Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introduction and invasion of common myna (Acridotheres tristis) in Kruger National Park, South Africa: still time for action?

  • Invasion Note
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common myna (Acridotheres tristis) is a passerine bird native to south-east Asia, established as an alien in many parts of the world including South Africa, where it is invasive. Common mynas are synanthropic birds with a strong preference for urban areas that usually do not expand into natural areas. However, as we document here, since the first records in Kruger National Park in 2000 when the birds started to spread from outside the park, the rate of spread has recently dramatically increased, with last three years accounting for 66% of the total number of 128 sightings. Thirty-two birds were observed to be nesting or breeding. This data suggests that the common myna in Kruger National Park is in the initial phase of establishment. Although the impacts on native birds at a population level are unlikely to be severe in a large natural savanna area with little human influence, the species is scored as having moderate impact in the EICAT IUCN scheme. Thus, we suggest that the population of common myna needs to be monitored and controlled to prevent it from further increase and spread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is provided in the supplementary material.

References

  • Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Bertolino S, Evans T, Genovesi P, Kumschick S, Roy HE, Smith KG, Volery L (2020) IUCN EICAT categories and criteria: first edition. IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), Gland. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.05.en

  • BirdLife International (2020) Species factsheet: Acridotheres tristis. http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 09 June 2020.

  • Birkhead J (1988) Indian mynas oust redbilled woodhoopoes and other hole nesters. Laniarius 33:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Marková Z, Mrugała A, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12:e1001850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CABI (2009) Acridotheres tristis (common myna). In: Invasive species compendium. CABI, Wallingford, UK. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/2994. Accessed 3 February 2021

  • Cheke A, Hume J (2008) Lost land of the Dodo. T & AD Poyser, London, UK

  • Colléony A, Schwartz A (2020) When the winners are the losers: invasive alien bird species outcompete the native winners in the biotic homogenization proces. Biol Conserv 241:108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig AJFK (1997) Indian myna Acridotheres tristis. In: Harrison JA, Allan DG, Underhill LG, Herremans M, Tree AJ, Parker V, Brown CJ (eds) The Atlas of Southern African Birds, vol. 2. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 454–455

  • du Toit JT, Biggs H, Rogers KH (eds) (2003) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer EE, Cassey P, Redding DW, Collen B, Franks V, Gaston KJ, Jones KE, Kark S, Orme CDL, Blackburn TM (2017a) The global distribution and drivers of alien bird species richness. PLoS Biol 15:e2000942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer EE, Redding DW, Blackburn TM (2017b) The global avian invasions atlas, a database of alien bird distributions worldwide. Sci Data 4:170041. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans T (2021) Quantifying the global threat to native birds from predation by non-native birds on small islands. Conserv Biol 35:1268–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans T, Kumschick S, Blackburn TM (2016) Application of the environmental impact classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts. Diversity Distrib 22:919–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans T, Blackburn TM, Jeschke JJ, Probert AF, Bacher S (2020) Application of the Socio-Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts. NeoBiota 62:123–142. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.51150

  • Feare C (2010) The use of Starlicide® in preliminary trials to control invasive common myna Acridotheres tristis populations on St Helena and Ascension islands, Atlantic Ocean. Conserv Evid 7:52–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Feare C, Craig A (1999) Common myna, Acridotheres tristis. In: Feare C, Craig A (eds) Starlings and mynas. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, pp 157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxcroft LC, van Wilgen NJ, Baard J, Cole N (2017) Biological invasions in South African National Parks. Bothalia 47:a2158. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v47i2.2158

  • Global Invasive Species Database (2020) Acridotheres tristis. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=108. Accessed 20 February 2021

  • Grarock K, Tidemann CR, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Is it benign or is it a pariah? Empirical evidence for the impact of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) on Australian birds. PLoS ONE 7:e40622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gumede ST, Downs CT (2020) Preliminary observations suggest Common Myna prefer lipid over protein and carbohydrate foods in a pairwise choice experiment. Ostrich 91:95–100. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2019.1683092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Diquelou M, Perea M (2014) Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. Anim Behav 92:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illidge M (2019) The impacts of the alien invasive common myna on indigenous birds in Pretoria. BSc Thesis, University of Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever C (2006) Naturalised birds of the world. Christopher Helm Ornithology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien species: A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), Auckland.

