagorn L (2015) Banning is not enough: the complexities of oceanic shark management by tuna regional fisheries management organizations. Glob Ecol Conserv 4:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood FM, Burn RW, Milliken T (2013) Dissecting the illegal ivory trade: an analysis of ivory seizures data. PLoS ONE 8:e76539. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076539

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan T, Zhang X, Balakrishnan R, Vincent ACJ (2021) Catch and trade bans for seahorses can be negated by non-selective fisheries. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Uhm DP, Siegel D (2016) The illegal trade in black caviar. Trends Org Crime 19(1):67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97626

  • Vincent ACJ (1996) The international trade in seahorses. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent ACJ, Foster SJ, Koldewey HJ (2011) Conservation and management of seahorses. J Fish Biol 78:1681–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03003.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinod K, Saravanan R, Johnson B, Murugan A, Joshi KK, Vivekanandan E (2018) Seahorse resources in India: need for paradigm shift in approach for sustainable fisheries and conservation. Mar Fish Policy Ser 8:106

    Google Scholar 

  • White AP, Liu WZ (1994) Bias in information-based measures in decision tree induction. Mach Learn 15(3):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winemiller KO (2005) Life history strategies, population regulation, and implications for fisheries management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:872–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Branch TA (2012) The future of fish. Trends Ecol Evol 1736(27):594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Davis B, Kettemer L, Ward-Paige CA, Chapman D, Heithaus MR, Kessel ST, Gruber SH (2013) Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar Policy 40:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright TF et al (2001) Nest Poaching in Neotropical Parrots. Conserv Biol 15(3):710–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Vincent AC (2017) Integrating multiple datasets with species distribution models to inform conservation of the poorly-recorded Chinese seahorses. Biol Conserv 211:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is a contribution from Project Seahorse. We are grateful to all our assistants, particularly Mr. B. Ramkumar, and all respondents who patiently answered our questions and shared their knowledge with us. We sincerely thank the Bay of Bengal Program Intergovernmental Organization for its assistance in India. Our great thanks to Dr. Murugan who provided invaluable support on the field. We also thank Juliano Abrantes, Ting-Chun Kuo, Muhammed Oyinlola, Colette Wabnitz and Xiong Zhang who provided helpful input for this manuscript. This research is supported by Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong, the International Development Research Centre, Canada, and Guylian Belgian Chocolate.

Funding

Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong (OPCFHK), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada, and Guylian Belgian Chocolate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Project Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    T. Vaidyanathan & A. C. J. Vincent

Authors
  1. T. Vaidyanathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. C. J. Vincent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Vaidyanathan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that there was no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Angus Jackson.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaidyanathan, T., Vincent, A.C.J. State of seahorse fisheries in India, nearly two decades after they were banned. Biodivers Conserv 30, 2223–2253 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02188-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02188-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation