Abstract
An ideal rAAV gene editing system not only effectively edits genes at specific site, but also prevents the spread of the virus from occurring off-target or carcinogenic risks. This is important for gene editing research at specific site in vivo. We report a single rAAV containing SaCas9 and guide RNAs under the control of subtle EF1a and tRNA promoters. The capacity of rAAV was compressed, and the editing efficiency was similar to that of the classical Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo. And we inserted the sequence of the green fluorescent protein eGFP into rAAV. The number of cells infected with the rAAV and the region in which the rAAV spreads were known by the fluorescent expression of eGFP in cells. In addition, we demonstrated that myostatin gene in the thigh muscles of C57BL/10 mice was knocked out by the rAAV9-SaCas9 system to make muscle mass increased obviously. The protein eGFP into rAAV has significant implications for our indirect analysis of the editing efficiency of SaCas9 in the genome of the target tissue and reduces the harm caused by off-target editing and prevents other tissue mutations. The rAAV system has substantial potential in improving muscle mass and preventing muscle atrophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has become a commonly used technology in medicine and life sciences (Li et al. 2018). It has been used to genetically modify potential clinical treatments for diseases (Mollanoori and Teimourian 2018; Yang et al. 2016). However, genome editing in tissues in vivo is affected by many factors, including the choice of vector, the efficiency of editing proteins and the influence of the internal environment. In clinical settings, adeno-associated virus (AAV) as the vector for Cas9 provides a promising genomic correction approach (Moreno et al. 2018). In particular, the technique allows genetic editing of specific muscle areas of inherited muscular dystrophy to improve atrophy symptoms (Crudele and Chamberlain 2019; Tabebordbar et al. 2016). However, many of the exciting tools developed from CRISPR/Cas9 technology are too bulky to meet the genome packaging limits of AAV (~ 4.85 kb including both ITRs). Notably, SpCas9 is ~ 4.3 kb, and it scarcely fits into the AAV capacity when coupled with essential gene regulatory elements. One way to overcome this technical hurdle is to take advantage of smaller orthologs of Cas9 derived from different prokaryotic species. Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9 (St1Cas9), Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 (NmCas9), and Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) nucleases that have been recognized to be effective have similar properties to those of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9), but are all ~ 1 kb shorter than SpCas9 (Kleinstiver et al. 2015; Esvelt et al. 2013; Ran et al. 2015). Thus, with the discovery of these smaller Cas9 nucleases, AAVs can be engineered with either of these smaller Cas9 genes or gRNA expression cassettes to create AAV-based CRISPR/Cas9. This technical hurdle can also be overcome by optimizing the promoter. Mefferd and coworkers have recently reported that expression of sgRNAs can be driven by small tRNA promoters (~ 70 bp) with sizes approximately half that of an sgRNA-expressing cassette with a U6 promoter (Mefferd et al. 2015) for efficient delivery of CRISPR materials into cells. Tabebordbar and coworkers have reconstructed a new vector AAV-SaCas9 in which expression of SaCas9 is driven by EF1a-short promoters (Tabebordbar et al. 2016). Other researchers have built the pX601-miniCMV-SaCas9-U6-sgRNA vector, in which expression of SaCas9 is driven by a miniCMV promoter, which is only 39 bp. The smaller sizes of two or more components of a single rAAV system would be necessary to perform genome-editing experiments, including rAAV tissue tropism, and efficient precise targeting and persistent performance of organizations (Zincarelli et al. 2008).
Myostatin (Mstn, also known as growth differentiation factor 8), is a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-b) signaling protein superfamily and a key regulator of muscle mass in vertebrates. Its expression inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of muscle cells. Myostatin signaling dysfunction promotes muscle growth, and myostatin-null animals have a characteristic supermuscle phenotype (McPherron et al. 1997; McPherron and Lee 1997). Unsurprisingly, in muscular dystrophy diseases, including sarcopenia, muscular dystrophy, and cancer-related cachexia, controlling myostatin signaling has become an attractive prospect for increasing functional muscle mass (Camporez et al. 2016; Smith and Lin 2013; Wei et al. 2016; Gallot et al. 2014; Weng et al. 2020). Researchers are increasingly exploring treatments for muscular dystrophy by knocking out Mstn gene expression, which has been found to be a simple and rapid way to improve muscle traits (Wei et al. 2016; Rodriguez et al. 2011; Salzler et al. 2016).
Here, we built a smaller rAAV-SaCas9 gene editing system, which generated EF1α-driven SaCas9 and tRNA-driven sgRNAs. And it indirectly understood the editing effect and distribution of Cas9 through the expression of eGFP in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we found that knockout of Mstn gene in mice muscle by this system effectively increased the mass of muscle cells. This study provides a reference for improving muscle mass and preventing muscle atrophy.
Materials and methods
Construction of SaCas9 and sgRNA plasmids
All plasmids were constructed with standard recombinant DNA cloning techniques. pX601-CMV:SaCas9-U6:sgRNA (pX601-AAV-CMV::NLS-SaCas9-NLS-U6::BsaI-sgRNA) was preserved in our laboratory. tRNAGLN and sgRNA scaffold sequences were generated by Sangon (Shanghai, China) (GGTTCCATGGTGTAATGGTTAGCACTCTGGACTCTGAATCCAGCGATCCGAGTTCAAATCTCGGTGGAACCT-GAAACACCGGAGACCACGGCAGGTCTCAGTTTTAGTACTCTGGAAACAGAATCTACTAAAACAAGGCAAAATGCCGTGTTTATCTCGTCAACTTGTTGGCGAGA) (Mefferd et al. 2015) and, after amplification with the primers tRNAGLN-F: 5′-AGGCATGCTGGGGAGGTACCGGTTCCATGGTGTAATGGTT-3′, Scaf-ITR-R:5′-CTAGGGGTTCCTGCGGCCGCAAAAATCTCGCCAACAAGTTG-3′, were ligated into pX601-CMV:SaCas9-U6:sgRNA, which was digested with Kpn I and Not I, with a ClonExpress® II One Step Cloning kit (Vazyme Biotech, China). The constructed vector was then transformed into DH5α competent cells, and transformants containing pX601-CMV:SaCas9-tRNA:sgRNA were identified by sequencing. After subculturing, DNA was extracted. The EF1α promoter was amplified from the pLentiCRISPR V2 vector with the primers EF1α-F: 5′-CCTGCGGCCTCTAGACTCGAGGTGGGCAGAGCGCACATCGC-3′ and EF1α-R: 5-TGGGGCCATGGTGGCACCGGTCCTGTGTTCTGGCGGCAAAC-3′. Then, pX601-CMV:SaCas9-tRNA:sgRNA, which was digested between the Xho I and Age I sites immediately before the SaCas9 gene, and the promoter were cloned with a ClonExpress® II One Step Cloning kit. Vector transformation, identification and plasmid extraction were performed as described above to obtain pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-tRNA:sgRNA. The P2A-eGFP gene was amplified from th-P2A-eGFP donor with primers P2A-eGFP-F: 5′-CCGGCCAGGCAAAAAAGAAAAAGGCTACTAATTTCTCCT-3′ and P2A-eGFP-R: 5′-ATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTCTTGTACAGCTCGTC. Then, pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-tRNA:sgRNA was digested with BamHI, and the P2A-eGFP gene was cloned with a ClonExpress® II One Step Cloning kit. Vector transformation, identification and plasmid extraction were performed as described above to obtain pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgRNA. The proposed structures of the vector are shown in Fig. 1a. The complementary oligonucleotides sgMstn1, sgMstn2 and sgMstn3 were annealed to form double-stranded inserts and were ligated into the BbsI digested plasmid. Finally, the plasmids pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgMstn1, pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgMstn2 and pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgMstn3 (denoted psgMstn1, psgMstn2 and psgMstn3) were constructed.
Cell culture and transfection
NIH/3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and were transfected with polyethylenimine (PEI). Briefly, 5 × 105 NIH/3T3 cells were cultured to 50–60% confluence in six-well plates and transfected with psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 and 1 × PEI, and the medium was replaced with DMEM (3% FBS) after 8 h. And the control cells were wild type cells cultured in the same batch. After 72 h, the cells were subjected to genomic DNA extraction. All cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
AAV vectors for the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Procedures were carried out as previously described (Senis et al. 2014). For the production of rAAV-DJ/8, rAAV9 viruses, HEK293T cells were seeded into 20 dishes (100 × 10 mm; 5 × 106 cells per dish). After 24 h, the cells were triple-transfected with psgMstn1, pAAV-DJ/8-RC/pAAV9-RC and pHelper according to the instructions provided with the PEI transfection reagent. After 72 h, the cells were harvested by scraping into medium, centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min and resuspended in 1 mL of 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cell suspension was subjected to three freeze–thaw cycles at − 80 °C and at 37 °C. After fast centrifugation and filtration, the cell debris was cleared. The viral solution was concentrated with PEG 8000 and purified on a cesium chloride density gradient column. After two rounds of ultracentrifugation, the high-density viruses were separated and extracted, and run through dialysis bags for desalting (Huang et al. 2017). The titers of the purified rAAV-DJ/8, rAAV9 viruses were determined with a RT-PCR-based method described previously (Holehonnur et al. 2014). pX601 was diluted from 109 copies/μL to 103 copies/μL as the standard solution. The primers were ITR-QPCR-F: 5′-CGGCCTCAGTGAGCGA-3′ and ITR-QPCR-R: 5′-AGGAACCCCTAGTGATG-3′. The resulting viruses were designated AAV-DJ/8-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgMstn1, AAV9-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA: sgMstn1 (denoted rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1, rAAV9-sgMstn1, respectively).
rAAV-DJ/8 transduction in vitro
AAV serotypes differ broadly in transduction efficacy and tissue tropism. Recombinant AAV-DJ vectors provide superior in vitro transduction efficacy to that of any other wild type serotype. Efficient transduction is beneficial for gene editing in the SaCas9 system. After digestion and resuspension of C2C12 cells in logarithmic growth phase, the cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in 12-well plates at a seeding density of 1 × 105 and grown overnight. The cells were cultured to 50–60% confluence and infected with ~ 2 × 109 vg/1 × 1010 vg rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1, and the control cells were wild type cells cultured in the same batch. Then, the medium was replaced with DMEM (3% FBS) after 8 h. Fluorescence was determined, and DNA and protein were extracted at 96 h, 120 h.
