Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic performance of pre-fabricated segmental bridges with an innovative layered-UHPC connection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) has been regarded as promising alternative to provide reliable connections between difference segments (e.g., columns and pier footing/cap) during accelerated bridge construction (ABC) procedures. This paper proposes an innovative layered-UHPC connection for the pre-fabricated segmental (PFS) piers, whose seismic performance was validated through quasi-static experiments. Based on the test results, design procedure is presented for PFS pier with this connection, to overcome the observed drawbacks and achieve high-level performance. The layered-UHPC connection ensures the emulative performance of pre-fabricated bridges as cast-in-place (CIP) ones, as well as provides greater economic efficiency than traditional UHPC connections. Based on experimental results, key issues concerning this connection, including the tensile behavior of UHPC, height of connection region, thickness of UHPC layer and steel bars in grouting bed, are presented and discussed. Then a seismic design procedure is proposed utilizing the capacity protection philosophy. The layered-UHPC connection is expected as capacity-protected component without damage, since it provides anchorage for longitudinal steel bars. While the pre-fabricated region is designed as ductile component undergoing nonlinearity during strong earthquakes. Following the detailed elaborations about the design philosophy, requirement and implementation steps, this procedure is further presented through illustration examples using PFS piers with various heights. The results show that PFS piers designed according to this procedure could meet the requirement under both frequent and rare earthquakes. Note that the PFS piers with this layered-UHPC connections could be designed similar to and emulative as CIP ones, which is believed friendly to designers in engineering practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  • Ameli MJ, Brown DN, Parks JE, Pantelides CP (2016) “Seismic Column-to-Footing Connections Using Grouted Splice Sleeves”. Aci Struct J 113(5):1021–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameli MJ, Parks JE, Brown DN, Pantelides CP (2015) “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.“Pci Journal:80–103

  • Billington SL, Breen JE (2000) Improving Standard Bridges with Attention to Cast-in-Place Substructure. J Bridge Engineering 5(4):344–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caltrans (2019) Caltrans seismic design criteria version 2.0. California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwell CB, Imbsen RA (2004) XTRACT: A tool for axial force-ultimate curvature interactions Structures: Building on the past, securing the future. 2004:1–9

  • Chen X, Li C. (2020) Seismic assessment of earthquake‐resilient tall pier bridges using rocking foundation retrofitted with various energy dissipation devices. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 27(11):e2625.

  • Chen X, Guan Z, Li J, Spencer BF Jr (2018) Shake table tests of tall-pier bridges to evaluate seismic performance. J Bridge Engineering 23(9):04018058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xiang N, Li J et al (2020) Influence of near-fault pulse-like motion characteristics on seismic performance of tall pier bridges with fragility analysis. J Earthquake Eng 26(4):2001–2022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xiang N, Guan Z, Li J (2022) Seismic vulnerability assessment of tall pier bridges under mainshock-aftershock-like earthquake sequences using vector-valued intensity measure. Eng Struct 253:113732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xiong J (2022) Seismic resilient design with base isolation device using friction pendulum bearing and viscous damper. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 153:107073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CJJ 166–2011 (2011) Code for seismic design of urban bridges. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Zhong Z, Huang X, Sun W, Mao W. (2022) Multi-platform simulation of reinforced concrete structures under impact loading. Engineering Structures. 266:114523.

  • Feng J, Gao X, Li J, Dong H, Yao W, Wang X, Sun W (2019) Influence of fiber mixture on impact response of ultra-high-performance hybrid fiber reinforced cementitious composite. Compos Part B-Engineering 163:487–496

  • Franchin P, Pinto PE (2014) Performance-based seismic design of integral abutment bridges. Bull Earthq Eng 12(2):939–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber ZB, Mackie KR, Al-Jelawy HM (2017) Testing and Analysis of Precast Columns with Grouted Sleeve Connections and Shifted Plastic Hinging. J Bridge Engineering 22(10):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber ZB, Saiidi MS, Sanders DH (2014) “Seismic Performance of Precast Columns with Mechanically Spliced Column-Footing Connections”. Aci Struct J 111(3):639–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraldsson OS, Janes TM, Eberhard MO, Stanton JF (2013) Seismic Resistance of Socket Connection between Footing and Precast Column. J Bridge Engineering 18(9):910–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Wang R, Gao X (2019) “Improvement effect of fiber alignment on resistance to elevated temperature of ultra-high performance concrete.“Composites Part B-Engineering 177

  • Hung C-C, Lee H-S, Chan SN (2019) Tension-stiffening effect in steel-reinforced UHPC composites: Constitutive model and effects of steel fibers, loading patterns, and rebar sizes. Compos Part B-Engineering 158:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa S, Matsuzaki H, Moustafa A, ElGawady MA, Kawashima K (2016) “Seismic-Resistant Bridge Columns with Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Segments.“Journal of Bridge Engineering 21(9)

  • JTG/T 2231-01-2020 (2020) Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC, Sritharan S, Fleischman RB, Restrepo JI, Henry RS, Cleland NM, Ghosh SK, Bonelli P (2018) “Seismic-Resistant Precast Concrete Structures: State of the Art.“Journal of Structural Engineering 144(4)

