Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Which species to conserve: evaluating children’s species-based conservation priorities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We currently have a meager understanding of the species attributes viewed as important for conservation by children, despite the fact that arguments for biodiversity conservation often hinge on the bequest value of species. We conducted a study of children between the ages of 4 and 14 (N = 183) on Andros Island, The Bahamas to determine how they prioritized wildlife species for conservation based on five attributes: endemism, use for hunting and fishing, rapid decline in population size, visibility around their home, and ecological significance. Children tended to rank ecological significance as the most important attribute for prioritizing wildlife for protection, followed closely by endemism, with other attributes being less important and not significantly different from one another. However, participants in a local environmental education program (N = 67) placed greater prioritization to species experiencing rapid population declines. We also found that boys prioritized use for hunting and fishing as more important for conservation than girls, older children placed greater importance on species with declining numbers and less importance on visibility of animals around their house, and children who had previously fished placed greater importance on endemism. These findings help elucidate how children value biodiversity, and suggest children’s conservation priorities may align relatively well with those of conservation biologists, especially after exposure to environmental education. We suggest that better understanding how children prioritize wildlife attributes for conservation can lead to more informed biodiversity conservation decisions and more effective policy implementation, as the perspectives of children can help bridge the gap between public opinion and scientific opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andros Conservancy and Trust (ANCAT). Available at http://www.ancat.net/index.php

  • Arponen A (2012) Prioritizing species for conservation planning. Biodivers Conserv 21:875–893. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0242-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (2005) Phylogenetic units and currencies above and below the species level. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 76–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bahamas National Trust (BNT) Discovery Club. http://www.bnt.bs/_m1891/Discovery-Club

  • Baldacchino G (ed) (2015) Archipelago tourism: policies and practices. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Odegardstuen TS, Kaltenborn BP (1998) Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian adolescents. Anthrozoos 11:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrill M, Joseph LN, Carwardine J, Bode M, Cook C, Game ET, Grantham H, Kark S, Linke S, McDonald-Madden E, Pressey RL, Walker S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evol 23:649–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton I, Golby B, Cho E (1997) Attachment and the transmission of values. In: Grusec JE, Kuczynski L (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: a handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New York, pp 103–134

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61. doi:10.1126/science.1127609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Sax DF (2004) An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Aust Ecol 29:530–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan KC (2000) The Bahamas. Mar Pollut Bull 41:94–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992. doi:10.1038/35010105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KF, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132:279–291. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumberlidge N, Ng PKL, Yeo DCJ, Magalhaes C, Campos MR, Alvarez F, Naruse T, Daniels SR, Esser LJ, Attipoe FYK, Clotilde-Ba FL, Darwall W, McIvor A, Baillie JEM, Collen B, Ram M (2009) Freshwater crabs and the biodiversity crisis: importance, threats, status, and conservation challenges. Biol Conserv 142:1665–1673. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curnick DJ, Head CEI, Huang D, Crabbe MJC, Gollock M, Hoeksema BW, Johnson KG, Jones R, Koldewey HJ, Obura DO, Rosen BR, Smith DJ, Taylor ML, Turner JR, Wren S, Redding DW (2015) Setting evolutionary-based conservation priorities for a phylogenetically data-poor taxonomic group (Scleractinia). Anim Conserv 18:303–312. doi:10.1111/acv.12185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR, Borkhataria R (1998) Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefit to endangered species. Conserv Biol 12:1103–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Devers P, Krausman P (2001) The relationship of gender to species conservation attitudes. Wildl Soc B 29:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vreede C, Warner A, Pitter R (2014) Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: the potential of peer education. J Environ Educ 45:37–56. doi:10.1080/00958964.2013.805710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delancy G (2011) Research and Statistics Department of the Ministry of Tourism. Tourism Today Network. http://www.tourismtoday.com/services/statistics/stopoversfrequently-requested-statisticstrends

