Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Increased grass cover height in the alleys of apple orchards does not promote Cydia pomonella biocontrol

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat management such as ground cover implementation in orchards is considered a promising approach to augment natural enemy abundance and diversity. However, the actual effects of grass cover management and specifically mowing frequency, on the abundance of tree natural enemies and thus on the biocontrol of major pests, are still largely unknown. We compared the effect of three heights, tall (no cutting), medium (mean height of 20 cm) and short (mean height of 5 cm), of a spontaneous grass cover in an experimental orchard on natural enemy abundance and predation rates from April to August. Early in the season (from April to May) grass cover height had no effect on codling moth egg predation. However later in the season (July and August) the predation rate increased more in the short grass cover than in the tall grass (66 vs. 38 %. respectively). The abundance of the earwig Forficula pubescens (Gené) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) was significantly positively correlated with egg predation in the plots with short grass but negatively correlated in the tall and medium plots suggesting that these predators could find an alternative resource in the taller grass cover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov A, Shearer PW, Hamilton GC (2003) Peach pest management programs impact beneficial fauna abundance and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) egg parasitism and predation. Environ Entomol 32:780–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2013) Package “MuMin”. Version 1.9.18. Available on: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/MuMIn.pdf. Cited 2 April 2014

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, RHB. C, Singmann H (2014) Package lme4: linear mixed-effects models using eigen and S4. Available on : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf. Cited 2 April 2014

  • Bogya S, Marko V, Szinetar C (2000) Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary. Int J Pest Manag 46:241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnip G, Daly J, Hackett J, Suckling D (2002) European earwig phenology and effect of understorey management on population estimation. NZ Plant Prot 55:390–395

  • Chang GC, Snyder WE (2004) The relationship between predator density, community composition, and field predation of Colorado potato beetle eggs. Biol Control 31:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debras JF (2007) Rôles fonctionnels des haies dans la régulation des ravageurs: le cas du psylle Cacopsylla pyri L. dans les vergers du sud-est de la France. These Université d’Avignon et des pays de Vaucluse

  • Development Core Team R (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Dib H, Simon S, Sauphanor B, Capowiez Y (2010) The role of natural enemies on the population dynamics of the rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in organic apple orchards in south-eastern France. Biol Control 55:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans EW (2009) Lady beetles as predators of insects other than Hemiptera. Biol Control 51:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Snyder WE (2010) Conserving the benefits of predator biodiversity. Biol Conserv 143:2260–2269

  • Glen DM (1977) Predation of codling moth eggs, Cydia pomonella, predators responsible and their alternative prey. J Appl Ecol 14:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen H, Vaal F, Blommers L (1998) Phenology of the common earwig Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) in an apple orchard. Int J Pest Manag 44:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg BN, Daane KM (2011) Diversity and invasion within a predator community: impacts on herbivore suppression. J Appl Ecol 48:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton DR, Broers DA, Lewis RR, Granatstein D, Zack RS, Unruh TR, Moldenke AR, Brown JJ (2003) Effects of mowing frequency on densities of natural enemies in three Pacific Northwest pear orchards. Entomol Exp Appl 106:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton DR, Jones VP, Unruh TR (2009) Use of a new immunomarking method to assess movement by generalist predators between a cover crop and tree canopy in a pear orchard. Am Entomol 55:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biol Conserv 106:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langellotto G, Denno R (2004) Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J (1983) Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau DK, Jedlicka JA, Bothwell SG, Moreno CR (2009) Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:573–592

  • Markó V, Keresztes B (2014) Flowers for better pest control? Ground cover plants enhance apple orchard spiders (Araneae), but not necessarily their impact on pests. Biocontrol Sci Technol 24:574–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro LB, Lavigne C, Ricci B, Franck P, Toubon J-F, Sauphanor B (2013) Predation of codling moth eggs is affected by pest management practices at orchard and landscape levels. Agric Ecosyst Environ 166:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce S, Hebron WM, Raven RJ, Zalucki MP, Hassan E (2004) Spider fauna of soybean crops in south-east Queensland and their potential as predators of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 43:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekar S (1999) Effect of IPM pratices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard. Agr Ecosyst Environ 26:155–166

  • Rieux R, Simon S, Defrance H (1999) Role of hedgerows and ground cover management on arthropod populations in pear orchards. Agric Ecosyst Environ 73:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson KA, Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Wade MR, Buckley HL (2008) Implications of floral resources for predation by an omnivorous lacewing. Basic Appl Ecol 9:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeu-Dalmau C, Espadaler X, Pinol J (2012) Abundance, interannual variation and potential pest predator role of two co-occurring earwig species in citrus canopies. J Appl Entomol 136:501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauphanor B, Sureau F (1993) Aggregation behavior and interspecific relationships in Dermaptera. Oecologia 96:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauphanor B, Dirwimmer C, Boutin S, Chaussabel A, Dupont N, Fauriel J, Gallia V, Lambert N, Navarro E, Parisi L, Plenet D, Ricaud V, Sagnes J, Sauvaitre D, Simon S, Speich P, Zavagli F (2009) Analyse comparative de différents systèmes en arboriculture fruitière. In: INRA (ed) Ecophyto R&D: vers des systèmes de culture économes en produits phytosanitaires. Rapport d’Expertise Collective Inra, Tome IV, p 49

  • Schellhorn NA, Bianchi F, Hsu CL (2014) Movement of entomophagous arthropods in agricultural landscapes: links to pest suppression. Annu Rev Entomol 59:559–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EB, Franco JC, Vasconcelos T, Branco M (2010) Effect of ground cover vegetation on the abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in citrus orchards. Bull Entomol Res 100:489–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Defrance H, Sauphanor B (2007) Effect of codling moth management on orchard arthropods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Bouvier J-C, Debras J-F, Sauphanor B (2010) Biodiversity and pest management in orchard systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:139–152

  • Simon S, Brun L, Guinaudeau J, Sauphanor B (2011) Pesticide use in current and innovative apple orchard systems. Agron Sustain Dev 31:541–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Arnold DC, Eikenbary RD, Rice NR, Shiferaw A, Cheary BS, Carroll BL (1996) Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biol Control 6:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub CS, Finke DL, Snyder WE (2008) Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals? Biol Control 45:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symondson WOC, Sunderland KD, Greenstone MH (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu Rev Entomol 47:561–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wan N-F, Ji X-Y, Gu X-J, Jiang J-X, Wu J-H, Li B (2014) Ecological engineering of ground cover vegetation promotes biocontrol services in peach orchards. Ecol Eng 64:62–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Sandrine Maugin for providing codling moth eggs and Lachaize-Muller Amaya for assistance in the field and lab. The research project received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under the grant agreement n°265865. The PhD fellowship of the first author was jointly financed by the ANR DynRurABio program and the INRA Smach metaprogram.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA, UR1115 Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, Domaine St. Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914, Avignon Cedex 09, France

    Gaëlle Marliac, Françoise Lescourret & Yvan Capowiez

  2. INRA, UE695 Unité Expérimentale de Recherches Intégrées de Gotheron, 26320, Saint-Marcel-Lès-Valence, France

    Sylvaine Simon

  3. Avignon Unversité, IMBE UMR 7263, AMU, CNRS, IRD Pôle Agrosciences, 301 rue Baruch de Spinoza, BP 21239, 84916, Avignon Cedex 9, France

    Christophe Mazzia

  4. INRA, Unité Ecodéveloppement, Domaine St. Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914, Avignon Cedex 09, France

    Servane Penvern

Authors
  1. Gaëlle Marliac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvaine Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christophe Mazzia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Servane Penvern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Françoise Lescourret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yvan Capowiez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaëlle Marliac.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Dirk Babendreier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marliac, G., Simon, S., Mazzia, C. et al. Increased grass cover height in the alleys of apple orchards does not promote Cydia pomonella biocontrol. BioControl 60, 805–815 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9687-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9687-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation