Skip to main content
Log in

Titanium Patient-Specific Implants in Reconstructive Neurosurgery

  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope

Surgery restoring lost parts of the skull, i.e., cranioplasty, is widely used in neurosurgical practice. We have compared operations using patient-specific implants obtained by two different methods: formation based on anatomical models and direct three-dimensional printing (direct metal laser sintering, DMLS). Both methods gave comparable clinical efficacy, though the DMLS manufacturing process avoids the need for intermediate devices and produces the required implant directly, giving this method an advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aydin, S., Kucukyuruk, B., Abuzayed, B., et al., “Cranioplasty: Review of materials and technique,” J. Neurosci. Rural Pract., 2, No. 2, 162-167 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah, A. M., Jung, H., and Skirboll, S., “Materials used in cranio-plasty: A history and analysis,” Neurosurgery Focus, 36, No. 4, (2014); http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 (accessed December 4, 2017).

  3. Potapov, A. A., Kravchuk, A. D., Likhterman, L. B., et al., Reconstructive Surgery for Skull Defects. Clinical Guidelines [in Russian], Moscow (2015).

  4. Yadla, S., Campbell, P., Chitale, R., et al., “Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: A systematic review,” Neurosurgery, 68, No. 4, 1124-1130 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuno, A., Tanaka, H., Iwamuro, H., et al., “Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty,” Acta Neurochirurgica, 148, 535-540 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flanigan, P., Kshettry, V. R., and Benzel, E. C., “World War II, tantalum, and evolution of modern cranioplasty technique,” Neurosurgery Focus, 36, No. 4 (2014); http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13552?url_ver=Z39.88_2003&rfr_id=ori: rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed (accessed December 4, 2017).

  7. Levchenko, O. V., “Current methods in cranioplasty,” Neirokhirurgiya, No. 2, 5-13 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Konovalov, A. N., Potapov, A. A., and Likhterman, L. B. Surgery for the Sequelae of Craniocerebral Trauma [in Russian], Media Sfera, Moscow (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Potapov, A. A., Kornienko, V. N., Kravchuk, A. D., et al., “Current technologies in the surgical treatment of the sequelae of Skull and Brain Trauma,” Vestn. Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk, No. 9, 31-38 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Konovalov, A. N., Potapov, A. A., Likhterman, L. B., et al., Reconstructive and Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Sequelae of Craniocerebral Trauma [in Russian], IP “T. A. Alekseeva,” Moscow (2012).

  11. Eolchiyan, C. A., “Plastic surgery for complex skull defects with titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants made using CAD/CAM technologies,” Vopr. Neirokhirurg., 78, No. 4, 3-13 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sirko, A. G. and Kirpa, I. Yu., “Reconstructive surgery of post-traumatic craniofacial defects using titanium plates made using patient-specific stereolithographic models,” Ukr. Neirokhirurg. Zh., No. 3, 54 (2010).

  13. Honeybul, S., Morisson, D. A., Ho, K. M., et al., “A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty,” J. Neurosurg., 126, 81-90 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo, J. M., Liu, B., Xie, Z. Y., et al., “Comparison of manually shaped and computer shaped titanium mesh for repairing large frontotemporoparietal skull defects after traumatic brain injury,” Neurosurgery Focus, 33, No. 1 (2012); http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/2012.2.FOCUS129 (accessed December 4, 2017).

  15. Bonda, D. J., Manjila, S., Selman, W. R., et al., “The recent revolution in the design and manufacture of cranial implants: Modern advancements and future directions,” Neurosurgery, 77, No. 5, 814-824 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, E. T., Ling, J. M., and Dinesh, S. K., “The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer,” J. Neurosurg., 124, No. 5, 1531-1537 (2016); http://thejns.org/doi/full/10.3171/2015.5.JNS15119 (accessed December 4, 2017).

  17. Mishinov, S. V., Stupak, V. V., Mamonova, N. V., et al., “Methods of three-dimensional prototyping and printing in reconstructive neurosurgery,” Med. Tekh., 302, No. 2, 22-26 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mishinov, S. V., Stupak, V. V., Panchenko, A. A., et al., “Reconstruction of the fronto-zygomatico-orbital zone using patient-specific titanium implants made by direct laser sintering on a 3D printer,” Ros. Neirokhirurg. Zh. im. Prof. A. L. Polenova, 9, No. 1, 80-83 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mukherjee, S., Thakur, B., Haq, I., et al., “Complications of titanium cranioplasty – A retrospective analysis of 174 patients,” Acta Neurochirurgica, 156, No. 5, 989-998 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Mishinov.

Additional information

Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 52, No. 3, May-Jun., 2018, pp. 5-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishinov, S.V., Stupak, V.V., Koporushko, N.A. et al. Titanium Patient-Specific Implants in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Biomed Eng 52, 152–155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-018-9802-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-018-9802-3

Navigation