  • Li C, Liu Y (2003) Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on the uniform distribution of system parameters. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32(5):671–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markogiannaki O, Orologopoulos N, Tegos I (2017) Experimental and analytical study on hollow precast piers with unbonded conventional reinforcement to control seismic and in-service response of bridges. In: 6th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, pp 282–296

  • Marshall C, Cantrell J, Mashal M, Ebrahimpour A (2020) A Precast Pier System for ABC in Seismic Regions, Structures Congress 2020, 183–192

  • MCS-EPFL (2016)

  • Meng Q, Wu C, Li J, Liu Z, Wu P, Yang Y, Wang Z (2020) “Steel/basalt rebar reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete components against methane-air explosion loads.“Composites Part B-Engineering 198

  • Mohebbi A, Saiidi MS, Itani AM (2017) Seismic design of precast piers with pocket connections, CFRPtendons and ECC/UHPC columns. Int J Bridge Eng Spec Issue 2017:99–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa A, ElGawady MA (2018) “Shaking Table Testing of Segmental Hollow-Core FRP-Concrete-Steel Bridge Columns.“Journal of Bridge Engineering 23(5)

  • Ou YC, Wang PH, Tsai MS, Chang KC, Lee GC (2010) Large-Scale Experimental Study of Precast Segmental Unbonded Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Columns for Seismic Regions. J Struct Engineering-Asce 136(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang Y, Wang X (2021) Cloud-IDA-MSA Conversion of Fragility Curves for Efficient and High-Fidelity Resilience Assessment. J Struct Eng 147(5):04021049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti F, Domaneschi M, De Grandis S (2013) The numerical computation of seismic fragility of base-isolated Nuclear Power Plants buildings. Nucl Eng Des 262:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MN, Seible F, Calvi GM, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons

  • Siwowski T, Rajchel M (2019) “Structural performance of a hybrid FRP composite - lightweight concrete bridge girder.“Composites Part B-Engineering 174

  • Steuck KP, Eberhard MO, Stanton JF (2009) “Anchorage of Large-Diameter Reinforcing Bars in Ducts”. Aci Struct J 106(4):506–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazarv M, Saiidi MS (2015) UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones. Eng Struct 99:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekie PB, Ellingwood BR (2003) Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32(14):2221–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu J, Wang Z, Liu T, Liu J, Zhang J (2021a) Cost-Effective UHPC for accelerated bridge construction: material properties, structural elements, and structural applications. J Bridge Engineering 26(2):04020117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ, Wang Z, Tang YC, Liu TX, Zhang J (2018) Cyclic loading test of self-centering precast segmental unbonded posttensioned UHPFRC bridge columns. Bull Earthq Eng 16(11):5227–5255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Ma B, Chen X (2021b) Seismic performance of pre-fabricated segmental bridge piers with grouted splice sleeve connections. Engineering Structures 229

  • Wang Z, Wang J, Li J, Han F, Zhang J (2019) Large-scale quasi-static testing of precast bridge column with pocket connections using noncontact lap-spliced bars and UHPC grout. Bull Earthq Eng 17(9):5021–5044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang J, Zhao G, Zhang J (2020) Numerical study on seismic behavior of precast bridge columns with large-diameter bars and UHPC grout considering the bar-slip effect. Bull Earthq Eng 18(10):4963–4984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White S, Palermo A (2016) Quasi-Static Testing of Posttensioned Nonemulative Column-Footing Connections for Bridge Piers.Journal of Bridge Engineering 21(6)

  • Xia X, Wu S, Sun S, Du Q, Long F (2022) Lateral hysteretic behavior of a novel metal rubber bridge bearing. Eng Struct 256:114051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Ma B, Duan X, Li J (2021) Experimental investigation of seismic behavior of UHPC connection between precast columns and footings in bridges. Eng Struct 239:112344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Ma B, Huang H, Su J, Li J, Wang R (2019) The Seismic Performance of Precast Bridge Piers with Grouted Sleeves. Engineering Mechaniscs. (in Chinese)

  • Zhong J, Yang T, Pang Y, Yuan W. (2021) A Novel Structure-Pulse Coupled Model for Quantifying the Column Ductility Demand under Pulse-Like GMs. Journal of Earthquake Engineering: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1989348

  • Zhong J, Ni M, Hu H et al (2022) Uncoupled multivariate power models for estimating performance-based seismic damage states of column curvature ductility. Structures 36:752–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51908348) and Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. 21QB1405000).

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51908348) & Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. 21QB1405000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., LTD, 200092, Shanghai, China

    Ruilong WANG & Biao MA

  2. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute, 200438, Shanghai, China

    Ruilong WANG

  3. International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 980-8576, Sendai, Japan

    Xu CHEN

Authors
  1. Ruilong WANG
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biao MA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xu CHEN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xu CHEN: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Writing. Biao MA: Resources; Writing-review & editing. Ruilong WANG: Conceptualization; Data curation; Funding acquisition; Writing-review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu CHEN.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

WANG, R., MA, B. & CHEN, X. Seismic performance of pre-fabricated segmental bridges with an innovative layered-UHPC connection. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 6943–6967 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01458-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01458-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation