Skip to main content
Log in

A parametric study on out-of-plane instability of doubly reinforced structural walls. Part II: Experimental investigation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of different parameters on the evolution of Out-Of-Plane (OOP) instability in rectangular walls were studied using a validated FEM model. Based on this parametric analysis, a test matrix was designed to experimentally investigate the progression of this mode of failure in rectangular walls. Results of the parametric study were presented within a companion paper, while the experimental observations as well as the numerical versus experimental comparisons are presented in this paper. The wall specimens were tested under in-plane cyclic loading and they exhibited different OOP responses. The development of OOP mechanisms was observed in all tested specimens, albeit with different values of maximum OOP displacement and followed by different types of instability. Progression of OOP deformation was suppressed by other failure modes in all specimens except one which failed due to large OOP displacement and global instability. In this study, the progression of OOP deformation and its relationship with the inelastic strain gradients of the longitudinal reinforcement along the length and height of the specimens are scrutinized and the numerical predictions are compared with the test measurements. The experimental findings regarding the evolution of this mode of failure and the influential parameters are in good agreement with the numerical predictions. However, the onset of OOP deformation typically had a delay in the numerical model when compared to the test results. One of the factors inducing this difference could be the effect of inherent and mostly unmeasurable eccentricities, including material, geometry as well as loading imperfections, which were not included in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Note: The OOP displacement history corresponds to the elevation of 600 mm from the base (where the initial OOP displacement measured by the instrument was maximum) for all the specimens

Fig. 3

Note: Variation of parameters in each specimen with respect to the benchmark specimen is underlined

Fig. 4

Note: The plots shown in this figure correspond to a 2 mm step size in the FEM prediction conducted in part I (Dashti et al. 2020a). As described and displayed in Sect. 5.1, the use of a smaller step size in the numerical model resulted in a more accurate prediction of the initial OOP deformation

Fig. 5

Note: The strain histories are plotted up to the 3rd 1.5% drift cycle to study their connection with the onset of OOP deformation

Fig. 6

Note: The average strains are calculated using the measurements of the linear potentiometers attached to both faces of the specimens, as indicated in Fig. 1

Fig. 7

Note: The average strains are calculated using the measurements of the linear potentiometers attached to south face and along the length of the specimens, as indicated in Fig. 1c

Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo CE, Creagh A, Moehle J, Hassan W, Tanyeri A (2010) Seismic vulnerability of non-special boundary element of shear wall under axial force reversals. Florida International University and University of California, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida J, Prodan O, Rosso A, Beyer K (2017) Tests on thin reinforced concrete walls subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane cyclic loading. Earthq Spectra 33(1):323–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai YH, Elayer DT (1999) Lateral stability of reinforced concrete columns under axial reversed cyclic tension and compression. ACI Struct J 96(5):780–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysanidis T, Tegos I (2012) The influence of tension strain of wall ends to their resistance against lateral instability for low-reinforced concrete walls. In: 15 WCEE

  • Creagh A, Acevedo C, Moehle J, Hassan W, Tanyeri AC (2010) Seismic performance of concrete special boundary element. University of Texas at Austin and University of California Berkley, Austin, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F (2017) Out-of-plane instability of rectangular reinforced concrete walls under in-plane loading. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, 294

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2017a) Tests on slender ductile structural walls designed according to New Zealand standard. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 50(4):504–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2017b) Numerical modeling of rectangular reinforced concrete structural walls. J Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2018a) Evolution of out-of-plane deformation and subsequent instability in rectangular RC walls under in-plane cyclic loading: experimental observation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(15):2944–2964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2018b) Validation of a numerical model for prediction of out-of-plane instability in ductile structural walls under concentric in-plane cyclic loading. J Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal R, Pampanin S (2018c) Local vs global instability of ductile structural walls. In: 2018 NZSEE conference. Auckland, New Zealand

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2018d) Inelastic strain gradients in reinforced concrete structural walls. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2018e) Blind prediction of in-plane and out-of-plane responses for a thin singly reinforced concrete flanged wall specimen. Bull Earthq Eng 16(1):427–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0211-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2019) A parametric investigation on applicability of the curved shell finite element model to nonlinear response prediction of planar RC walls. Bull Earthq Eng 17(12):6515–6546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00582-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2020a) A parametric study on out-of-plane instability of doubly reinforced structural walls. Part I: FEM predictions. Bull Earthq Eng 18:3747–3780.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00828-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti F, Dhakal RP, Pampanin S (2020b) Out-of-plane response of in-plane-loaded ductile structural walls: state-of-the-art and classification of the observed mechanisms. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1713928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodsir WJ (1985) The design of coupled frame-wall structures for seismic actions. Ph.D., University of Canterbury

  • Haro AG, Kowalsky M, Chai YH, Lucier GW (2018) Boundary elements of special reinforced concrete walls tested under different loading paths. Earthq Spectra 34(3):1267–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilson C, Segura C, Wallace J (2014) Experimental study of longitudinal reinforcement buckling in reinforced concrete structural wall boundary elements. In: Tenth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering (10NCEE), Anchorage, Alaska

  • Johnson B (2010) Anchorage detailing effects on lateral deformation components of R/C shear walls. Master thesis, University of Minnesota

  • Menegon S, Wilson J, Gad E, Lam N (2015) Out-of-plane buckling of limited ductile reinforced concrete walls under cyclic loads. In: 2015 NZSEE conference. Rotorua, New Zealand

  • Menegotto M, Pinto P (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: IABSE symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads. Association Internationale des Ponts et Charpentes, Lisbon

  • NZS 3101:2006 (2008) Concrete structures standard part 1—the design of concrete structures (Amendment no. 2). Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Oesterle R, Fiorato A, Johal L, Carpenter J, Russell H, Corley W (1976) Earthquake resistant structural walls: tests of isolated walls. Research and Development Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland Cement Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T, Priestley M (1993) Stability of ductile structural walls. ACI Struct J 90(4):385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso A, Almeida J, Beyer K (2016) Stability of thin reinforced concrete walls under cyclic loads: state-of-the-art and new experimental findings. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9827-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso A, Jiménez-Roa LA, de Almeida JP, Zuniga APG, Blandón CA, Bonett RL, Beyer K (2017) Cyclic tensile-compressive tests on thin concrete boundary elements with a single layer of reinforcement prone to out-of-plane instability. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0228-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso A, Jiménez-Roa LA, de Almeida JP, Beyer K (2020) Instability of thin concrete walls with a single layer of reinforcement under cyclic loading: numerical simulation and improved equivalent boundary element model for assessment. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1691679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea M, Wallace JW, Segura C (2013) Seismic performance of thin reinforced concrete shear wall boundaries. University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb R, Tani M, Kono S (2016) Performance of confined boundary regions of RC walls under cyclic reversal loadings. J Adv Concr Technol 14(4):108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen IV JH, Wallace JW (1995) Displacement-based design of reinforced concrete structural walls: an experimental investigation of walls with rectangular and T-shaped cross-sections. Report no. CU/CEE-95-06, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY

  • Tripathi M, Dhakal RP, Dashti F, Massone LM (2018) Low-cycle fatigue behaviour of reinforcing bars including the effect of inelastic buckling. Constr Build Mater 190:1226–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi M, Dhakal RP, Dashti F, Gokhale R (2020a) Axial response of rectangular RC prisms representing the boundary elements of ductile concrete walls. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00868-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi M, Dhakal RP, Dashti F (2020b) Nonlinear cyclic behaviour of high-strength ductile RC walls: experimental and numerical investigations. Eng Struct (in press)

  • Welt TS, Massone LM, LaFave JM, Lehman DE, McCabe SL, Polanco P (2016) Confinement behavior of rectangular reinforced concrete prisms simulating wall boundary elements. J Struct Eng 143(4):04016204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Hazard Research Platform (NHRP), the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and the Quake Centre at the University of Canterbury to conduct this research as well as the specimen fabrication scrupulously done by Bradford Precast. The considerate technician support provided by Alan Thirlwell at the University of Canterbury is also greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Dashti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dashti, F., Tripathi, M., Dhakal, R.P. et al. A parametric study on out-of-plane instability of doubly reinforced structural walls. Part II: Experimental investigation. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 5193–5220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00898-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00898-w

Keywords

Navigation