Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traded under the radar: poor documentation of trade in nationally-protected non-CITES species can cause fraudulent trade to go undetected

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Documentation of international trade in non-CITES species is generally poor. As a result, illegal trade in nationally-protected non-CITES species is often hard to detect. To show that such illicit trade nevertheless occurs, this study has analysed import and export records of the Giant Blue-tongued Skink Tiliqua gigas for the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) between 1999 and 2015. EU trade data for T. gigas was obtained from the UNEP-WCMCM CITES Trade Database. Trade data for the US was extracted from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS). We observed a sudden shift in source codes (from wild-caught to captive-bred) coinciding with legislative changes, which has been indicative of laundering practices in the past. In the US, no less than 45% of all imported T. gigas was declared as wild-caught, constituting a direct violation of Indonesia’s national laws and the US Lacey Act. The keeping of trade records is subjected to the willingness of individual countries, yet unwillingness to collect such data can severely threaten species when over-exploitation or laundering practices remain undetected. A CITES Appendix III-listing, obligating participating countries to maintain trade records, would facilitate improved detection and monitoring of illegal trade in nationally-protected species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source UNEP-WMCM CITES Trade Database

Fig. 2

Source LEMIS Database

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altherr S (2014) Stolen wildlife: why the EU needs to tackle smuggling of nationally protected species. Munich, Germany

  • Alves RNN, da Silva Viera WL, Santana GG (2008) Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 17:2037–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auliya M, Altherr S, Ariano-Sanchez D, Baard EH, Brown C, Brown RM, Cantu JC, Gentile G, Gildenhuys P, Henningheim E, Hintzmann J (2016) Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market. Biol Conserv 204:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin CC (2006) Checklist and comments on the terrestrial reptile fauna of Kau Wildlife area, Papua New Guinea. Herpetol Rev 37:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios-Garrido H, Palmar J, Wildermann N, Rojas-Cañizales D, Diedrich A, Hamann M (2018) Marine turtle presence in the traditional pharmacopeoia, cosmovision, and beliefs of Wayúu indigenous people. Chel Conserv Biol 17:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challender DW, MacMillan DC (2014) Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conserv Lett 7:484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chng SC, Eaton JA, Krishnasamy K, Shepherd CR, Nijman V (2015) In the market for extinction: an inventory of Jakarta’s bird markets. TRAFFIC, Petaling Jaya

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harfoot M, Glaser SA, Tittensor DP, Britten GL, McLardy C, Malsch K, Burgess ND (2018) Unveiling the patterns and trends in 40 years of global trade in CITES-listed wildlife. Biol Conserv 223:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J, Chng SC (2018) Biological parameters used in setting captive-breeding quotas for Indonesia’s breeding facilities. Conserv Biol 32:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J, Indenbaum RA (2019) Endemic Vietnamese reptiles in commercial trade. J Asia Pac Biodivers 12(1):45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J, Shepherd CR (2018) Challenges in documenting trade in non-CITES listed species: a case study on crocodile skinks (Tribolonotus spp.). J Asia Pac Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J, Shepherd CR (2019) Trade in endangered and critically endangered Japanese Herpetofauna endemic to the Nansei Islands warrants increased protection. Curr Herpetol 38(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TJ, Auliya M, Burgess ND, Aust PW, Pertoldi C, Strand J (2018) Exploring the international trade in African snakes not listed on CITES: highlighting the role of the internet and social media. Biodivers Conserv 1:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson P, Ladle RJ (2009) Governing bird-keeping in Java and Bali: evidence from a household survey. Oryx 43:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemens MW, Thorbjarnarson JB (1995) Reptiles as a food resource. Biodivers Conserv 4(3):281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons JA, Natusch DJ (2011) Wildlife laundering through breeding farms: illegal harvest, population declines and a means of regulating the trade of green pythons (Morelia viridis) from Indonesia. Biol Conserv 144:3073–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiri S et al (2018) Extinct, obscure or imaginary: the lizard species with the smallest ranges. Divers Distrib 24:262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V (2010) An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodivers Conserv 19:1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V, Shepherd CR (2011) The role of Thailand in the International trade in CITES-listed live reptiles and amphibians. PLoS ONE 6:e17825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V, Shepherd CR (2015a) Adding up the numbers: an investigation into commercial breeding of Tokay Geckos in Indonesia. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V, Shepherd CR (2015b) Analysis of a decade of trade of tortoises and freshwater turtles in Bangkok, Thailand. Biodivers Conserv 24:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0809-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien S, Emahalala ER, Beard V, Rakotondrainy RM, Reid A, Raharisoa V, Coulson T (2003) Decline of the Madagascar radiated tortoise Geochelone radiata due to overexploitation. Oryx 37:338–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JE, Sinovas P (2018) Challenges of analyzing the global trade in CITES-listed wildlife. Conserv Biol 32(5):1203–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JE, Griffiths RA, John FAS, Roberts DL (2015) Dynamics of the global trade in live reptiles: shifting trends in production and consequences for sustainability. Biol Conserv 184:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser AM, Mainka SA (2002) Overexploitation and species extinctions. Conserv Biol 16:584–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Hoover C, Dodd CK (2005) Challenges in evaluating the impact of the trade in amphibians and reptiles on wild populations. Bioscience 55:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart BL, Rhodin AGJ, Grismer LL, Hansel T (2006) Scientific description can imperil species. Science 312:1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki D, Fuse K, Aizu M, Yoshizawa S, Tanaka W, Araya K, Praxaysombath B (2015) Reptile diversity in food markets in Laos. Curr Herpetol 34:112–119. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.34.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sy EY (2015) Checklist of exotic species in the Philippine pet trade, II. Reptiles. J Nat Stud 14:66–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Tensen L (2016) Under what circumstances can wildlife farming benefit species conservation? Glob Ecol Conserv 6:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaglica V et al (2017) Monitoring internet trade to inform species conservation actions. Endanger Species Res 32:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank a donor that wishes to remain anonymous for its support of this project. Thanks also go to Chris Shepherd, Lalita Gomez and Phill Cassey for constructive and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Janssen.

Additional information

Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity legal instruments and regulations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen, J., Leupen, B.T.C. Traded under the radar: poor documentation of trade in nationally-protected non-CITES species can cause fraudulent trade to go undetected. Biodivers Conserv 28, 2797–2804 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01796-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01796-7

Keywords

Navigation