Mice
90 C57BL/10 male mice in SPF grade (6 weeks of age) were purchased from the Center of Experimental Animal of Guangdong province (Guangzhou, China) and maintained in a specific-pathogen-free animal facility according to the Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals and the related ethical regulations at Henan Agricultural University. Then, these mice were fed to the age of 8 weeks and were healthy without any abnormalities.
rAAV9 transduction in vivo
Compared with AAV-DJ, AAV9 is more addicted in muscle tissue; it is conducive to gene editing of muscle cells and is often applied in muscle tissue. In addition, the packaging of different types of AAV allows for broad applicability of the psgMstn1 plasmid. 90 C57BL/10 male mice were divided into three groups, each with 30 mice, and two doses rAAV9-sgMstn1 and 1 × PBS were injected into male C57BL/10 mice. Three points on the thigh muscle in the left thigh in the treatment group were injected with ~ 1 × 1010 vg/1 × 1011 vg of rAAV9-sgMstn1 in 100 µL of 1 × PBS (30 µL/point), and the control group were treated with 100 µL of 1 × PBS (30 µL/point). After 6, 8, 10 weeks, 10 mice were sacrificed in each group, the expression of the tissue fluorescence were determined by a body imaging system, and the thigh muscles were collected for genomic DNA extraction, western blotting and muscle tissue sections, respectively.
T7 endonuclease 1 (T7E1) cleavage assay and targeted deep-sequencing analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted with a Tissue and Cell Culture DNA Midi kit (TianGen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified genomic DNA was used as a template to amplify a fragment of the Mstn gene with the following specific primers: MSTN-Test1-F: 5′-CGCCTGGAAACAGCTCCTAA-3′ and MSTN-Test1-R: 5′-TCTCATGCTTTAACACTGCCT-3′; MSTN-Test2-F: 5′-TTCTAATGCAAGCGGATGGC-3′ and MSTN-Test2-R: 5′-CACACCTACCTTTGGAGTAAGA-3′; and MSTN-Test3-F: 5′-GGATGGCAAGCCCAAATGTT-3′ and MSTN-Test3-R: 5′-ACACACCTACCTTTGGAGTAAG-3′. The fragment sizes amplified by these primer sets were 521 bp, 548 bp and 537 bp, respectively. The PCR products were digested with T7 endonuclease 1 (NEB, Boston, USA) and resolved with 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The primers used for tracking of insertions and deletions (indels) by decomposition (TIDE) were the same as the MSTN-Test-F/R primers. Genomic DNA (100 ng) was used for PCR amplification with a High Fidelity 2 × PCR Master Mix (NEB). For TIDE analysis, 300 ng of PCR product was purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Mannheim, Germany) and sent for Sanger sequencing with the forward primer MSTN-Test-F. Indel values were obtained with the TIDE web tool (https://tide.deskgen.com/) as described previously. Targeted deep-sequencing analysis was performed for C2C12 cells and gDNA from mouse muscle with a PCR amplification approach. Briefly, the off-target locus was identified through the website http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/. On-target or off-target locus-specific primers (Table 1) were used to amplify the editing site with Phusion High Fidelity DNA Polymerase. The resultant amplicons were separated on a 1.0% agarose gel. The bands of ~ 150 bp were extracted with a SanPrep DNA Gel Extraction kit. Then, targeted deep-sequencing of DNA products was performed by GENEWIZ Inc. In brief, the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, Santiago, USA) in paired-end mode with a read length of 150 bp. Primary analysis was performed with built-in software, HiSeq Control Software (HCS), RTA 2.3 plus, and demultiplexing was performed with bcl2fastq 2.17. Finally, the raw data of the targeted sequencing were analyzed by bioinformatics analysts at GENEWIZ Inc. The resulting indel frequencies, sizes and distributions were then plotted with GraphPad Prism.
Protein analysis
Protein extracts were prepared on ice by homogenization of pieces of frozen tissues or cell pellets in 500 µL of RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and 2 mM MgCl2) supplemented with 1:100 protease inhibitor solution (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) by passage through a syringe. With each loose- and tight-fitting piston, the samples received 30 strokes and were then centrifuged at 1000×g for 5 min at 4 °C to remove debris. The supernatant (whole cell lysate) was collected. For the isolation of membrane fractions, the supernatant was further centrifuged at 13,200×g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended (2 µL/mg tissue) in sample buffer (2.7 M urea, 3.3% SDS and 0.167 M Tris, pH 6.7). The protein concentration was estimated with a BCA assay. For protein detection, 30 µg of sample was separated with 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. After incubation in 5% nonfat milk for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-MSTN/GAPDH antibody (1:1000, Bioss Antibodies, China, catalogue number: bs-23012R/bs-2188R) overnight at 4 °C. Then membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:2000, Bioss Antibodies, catalogue number: bs-0295G) antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The target proteins were detected with Luminata™ Crescendo immunoblotting HRP Substrate (Millipore, USA).
Histology analyses
The quadriceps and adductors muscles were fixed in para-formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for further histopathological investigations. Formalin-fixed quadriceps and adductors muscles sections were stained to investigate the density and diameter of muscle fibers by hematoxylin and eosin according to a standard protocol (Feldman and Wolfe 2014). After the staining procedure, the slides were scanned with a microscope. At least five fields at 40 × /200 × magnification were definite selected from each section and ten sections in each group for imaging. The muscle mass at the same muscle position was observed in different groups of mice. The cross-sectional area of each quadriceps or adductors muscle in each section was analyzed, and then the average cross-sectional area (mm2) of individual muscle cell was calculated. All data were obtained and analyzed with Image Pro Plus 6.0 software.
Muscle weights of mice
The experimental mice were weighed weekly from the first week to the eighth week. The quadriceps and adductor muscles from the left thigh in the experimental mice were dissected at 10 weeks. The quadriceps and adductors muscles were weighed on electronic scales and the weight was recorded for each muscle. Ten mice were weighed per group.
Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Unpaired Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA were used for group comparisons with Prism 6 (GraphPad). *P values less than 0.05 and greater than 0.01 were considered significant. **P value less than 0.01 was considered to be of greater significance.
Results
Construction of new CRISPR/SaCas9 vectors and location of Mstn knockout targets
In our experiment, we focused on the design of a compact CRISPR/SaCas9 vector, pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgRNA plasmid suitable for AAV delivery. The pX601-EF1α:SaCas9-eGFP-tRNA:sgRNA plasmid contains an EF1α promoter controlling expression of the SaCas9 coding region fused to a self-cleaving P2A sequence attached to an eGFP sequence, and it contains a constitutively expressing sgRNA expression cassette controlled by a tRNA promoter. The P2A sequence enables the SaCas9 and the eGFP domain to yield two independent proteins from the same cistron, and the translated proteins from the two genes retain their functions. This approach can be used to indirectly understand the transfection ability of recombinant AAV and the gene editing effect mediated by SaCas9 protein through the expression level of GFP protein (Fig. 1a).
The sgRNAs were designed to target the mouse Mstn locus (sgMstn1/sgMstn2/sgMstn3) (Fig. 1b). We chose to target the Mstn locus because it is a well-studied gene known for its important role in muscle of overgrowth and is important in research on some muscular atrophic diseases. The three sgRNAs are located at the N-terminal of the first and second exon of Mstn gene, and these sites play an important role in the synthesis of MSTN precursor proteins.
The reconstructed CRISPR/SaCas9 vector exhibits efficient genome editing in vitro
To examine the genome editing capabilities of the reconstructed CRISPR/SaCas9 vector, we transfected NIH/3T3 cells with the plasmid psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 in the treatment groups. The expression of eGFP from the transfected plasmid psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 was confirmed by cellular immunofluorescence in the NIH/3T3 cells. The control cells were wild type cells cultured in the same batch. A flow cytometry experiment was performed on NIH/3T3 cells transfected with the psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 plasmids. The expression efficiency of psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 plasmids was 46.40%, 43.81% or 42.42%, respectively (Fig. 2a). The results confirmed that the recombinant vectors expressed effectively. Genomic DNA was isolated, and the 521 bp, 548 bp and 537 bp regions from the sgMstn1/sgMstn2/sgMstn3 loci were PCR amplified and examined for SaCas9-mediated editing with a T7 endonuclease digestion identification method. With this assay, if no editing occurred, a single band was visible on the gel. The results were as shown in the control groups. When editing did occur, the DNA was cut at the location of the editing, thus resulting in two smaller bands of 181 and 340 bp in length for sgMstn1; 185 and 352 bp in length for sgMstn2; and 122 and 415 bp in length for sgMstn3 (Fig. 2b). For TIDE analysis, PCR products were sent for Sanger sequencing with the forward primer MSTN-Test1/2/3-F. The sequencing results of psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 plasmids showed that compared with the ordered, single peaks of normal cell gene, the knockout cell gene had chaotic peaks due to random mutations at the knockout site. (Fig. 2c). Indel values were obtained with the TIDE web tool (https://tide.deskgen.com/). The control group did not exhibit editing of the Mstn locus. However, cells transfected with psgMstn1/psgMstn2/psgMstn3 plasmids displayed an average of 31.44%, 18.23% or 27.26% editing, respectively (Fig. 2d). Genome editing percentages were averaged from three independent samples per group. From the above data, we determined that all three plasmids had gene editing ability. Compared with that of sgMstn2 and sgMstn3, the gene editing efficiency of sgMstn1 was higher, and the knock-off efficiency was lower. Therefore, sgMstn1 was selected as the first choice for in vivo and in vitro targeting of packaged rAAV vectors.
The rAAV-DJ/8-SaCas9 efficiently expresses the eGFP fluorescence in vitro
We infected C2C12 cells with ~ 2 × 109 vg/1 × 1010 vg of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 in the treatment groups. The control group comprised wild type C2C12 cells cultured in the same batch. All cells were observed and harvested 96 h, 120 h later. The expression of eGFP in the treatment groups were confirmed by cellular immunofluorescence in C2C12 cells. No eGFP expression was observed in the control group (Fig. 3a). A flow cytometry experiment was performed on C2C12 cells infected with the rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1. The eGFP expression efficiency of the treatment groups with 2 × 109 vg rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 was 4.36%, 17.31% at 96 h, 120 h later and 1 × 1010 vg rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 was 6.21%, 24.84% at 96 h,120 h later, respectively. No eGFP expression was observed in the control group (Fig. 3b). The eGFP expression efficiency of the treatment groups were prominent in vitro.
The rAAV-DJ/8-SaCas9 efficiently targets the Mstn site in C2C12 cells
We have demonstrated that Mstn site knockout occurs at the cellular and molecular level in C2C12 cells. Genomic DNA was isolated from a 521 bp region from the sgMstn1 locus, PCR amplified and examined for SaCas9-mediated editing with a T7 endonuclease digestion identification method. The results indicated two smaller bands 181 and 340 bp in length for sgMstn1 (Fig. 4a). For TIDE analysis, the 2 × 109 vg of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 resulted in 8.72%, 17.75% editing at 96 h, 120 h, and the 1 × 1010 vg of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 resulted in 11.94%, 22.22% editing at 96 h, 120 h. The control group did not exhibit editing of the Mstn locus (Fig. 4b). Genome editing percentages were averaged from three independent samples per group. Compared with the control group, the treatment groups infected with rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 showed decrease in MSTN protein levels (Fig. 4c). A stacked histogram showing the percentage distribution of MSTN expression in two dose treatment groups indicated 80.67%, 74% at 96 h, and 69.67%, 65.33% at 120 h (Fig. 4d). Data represent the means ± SD from three technical replicates. Efficient editing and MSTN protein reduction indicated the success of the delivery and activity of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 at the Mstn locus, and demonstrated that gene editing of the cells were effective by the rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1.
The rAAV9-SaCas9 efficiently expresses the eGFP fluorescence in vivo
We sought to assess whether our SaCas9 system could be used for steady expression in vivo. In these experiments, we produced rAAV9-sgMstn1, pseudotyped as 9 serotype. In the two treatment groups, rAAV9-sgMstn1 were infected into the left thigh muscle in C57BL/10 male mice, each at a titer of ~ 1 × 1010 vg/1 × 1011 vg. We found that eGFP fluorescence expression was detected 6 weeks later in the treatment groups, and the expression of eGFP was more obvious with the increase of time. In addition, the fluorescence expression of eGFP was higher in the high-dose group at the same time point, and no fluorescence expression was detected in the control group (Fig. 5).
The rAAV9-SaCas9 efficiently targets the Mstn site in mice thigh muscle
We have demonstrated that Mstn site knockout occurs at the cellular and molecular level in mice thigh muscle. Genomic DNA from mice muscle was isolated, and a 521 bp region from the sgMstn1 locus was PCR amplified and examined for SaCas9-mediated editing with a T7 endonuclease digestion identification method. The results revealed two smaller bands 181 and 340 bp in length for sgMstn1 in the treatment groups, which were absent in the control group (Fig. 6a). For TIDE analysis, the 1 × 1010 vg of rAAV9-sgMstn1 displayed 6.31%, 13.11% and 18.8% editing at 6, 8 and 10 weeks, and the 1 × 1011 vg of rAAV9-sgMstn1 displayed 9.29%, 17.59% and 21.68% editing at 6, 8 and 10 weeks (Fig. 6b). Muscle from mice that received the 1 × PBS did not exhibit editing of the Mstn locus. The genome editing percentages were averaged from three independent samples per group. Compared with the control group muscles, MSTN protein levels were reduced in the muscle infected with ~ 1 × 1010 vg/1 × 1011 vg of the rAAV9-sgMstn1 (Fig. 6c). A stacked histogram showing the percentage distribution of MSTN expression in muscle after infection with 1 × 1010 vg of the rAAV9-sgMstn1 indicated 85%, 73.2%, 59.8% at 6, 8, 10 weeks. And the percentage distribution of MSTN expression in muscle after infection with 1 × 1011 vg of the rAAV9-sgMstn1 indicated 80.43%, 67.5%, 51.33% at 6, 8, 10 weeks (Fig. 6d). The data represent means ± SD from three technical replicates. Efficient editing and MSTN protein reduction indicated the success of the delivery and activity of rAAV9-sgMstn1 at the Mstn locus in mice. Moreover, the editing effect of the two treatment groups was more obvious with the increase of time, while that of the high-dose group was relatively higher.
The rAAV9-SaCas9 effectively edited genes and improved muscle mass in mice
Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the 1 × 1011 vg rAAV9-sgMstn1 treatment group and the control group were performed, and the transverse sections of the quadriceps and adductors muscles showed different density distributions. The total muscle mass of the treatment group had significantly enlarged than the control group (proportional scale: 200 µm). And the cross-sectional area of each muscle fiber of the treatment group were substantially added (proportional scale: 50 µm) (Fig. 7).
Mstn gene was knocked out by the rAAV9-SaCas9 in thigh muscles to increase muscle mass
We detected the changes of body weight in C57BL/10 mice after Mstn was knocked out. Compared with the control group, the body weight of the 1 × 1011 vg rAAV9-sgMstn1 treatment group were substantially added, especially in the 7–10 weeks (Fig. 8a). In addition, we clearly found the weight change of quadriceps and adductor. Compared with the control group, treatment with 1 × 1011 vg of the rAAV9-sgMstn1 significantly increased the quadriceps weight (0.01 < P < 0.05) and adductors weight (0.01 < P < 0.05) at 10 weeks (Fig. 8b). These results revealed muscle weight increase in the Mstn knockout muscle. According to analysis of the quadriceps and adductors muscle sections, we observed that the total area of quadriceps and adductors muscles in the treated group were significantly greater than those in the control group (0.01 < P < 0.05) at 10 weeks (Fig. 8c). And the average area of individual muscle fiber cell in the treated group was significantly greater than it in the control group (0.01 < P < 0.05) at 10 weeks (Fig. 8d). The results revealed that the area of muscle fibers increased, and muscles enlarged, with decreased MSTN expression in muscle tissues.
SaCas9 is highly specific in vivo
The possibility of off-target edits is a major concern in therapeutic CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Some researchers have found that SaCas9 is a naturally highly occurring genome editing platform in mice (Xu et al. 2019; Ohmori et al; 2017). Using targeted deep-sequencing of mouse cell DNA products obtained by GENEWIZ Inc., we screened for off-target sites in the mouse genome to determine whether SaCas9 maintained its minimal off-targeting profile in mice cells. NIH/3T3 cells were transfected with psgMstn1, psgMstn2 and psgMstn3 plasmids. The resulting genomic DNA was subjected to sequencing analysis. Sequencing revealed few off-target sites in the mouse genome, a result consistent with our previous observations in mouse cells. Six potential off-target sites were identified for sgMstn1, five for sgMstn2 and another nine for sgMstn3, with a low probability of off-target sites in the mouse genome (Fig. 9a). We concluded that SaCas9 editing is intrinsically specific. We also performed targeted deep-sequencing with genomic DNA from the muscles of mice to validate these off-target sites. According to this more sensitive readout, indels detected more accurately above background at all of the off-target locus 1 sites with Mstn (Fig. 9b). These results indicated that rAAV9-sgMstn1 is a promising and safe candidate for in vivo applications.
Discussion
Several CRISPR/Cas9-based-inducible systems have been developed, but few have been developed for the SaCas9 variant. Since the characterization of SaCas9 (Ran et al. 2015), several groups have extended its application in targeted mutagenesis in a variety of models such as plants, mice and zebrafish (Kaya et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018; Feng et al.2016). Because of its smaller size, SaCas9 provides substantial advantages in the delivery and expression of Cas9, especially when AAVs are used. Recent work has shown that SaCas9 has higher activity than the other Cas9 variants such as SpCas9 and FnCpf1 (Xie et al. 2018).
To our knowledge, there are currently few available single AAV viruses containing both the Cas9 and sgRNA. Among them, the rAAV-SaCas9 system has been shown to be effective for gene editing in vivo (Ran et al. 2015). These systems not only provide comparable editing levels to those of other SpCas9 systems, but also have the advantage of being within the AAV packaging limit. Moreover, researchers can manipulate gene expression at precise sites and to precise degrees of expression. Therefore, these SaCas9 systems can probably be used to edit genes at specific sites to improve tissue traits and treat chronic diseases (De Caneva et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2019). First, we report the development of an SaCas9 system with a different sgRNA promoter (tRNA pro ~ 72 bp) and SaCas9 promoter (EF1α pro ~ 212 bp) that can be delivered to cells via rAAV. This single vector system contains a smaller Cas9, a fluorescent protein and a gRNA expression cassette. Only one virus is needed to mediate genome editing in animals or cell lines. We believe that this system should be extremely useful and may be used separately or in combination with other expression cassettes in experiments.
We observed favorable gene editing efficiency by AAV in vitro across our experiments. Through infection of C2C12 cells, we observed fluorescence expression of the eGFP protein in rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1. One study has indicated that when the SaCas9 system targets the HT1080 cell line in vitro, the genome editing rate is ~ 40–50% (Morsy et al. 2017). In contrast, our system showed relatively low editing efficiency ~ 17.31% in vitro with the same amount of virus, but by increasing the amount of virus, we substantially improved the editing efficiency approximately ~ 24.84%. So we found that increasing the amount of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1 improved the expression of eGFP protein and the efficiency of SaCas9 protein editing. We also found that rAAV-SaCas9 was expressed stably in cells for a long time in our experiments. Therefore, genome editing efficiency can be improved by increasing the expression time and titer of rAAV-DJ/8-sgMstn1.
Because of differences in AAV serotypes, transcription factors and injection sites, AAV-mediated delivery of transgenes in tissues often differs (Huang et al. 2017). In addition, the titer of the AAV virus and the method of virus injection also greatly affect the efficiency of AAV-mediated transgene delivery. Intramuscular injection was used because it has a highly targeted effect on tissues. The effect is more easily analyzed by comparing the differences in muscle tissues, cells and corresponding proteins without considering the overall effect on local areas. In addition, systemic injection may cause adverse effects specific to nerves, immune cells, hormones and other factors, and may cause a large area of off-target editing and even cancer mutations in offspring. Mstn knockout in mice also resulted in changes in body characteristics. Therefore, we focused on local targeted knockout experiments in gene editing. In our experiments, we infused our rAAV-SaCas9 system into the left thigh in C57BL/10 male mice. Therefore, genome editing was restricted to the SaCas9 system within this region. We found that the higher the rAAV9-sgMstn1 titer, the higher the fluorescence intensity of eGFP protein. Moreover, we were able to clearly observed the location of the rAAV9-sgMstn1 through eGFP protein fluorescence. Although eGFP fluorescence of the rAAV was detected, the fluorescence intensity was not strong and it was easy to be interfered by the fur. Therefore, the expression of this eGFP fluorescence needs to be improved.
We observed the feasibility and effectiveness of genome editing in these systems, which achieved average ~ 20.24% genome editing. These editing efficiencies are higher than those in previous studies from laboratory examining SaCas9 genome editing (Wei et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2018). In agreement with the results of in vitro experiments, increasing the amount of recombinant rAAV in vivo also promoted the genome editing efficiency of the rAAV. The genome editing efficiency in the high virus titer group was 17.59% at 8 weeks, and the greatest amount of genomic editing was ~ 21.68%. Therefore, within a certain period of time, when the amount and expression time of the rAAV increased, the gene editing in vivo achieved the best effect.
Muscle wasting occurs with aging and in a wide range of catabolic diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, chronic renal disease and heart failure, which can dramatically decrease quality of life and increase disease mortality (Wei et al. 2016). Recently, in vivo genome editing targeting muscle tissues with CRISPR-Cas systems has shown efficacy in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Lim et al. 2018). The researchers found that by blocking the MSTN protein expression and myostatin pathway of some skeletal muscle cells, these cells should be able to prevent the atrophy of target cells and adjacent cells, thus maintaining muscle function to a certain extent (Cohen et al. 2015). Our constructed rAAV-SaCas9 system has been shown to be effective for Mstn editing of thigh muscles. Moreover, the rAAV-SaCas9 system significantly improved muscle cells by knocking out the Mstn gene. This laid a foundation for the clinical application of the rAAV-SaCas9 system. Thomas and Joulia et al. have found that MSTN up-regulates the activity and level of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, thus preventing G1 phase to S phase transition, inhibiting the proliferation of muscle cells, and decreasing the number of muscle fibers (Thomas et al. 2000; Joulia et al. 2003). McPherron and coworkers have found that mice with gene knockout of Mstn have significantly enlarged muscles. In the mutant mice, the number of muscle fibers was 86% greater than that in wild-type mice, thus indicating that Mstn knockout causes muscle fiber growth and hypertrophy (McPherron et al. 1997). The results of our experiment are consistent with that conclusion. Treatment with rAAV9-Mstn1 resulted in significantly higher body weight, quadriceps weight and adductor weight than those in the normal group. Through analysis of muscle tissue, we confirmed that knockout the Mstn gene changed the volume and number of muscle fibers, an effect particularly important for improving muscle mass.
In summary, gene editing for all of the systems could probably be optimized further by using highly efficient sgRNAs and high titer rAAV, increasing the incubation time of these viruses in vivo, and using serotypes of AAV that transduce target cells with high efficiency. In this paper, we demonstrate that the constructed rAAV-SaCas9 system confer stable expression in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, The fluorescence intensity of eGFP protein and the gene editing efficiency of SaCas9 protein increased with increasing rAAV-SaCas9 titer. The fluorescence intensity of the eGFP protein was also used to determine the infection effects and the location of the rAAV-SaCas9. In addition, we edited mice muscle with a high dose of rAAV9-SaCas9 virus, which effectively improved the muscle properties of mice. The results show that the rAAV-SaCas9 system has great potential in disease treatment and genetic modification.
References
Camporez JP, Petersen MC, Abudukadier A, Moreira GV, Jurczak MJ, Friedman G, Haqq CM, Petersen KF, Shulman GI (2016) Anti-myostatin antibody increases muscle mass and strength and improves insulin sensitivity in old mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:2212–2217
Cohen S, Nathan JA, Goldberg AL (2015) Muscle wasting in disease: molecular mechanisms and promising therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 14:58–74
Crudele JM, Chamberlain JS (2019) AAV-based gene therapies for the muscular dystrophies. Hum Mol Genet 28:R102-r107
Caneva AD, Porro F, Bortolussi G, Sola R, Lisjak M, Barzel A, Giacca M, Kay MA, Vlahovicek K, Zentilin L, Muro AF (2019) Coupling AAV-mediated promoterless gene targeting to SaCas9 nuclease to efficiently correct liver metabolic diseases. JCI Insight 5:e128863
Esvelt KM, Mali P, Braff JL, Moosburner M, Yaung SJ, Church GM (2013) Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat Methods 10:1116–1121
Feldman AT, Wolfe D (2014) Tissue processing and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Methods Mol Biol 1180:31–43
Feng Y, Chen C, Han Y, Chen Z, Lu X, Liang F, Li S, Qin W, Lin S (2016) Expanding CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing capacity in zebrafish using SaCas9. G3 (bethesda) 6:2517–2521
Gallot YS, Durieux AC, Castells J, Desgeorges MM, Vernus B, Plantureux L, Rémond D, Jahnke VE, Lefai E, Dardevet D et al (2014) Myostatin gene inactivation prevents skeletal muscle wasting in cancer. Cancer Res 74:7344–7356
Holehonnur R, Luong JA, Chaturvedi D, Ho A, Lella SK, Hosek MP, Ploski JE (2014) Adeno-associated viral serotypes produce differing titers and differentially transduce neurons within the rat basal and lateral amygdala. BMC Neurosci 15:28
Huang X, Zhou G, Wu W, Duan Y, Ma G, Song J, Xiao R, Vandenberghe L, Zhang F, D’Amore PA, Lei H (2017) Genome editing abrogates angiogenesis in vivo. Nat Commun 8:112
Joulia D, Bernardi H, Garandel V, Rabenoelina F, Vernus B, Cabello G (2003) Mechanisms involved in the inhibition of myoblast proliferation and differentiation by myostatin. Exp Cell Res 286:263–275
Kaya H, Ishibashi K, Toki S (2017) A split Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 as a compact genome-editing tool in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 58:643–649
Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Gonzales AP, Li Z, Peterson RT, Yeh JR et al (2015) Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523:481–485
Kumar N, Stanford W, de Solis C, Aradhana, Abraham ND, Dao TJ, Thaseen S, Sairavi A, Gonzalez CU, Ploski JE (2018) The development of an AAV-based CRISPR SaCas9 genome editing system that can be delivered to neurons in vivo and regulated via doxycycline and Cre-recombinase. Front Mol Neurosci 11:413
Li ZH, Zhao JL, Muhammad N, Wang DY, Mao QW, Xia HB (2018) Establishment of a HEK293 cell line by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated luciferase knock-in to study transcriptional regulation of the human SREBP1 gene. Biotech Lett 40:1495–1506
Lim KRQ, Yoon C, Yokota T (2018) Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 for the treatment of duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pers Med 8:38
McPherron AC, Lee SJ (1997) Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12457–12461
McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee SJ (1997) Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 387:83–90
Mefferd AL, Kornepati AV, Bogerd HP, Kennedy EM, Cullen BR (2015) Expression of CRISPR/Cas single guide RNAs using small tRNA promoters. RNA 21:1683–1689
Mollanoori H, Teimourian S (2018) Therapeutic applications of CRISPR/Cas9 system in gene therapy. Biotech Lett 40:907–914
Moreno AM, Fu X, Zhu J, Katrekar D, Shih YV, Marlett J, Cabotaje J, Tat J, Naughton J, Lisowski L et al (2018) In situ gene therapy via AAV-CRISPR-Cas9-mediated targeted gene regulation. Mol Ther 26:1818–1827
Morsy SG, Tonne JM, Zhu Y, Lu B, Budzik K, Krempski JW, Ali SA, El-Feky MA, Ikeda Y (2017) Divergent susceptibilities to AAV-SaCas9-gRNA vector-mediated genome-editing in a single-cell-derived cell population. BMC Res Notes 10:720
Ohmori T, Nagao Y, Mizukami H, Sakata A, Muramatsu SI (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing via postnatal administration of AAV vector cures haemophilia B mice. Sci Rep 7:4159
Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu X, Makarova KS et al (2015) In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520:186–191
Rodriguez J, Vernus B, Toubiana M, Jublanc E, Tintignac L, Leibovitch S, Bonnieu A (2011) Myostatin inactivation increases myotube size through regulation of translational initiation machinery. J Cell Biochem 112:3531–3542
Salzler RR, Shah D, Doré A, Bauerlein R, Miloscio L, Latres E, Papadopoulos NJ, Olson WC, MacDonald D, Duan X (2016) Myostatin deficiency but not anti-myostatin blockade induces marked proteomic changes in mouse skeletal muscle. Proteomics 16:2019–2027
Senis E, Fatouros C, Grosse S, Wiedtke E, Niopek D, Mueller AK, Borner K, Grimm D (2014) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering: an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector toolbox. Biotechnol J 9:1402–1412
Smith RC, Lin BK (2013) Myostatin inhibitors as therapies for muscle wasting associated with cancer and other disorders. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 7:352–360
Tabebordbar M, Zhu K, Cheng JKW, Chew WL, Widrick JJ, Yan WX, Maesner C, Wu EY, Xiao R, Ran FA et al (2016) In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells. Science 351:407–411
Thomas M, Langley B, Berry C, Sharma M, Kirk S, Bass J, Kambadur R (2000) Myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle growth, functions by inhibiting myoblast proliferation. J Biol Chem 275:40235–40243
Wei Y, Chen Y, Qiu Y, Zhao H, Liu G, Zhang Y, Meng Q, Wu G, Chen Y, Cai X et al (2016) Prevention of muscle wasting by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of myostatin in vivo. Mol Ther 24:1889–1891
Weng S, Gao F, Wang J, Li X, Chu B, Wang J, Yang G (2020) Improvement of muscular atrophy by AAV-SaCas9-mediated myostatin gene editing in aged mice. Cancer Gene Ther 27:960–975
Xie H, Tang L, He X, Liu X, Zhou C, Liu J, Ge X, Li J, Liu C, Zhao J et al (2018) SaCas9 Requires 5′-NNGRRT-3′ PAM for sufficient cleavage and possesses higher cleavage activity than SpCas9 or FnCpf1 in human cells. Biotechnol J 13:e1700561
Xu L, Gao Y, Lau YS, Han R (2018) Adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery of CRISPR for cardiac gene editing in mice. J vis Exp 138:57560
Xu L, Lau YS, Gao Y, Li H, Han R (2019) Life-long AAV-mediated CRISPR genome editing in dystrophic heart improves cardiomyopathy without causing serious lesions in mdx mice. Mol Ther 27:1407–1414
Yang Y, Wang L, Bell P, McMenamin D, He Z, White J, Yu H, Xu C, Morizono H, Musunuru K et al (2016) A dual AAV system enables the Cas9-mediated correction of a metabolic liver disease in newborn mice. Nat Biotechnol 34:334–338
Zincarelli C, Soltys S, Rengo G, Rabinowitz JE (2008) Analysis of AAV serotypes 1–9 mediated gene expression and tropism in mice after systemic injection. Mol Ther 16:1073–1080
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China (Grant No. 2016ZX08006001-006) and Advantage and Characteristic Discipline of Henan Province (Grant No. 203/18xk0102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SW and GY contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, experiment operation were performed by YZ, XW, CY and XX. Data collection and analysis were performed by SW, JW, LH and KZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SW and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Before initiation of the study, we obtained permission from the Experimental Animal Ethical Committee of Henan Agricultural University.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Weng, S., Zhao, Y., Yu, C. et al. Construction of a rAAV-SaCas9 system expressing eGFP and its application to improve muscle mass. Biotechnol Lett 43, 2111–2129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-021-03183-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-021-03183-1