  • Department of Statistics of The Bahamas (2013) Population Census 2010. http://statistics.bahamas.gov.bs/key.php?cat=13

  • Desimone LM, Le Floch KC (2004) Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educ Eval Policy Anal 26:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagles PFJ, Demare R (1999) Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. J Environ Educ 30:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt NM, Deleveaux VK (2007) The Bahamas Nassau grouper (Epinephelus straitus) fishery-two assessment methods applied to a data-deficient coastal population. Fish Res 81:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eick CJ, Carrier S, Perez K, Keasal DE (2010) Summer methods in summer camps: teaching projects WILD, WET, and learning tree at an outdoor environmental education center. In: Weaver S, Bodzin AM, Shiner Klein B (eds) The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, 16 U.S.C ch. 35 § 1531 et seq

  • Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies TJ, Cowling RM, Faith DP, Balmford A, Manning JC, Proches S, van der Bank M, Reeves G, Hedderson TAJ, Savolainen V (2007) Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445:757–760. doi:10.1038/nature05587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frew K, Peterson MN, Stevenson K (2016). Are we working to save the species our children want to protect? evaluating species attribute preferences among children. Oryx (in press)

  • Hayes MC, Peterson MN, Heinen-Kay JL, Langerhans RB (2015) Toursim-related drivers of support for protection of fisheries resources on Andros Island, The Bahamas. Ocean Coast Manag 106:118–123. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday AJ, Chambers LE, Arnould JPY (2015) Prioritizing climate change adaptation options for iconic marine species. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-100-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB, Norgaard RB (1992) Environmental valuation under sustainable development. Am Econ Rev 82:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter M (2011) Impact of ecological disturbance on awareness of urban nature and sense of environmental stewardship in residential neighborhoods. Landsc Urban Plan 101:131–138. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2015) IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.redlist.org

  • Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2:e296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen JB, Boiesen JH, Thorsen BJ, Strange N (2007) What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus “Iconised” species when valuing biodiversity. Environ Resour Econ 39:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn PH (1999) The human relationship with nature. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn PH, Kellert SR (eds) (2002) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairo M, Ali B, Cheesman O, Haysom K, Murphy S. (2003). Invasive species threats to Caribbean Region. Report to the Nature Conservancy, Arlington

  • Kellert SR, Berry J (1987) Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildl Soc B 15:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Westervelt MO (1984) Children’s attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors towards animals. Child Environ Q 1:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasny M, Delia J (2014) Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. J Clean Prod 106:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson LR, Castleberry SB, Green GT (2010) Effects of an environmental education program on Environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. J Park Recreat Adm 28:95–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris E (2007) What to let go. Nature 450:152–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J (2007) The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 13:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J (2008) Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers. Conserv Biol 22:624–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv 142:1370–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum ML (2015) Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodivers Conserv 24:2497–2519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C, Soule M, Noss RF (2006) “A mission-drive discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20:631–651. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00449.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuser E, Harshaw HW, Mooers AO (2009) Public preference for endemism over other conservation-related species attributes. Conserv Biol 23:1041–1046. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01257.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KK, McGee CTK (2001) Toward incorporating human dimensions information into wildlife management decision-making. Hum Dimens Wildl 6:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery CA (2002) Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values. J Environ Manag 65:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcom TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9495–9500. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707823105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • National Fishery Sector Overview, the Commonwealth of the Bahamas (2009) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations report

  • National Museum of The Bahamas (2014) Discovery Club curriculum for Explorers and Guardians

  • Negev M, Sagy G, Garb Y, Salzberg A, Tal A (2008) Evaluating the environmental literacy of Israeli elementary and high school students. J Environ Educ 39:3–20. doi:10.3200/JOEE.39.2.3-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman J, Öhman M (2013) Participatory approach in practice: an analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environ Educ Res 19:324–341. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.695012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala M (2015a) Hope in the face of climate change: associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. J Environ Educ 46:133–148. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala M (2015b) Climate change skepticism among adolescents. J Youth Stud 18:1135–1153. doi:10.1080/13676261.2015.1020927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17:503–507. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02614-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding David W, DeWolff CURT, Mooers AØ (2010) Evolutionary distinctiveness, threat status, and ecological oddity in primates. Conserv Biol 24:1052–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer A, Mase A, Mulvaney K, Mullendore N, Perry-Hill R, Prokopy L (2014) The impact of information and familiarity on public attitudes toward the eastern hellbender. Anim Conserv 17:235–243. doi:10.1111/acv.12085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey KS (2004) Large-scale ecological impacts of development on tropical island systems: comparison of developed and undeveloped islands in the central Bahamas. Bull Mar Sci 7:295–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellabarger R, Peterson MN, Sills E, Cubbage F (2012) The influence of place meanings on conservation and human rights in the Arizona Sonora borderlands. Environ Commun 6:383–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Posa MC, Lee TM, Bickford D, Koh LP, Brook BW (2010) The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:317–328. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Species at Risk Act (SARA) (2002) Bill C-5, an act respecting the protection of wildlife species at risk in Canada. Statutes of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman R, Diefenback DR, Swope CB, Finley JC, Luloff AE, Zinn HC, San-Julian GJ, Wang GA (2004) Integrating wildlife and human-dimensions research methods to study hunters. J Wildl Manag 68:762–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav 25:322–348. doi:10.1177/0013916593255002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Mertig AG, Moore SE (2013) Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.005951

  • Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Moore SE, Carrier SJ (2014a) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Chang 126:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Carrier SJ, Strand RL, Bondell HD, Kirby-Hathaway T, Moore SE (2014b) Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. J Environ Educ 45:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner A, Davis M (2010) Queen conch stock assessment, historical fishing grounds, Andros Island, Bahamas, August 2010. The Nature Conservancy

  • Stoner R, Davis M, Booker C (2009) Queen conch stock assessment, proposed MPA and fishing grounds, Berry Islands, Bahamas. Community Conch Report

  • Tarrant MA, Cordell HK (2002) Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environ Manag 20:692–703. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C, Nantha HS, Wilson C (2007) Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecol Econ 60:627–633. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK (1995) Prioritizing South African estuaries for conservation: a practical example using waterbirds. Biol Conserv 74:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadala CE, Bixler RD, James JJ (2007) Childhood play and environmental interests: panacea or snake oil? J Environ Educ 39:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study on tropical islands. Anim Conserv 12:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron A, Mooers AO, Miller DC, Nibbelink N, Redding D, Kuhn TS, Robers JT, Gittleman JL (2013) Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12144–12148. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221370110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss EB (1990) Our rights and obligations to future generations for the environment. Am J Int Law 84:198–207. doi:10.2307/2203020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells NM, Lekies KS (2006) Nature and the life course: pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Child Youth Environ 16:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • White PCL, Bennett AC, Hayes EJV (2001) The use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. Mamm Rev 31:151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP (2006) Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440:337–340. doi:10.1038/nature04366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny L, Chua P, Aldrich C (2000) Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Forfar Field Station staff, particularly Kate Hammond and Lyndon Rolle, and the Bahamas National Trust, especially Portia Sweeting and Leslie Brace, for facilitating the surveys. We also thank Alayne McKnight and Haley Doty for assistance conducting the surveys.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    H. G. Shapiro, K. A. Erickson, M. Nils Peterson, K. N. Frew & K. T. Stevenson

  2. Department of Biological Sciences and W.M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    R. B. Langerhans

Authors
  1. H. G. Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. A. Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Nils Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. N. Frew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. T. Stevenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. B. Langerhans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Nils Peterson.

Additional information

Communicated by Astrid van Teeffelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shapiro, H.G., Erickson, K.A., Peterson, M.N. et al. Which species to conserve: evaluating children’s species-based conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 25, 539–553 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1067-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1067-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation