Skip to main content
Log in

Comparation of the effects of different 5′-untranslated regions (UTRs) on gene expression in HEK293 cells

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate four 5′-UTRs on GFP expression in HEK293T cells.

Results

The recombinant plasmids were constructed by restriction enzyme digestion, digestion and DNA sequencing. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting results showed that the transcription and translation level of PPRV-GFP mRNA was significantly lower than that of the other reporters. The transcription and translation level of ChEF1-GFP was the highest in HEK293T cells.

Conclusions

Different UTRs can significantly affect protein expression. Additionally, the findings also will be useful in biological applications that require tuning of gene expression and system optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attal J, Théron M, Kann G, Bolifraud P, Puissant C, Houdebine LM (2000) The stimulation of gene expression by the R region from HTLV-1 and BLV. J Biotechnol 77:179–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bashirullah A, Cooperstock RL, Lipshitz HD (2001) Spatial and temporal control of RNA stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7025–7028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger C, Boris-Lawrie K (2009) Mechanisms employed by retroviruses to exploit host factors for translational control of a complicated proteome. Retrovirology 6:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee GG, Sharps JL (2002) The RNA polymerase of influenza a virus is stabilized by interaction with its viral RNA promoter. J Virol 76:7103–7113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Férec C, Cooper DN (2006) A systematic analysis of disease-associated variants in the 3′ regulatory regions of human protein-coding genes II: the importance of mRNA secondary structure in assessing the functionality of 3′ UTR variants. Human Genet 120:301–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chulakasian S, Chang TJ, Tsai CH, Wong ML, Hsu WL (2013) Translational enhancing activity in 5′ UTR of peste des petits ruminants virus fusion gene. FEBS J 280:1237–1248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conne B, Stutz A, Vassalli J (2000) The 3′ untranslated region of messenger RNA: a molecular ‘hotspot’ for pathology. Nat Med 6:637–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir S, Veltenc L, Sharona E, Zeevia D, Careya LB, Weinbergera A, Segala E (2013) Deciphering the rules by which 5′-UTR sequences affect protein expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E2792–E2801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flick R, Neumann G, Hoffmann E, Neumeier E, Hobom G (1996) Promoter elements in the influenza vRNA terminal structure. RNA 2:1046–1057

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenadl C, Gunzburg WH, Salmons B, Indik S (2012) The 5′ leader sequence of mouse mammary tumor virus enhances expression of the envelope and reporter genes. J Gen Virol 93:308–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen R (2001) mRNA localization: message on the move. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(4):247–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulasegaran-Shylini R, Atasheva S, Gorenstein DG, Frolov I (2009) Structural and functional elements of the promoter encoded by the 5′ untranslated region of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus genome. J Virol 83:8327–8339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Li WH (2012) Evolution of 5′ untranslated region length and gene expression reprogramming in yeasts. Mol Biol Evol 29(1):81–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Liu K, Xue C, Zhou J, Xu S, Ren Y, Zheng J, Cao Y (2013) Impact of the segment-specific region of the 3′-untranslated region of the influenza A virus PB1 segment on protein expression. Virus Genes 47:429–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mignone F, Gissi C, Liuni S, Pesole G (2002) Untranslated regions of mRNAs. Genome Biol 3(3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogozin IB, Kochetov AV, Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV, Milanesi L (2001) Presence of ATG triplets in 5′ untranslated regions of eukaryotic cDNAs correlates with a ‘weak’ context of the start codon. Bioinformatics 17:890–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RJ, Mohr I (2003) Translation initiation and viral tricks. Trends Biochem Sci 28:130–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velden AW, Thomas AA (1999) The role of the 5′ untranslated region of an mRNA in translation regulation during development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 31:87–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Genetically modified organisms breeding major projects (No. 2014ZX08010B15), the basic research projects of Henan province (142300413209), the Recommend International Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology Plan (“948” project) of China (No. 2011-G35).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-Yu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, XM., Zha, GM., Wang, J. et al. Comparation of the effects of different 5′-untranslated regions (UTRs) on gene expression in HEK293 cells. Biotechnol Lett 38, 2051–2057 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2199-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2199-8

Keywords

Navigation