  • Markula A, Hannas-Jones M, Csurhes S (2016) Indian mynah Acridotheres tristis. Invasive Animal Risk Assessment, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland

  • Old JM, Spencer RJ, Wolfenden J (2014) The common myna (Sturnus tristis) in urban, rural and semi-rural areas in Greater Sydney and its surrounds. Emu 114:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU13029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock DS, van Rensburg BJ, Robertson MP (2007) The distribution and spread of the invasive alien common myna, Acridotheres tristis L. (Aves: Sturnidae), in southern Africa. S Afr J Sci 103:465–473. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/5786

  • Pell AS, Tidemann CR (1997) The ecology of the common myna in urban nature reserves in the Australian Capital Territory. Emu 97:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU97018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peneaux C, Griffin AS (2015) Opportunistic observations of travel distances in common mynas (Arcidotheres tristis). Canberra Bird Notes 40:228–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham T, van Son J (2009) Indian myna control project handbook: managing the invasion of Indian mynas in Northern NSW. NSW Environmental Trust, https://www.bellingerlandcare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/IndianMynaHandbook.pdf

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC, Genovesi P, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Liebhold AM, Mandrak NE, Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Pergl J, Roy HE, Seebens H, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wingfield MJ, Richardson DM (2020) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev 95:1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AM, Griffin AS, van Rensburg BJ, Kark S (2020) Noisy neighbours and myna problems: interaction webs and aggression around tree hollows in urban habitats. J Appl Ecol 57:1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton RT, Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Wood LE, Richardson DM (2020) Assessing biological invasions in protected areas after 30 years: revisiting nature reserves targeted by the 1980s SCOPE programme. Biol Conserv 243:108424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivambu TC, Shivambu N, Downs CT (2020) Impact assessment of seven alien invasive bird species already introduced to South Africa. Biol Invas 22:1829–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02221-9

  • Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5460–5465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I (2012) Consumer and motor innovation in the common myna: the role of motivation and emotional responses. Anim Behav 83:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I, Boyce H ( 2011) Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. PloS ONE 6:e19535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019535

  • Tarboton W, Ryan P (2016) Guide to birds of the Kruger National Park. Struik Nature, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Underhill LG, Spiby J, Fox G (2014) SABAP2 shows that the common myna Acridotheres tristis is using the towns and villages as stepping stones to spread across South Africa. Ornithol Observ 5:453–456. http://oo.adu.org.za/content.php?id=160

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kruger National Park rangers and managers, Guy Hausler and members of the public for providing records of myna sightings.

Funding

The study was supported by grant no. 18-18495S (Czech Science Foundation), and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (Czech Academy of Sciences). LCF is funded by SANParks, and acknowledges support from the DSI-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klára Pyšková.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1.

The list of localities of common myna (Acridotheres tristis) in Kruger National Park. The following information is given for each record: ID, date of sighting, description of the locality with notes on observation, behaviour, habitat, observer category, coordinates, number of birds observed, whether the locality is within KNP (1 – yes, 0 – no), and whether the sighting was the first in a given locality (1 – yes, 0 – no). The sightings were reported mostly by park rangers and the details on observers are being held in the complete database maintained at SanParks. Habitats: natural = in natural vegetation, no human influence; Natural (near decomissioned windmill) = in natural vegetation area, near old infrastructure; natural/river (causeway) = natural area, near a river/stream causeway; dam/remote = dam far from human areas; camp = tourist camp; staff garden/camp = in a staff garden or living quarters, near a camp; staff camp/isolated= few permanent residents; dam/camp = at a dam, situated near a tourist camp; entrance gate (small) = single isolated park gate, no permanent residents; picnic spot = tourist picnic site; neighbouring town = adjacent to KNP or within 20 km. N.A. = not applicable, unknown, N.R. = not recorded. (XLSX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pyšková, K., Pyšek, P. & Foxcroft, L.C. Introduction and invasion of common myna (Acridotheres tristis) in Kruger National Park, South Africa: still time for action?. Biol Invasions 24, 2291–2300 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02790-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02790-x

Keywords

Navigation